K V Venkatesh
August 2019
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 00:23, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
K V Venkatesh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
It is violation of blocking policy. I have always worked hard towards betterment of Wikipedia. I've added most of the information with top citations from the press or media. Please unblock me. I think I am targeted by multiple users. K V Venkatesh (talk) 01:50, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:57, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
K V Venkatesh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand what I've done. I pardon for my mistakes and will not repeat it again. I will contribute to friendly editing according to Wikipedia policies. A sincere request to Please unblock me, and give me a chance. This is the first time ever I got blocked. I request the administrators to kindly excuse me for once. Please show some pity. I am new to Wikipedia and I don't know much. Thankyou! I also extend my apologies to Cyphoidbomb (talk).
K V Venkatesh (talk) 02:13, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you're serious about wanting to be unblocked, you should stop engaging in sock puppetry and block evasion, wait six months, and ask for the standard offer. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:46, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Hello sir! Thankyou. I'll do it. You can see my edits from the three accounts. There is nothing like vandalism or disruption of Wikipedia articles or quarrels with anyone. One thing I can do is sincerely request the respectable administrators like you to once look into the contributions of K V Venkatesh (talk) , Cyebyckk (talk) and ThisisAkuna (talk) . I am guilty for not following WP:NPOV in few instances. I am guilty for reverting the Saaho edit of Cyphoidbomb (talk) sir. I am also guilty for posing a question to him on his talk page, through Cyebyckk (talk) ! I won't repeat any sort of this kind in the future. I follow your instructions. I will work towards making useful contribution s to Wikipedia. I thank you a lot for looking into my matter NinjaRobotPirate (talk) sir!
K V Venkatesh (talk) 10:34, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Administrator note The only way you will be unblocked is if you spend some time explaining what you were blocked for, why you did it, why it is problematic, and explaining how you will avoid the behavior in the future. There are other issues that I am concerned with as well, like in these edits where you appear to be heaping drooling praise onto Trisha, without any awareness that this is a neutral encyclopedia. We're not here here to advertise or promote, we're here to present a balanced perspective of all of our article subjects. So I also would appreciate if you'd please read WP:NPOV and try to figure out a way to explain why some of those edits are contrary to our encyclopedic goals. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:14, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
I think that I am blocked for maintaining multiple accounts which is against the Wikipedia policies. Yes, some of those edits mentioned by Cyphoidbomb (talk) may be contrary. I am sorry. I will give a neutral portrait along with citations. I will follow the suggestions of administrators thoroughly. Cyphoidbomb (talk) sir, please help me in getting unblocked. I will delete my other two accounts also. I came here to add information. Please show some pity.
Regards
K V Venkatesh (talk) 03:29, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- Just a passerby, but I would observe that if you want us to show some pity, you might want to show some remorse. You ask for reinstatement while still socking. This feels very much like a guy asking to be let out of jail for repeatedly stabbing people...while continuing to stab people and asking for pity. Come on. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 07:18, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
I have three accounts and I read it on the Wikipedia that multiple accounts are allowed but not for legitimate reasons. My mistake was not following the neutral portrayal rule while editing a few articles ( like today's edit on Saaho by Cyebyckk (talk) which I did with 4 references ). I have taken inspiration from other articles and decided to edit Saaho. Now I understand my mistake. Even Cyphoidbomb (talk) sir is so sweet and he was teaching me the way to do Wikipedia. I am still a learner. Don't know many things which top administrators like you know. You can see all my edits from the three accounts. There is nothing like vandalism or quarrels with anyone. Only thing I can do is sincerely request the respectable administrators like you to once look into the contributions of K V Venkatesh (talk) , Cyebyckk (talk) and ThisisAkuna (talk) . I am guilty for not following WP:NPOV in few instances. I am guilty for reverting the Saaho edit of Cyphoidbomb (talk) sir. I am also guilty for posing a question to him on his talk page, through Cyebyckk (talk) ! I have to suffer! Thankyou Jack Sebastian (talk) sir for replying me. Regards K V Venkatesh (talk) 09:59, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- KV, is there a reason why you were using multiple accounts and did not declare that on your various user pages as per WP:DG? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:04, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Yes sir. I thought that I could have multiple accounts. Like many new users, I created two more accounts along with my main account. I thought that its not necessary to reveal that all the three accounts belong to one. If at all I am unblocked, then I will surely mention the details of my main account in the other two accounts (or) will delete the extra ones, because now I understand that having only one account is best like you Cyphoidbomb (talk) sir. I didn't really know that something called 'sock puppetry' exists at all until today. Noone atleast told me about it. Now I am punished with indefinite blocking. Was not even warned or blocked for a limited time. I am completely new to Wikipedia, just getting stunned & sometimes excited to see how its working. Very difficult for a new user like me who lives in India. Well, all's well that ends well. Regards - K V Venkatesh (talk) 18:23, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
K V Venkatesh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I didn't really abuse anyone from any of my accounts or encourage any kind of vandalism for sure. 1. I know that I am blocked for using multiple accounts and for not using WP:NPOV while doing this these edits and [1]. Provided, my edits are always with citations from top websites. But I will not violate any policy further. 2. I did not misinterpret any information. Neither will I do so in future. The blocking is not necessary. I promise, that I will not disappoint. 3. Provided a chance, I will improve many Wikipedia pages with latest information ( along with references) and will follow all the policies. I will also mention my main account in the user pages of the other two accounts. I kindly request the respective administrator to once look into the contributions of my three accounts- K V Venkatesh (talk) , Cyebyckk (talk) and ThisisAkuna (talk) respectively to know my edits. There are only few & it won't take much time to examine. Also please check my edits of popular pages! I never encouraged misleads or vandalism! I was new to Wikipedia that time, but now I am thorough with all the policies. I was directly blocked without even being warned to know the policies. I deserve a chance please! I will always work for the betterment & improvement of Wikipedia pages. I will not disappoint. Thankyou! K V Venkatesh (talk) 12:44, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You show no clear understanding of why your violations of WP:SOCK were inappropriate. As such, there are no grounds to lift the block. At this point, you are really just wasting our time. Try again no sooner than six months (i.e. no sooner than 2020-03-19) under WP:SO, but only if you have refrained from all further edits in that time. Yamla (talk) 12:51, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.