Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajender Singh (March 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 21:57, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Kbv2024! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:57, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vaishnavi Ganatra has been accepted

edit
 
Vaishnavi Ganatra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Noahfgodard (talk) 19:20, 19 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Draft:Yogesh lakhani

edit
 

The article Draft:Yogesh lakhani has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahoj Ashu (talk) 17:05, 10 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Yogesh lakhani has received doctorate & was also certified recently from world boom of record

His company is only leading OOH company in mumbai Maharashtra and has received many awards Kbv2024 (talk) 17:16, 10 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Yogesh lakhani moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Yogesh lakhani, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 13:22, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

May 2022

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kbv2024 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi, Bbb23 Liam new to wikipedia and jam learning day by day, but I don't think so I have done anything so wrong that my account should get blocked, 1st iam not using multiple account this is my only account on wikipedia, if I have done any thing wrong I think u need to warn me explain me first and then block me. I hope u understand

Decline reason:

If you aren't using mulitple accounts yourself, then this would be meat puppetry. 331dot (talk) 09:02, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Kbv2024 (talk) 03:17, 13 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Bbb23 pls consider my request , iam not doing any false thing very passionately I want to learn and improve my skills on wikipedia , I have no connection with suspected accounts. I hope u consider my request and unban me. I have successfully made one draft published. research was done before making it. Kbv2024 (talk) 09:54, 13 May 2022 (UTC)Reply