KallebTigray

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amba Senayt (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amba Senayt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:35, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello, KallebTigray! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:35, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

hello

its me ethiotendo your friend Rakeey23 (talk) 21:47, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

hi ethiotendo KallebTigray (talk) 04:18, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

wanna play roblox Rakeey23 (talk) 01:15, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

yes KallebTigray (talk) 15:58, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

why are we talking on wikipedia of all places :Skull: Rakeey23 (talk) 03:12, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

bro ion know you are the one who started the conversation KallebTigray (talk) 02:08, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

are you still playing entry point with sackru Rakeey23 (talk) 16:36, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

nah nrn KallebTigray (talk) 19:48, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

also you were kinda bein mean KallebTigray (talk) 19:48, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

sorry Rakeey23 (talk) 01:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

its ok KallebTigray (talk) 20:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

yoseph help me!!! KallebTigray (talk) 17:51, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

what do you need help with Rakeey23 (talk) 02:51, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

you KallebTigray (talk) 16:54, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

,e Rakeey23 (talk) 02:51, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

help me KallebTigray (talk) 02:57, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

me Rakeey23 (talk) 02:52, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

you KallebTigray (talk) 16:19, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

you KallebTigray (talk) 16:39, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

im in study hall rn. what is it? Rakeey23 (talk) 17:54, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

hi KallebTigray (talk) 01:20, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

stay tuned for this weekend Rakeey23 (talk) 15:52, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Gebremichael of Tigray moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gebremichael of Tigray, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 17:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gebremichael of Tigray (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gebremichael of Tigray and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 18:09, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Za Dembalé moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Za Dembalé. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:50, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

can i get my friend to help? KallebTigray (talk) 00:56, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Adal Kingdom

Hi @KallebTigray: You blanked that page for some reason. Mainspace articles are never blanked. There is never a blank article on Wikipedia. If you keep doing that your going to get blocked. Its deeply uncool behaviour. Its disruptive editing. scope_creep^Talk 18:26, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Bro what? I cleared the page because the Kingdom of Adal was a different entity from the Adal Sultanate. I forgot to edit the page which i am now currently doing. Please do not connect two different entities with eachother and thank you. KallebTigray (talk) 21:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

@KallebTigray: You should probably create the article in WP:DRAFT. Your leaving these finished, barely even started articles without references which is completly uncool. If its a seperate Kingdom with a similar name, fair enough but at least in draft you can work on it, hassle free for 6 months without interference. I wouldn't clear down any articles again. Admin will block you for that in a New York minute. They're not really keen on it at all. I hope you take my advice. If you need help, ping me. scope_creep^Talk 01:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Alright. KallebTigray (talk) 04:01, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Scope creep, note this article was deleted in 2019 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adal Kingdom, hence dont restore it KallebTigray. Magherbin (talk) 10:22, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Seems to be a quite a comprehensive merge consensus in that Afd. I would suggest not writing it @KallebTigray: as its been considered non-notable and it will be sent back to Afd if promoted out of draft into mainspace. There is always plenty of other stuff to work on. scope_creep^Talk 10:57, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Yeah but i have reliable sources found, describing a kingdom known as "Adal" but not in the 9th century, it was more so founded as a result of the collapse of the Axumite Kingdom itself. It also absorbed Somali City States more so Zeila into it. There is a book about the Kingdom. KallebTigray (talk) 16:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

I also saw mentions of the Kingdom of Adal literally on Wikipedia, its in the article of Djibouti and the History of Somalia, so i dont see a problem with making an article about it. KallebTigray (talk) 16:24, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Agʿazi People. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You cited four sources, two of which do not corroborate what you wrote, another that is an incomplete citation (perahps this was WP:COPYPASTEd from another article?), and another that is self-published. Gyrofrog (talk) 22:14, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

They do corroborate? I reviewed them and they go perfectly with my claim. KallebTigray (talk) 02:05, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

They didn't. The opening sentence (at least at the time of my edit) read:

The Ag'azi People, also known as Agazi People, were a people who ruled the Kingdom of D'mt, Kingdom of Aksum, and even the Land of Punt for a period of time, under the Ag'azyan Dynasty and the Solomonic Dynasty, a Dynasty that ruled the Land of Punt for a period of time, being the predecessor of the Solomonic Dynasty, with Sheba being its last dynastic ruler, and the Ag'azi People are the ancestors of Habesha's.

You cited four different sources for this. Of those, the Smidt & Munro-Hay do not really back up this text (for example: there's a difference between "the Ag'azi People are the ancestors of Habesha" - which you wrote - and "The pre-Aksumite kings - at least some of them - descended from the Ag'azi" which is what Smidt actually says about it). That's why I split those two citations off with new sentences, to reflect what those two sources actually do say (and for the reader's convenience, I included relevant quotes from those sources with the citations. You can see the edit I made here: diff.) As for the other two sources, one was incomplete (which someone else came along & fixed in the meantime), & the other is self-published, which isn't allowed. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 20:53, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

thats because i literally used sources on there for different parts of the sentence... KallebTigray (talk) 00:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Edit

Please stop editing when you don't know anything about what your talking about JUMPp1harm (talk) 23:20, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

I know exactly what im talking about??? What do you even mean? KallebTigray (talk) 02:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Respectfully, no, you don't. At least not about Aksum. JUMPp1harm (talk) 03:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

I've literally been researching about Axum for a long time. Axum was succeeded literally by all of those states and there is sources to my claim. KallebTigray (talk) 03:13, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Stop meddling with the reigns of kings. Return them to their original state. They were already right. JUMPp1harm (talk) 03:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Which kings are you even talking about? KallebTigray (talk) 03:16, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

All of them. Why did you change it? JUMPp1harm (talk) 03:19, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

All of them? Be more specific. KallebTigray (talk) 03:20, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Oral history isn't reliable. Stop meddling with the kings list and their reigns JUMPp1harm (talk) 03:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Who is even talking about Oral History? And im clearly asking you, WHICH KINGS are you even talking about. Ive done my research. I always do before doing edits. KallebTigray (talk) 03:20, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Stop including kings who never existed. Only documented kings with coins or inscriptions or mentioned by contemporary historians are valid. Or add in a separate section. Most scholars don't take the kings list seriously JUMPp1harm (talk) 03:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Za Zalis and Za Dembale if those are what you are talking about, they did exist. There is documents literally about them and even are stated as the Predecessor/Successor of Za Haqala. And if you are talking about Zena Petros, he is LITERALLY STATED in multiple articles and documents of Zagwe History and even Damot History as he led a campaign against the Kingdom of Damot during his Reign. KallebTigray (talk) 03:26, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

No they didn't. You don't know anything. There is a reason why they weren't included in the list before you added them. Stop messing with it. There is no contemporary evidence for their existence JUMPp1harm (talk) 03:31, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Thats a quite false accusation there. There is sources STATING of their existence and I can site some right now. And also, Axum had Kings before they even started making massive amounts of Golden Coins within their Kingdom. I think youre the one who doesn't know anything. KallebTigray (talk) 03:36, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Maybe you don't understand but these "sources" aren't reliable considering they are from 1000+ later. Obviously kings existed but we don't know who. There is a reason why they weren't included in the list before you added them. Use your brain JUMPp1harm (talk) 03:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

If there is literally documentations from ancient times about these kings, they most definetely existed unless it was basically myths, inwhich this one is not. If one of them is fake, then why is za dembale have stated to have possibly contacted roman emperor nerva? and why is Richard Pankhurst, a RELIABLE SOURCE, stating his existence? I literally have a copy of his book right now and i can give quotes FROM THE BOOK. KallebTigray (talk) 03:42, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Give me the book and page JUMPp1harm (talk) 03:48, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Pankhurst, Richard (1998). The Ethiopians: A History (2nd ed.). Great Britain: Wiley (published 2001). pp. 45–46. ISBN 978-0631224938 KallebTigray (talk) 03:50, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

I've tried finding this book online before and couldn't, but I've read multiple other books and never heard anything about what you're saying. It's probably some nonsense. JUMPp1harm (talk) 03:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

It isnt nonsense? This is a historian we are talking about here. Read his article. Richard Pankhurst KallebTigray (talk) 03:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

ooops wrong person, i meant Richard Pankhurst (historian) KallebTigray (talk) 03:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

I know him and you linked the wrong person. I can't find the book online but i've read multiple other books about aksum and never heard of what your saying. JUMPp1harm (talk) 04:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

I have a direct copy of the Book. Also its basically because Za Dembale and Za Zalis are both kings that are not very well known about as very few documentations survive about them and their reigns. They are mainly only known because they are the predecessor/successor of za haqala and one of them had contact with roman emperor nerva. Its very difficult to find anything about these Kings which is why i understand why it feels like they are fake. KallebTigray (talk) 04:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Richard Pankhurst is not always correct. Can you provide evidence to support your claim? Do contemporary Roman historians mention him or something? What is the evidence and why is it not included in other books about Aksum? Have you read Munro Hay's book? JUMPp1harm (talk) 04:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Like i said before, its because very few documentations survive about the two kings as they were either barley documented or some of their inscriptions were destroyed. I dont have much of the sources but one of my friends do. Infact he is the one who gave me many sources about za dembale. Ill find more sources about the two. KallebTigray (talk) 04:22, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Please, I don't have time for this nonsense. I've read virtually everything about Aksum and never heard of anything about your saying. Go read the book by Munro Hay if you want to learn or Foundations of an African Civilization Aksum & the Northern Horn, 1000 BC - AD 1300 By D. W. Phillipson. You're just making stuff up JUMPp1harm (talk) 04:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Im not making it up? I even sent the page that states the Roman-Axumite communications... KallebTigray (talk) 04:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

I already told you, I can't find the book online. What's his source? Is it a Roman historian or something. JUMPp1harm (talk) 04:44, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

I can see that you cant find the book online, but that doesnt mean im making this up. Im taking it straight from the book. KallebTigray (talk) 04:46, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Ok then tell me what his source? JUMPp1harm (talk) 04:47, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

wdym by "his source"? KallebTigray (talk) 04:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

I don't think you understand these sources were created long after Aksum. Most scholars don't consider them credible. It's late, I don't have time for your foolishness. If you genuinely want to learn, read "Aksum: An African Civilisation of Late Antiquity" by Munro Hay. A historian who conducted excavations at Aksum and shared virtually all available information about Aksum from every possible source. There is a reason why he excludes these kings. JUMPp1harm (talk) 03:54, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

You do realize Richard Pankhurst did excavations AND researching to make these documents right? Why would he just make up random Historical Documents? He is literally one of the most Reliable People upon Ethiopian History. KallebTigray (talk) 03:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Do you by chance even know who Richard Pankhurst is? He states the existance of Za Dembale. KallebTigray (talk) 03:37, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Yes I know who he is. I told you I can't find the book online. What is the evidence? JUMPp1harm (talk) 04:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024

Thanks for contributing to the article King Joram. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 17:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

but the sources i copied are the sources i used in previous articles and also, i didnt want to type an entire source over and over again which is why i cnped. KallebTigray (talk) 17:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

This is not a reliable source. It appears you have used it again at Draft:King Joram even after being made aware this is a mirror. Please stop; you cannot use WP:CIRCULAR references. Sam Kuru (talk) 17:19, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

how is it unreliable? did you even read anything i said at all? i LITERALLY told you that i added that source myself, and i didnt want to add it to other sources over and over again so i copied and pasted it. i mirrored my own self. if this source is so unreliable, please explain how. KallebTigray (talk) 17:22, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

That website is a Wikipedia mirror, as I noted in the links I gave you: WP:MIRROR and WP:CIRCULAR. It is an older copy of our article at Kingdom of Simien. We cannot use our own site as a reference, and we certainly cannot use a junk mirror site that strips out the actual sources used in the making of the article here. You will need to link to actual reliable sources that support the specific claims in your drafts. If you need more assistance in understanding this, please let me know. Sam Kuru (talk) 17:28, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

ok KallebTigray (talk) 17:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Agʿazi People, you may be blocked from editing. The Pankhurst article does not mention any of this: no appearance of the term "Ag'azi/Agazi" etc., nor anything about a decline (of D'mt, Ag'azi, or otherwise), nor 650 B.C., nor Menelik. You're (again) citing a source that doesn't say the things that are in the text. Gyrofrog (talk) 17:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Najashi. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. I already told the other involved editor, and I am telling you as well. Gyrofrog (talk) 17:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

HE LITERALLY HARRASSED ME FIRST KallebTigray (talk) 00:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

BYGT moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to BYGT. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:20, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Anbasa Wedem moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Anbasa Wedem. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 19:34, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Complaint that you are edit warring on certain articles

Hello KallebTigray. Please see:

WP:AN3#User:JUMPp1harm and User:KallebTigray reported by User:Wowzers122 (Result: ).

If you want to reply you can post a response at the noticeboard. Edit warring is against Wikipedia policy and can lead to blocks. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:24, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

they are literally reversing MY edits, im reversing them back, why am i the only one getting the warn and not the people who started the whole thing??? KallebTigray (talk) 04:32, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for contravening Wikipedia's policy against harassment. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  EvergreenFir (talk) 18:02, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

HE LITERALLY HARRASSED ME FIRST KallebTigray (talk) 00:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Calling another user "retarded" is too far. JUMPp1harm called you dumb and was warned for it. You went a step further. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:24, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

alright sorry, i didnt even know he even got a warning. i was just mad, he consistently is rude to me when im trying to be respectful to him and its annoying how he keeps just being mad at me even when i literally am trying to be respectful to him and kind. KallebTigray (talk) 03:47, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes), a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Daniel Case (talk) 18:15, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Najashi

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Najashi. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Socialwave597 (talk) 18:24, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

he literally insulted me first.. KallebTigray (talk) 00:33, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Dawaro

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Dawaro, you may be blocked from editing. "According to sources" - what sources? And why do you keep changing the dates at the Kingdom of Aksum article? Please read WP:NOR. Socialwave597 (talk) 06:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

My Bad, i forgot to add the sources. Also, im changing the date because of the most literal fact that literally the Kingdom of Axum started out as a city state. I will grab the source for the Dawaro Sultanate soon. KallebTigray (talk) 17:09, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

found a source about the 400 B.C. btw. https://www.heritagedaily.com/2020/03/the-kingdom-of-aksum-africas-lost-empire/119720 KallebTigray (talk) 17:13, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

No don't change the date or bring back those edits. The Aksumite polity arose in the 1st century AD. Socialwave597 (talk) 17:30, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

i JUST sent you a source proving Axum existed in 400 B.C. KallebTigray (talk) 18:00, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

No, it says that the proto-Aksumite Iron Age period began in around 400 BC and that the Aksumite state existed from AD 100 to 940. The Dir Somalis never lived in Dawaro, nor was there a sultanate after the collapse of Aksum. You really need to stop with this original research, otherwise a permeant block is practically imminent. Socialwave597 (talk) 18:42, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

what the hell do you even mean by "original research" KallebTigray (talk) 19:21, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Sewasew | Sultanate of Dawaro (የዳዋሮ ሱልጣኔት) KallebTigray (talk) 19:22, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

its literally even on wikipedia lol... "The early Adal Kingdom (9th century to 13th century) was an exclusive Dir Kingdom with its capital being Zeila. In the 10th century, the Jarso clan a sub-division of Dir established the Dawaro Sultanate centred in Hararghe Highlands." KallebTigray (talk) 19:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

The Emirate of Adal, which existed somewhere on the lower side of the Awash River, was largely an Afar polity as explained by Richard Pankhurst[1]. Dawaro was a region that existed in modern day Arsi province and was never mentioned in the historical records until the 14th century. If you continue with this original research and citing unreliable or nonexistent sources, I will report you. Please read WP:SOURCE, WP:SCHOLARSHIP or WP:NOR. Socialwave597 (talk) 19:51, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Look at the sources i sent you atleast. And elaborate on "original research" KallebTigray (talk) 19:55, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

@Socialwave597 is referring to the Wikipedia:No original research policy (it's already been linked three other times on this page, but here you go). -- Gyrofrog (talk) 23:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Sultanate of Dawaro - Sultanate of Dawaro - abcdef.wiki KallebTigray (talk) 19:25, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

it said the axumite iron age period reached its height in the 1st century ce. Not that axum formed in the 1st century C.E.. KallebTigray (talk) 19:26, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

no i mean elaborate on its MEANING KallebTigray (talk) 04:03, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Agʿazi People for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Agʿazi People, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agʿazi People until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

why the hell would ag'azi people be deleted KallebTigray (talk) 03:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

i told you to stop making random ass wikipedia articles Rakeey23 (talk) 20:01, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Gideon IV moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Gideon IV. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Gideon IV appears to be a legendary figure, not a real person, and this article should reflect that. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. voorts (talk/contributions) 04:38, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Agʿazi People. You wrote " The D'mt Kingdom was a Kingdom that had prospered through trade under the Ag'azi People" then cited a source that makes no mention whatsoever of "Ag'azi People" (nor "D'mt," "Menelik," "Solomon," "650," "980" nor pretty much anything else you wrote). That is original research, and this is the last time you'll be warned about it. If there are other sources that support this, then don't make assertions until you can cite the sources. Gyrofrog (talk) 17:34, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

kalleb what the hell are you doing!!!!!!!!!!!!! Rakeey23 (talk) 20:10, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

stfu!!!! KallebTigray (talk) 03:23, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

bro i literally asked you to elaborate on original research and you didnt. literally ELABORATE. KallebTigray (talk) 03:24, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Literally all it means is just stop adding material which you have no sources for. That's it. Do not add anything unless you cited a source directly supporting it. Socialwave597 (talk) 07:06, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

More specifically, it means don't write something and cite a source that doesn't support it. It's been repeatedly pointed out to you, and not only by me. What happened when you read Wikipedia:No original research? That page describes one of Wikipedia's policies; it's not optional. If you can't, don't, or won't understand it, then I'm afraid Wikipedia is not the place for you. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 14:25, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

ok thank you for explaining. KallebTigray (talk) 16:19, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

ok fine ill help you tell me when you need help in an argument Rakeey23 (talk) 20:03, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Tesema Goshu moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Tesema Goshu. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Conquest of Shewa moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Conquest of Shewa. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:41, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	From one of your friends. I know you get in a lot of arguments but keep doing what you do, search for more sources too. You are a smart person for your age. Rakeey23 (talk) 00:08, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

ty KallebTigray (talk) 01:44, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Ogaden

Yo Kalleb, you wanna make an article about the Ethiopian conquest of Ogaden from 1891 to 1904 after shewa? Rakeey23 (talk) 00:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

help in shewa NOW KallebTigray (talk) 01:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

ok Rakeey23 (talk) 04:29, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Amba Senayt

Hello, KallebTigray. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Amba Senayt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Kingdom of Aksum, you may be blocked from editing. Socialwave597 (talk) 18:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Za Dembalé (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Za Dembalé and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 15:25, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi KallebTigray. Thank you for your work on Zena Petros. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:42, 24 April 2024 (UTC)