User talk:Keithbob/Archive 4

TALK PAGE ARCHIVE FOR THE YEAR 2012

Your Arbitration evidence is too long

Hello, Keithbob. Thank you for your recent submission of evidence for the TimidGuy ban appeal Arbitration case. As you may be aware, the Arbitration Committee asks that users submitting evidence in cases adhere to limits regarding the length of their submissions. These limits, of User:HersfoldArbClerkBot/Length header/Words words and User:HersfoldArbClerkBot/Length header/Diffs diffs maximum, are in place to ensure that the Arbitration Committee receives only the most important information relevant to the case, and is able to determine an appropriate course of action in a reasonable amount of time. The evidence you have submitted currently exceeds at least one of these limits, and is presently at 704 words and 60 diffs. Please try to reduce the length of your submission to fit within these limits; this guide may be able to provide some help in doing so. If the length of your evidence is not reduced soon, it may be refactored or removed by a human clerk within a few days. Thank you! If you have any questions or concerns regarding the case, please contact the drafting Arbitrator or case clerk (listed on the case pages); if you have any questions or concerns about this bot, please contact the operator. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, HersfoldArbClerkBOT^(talk) 14:12, 8 January 2012 (UTC)  Done-- — Keithbob • Talk • 17:29, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited The Civil Wars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Fixed -- — Keithbob • Talk • 15:18, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

The Civil Wars

Keith, Sensibility Music is The Civil Wars' management company and label. You have significantly changed the band's Wikipedia page, and removed information and citations we've specifically included. Can you please restore this information and the format in which it was written? Thank you, Nate Yetton sensibility music — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sensibilitymusic (talk • contribs) 21:24, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. I'll respond on your User Talk page. -- — Keithbob • Talk • 21:58, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

John Paul White bio

Yes, I agree that photo is not appropriate. The trouble is, bad as it is, it was the only one I could find which was free to use on Wikipedia. Trilobitealive (talk) 02:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Trilobitealive, I know you are doing the best with what you have and your work is appreciated. I'm OK with leaving the photo for now. We just have to be careful to make sure the content for JPW is about him and not about TCW which is whole other article (as you know) :-) Thanks for your help!-- — Keithbob • Talk • 17:45, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Bridgewater Associates needs cleanup

After the December GA review, this article was tagged with a host of verifiability problems. See the article's talk page for my note: in 7 days I'll revisit the article. If the tags haven't been addressed, I'll do a reassessment, which could mean the loss of GA status. You're the main contributor, so I thought I should let you know. Cheers, AstroCog (talk) 13:41, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for taking care of that so quickly! Cheers, AstroCog (talk) 13:50, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. Thank for all your contributions to the process!-- — Keithbob • Talk • 13:48, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Derek Trucks

Just a note to voice my appreciation for the work you did cleaning up the article on Derek Trucks. He is increasingly becoming a more commercially successful and visible musician. Thanks. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 13:09, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

You are welcome, its good to be recognized :-)-- — Keithbob • Talk • 15:05, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Question/Help

Hey, I have worked with you before on the risk parity article as well as financial risk. However, it seems I am having issues with User:Brianmarc on the Downside risk page (and less so on Sortino ratio). I have tried to contact this user on his talk page to try to work together on improving the article, but it seems he is not willing to be cooperative and, in my view, is merely blanking out entire parts of pages (that are cited) without giving reason. I'm not sure how to go forward with this, and was hoping for your help in figuring out what to do. Thank you. Zfeinst (talk) 04:41, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi Zfeinst, I can't come to the article and help you as that would be considered the 'canvassing' a friendly editor (by you) to come and be on your side in a dispute. This kind of stacking of the deck is not permitted on Wikipedia. I'm not saying that you were asking me to do that, just letting you know about that rule. However, I can look at the edit history(s) and advise you on how to respond or proceed with an editor who is being disruptive etc. So let me look at the edits and then I'll respond further.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 15:48, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. I'm just trying to learn the rules/procedures for dealing with a disruptive/uncivil editor. I appreciate your help. In regards to the situation I mentioned, an admin appears to have intervened already to tell that user to be more civil. But, for future reference, would you mind telling me the procedure that I should do if such a thing happens again? Thank you. Zfeinst (talk) 16:54, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Good. I'm glad an Admin has stepped in. Brianmarc is a rather inexperienced user and may not be aware that Wikipedia has strict policies on WP:CIVILITY and WP:NPA (No Personal Attacks). I haven't looked at all his edits but his edit summaries that say: "keep getting ambushed bt some ignorant wannabe!" and "Fuck you, cocksucket" are not acceptable and if repeated, after a warning from an Admin, could result in a temporary block of the user account. There are various kinds of dispute resolution which are outlined at WP:DISPUTE. There are two basic kinds of disputes: content and behavior. If he continues to be incivil and make personal attacks (behavior) then I would post a note on the talk page of the Admin who has intervened and show him the diffs sample diff here. The Admin will take care of the behavior. If he continues to remove large quantities of content, especially sourced content, like he has here [1] and leaves the edit summary blank and doesn't respond to your requests for an explanation on the talk page; then you could take the matter to the WP:DRN which is a dispute resolution noticeboard for non-specific content issues. Be sure to notify Brianmarc if you open a discussion at DRN so he can participate. Dispute resolution is a complicated, time consuming and painstaking process, but it will give you results if you stick with it. If you need further assistance now or in the future, please feel free to contact me. Wikipedia needs more sincere, civil, collaborative editors like you to help us improve the encyclopedia. So be patient and keep the faith. Cheers! -- — Keithbob • Talk • 17:26, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

I just saw today's post by Tiderolls [2] which outlines all of Brianmarc's faulty editing. Tideroll's has a history with this editor and is aware of the problems. So if issues (of any kind) continue, just go to Tideroll's talk page for advice. He will help you. Good Luck!-- — Keithbob • Talk • 18:00, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Great, thank you for your help. I really appreciate it. Zfeinst (talk) 18:03, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

World Factoring Yearbook

I'm leaving this message as you're listed as a current participant of WikiProject Business. I was informed yesterday that the current World Factoring Yearbook (circa £150) is now free for download as an ebook. It's a matter of filling out this form. I'm not sure if you'll find this useful as a reliable source, but I thought I should let you know that it's freely available online. I apologise in advance if this doesn't interest you! All the best, The Cavalry (Message me) 14:56, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for this. Cheers!-- — Keithbob • Talk • 19:27, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Eloquence

I have no knowledge of the/your conflict W/ Will Beback. I know that he is a quality editor and has been a mentor to me when asked. And. from your parting words to him at his talk and at ANI, I glean that you likewise are a forthright editor. Your words were eloquent and insightful and they fit situations in my editing life. If I may, I ask that I can "borrow them" (with a bit of rephrasing and good old WP editing) to situations where they may shed the light of awareness. Thanking you in advance. ```Buster Seven Talk 20:33, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi Buster, I think I have seen you on the Sarah Palin talk page a time or two. Thank you for your compliment and yes you may take any of my words and make them your own in your own future posts. Cheers!-- — Keithbob • Talk • 20:49, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

I thought it was you!....§:~). I still visit Sarah to reminisce. Your reminder that we are people behind our User masks is timely. ```Buster Seven Talk 21:03, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Nancy Lonsdorf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Washingtonian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 27 February 2012 (UTC)  Done-- — Keithbob • Talk • 13:49, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Transcendence: Healing and Transformation Through Transcendental Meditation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Transcendence: Healing and Transformation Through Transcendental Meditation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transcendence: Healing and Transformation Through Transcendental Meditation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article..Fladrif (talk) 03:42, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

That's fine. Let's see what the uninvolved editors in the community have to say about it.I'm sure they will make a fair assessment.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 03:53, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Many thanks!

Thank you for your kindness with the barnstar! We WikiFairy editors are routinely unnoticed most of the time. Those virtual little trinkets seem so small to most people, but on our worst days, seeing these little benchmarks make a real difference! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 00:16, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

You are welcome my friend.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 01:47, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. When you recently edited Pattie Boyd, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Terence Donovan, Vogue and David Bailey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 9 March 2012 (UTC)  Done-- — Keithbob • Talk • 14:20, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Horizon Organic

I view the "Controversy" heading as more appropriate, given the section contents. Its commonly used on WP, as is "Criticism;" in fact, the Dean Foods page has a controversy section with common content.--E8 (talk) 17:06, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Ed, thanks for your post. Why don't we continue the discussion on the article talk page?-- — Keithbob • Talk • 17:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Pattie Boyd

Talk page.--andreasegde (talk) 09:07, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

OK, I have responded there. Thank you for the notification.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 19:29, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

GOCE March drive newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 backlog elimination drive update GOCE March 2012 Backlog Elimination progress graphs Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 Backlog elimination drive! Here's the mid-drive newsletter. Participation: We have had 58 people sign up for this drive so far, which compares favorably with our last drive, and 27 have copy-edited at least one article. If you have signed up but have not yet copy-edited any articles, please consider doing so. Every bit helps! If you haven't signed up yet, it's not too late. Join us! Progress report: Our target of completing the 2010 articles has almost been reached, with only 56 remaining of the 194 we had at the start of the drive. The last ones are always the most difficult, so thank you if you are able to help copy-edit any of the remaining articles. We have reduced the total backlog by 163 articles so far. Special thanks: Special thanks to Stfg, who has been going through the backlog and doing some preliminary vetting of the articles—removing copyright violations, doing initial clean-up, and nominating some for deletion. This work has helped make the drive a more pleasant experience for all our volunteers. Your drive coordinators – Dianna (talk), Stfg (talk), and Dank (talk) To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Kara Young

Someone named Fasttimes68 keeps getting into editing wars, now it seems with this former model's page. Her husband only "claims" to be a billionaire, it was never reported by a third party source that is actually is. I suggest this matter with this editing person be stopped. He seems to like arguing with other editors regarding models quite often on here. JohnJaySee (talk) 13:04, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

I've made comments on the talk page. I think there is room for improvement on both sides of this fence. Cheers!-- — Keithbob • Talk • 21:42, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Nice job

Very nice edits on Kara Young. Thank you. Just an FYI, I'm going to follow your edits from time to time to observe how you work. Not stalking, just learning. Fasttimes68 (talk) 21:40, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the compliments on the editing. Cheers!-- — Keithbob • Talk • 21:43, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Nice job, yes. In viewing the article on Young, the husband's part is not necessary in an article about a model who is notable for her own career, not his. Perhaps the debatable sentence about him should be removed for just that reason alone and it will also avoid further edit warring. 71.183.42.144 (talk) 13:50, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the compliments. Regarding the text on the husband. That is something that has been discussed on the talk page and if you have input, that would be the place to express it. Cheers!-- — Keithbob • Talk • 16:55, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Robben Ford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to KISS

Steve Brill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to App

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:23, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

 Done-- — Keithbob • Talk • 15:30, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

GOCE March drive wrap-up

Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 backlog elimination drive GOCE March 2012 Backlog Elimination progress graph Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 Backlog elimination drive! This is the most successful drive we have had for quite a while. Here is your end-of-drive wrap-up newsletter. Participation Of the 70 people who signed up for this drive, 40 copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Special acknowledgement goes out to Lfstevens, who did over 200 articles, most of them in the last third of the drive, and topped all three leaderboard categories. You're a superstar! Stfg and others have been pre-checking the articles for quality and conformance to Wikipedia guidelines; some have been nominated for deletion or had some preliminary clean-up done to help make the copy-edit process more fun and appealing. Thanks to all who helped get those nasty last few articles out of the target months. Progress report During this drive we were successful in eliminating our target months—October, November, and December 2010—from the queue, and have now eliminated all the 2010 articles from our list. We were able to complete 500 articles this month! End-of-drive results and barnstar information can be found here. When working on the backlog, please keep in mind that there are options other than copy-editing available; some articles may be candidates for deletion, or may not be suitable for copy-editing at this time for other reasons. The {{GOCEreviewed}} tag can be placed on any article you find to be totally uneditable, and you can nominate for deletion any that you discover to be copyright violations or completely unintelligible. If you need help deciding what to do, please contact any of the coordinators. Thank you for participating in the March 2012 drive! All contributions are appreciated. Our next copy-edit drive will be in May. Your drive coordinators – Dianna (Talk), Stfg (Talk), and Dank (talk) To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. EdwardsBot (talk) 22:07, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Dispute resolution survey

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Keithbob. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click HERE to participate. Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 11:11, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Left a response

A response to your question at Shawn Colvin's article. xoxox.. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 10:32, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Martin Hosking

Appreciate your editing of Martin Hosking's BLP and your strong commitment to policy around BLPs. The latest reversion may have removed some of your edits. They were not in my mind controversial so feel free to reinsert (sorry about any additional work). Or to draw (or ignore) any of the factual information inserted in the talk page. Regards 220.245.205.26 (talk) 21:55, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Am looking forward to contributing to WP under my brand new memership!. You have modeled for me excellent interaction and selfless contribution towards improving WP and how in turn this has taken a burden off me personally. I am very comfortable with the facts of RB and of what I have tried to do. Incidentally we share a fondness for Eckhart Tolle and a number of other related matters. I will contribute in the Talk Space as needed on both REDBUBBLE and my BLP and will do so in the third person. I don't do this to misrepresent my connection but just so my contributions are given no more (and no less weight than others). I will declare on my user page my conflict of interest in line with WP:COI but will take it as read in relation to REDBUBBLE and the BLP Martin Hosking so I don't need to declare it each time.XcommR (talk) 00:14, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

fyi. I have requested a minor edit to the BLP for accuracy. Also that the article be edited back as it is now split. At some stage would like the Talk Space cleaned up as it contains some malicious material and I understand the wp:BLP policies also apply in talk space. No urgency. Appreciate all your professionalism. XcommR (talk) 12:20, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Bored? Haaha..

Did I ever give you one of these invitations? Either way, click and scroll down on the page connected with the little babel box. When I get bored, I either check out the various lists of things to do there. Also, I have kept a list of maybe 5 or 6 articles whose notability is in question. My problem is that I don't like to address those (potentially confrontational) issues, so if you are willing, let me know! *Also, I am truly computer illiterate with the exception of using email, and some Wikipedia and Commons. This especially applies to removing watermarks and frames for the photos I've uploaded. Would you be willing to do any of that stuff? There are a slew of photos in Commons that should be placed in a Category of their own, but I'm ignorant as far as creating categories there properly; and many need more work, too, each really deserves it there, but I can provide a list of them for you as well. Name yer poison! Matter of fact, if you don't like these options, let me know, and I'll have a new list for you!

--Leahtwosaints (talk) 22:41, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. When you recently edited Daniel Wesley (athlete), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athletics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

 Done-- — Keithbob • Talk • 12:58, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination

I nominated an article that you started for DYK at Template:Did you know nominations/RedBubble. SL93 (talk) 02:55, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, I've left a comment there.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 21:38, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. When you recently edited RedBubble, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ivan Milat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

It seems its up for speedy deletion, so maybe this little point doesn't matter so much now.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 02:25, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

McKinsey talk page

Just threw up some comments on the McKinsey talk page -- look forward to working together on this! My[2011] (talk) | 21:39, 19 April 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by My2011 (talk • contribs)

Do you want to put office locations on talk page? just to save it somewhere? I feel bad for the guy. My[2011] (talk) | 00:42, 20 April 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by My2011 (talk • contribs)

I moved them to another article per the talk page. -- — Keithbob • Talk • 20:26, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi Kiethbob. Just wanted to give you a friendly ping that My2011 and I are waiting for your comments on the Galleon Scandal on the McKinsey & Co Talk page if you're still interested. User:King4057 (COI Disclosure on User Page) 16:04, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Ok, I've left a comment there.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 02:09, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Kiethbob. I went ahead and did my best to create an updated Galleon scandal section based on My2011's feedback on the McKinsey & Co Talk page. Really appreciate all your help and patience. With so much complex and controversial content, it's unlikely I'd be able to improve the article without so much participation from the community. My hope is that if the section is basically ok, we can move to article-space and there can be bold edits from there. I should have updates on the History/Org sections by next week. User:King4057 (COI Disclosure on User Page) 20:56, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

GOCE May copy edit drive

Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their May 2012 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on May 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on May 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goal for the drive will be to eliminate January, February, and March 2011 from the queue. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 5 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa, and Stfg. >>> Sign up now <<< To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:33, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Redbubble

Keithbob Inevitably some of the attention which had been focused on Martin Hosking has shifted over to the page RedBubble with some inappropriate editing. I have left a comment in the talk section but have not attempted to re-edit. Will leave it with you but will keep a watch out and voice opinion as needed. XcommR (talk) 22:55, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

OK thanks.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 02:25, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. When you recently edited List of McKinsey & Company people and offices, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stamford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 25 April 2012 (UTC)  Done-- — Keithbob • Talk • 02:25, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Don't yet

Hi, I saw your comment about unsourced Derek Trucks edits. I am sick right now, but before you remove more and more from that article, please wait till I'm feeling alright, OK? I did a lot of work on it, both bad and good, and a couple years ago, asked another editor to help clean it up, and the more that is yanked around without knowing where those references actually are could leave the whole biography in two sentences really soon if it continues. I try to avoid WP:OR, but a photographer friend of mine is Derek's Dad's best friend.. so please wait. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 15:48, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi, the post you refer to is from 3 months ago and I"ve already made lots of edit since then. However, I have not touched the article since Feb 6th. So no worries, take your time, get well, and work on it when you are feeling better. I'm working on other things. Get well soon.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 22:09, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of RedBubble

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on RedBubble requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 02:08, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Ok I've responded on the talk page. -- — Keithbob • Talk • 02:26, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of RedBubble for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RedBubble is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RedBubble until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 06:10, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Kevin Ou

In this series of edits, you left a number of richly deserved warning templates at the top of Kevin Ou. I've removed a lot of junk from that article, but the closer I look at what remains the more dubious (or trivial) it seems. An AfD is not unimaginable. I'm sure I could continue cutting junk, but I'm pausing now, because there are more pressing demands on my limited time than this photographer. However, you'd be most welcome to wield your own editorial machete. -- Hoary (talk) 00:47, 5 May 2012 (UTC) OK, will do. -- — Keithbob • Talk • 15:10, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

GOCE May mid-drive newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors May 2012 backlog elimination drive mid-drive newsletter Participation: Out of 49 people signed up for this drive so far, 26 have copy-edited at least one article. It's a smaller group than last drive, but we're making good progress. If you've signed up but haven't yet copy-edited any articles, please consider doing so. Every bit helps! If you haven't signed up yet, it's not too late. Join us! Progress report: We're on track to meet our targets for the drive, largely due to the efforts of Lfstevens and the others on the leaderboard. Thanks to all. We have reduced our target group of articles—January, February, and March 2011—by over half, and it looks like we will achieve that goal. Good progress is being made on the overall backlog as well, with over 500 articles copy-edited during the drive so far. The total backlog currently sits at around 3200 articles. Hall of Fame: GOCE coordinator Diannaa was awarded a spot in the GOCE Hall of Fame this month! She has copy-edited over 1567 articles during these drives, and surpassed the 1,000,000-word mark on May 5. On to the second million! – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa and Stfg >>> Sign up now <<< To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:32, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

History of TM

In your recent edits of the History of Transcendental Meditation article, you left a reference without a full citation. The ref name is Bromley, but there are no details associated with this reference. --BwB (talk) 22:06, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

•  Done

Re: Kara Anastasio

Apologies for the length, this kind of got away from me.

As this isn't primarily about the article subject anymore, I'm responding here. Wikipedia:Proposed deletions are fine, which is what you did. Anyone may remove them, normally by showing that something is not a hoax, including or providing references here, demonstrating notability, or indicating that it would need a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion example. I did not claim that she is notable, but removed the Prod, suggesting that the article be redirected to United States House of Representatives elections, 2004#Ohio (note that #Ohio goes to the corresponding section), since United States House of Representatives elections in Ohio, 2004&redirect=no (the corresponding state sub-article doesn't exist, and currently redirects back there). If deleted, search results would land readers at a page similar to this, while no longer having her article there. Indeed Ohio's 7th congressional district#Election results might be an even better anchor, as showing both attempts simultaneously. First elections rarely need to state 'unsuccessful, they ran again here 2 years later', but subsequent elections often mention 'previously unsuccessful, ran again'. Having identified that she was an unsuccessful candidate but still the nominee and a plausible search term, an attempted redirect should be the first step. Proposing deletion leaves a void, which prompts recreation if left redlinked elsewhere. If the redirect stays, fine; if reverted, the article can be taken to AfD. After your post at article talk & my talk, I initially thought I'd removed an AfD template (a no-no), and was relieved to discover we were just miscommunicating. You may now either redirect it or take it to AfD, where redirect will be the likely result unless notability is established. Questions? Dru of Id (talk) 19:23, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Hey Dru, thanks for this in depth explanation. So the process is to first propose deletion with a PROD. Then if no-one fixes the issue its taken to AfD for discussion (unless it needs a Speedy, which is another topic we wont' get into). Is that correct? But what if someone removes the PROD tag, like you did? I can still take it to AfD for discussion? That is what I wanted in teh first place. In future can I go direct to that step? Also I'm still not clear on why you removed the tag as you did not solve the notability problem. I guess you are saying you did it because a deletion would take the search to a list page and you think it should be redirected. What I think should be done is that it should be deleted and the search term redirected to either the Ohio election page (cited above) or the John Hagelin/Personal section where we could include a one sentence description of her career. Thoughts? -- — Keithbob • Talk • 19:29, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

I removed the Prod because I think a Redirect is the best outcome, and the most likely outcome (I think it best to assist in getting readers to content, and less likely to tempt recreation). You could just have redirected it, citing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes#Politicians, since there's actually coverage. You Prod'ed it (which was fine, but is supposed to meet the 'no editor would object' guideline, and there is coverage); I've removed the Prod, which cannot be re-applied. The choices are now redirect, or AfD, which will likely have the same result, but gives the opportunity for establishing notability (and drama) but is enforceable, and the result can be locked if repeatably bothered with. While you can go directly to AfD with many articles, editors would normally expect the process which takes the path of least resistance, or they'll complain that adequate prior steps haven't been taken or you're wasting their time, although less likely with your first. Dru of Id (talk) 19:50, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

So is it OK to just redirect now without goig to AfD? If we redirect now, without going to AfD, what will happen to the current page content? -- — Keithbob • Talk • 20:12, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Yes, it's ok to redirect it now, although it could be reverted by any editor at any time; watchlist it if you want. The current content remains in the article history; if it were problematic, it could be deleted, recreated, and redirected, or specific edits and their summaries Wikipedia:Revision deletion. Dru of Id (talk) 20:27, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Ok, you may proceed as you see fit, but I'm going to just think about these options for now. Thanks for walking me through this.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 17:03, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

McKinsey & Co

Hi Keithbob, I wanted to let you know I've provided a dump of historical content, responses and other suggestions on the McKinsey & Company Talk page. There's no rush or anything, but if you do have time your feedback would be appreciated as always. User:King4057 19:07, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll put it on my list. -- — Keithbob • Talk • 19:14, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi Keithbob. I just wanted to poke you about the request for feedback on the McKinsey & Company history section from a couple weeks ago and wanted to see if you got a chance to look at it. McKinsey's reputation is a complex animal, so I tried a "stick to the facts" approach before we represent all majority and minority viewpoints later on in a Reputation section. User:King4057 17:47, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

GOCE May drive wrap-up

Guild of Copy Editors May 2012 backlog elimination drive wrap-up Participation: Out of 54 people who signed up this drive, 32 copy-edited at least one article. Last drive's superstar, Lfstevens, again stood out, topping the leader board in all three categories and copy-editing over 700 articles. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: We were once again successful in our primary goal—removing the oldest three months from the backlog—while removing 1166 articles from the queue, the second-most in our history. The total backlog currently sits at around 2600 articles, down from 8323 when we started out just over two years ago. Coodinator election: The six-month term for our third tranche of Guild coordinators will be expiring at the end of June. We will be accepting nominations for the fourth tranche of coordinators, who will also serve a six-month term. Nominations will open starting on June 5. For complete information, please have a look at the election page. – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa, and Stfg To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:38, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Criteria issues

Hey- I believe the associated acts as I understand it, are those groups which the person in question was a member at some point. Lately, I've seen articles with a litany of every musician who ever even jammed with another person! Eric Clapton, for example, has played with damn near every amazing musician alive. How can they all fit in an infobox? But, if Clapton was a member of a band, such as The Yardbirds, or John Mayall's band, then they qualify as associated acts. If one disagrees with my assessment, then I defy them to figure out what to put as associated acts for session musicians' biographies like the ones for multi-instrumentalist David Lindley, or Waddy Wachtel, both of whom have played with damn near all the greats across genres. However, now that I think about it- back to Eric Clapton, if it is unavoidable to list all the people, or past members, you can always create a little fold thing, where someone must click to see the full list. There's my best guess. Hope this helps. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 03:48, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Here's the official article for the infobox criteria. Hopefully, this works: Template:Infobox musical artist#For articles about individuals. I feel proud that I even came close in my own guesswork! For information about doing anything with album or song pages, I'd ask the following users-- User:Discographer, User:DISEman, and/or User:Wasted Time R. This is why I keep a little list of people I learn from, or learn with on my Userpage for easy access. They're all good folk. :) --Leahtwosaints (talk) 01:05, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, I don't usually work on song or album pages but if I do I'll give them a shout. Gracias, -- — Keithbob • Talk • 14:37, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Can I send you email?

Are you email friendly, or prefer to limit talk here? I have a bunch of thoughts on our editing, and tend to get really wordy. Let me know! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 01:54, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested)

Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:

• Link to Survey (should take between 5-10 minutes): http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N8FQ6MM

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi ^{t | c} 17:22, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. When you recently edited Parsons College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Look (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Courtesy notice

Hi, Keithbob. This is a note to let you know that I indirectly mentioned you at ANI earlier today; the thread is at Wikipedia:ANI#User:Andreasegde is disrupting a discussion and straw poll @ the Beatles talk page. I cited your interaction with Andreasegde as an example of his behaviour but did not mention you by name. I just thought it might be best to let you know. -- Dianna (talk) 05:51, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. -- — Keithbob • Talk • 22:23, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

McKinsey History

Hi Keith. Just wanted to let you know My2011 and I have been working on the draft history section of the McKinsey & Company article we started in May. I just posted an update on his Talk page asking if it was ready for article-space.

You are probably a more senior editor than either of us and I thought you might want to chime in and take a look. I was also poking a bit on the Office Locations section we discussed in May that kind of slipped through the cracks and never got implemented.

Finally, if you're interested, we could use your experience for the upcoming Organization section. There are some unsourced criticisms near the end of that section. Asking to remove content isn't really my bread and butter and I won't declare that no sources exist (lest I get proven wrong). Maybe you could lend some perspective on the best approach? User:King4057 (EthicalWiki) 16:36, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

I don't have a lot of time to spend on it, but I've made some edits to the draft from a content perspective.

I commented that you could go ahead and post the office locations section

First step would be to tag the unsourced text with like this: and then after a reasonable amount of time, if no sources are produced it could be removed. Putting a note on the talk page would also be helpful.

I also think you shouldn't have to chase people to get them to approve changes or additions to the article. You can notify other editors on the article talk or their user talk pages. But WP:COI does not say that you cannot edit or add content.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 16:41, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Keithbob. I put in the Office Locations section as a non-controversial edit per Talk page consensus and implemented the Fortune quote into the draft History section. The paragraph in the Organization section that starts "Another controversial practice" has been marked with "citation needed" since March, but I'm still not comfortable removing it myself as a COI. User:King4057 (EthicalWiki) 17:18, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

OK I've removed it and put it on the talk page.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 17:54, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I submitted a {{request edit}} on the Talk page for the History section. I would welcome your feedback on whether it's ready. User:King4057 18:42, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

STEVE EARLE

Hi. I don't have time at the moment to make corrections, but wanted to let you know that you have made some mistakes in your edits of the article on Steve Earle. (For instance, he was only in jail about two months.) You rely heavily on a brief CMT web bio, when previous authors had relied on extensive published biographies by St.John and McGee, though they were not always cited well. This is a problem I see often on Wikipedia: references too often are satisfied by web sources, while better researched books are not considered. I will work on it, but do try to go beyond a sketchy web bio if you are going to make such wholesale changes, or simply put a "reference needed" tag. 99.43.32.160 (talk) 18:34, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your post. Glad you are wanting to help with the article and will be providing citations from books and other sources. Let's discuss further on the talk page.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 11:55, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Radney Foster

Just so you know, the entry about him being related to a member of Foster the People seems to be vandalism, as I can't find anything to verify it. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:20, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

• • OK, Good catch. -- — Keithbob • Talk • 18:54, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
• Also, I'd appreciate if you could weigh in on this Good Article reassessment since you edited that article a lot. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:42, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
  • I'll have a look, thanks. -- — Keithbob • Talk • 18:54, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Peter Schiff Article

Keithbob, I have left several messages on the Peter Schiff talk page that give sources and other material relevant to the resolution of the infobox format disagreement. The page is due to unlock at the end of the month, so I would appreciate your attention to this to see whether it can be resolved before then. Thank you.24.151.25.89 (talk) 23:27, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Noted.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 23:50, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is approved!

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

• The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code you were emailed. If you did not receive a code, email wikiocaasi@yahoo.com your Wikipedia username.
• To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
• If you need assistance, email or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
• HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
• Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:30, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, I am finding it very useful and using it frequently.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 13:49, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Credo

Could you donate your Credo account to User:Rosiestep? Worm that turned donated his account to me, can you do the same to Rosie. Ask Ocaasi to sort it as he did with me if you want. She could really use it I think. I agree, Credo is not as good as highbeam for general research but its good for what I do in rooting out missing articles and stubbing from encyclopedias but not much use for research articles.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:26, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

I'm happy to try and transfer the account, but it will be more difficult than with Dr.Blofeld as he transferred his before they went out. Our Credo contact just changed jobs and the role she was playing has not been filled. You could always try a direct transfer by trying to changing your password and email/username and notifying Nvv what he should do to login. Then Nvv could change the password to something only s/he knows. If you want to go through the existing Credo channels I will try, but it could take weeks. Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:21, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

The Beatles poll

Hello — this message is to inform you that there is currently a public poll to determine whether to capitalize the definite article ("the") when mentioning the band "THE BEATLES" mid-sentence. As you've previously participated either here, here, or here, your input would be appreciated. Thank you for your time. Jburlinson (talk) 21:09, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification. I have voted.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 13:47, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Your free 1-year Questia online library account is approved ready

Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!

1. Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
2. Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
3. Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
4. You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).

If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).

• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
• Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
• Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:08, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Jimmy LaFave

Keithbob, I've found several new sources which may help beef up the Jimmy LaFave article and have posted them on Talk:Jimmy_LaFave. Your help with the lead paragraph would be most appreciated. Thank you. Kmzundel (talk) 14:56, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

 Done-- — Keithbob • Talk • 02:34, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Risk Parity page questions...

Keithbob,

We're a magazine (aiCIO) doing a piece on risk parity, and we noticed that you are the editor who is taking great care of that page. Our 'hook' for the article is a history of risk parity through its wikipedia page -- so I wanted to start a dialogue. What sparked your interest in this page? Caused you to really grab the horns on this one? I also see you edit a lot on meditation and such -- any connection there? Sorry if I've asked you in the wrong format -- i.e. this talk page -- but I'm pretty clueless about this stuff. Is this the best forum to ask you questions in? All my best, and keep up the great work.

TheOctoberIssue (talk) 12:37, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

(For full-disclosure, I'm Kip McDaniel, editor of aiCIO. We cover risk parity quite extensively in the context of its use by asset owners ie. pension funds, endowments etc. (our target audience))

Thanks for the compliments on my work at Wikipedia. I think most editors on Wikipedia have an evolving list of hobbies and interests that change as they continue to live and grow as a person. We sometimes are drawn to articles and topics on Wikipedia in that way. However, we are also drawn to specific areas where help, assistance or clean up is needed and we put our efforts there as well. In all cases though, I think the main motivation is to help with the global project to create and maintain a high quality, encyclopedia as a free Internet resource. That's the main thing. In this way I consider myself to be a very minor part of giant team and don't feel my contributions are unique or special in any way. With that in mind, I would like to respectfully decline your invitation but also wish you success with your magazine and its endeavors. Best, -- — Keithbob • Talk • 16:57, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maharishi Effect, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bayesian and Katyusha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

The Burns Sisters

Looks like one of The Burns Sisters (Annie) has made several edits today on the article causing multiple issues. There are so many guidelines regarding BLPs, that I am unsure how to handle. Any suggestions? Thank you. Kmzundel (talk) 14:01, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

We can't assume that the new editor is the subject of the article and even if they are...Its ok for folks to edit their own bio as long as they follow the WP guidelines carefully and collaborate with other editors. However, this newly created, single purpose account has added a large body of un-sourced content, much of which is promotional sounding. So, I'll edit it down and post a note on the user's page to add sources in the future. -- — Keithbob • Talk • 16:30, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the assistance and feedback! Kmzundel (talk) 17:23, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome! Good edits on the Discog chart and EL section. thanks! -- — Keithbob • Talk • 17:31, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

PS I left the user a note on their talk page welcoming them and explaining some of the rules.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 17:31, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank YOU! Still so much to learn! I didn't realize one could leave a comment on a talk page, if there is no user page, so thanks for educating me about that as well! Kmzundel (talk) 17:37, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Yes, you just create the page :-) -- — Keithbob • Talk • 01:55, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Maharishi Group source

Sorry, but I've had to edit your posting of the Toronto Star article at Talk:Maharishi Group. I'm almost certain that copying the entire article to the talk page is a copyright violation. I've left enough of it to establish the context of the section being cited. AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:56, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Oh, didn't think of that consideration. Thanks for amending the post of a of it.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 01:55, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Today (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

SAS Institute

I broke up the request edit.

BTW: COIDave is me. For a time when I changed my username to Corporate I thought it was a good idea to create an alternate account for my COI work like others have, but ultimately kinda ditched the idea, but just kept with it where I already introduced myself as COIDave. Corporate 15:47, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Corp, I'll check back when I have time. Cheers!-- — Keithbob • Talk • 16:53, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Administrator's Noticeboard

I thought it was relevant to notify you that there is a discussion concerning User: Agadant and the Web Sheriff article at the Administrator's Noticeboard. Since you were active on the Web Sheriff talk page some time back and because you have worked with Agadant on other articles with good results, I thought it might be appropriate to notify you. I have not mentioned your name in my thread but in case you have an interest and would like to comment on the matter at hand I am providing a link here. Cheers!-- — Keithbob • Talk • 23:15, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Keithbob. I have left a comment. I am not volunteering to copy-edit the article nor to mediate any discussion - but if nobody else is wiling to do it, then I will consider helping out. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 15:30, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Silk. -- — Keithbob • Talk • 17:03, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Credit Suisse

Hi Keithbob. It sounds like I won't be doing work for a Credit Suisse competitor, so I went ahead and finished up the article. I'm not shooting for a ranked article or anything, but would love your feedback if you felt there was a specific area that needed improvement.

I also thought I would point out I suggested we merge First Boston with Credit Suisse First Boston on a string you started over there. Corporate 16:14, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

 Done-- — Keithbob • Talk • 17:03, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Help needed

Hi Silk, sometime ago I created an article called RedBubble at the request of the community (talk page) to replace a contentious BLP for one of its founders. Anyway, the article now has some issues that need the attention of an Admin. ie page protection, sock puppetry and possible outing. I know you are very busy. Is there someone you could recommend that I could confer with as to how to best proceed with these issues? Many thanks, -- — Keithbob • Talk • 18:58, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

I see an edit war is starting. XcommR, who has a declared COI, is reverting edits. I note that the edits being reverted do make statements which are not supported by the sources, and that you have adjusted the material so that it is neutral. I can see the article as a candidate for protection - but perhaps not quite yet. I'd like to see how things progress. The outing issue is tricky because the outing claims are based on a statement that XcommR made which could reasonably be seen as stating who he is. If I say on Wikipedia "I am the founding editor of Angel Exhaust", and then someone says - ah! you're Steve Pereira, they are not guilty of outing asa the information is all there. If XcommR felt he had made that statement in error and wished to have it suppressed, he could ask for that to be done. As it is, the statement has been deleted anyway, so only admins can now see it. I'm not sure who might be socking. It appears that one of the IP accounts has now registered - possibly in response to XcommR's comments. If there's some specific issue you'd like to talk over, or an admin action you feel might be appropriate, you can always ask me, but at the moment it looks like you have the situation in control. If the edit war flares up again, let me know, and I'll protect the page and/or have have a word with those warring. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 22:17, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Martin Hosking blogs on RedBubble that he is editing Wikipedia as user XcommR. His RedBubble blog is publicly visible as well as a feed to thousands of RedBubble accounts and has been posted since April, so it is a bit late for it to be suppressed lol. He cannot complain about "outing" when he is the one who has chosen to out himself. http://www.redbubble.com/people/pilgrim/journal/8731615-wikipedia .

About the content of the article itself, RedBubble's decision to promote and sell the Hipster Hitler clothing and offensive children's clothing traumatised and divided the RedBubble community which had previously been a friendly artist's community. The article could do with improvement to tell this story in a balanced way including by referencing media reports of what was promoted and sold by RedBubble and what was said about it. The article mentions one Jewish organisation applauding RedBubble but not what the many more who condemned the products being sold said. It does not mention what the public authorities such as Child Protection Commissioner said about the children's clothing. The article mentions the exact contents of an ironic hoodie about murdering suspicious people but does not mention the content of the clothing people found offensive. Velocityc (talk) 20:26, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

John Hagelin

I've requested a GA review for John Hagelin. You, I, and TG seem to have the most edits on that page of active editors. Per the reviewers suggestion, I'm going to reformat the entire referencing style. If you'd like to join in I'd be happy to have the help. No pressure just if you have the time and interest.(olive (talk) 20:42, 16 October 2012 (UTC))

Ok I'll check the talk page and we what needs to be done.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 17:49, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi Kbob. I'd like to move this discussion to the article talk page from my talk oage and TG's so I can keep track of the steps in this reformatting process, and so I know who is doing what, if that's OK.olive (talk) 02:11, 18 October 2012 (UTC))

Sounds like a plan, Stan! -- — Keithbob • Talk • 18:34, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yoshiyahu Yosef Pinto, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Prudential and Essex House (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 18 October 2012 (UTC)  Done -- — Keithbob • Talk • 18:47, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

BTW, you know this is me right? I changed my username to make it anonymous ;-) Corporate 23:09, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Hey Keithbob. Actually, would you be interested in coaching me through taking Credit Suisse to GA status?

The companies I consult will rarely be able to do the same, but as a matter of my basic qualification to consult them, I should at least work my way to becoming a regular GA contributor, if not FA eventually.

And Credit Suisse is a perfect example of the type of business that is under-serviced by our volunteer model where I should gain experience writing, researching and understanding. Corporate 18:09, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Sure I can work with you on that as my time allows. Today is not a good day but this week I will take a deeper look at the article and see where there may be weaknesses that would flunk a GA review. Please feel free to remind me if I forget.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 18:25, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

BTW, is it possible to bring smaller subjects to GA? For example, I could start out with a smaller subject like the Chartered Institute of Public Relations, but there are no sources available for 20+ years of their history and it would be a short article, so it's not really possible to make the article complete. Corporate 21:52, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Articles don't have to be big to get GA. But they do require 'broad coverage'. [3] A lot depends on who you get as a GA reviewer. Some are stricter than others. But size is not a criteria, for example I got GA for Norman E. Rosenthal, Amos Lee and Risk parity. And yes it would be a good idea to start with a smaller article if you have one in mind.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 23:07, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Cool - I'm giving it a go with the Chartered Institute of Public Relations. It's a small article where I have more domain knowledge, but there's not enough sourcing to fill out the History section. I'd be interested in your thoughts if you have time. My interest in contributing to this article initially came primarily from their ethics-on-Wikipedia activity. No worries if it's not exactly a subject that interests you though ;-) Corporate 02:51, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Hey Keith. Don't feel obligated or anything, but if you have time, I would love a second pair of eye-balls on the Public Relations Society of America article. I want to take that one to GA after the CIPR article, but it's much larger and more complex. I spent all weekend on it and need to come back to it later to fill in some holes. Corporate 04:32, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Harold Bloomfield (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Harold Bloomfield (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
• disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. FunkyCanute (talk) 12:29, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Now that there is a redirect, I have no objection to the deletion of the DAB page. -- — Keithbob • Talk • 15:54, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Request for comment

A discussion has been opened at Wikipedia:No_original_research/Noticeboard#Frank_L._VanderSloot, where all discussion should take place. The questions are:

1. Based on the claim of Synthesis, should the original version or the revised version of the LGBT Section be used in the article from henceforth—of course with the ability to edit it as necessary?
2. Because the original "LGBT issues" Section adversely comments on a Living Person, should that section be immediately replaced with the revised section—of course with the ability to edit it as necessary?
3. Should the Sources identified as faulty or not germane be eliminated from the list of References?
   GeorgeLouis (talk) 00:22, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

 Done I left a comment. Probably not what you are looking for but I don't have time to research each source and read prior discussions to comment any further. Good luck!-- — Keithbob • Talk • 17:48, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for all the info

Thanks for the info about finding sources, KB. I really appreciate it.Coaster92 (talk) 03:32, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome :-) -- — Keithbob • Talk • 14:29, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Religare, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Stock Exchange (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Mark Erelli

Keithbob, I've committed to helping with the Mark Erelli article. I just put up a stub with an infobix and discography. Any help you can provide would be very much appreciated. I've found several CD reviews and there are articles in the Huffington Post and Washington Post. He's from the Boston area, so I'm certain the Boston Globe and/or Herald would have articles as well. He's one of the top folk musicians out there, IMHO and deserves better than what's currently published on Wikipedia. Thanks so much for any assistance you may have the time or inclination for. Kmzundel (talk) 18:10, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

OK I'll stop by and enjoy the party as time allows :-) -- — Keithbob • Talk • 21:31, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Cool beans! Thank you!  :-) Kmzundel (talk) 22:51, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Notice of No Original Research Noticeboard discussion

Hello, Keithbob. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Wikipedia:ORN#Frank_L._VanderSloot Thank you. GeorgeLouis (talk) 01:10, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks but I think I've said all I have to say on that thread. However, I will try to look in on the FLV talk page now and then and help out if I can. Best, -- — Keithbob • Talk • 02:11, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Hedge fund update

Hi there Keithbob, just wanted to let you know that I had posted a revised draft of the section with a reply on the Hedge fund Talk page yesterday, in case you'd like to review and possibly move it over. Cheers, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 15:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

McKinsey Healthcare

Hi Keithbob, I posted a draft on the McKinsey Talk page regarding a controversy about a healthcare survey McKinsey published. I would appreciate your feedback if you're up for it. Corporate 23:58, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

OK, will take a look tomorrow. Feel free to remind me if I forget. -- — Keithbob • Talk • 01:23, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Transcendental Meditation movement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Golden Dome (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Edits

Kiethbob,

The reason I made that edit is because NOBODY speaks for Katy other than herself. No online articles, no magazines, no family, no "close sources" or anything. She said that on her twitter. This is why I am certain that, unless she or John specifically announces otherwise, THEY ARE NOT A COUPLE. It really bothers me how many people don't pay attention to the most reliable sources, which in this case are John and Katy themselves. There has not been any official proof (i.e. pics of kissing, making out, or anything intimate) of her dating John. Even if http://www.3news.co.nz/ is thought to be reliable, the site DOES NOT speak for Katy. You can read her tweet here regarding any gossip, past or present: https://twitter.com/katyperry/status/155808503326441473 Thesomeone987 (talk) 21:15, 15 November 2012 (UTC)Thesomeone987

Sorry but that's not how WP works. I've explained in more detail on your talk page. Cheers! -- — Keithbob • Talk • 21:22, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Credit Suisse

Hey Keithbob. I have three smaller articles waiting for GA review now and I was thinking of switching back to bringing Credit Suisse up to GA.

Besides the Corporate Culture and Investment strategy sections, do you think there are any other major sections missing/lacking that need beefing up? I'm going to vet the editorial and sourcing closely now.

Corporate 20:26, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

I gave it another cull-through. It is much better sourced now and I improved the general writing and editorial. I still feel like it's missing a section or two; other major banks have sections on management, CSR, art sponsorships, or longer controversy sections. Just not sure what this one needs that there is sourcing for. Perhaps an M&A section. A little stumped on what needs adding. Corporate 23:50, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

This is still on my to do list. I hope to get to it today :-) -- — Keithbob • Talk • 19:02, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Request for comment

You are receiving this message because you have submitted at least one edit to the Frank_L._VanderSloot article during the past thirty days. Your attention is called to Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Rhode Island Red.2. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk)

 Done-- — Keithbob • Talk • 19:00, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Getting Hedge fund structure right

Hi Keithbob, on Monday of last week I posted a thorough reply to your comments (and others') with another revision of the Hedge fund structure section that I hope answers the outstanding concerns. My reply (see here) is admittedly long, however I'd like to ask if you're willing to look at it again and offer your feedback to this version. Let me know back on that Talk page if you're able. Thanks, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 17:33, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Yes I'll take a look, maybe today. Please remind me if I forget.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 18:59, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi again, Keithbob. I posted my summary of just the first section earlier this week, and so far I've just received one comment from Wildfowl, and nothing yet from anyone else. How comfortable would you with the absence of opposition as a basis for moving the section into the article? At the very least, I'd like your feedback. Cheers, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 13:48, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

I've commented on the page. Nice work! -- — Keithbob • Talk • 14:29, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Jacqueline Hassink

thanks for getting back to me. i understand now. how can we make the changes that you do approve active? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacobien kyoto (talk • contribs) 15:10, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Jacobien, Normally I would respond here on my user page, but since you are a new user and I want to make things easy for you, I will move this conversation to your talk page. Cheers!-- — Keithbob • Talk • 15:18, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

errors Jacqueline Hassink

hello there,

the person who messed with my text on wikipedia changed things around and made errors. I do not understand why someone out of the blue can start changing things while I know what the truth is since it is my work!

can you please bring it back to the way it was.

jacqueline hassink — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacobien kyoto (talk • contribs) 19:54, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Sorry but that is how WP works. It is a collaborative volunteer community and the WP guidelines do not consider personal testimony to be fact. Please visit WP:V for more info. Cheers! -- — Keithbob • Talk • 18:27, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jacqueline Hassink, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page D2 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

 Done-- — Keithbob • Talk • 18:30, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

McKinsey & Healthcare

Hi Keithbob. It's been a couple weeks without any more input. Do you think it's ready for merge? I pinged My2011, since he has been involved since the beginning. Gigs' user page says he is out sick and DGG prefers not to do proxy editing via request edits. So I think it falls on you unless you would like to wait a bit longer for My2011. Corporate 18:58, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I'm busy today with real life stuff. Will try to look at this tomorrow. -- — Keithbob • Talk • 16:05, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

No problem. Hope I'm not pestering too much. Appreciate all your help. Corporate 03:48, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Its fine, but a link to the article or talk page etc would be nice :-) -- — Keithbob • Talk • 20:25, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

OK, I found the relevant page and its seems that today USER: Gigs, made the change. So now I can take the day off :-) -- — Keithbob • Talk • 20:40, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Hedge fund#Domicile

Hey there, I hope you've been well. Yesterday I finally got to posting a dedicated section on the Hedge fund Talk page about the next subsection, Domicle. (See here.) If you have a chance to review and comment, I'd be grateful, and I'm reaching out to at least additional participant as well. Cheers, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 14:58, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Transcendental Meditation in education, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingsbury School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:45, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

 Done -- — Keithbob • Talk • 13:27, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the thanks!

Gosh that was quick but thanks for the complement! Bleaney (talk) 22:23, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Peter Schiff

Hello. I see that you made changes on the Peter Schiff article today. I have not read each of them yet, however I did notice that you re-wrote the reference to Paul Krugman's Dec. 2011 reference to Mr. Schiff. That particular language, with the inclusion of the Schiff quotation, was negotiated among several editors after lengthy discussion on the talk page [4]. Please revert that portion of your edit. Much obliged.'''SPECIFICO''' (talk) 19:52, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi thanks for your considerate approach. I've made a post on the talk page to sort it out. Best,-- — Keithbob • Talk • 20:37, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Happy Holidays to All!

-- — Keithbob • Talk • 23:35, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Hedge fund#Investment manager locations

Hi there, Keithbob. Last week I posted a detailed request about the Investment manager locations section on the Hedge fund article's Talk page (see here). So far I haven't received any reply, so I'm reaching out to you and a couple of additional editors about it. I'll keep an eye on the page and respond as necessary. Cheers, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 17:06, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

 Done -- — Keithbob • Talk • 17:18, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Transcendental Meditation technique, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Humboldt, California and William Johnston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Hedge fund

Hello, Keithbob. You have new messages at WWB Too's talk page.
Message added 20:09, 21 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks.

Good work.'''SPECIFICO''' (talk) 02:37, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject Brands

Hello, Keithbob. You are invited to join WikiProject Brands, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of brands and brand-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:21, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Technical Analysis

Hi,
Maybe you like to know that the discussion in the Technical Analysis Talk Page is currently active.
If you are interested to contribute in the present debate, your help will be appreciated.
177.33.146.101 (talk) 03:05, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Moving on with Hedge fund

Hi there, Keithbob. I've left another note on the Talk page, essentially making the point that while I think a more concise treatment of the sections we're working toward is a fine goal down the road, the material I am presenting at least fixes existing problems with the article, and may itself be the basis for a forked article down the road. And it is important to me to address the immediate problems that I see with the article before thinking about another rewrite effort. I hope you'll reconsider and help me accomplish this, but if you have made up your mind, I'll respect that, and seek input from others. Cheers, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 16:01, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Community & Individual Development Association

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Community & Individual Development Association, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Community and Individual Development Association City Campus. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. VWBot (talk) 20:09, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

The Community and Individual Development Association City Campus (stub) has been redirected to the new article. -- — Keithbob • Talk • 20:11, 30 December 2012 (UTC)