User talk:KH-1/Archives

Latest comment: 5 months ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic Invitation

Welcome! edit

Hello, C759, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!  Flat Out let's discuss it 07:05, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

C759, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi C759! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Abigail Valte) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Abigail Valte, C759!

Wikipedia editor NearEMPTiness just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hi C759. I like your stub on A Valte, but it is still very short. Could you expand it a bit, please?

To reply, leave a comment on NearEMPTiness's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

About Empowr edit

Hello C759 I just noticed your edit on the Empowr page. Please leave a reason also, in the Talk area of the page. Further let me know your views if you can help. Thanks

  1. SatyamSatsContactMe11:07, 25 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

All Is Well (film) edit

You removed a source from the page All Is Well (film). Please explain your edits in the edit summary if you remove content or sources from a page. Otherwise it would be considered as vandalism. Thanks!Rameshnta909 (talk) 14:59, 18 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

A brownie for you edit

  Great work reverting vandalism! Romtamtalk 14:00, 19 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reverting edit edit

So so sorry! It was an accident!

Best regards, Romtamtalk 05:33, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

August 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Durgapur may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:19, 29 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For the swift reversal of a rather misplaced redirection on my talk page Amortias (T)(C) 16:36, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Gwar discography and other edit

why you undo my edits on those articles:

  • 1 at this moment charts, and certifications are not true, you removed sources and correct chart position that i add
  • 2 i did update discography and certifications
  • 3 in this article alredy have been written discography, i did use wikitable to sort all informations and add more sources
  • 4 as i have notify on edit summary timline and videography have been integrated with Gwar discography
  • 5 as i notify on edit summary article was integrated with List of Gwar members
  • i realize that there was war with some other user, but that was not me, what is the point to spend hours on rewriting and adding sources and go to edit war 66.102.129.154 (talk) 10:04, 1 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

I have unreviewed a page you curated edit

Hi, I'm BethNaught. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, OneWorld Foundation India, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. BethNaught (talk) 15:54, 9 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

I tagged it with db-spam, so I'm not sure what the issue is.... -C759 (talk) 00:01, 10 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Not sure if I understand why tracking down dead links and mirroring their content is considering "spamming" edit

Especially since Wikipedia has a NOFOLLOW policy on links to begin with. All these edits were made to the ref section, only to restore original citations lost to 404s and only mirrored when the original could not be tracked down... Wikipedia would rather have dead links I guess? Also several edits that had been up and considered good for months were reverted too. Seems a bit spiteful.

No good deed goes unpunished I guess. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.45.36.252 (talk) 14:12, 17 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

You're not the first to try this. Don't pretend that you have pure motives - it's not remotely convincing. -C759 (talk) 00:20, 18 September 2014 (UTC)Reply


Ganguli edit

He is clearly not notable. Why not nominate it for speedy deletion??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.185.71.34 (talk) 03:43, 19 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Suggestion edit

Perhaps my added content, pending agreeable references, could be reincorporated by other means? Lack of internet censorship and the moral implications of said phenomenon being the culprit. I would like to describe how this enhanced availability of suicide literature may be linked to recent deaths in the media. Eg Grant Li, Matthew Sattherthwaite and Kevin Boyle all used the internet as a means to acquiring either their method and/or the equipment it involved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redzimus (talkcontribs) 10:08, 19 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 23 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Window film, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Homes and Ceramics. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Kicks from spurious deletion - Promotion/advertising?! edit

Dear C759 I am at a loss to understand why you have sought fit to remove all my content - it all objectively links to third party websites proving that what I am stating is true, in summary based on the few contributions made this morning:

  • There is an additional 'Invictus' inspired song in the public domain to those listed on the Invictus page - so I simply stated that and linked to it, objectively with no promotional language etc etc;
  • There is an additional repository of photographic information on Cane Hill asylum, and I've linked to it, again with no promotional language etc;
  • There is an additional angle to anti-drug education, which I've linked to and provided simply as fact without any sort of promotion, citing third party media reports that verify what I have said...

...Having read the Wikipedia treatise on objectivity of content, what exactly is it that makes the many previous entries on Invictus, Cane Hill, Drug Education etc neutral where they refer to other people's creative works, yet my edits promotional, even though they do no more than simply objectively stating and linking as the other entries do?

I must say my confidence and motivation to now add anything at all to Wikipedia has now been singlehandedly destroyed, and even my inclination to use Wikipedia as a basic reference source has been severely altered - I now realize that users can spuriously remove content simply by alleging it is advertising, and that a time-apartheid approach to content entry only allows those with the most time to read unwieldly treaties and extensively argue out minutiae ad absurdium to create any bias of their intent under the banner of 'neutrality'. Ajs uk2 (talk) 09:47, 6 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Looks like nothing more than name-dropping to me. What is your relation to the Thieving Names and the musical comedy? -C759 (talk) 10:35, 6 October 2014 (UTC)Reply


October 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Karva Chauth may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ला इस दिन कुछ अलग दिखना चाहती है। आइए हम देते हैं कुछ टिप्स इस करवा चौथ पर ताकि आप दिखें सबसे खास। (Beautiful and attractive jewelry and clothes, along with make-up, are so enjoyable on festivals. On

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:54, 11 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

iPhone 6 in China information edit

Hi C759 - you had removed a comment I made on iPhone 6 about its nickname in China. I'm an American living in China so I've heard this firsthand. I felt it was an unusual enough nickname that it merited citing a source, which was in fact a blog entry I had helped publish. This wasn't meant as self-promotion, but it was hard to find other English-language sources that describe this phenomenon. Can I re-add the comment and the attributed source?EmceeInPRC (talk) 03:02, 20 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Blogs are not considered reliable sources. Also repeatedly citing sources that you are closely associated is seen as spamming and conflict of interest. -C759 (talk) 04:41, 20 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Okay, understood. Good to know. Will refrain from re-adding.EmceeInPRC (talk) 04:43, 20 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Relevant photos links from Scientific source seo-forum-seo-luntan.com edit

These days you're removing relevant, unique photos links from a science source. For example true, adequate photos of typhoon area (typhoons Rammasun and Kalmaegi 2014) or of a new soft drink (Mirinda Watermelon). Why you do this? Сароман (talk) 13:56, 24 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

See WP:REFSPAM and WP:RS. Spamming will not be tolerated. -C759 (talk) 13:57, 24 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
I know Wikipedia from its beginning. I'm almost 40 years old scientist. Why do you think that links to relevant, unique, true photos is "spam"? If you continue to think so, I'll report this issue to the higher community level. I know you became a respectful editor here, but I think you're wrong in this case. Linking to relevant photos isn't spam. Сароман (talk) 14:01, 24 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Did you read WP:REFSPAM and WP:RS?-C759 (talk) 14:05, 24 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
I think our debate here is no longer productive and because I'm a very busy family person, I informed about this issue already the higher Wikipedian level (i.e. here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents.) I hope they (the admins) will create the right decision and we, both, can save our time for more constructive online or/and offline activities, dear C759. Have a nice day! Сароман (talk) 14:33, 24 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Good one - WP:BOOMERANG. I'm not even going to bother. -C759 (talk) 14:34, 24 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Electronic Cigarette RFC edit

Since you have edited the article reciently you may want to comment on the current request for comment on the talk page. AlbinoFerret (talk) 14:23, 26 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Regarding Speedy Nomination edit

Hi, You just nominated the page I just created Splash math for speedy nomination. I was editing the page as a third party and have no affiliation whatsoever with the company. I am a teacher & use it in my classroom. Can you tell me how do I modify the page so that it doesn't look like a promotion. I Google-searched & tried to present as many facts as I can and also researched on few other pages of similar companies/products — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arpitjain11 (talkcontribs) 10:34, 10 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

November 2014 edit

Hello, I'm Gaurav. Please let me know why you have removed the external link I have added in the page of SEO, as it was following all Wikipedia guidelines. The page I tried to link was informational based on actual facts and information from other authoritative resources.

Alarm.com edit

FYI: User talk:JohnCD#Alarm.com, Inc.. JohnCD (talk) 13:13, 2 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Jason Tom edit

Hello C759, we have a team of editors working on the Jason Tom article and we are working on building content for it and would appreciate that you do not remove content as we are consistently building the article with reliable resources that back up the content that is provided and presented. We appreciate your interest in the topic and article. Thank you for your contributions. We do appreciate you and your time involved in the article. If you have any specific feedback and suggestions that would assist us we would appreciate it. Please respond here and we look forward in hearing from you. Thank you. Keep in mind we are working on it. Thank you again C759. Angel Light17 (talk) 00:17, 5 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Who exactly is "we" and what is your relation to Jason Tom? -C759 (talk) 00:21, 5 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

No relation. "We" includes you and I and editors from the Wikipedia community. Will turn to Teahouse for assistance. Thank you for your contribution. -Angel Light17 (talk) 00:56, 5 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Regarding spamming edit

Hey, I see your message regarding me "spamming" with similarkind.com links. I knew that wikipedia puts rel="nofollow" on external links. That was the very reason I placed my website since I had no intent to boost my search rankings but rather people have better experience getting appropriate list. Those list are primarily constructed using Wikipedia and other reliable public data sources like Freebase. I am not even monetizing my site with ads. If still it is against some wikipedia policy then I won't post links. But my motive wasn't that of a "spammer". I only wanted to build something which can help. Sushant gupta (talk) 15:35, 10 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Rollbacker edit

 

I have granted rollback rights to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. 14:38, 27 January 2015 (UTC)– Gilliam (talk)

Thanks. I'm happy with TW though. -KH-1 (talk) 12:48, 28 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

OR tag on Death of Elisa Lam edit

I totally understand why you put it there, but please do understand that what's there is just the intro of the article as I will be expanding it further, including sources for most of the statements in the intro. If it's OK with you, can we take the tag off? Daniel Case (talk) 00:31, 29 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sure, but I don't think we should be giving credibility to fringe theories about paranormal interference. -KH-1 (talk) 00:40, 29 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
They've been mentioned in a couple of reliable sources. I won't be devoting much to them, other than noting that they exist. Daniel Case (talk) 03:47, 29 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

hello,

     i respect your reviews. Can you please help me out in the page "Arlo Enterprises" to avoid it from speedy deletion. Thank you

hello,

     i respect your reviews. Can you please help me out in the page "Arlo Enterprises" to avoid it from speedy deletion. Thank you

Refspam edit

Good catch. (re: Special:Contributions/Ktyrr1093) --— Rhododendrites talk \\ 21:44, 20 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Rai Techintro Private Limited deletion query edit

I made a page for Rai Techintro Private Limited but it was deleted because of advertising and promotion article. Since I wrote my first article so it was done by mistake. I request you to please suggest me that which line should I remove from the the article to complete your terms of use. I want to rewrite the article on the same topic. Thanks!User:vsray (talk) 20:15, 26 February 2015 (IST)

Citations fixed edit

Hi,

I have added citation and removed 404 page not found links on pagetraffic page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageTraffic Please review if its ok now?

Mikehose (talk) 09:10, 6 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Removing references edit

Can you please not remove references? Thank you. Samsara 19:04, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

What exactly is it referencing?-KH-1 (talk) 23:57, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
The content of the article. Samsara 06:22, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
What you've inserted is an external link, not a reference. -KH-1 (talk) 06:38, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
If you feel the need to convert it to an inline reference, feel free. Deleting references, however, is not acceptable. Samsara 07:50, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi KH-1, i re-integrated my edits and undid your changes. I do believe they are significant to these topics and add value. Thanks for your understanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyk1ng (talkcontribs) 09:19, 20 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

List of presidents of Croatia edit

Hello, I am sending you a message because you obviously did not know enough about the history of Croatia. First of all, Croatia was independent since 1991, since then we have the Croatian president, not the Communists who had de facto role The president of the Socialist Republic of Croatian (which was part of Yugoslavia and the Republic of Croatia became independent in 1991). Thank you for your attention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mica Maca Pipica (talkcontribs) 13:45, 20 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

You should provide an edit summary explaining your actions when you intend on removing large chunks of information. -KH-1 (talk) 23:30, 20 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ray Marcano edit

How can I do a speedy delete on this page? Someone has created this and his handle is associated with porn sites. I don't want to be associated with this is any way — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmarcano (talkcontribs) 01:48, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 22 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fatubessi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portuguese. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:48, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply


Response to alleged spamming edit

Dear KH-1, With reference to the alleged spamming, I would like to challenge your assumption and request that you reinstate the external links on the legal subject of Damages on the following grounds: (1) the external links were directed so as to take Wiki users to many pages of free materials of the highest educational standard on the subject (3) there is nothing for sale at the redirected web page so there is no commercial gain on my part, the external link is to entirely educational content (3) I effectively have 2 phds on the subject of damages having undertaken many years of research and having written a book on the subject (3) If you google "the law of damages" you will find my web page is the second most used resource on damages on the web (4) I contributed significantly to the Wiki page on Damages many years ago using my own name when editing (from about 2000 onwards), correcting many errors and making the content more accurate (5) I have not included any references to my book under References, which I could have done. The book is not currently offered for sale so there is no question of potential gain at this stage (6) The law of damages is a vast subject comprising centuries of law reporting throughout the English speaking world. It is not possible to provide anything other than an overview of the subject at wiki and numerous external links to further more detailed information are an inevitable consequence. At present there is only one external link (which suggests either no one is bothering to make the information more useful alternatively someone is blocking the addition of links) and the removal of the link in question effectively denies users access to materials which are the subject of high commendation by peers (7) Multiple links to different web pages were appropriate and should not have been regarded as spamming since each link directed readers to distinct web pages containing specific subject matter research. For example, under wiki page Chaplin v Hicks, which contains the barest/minimal detail, I inserted an external link to this page: (liability to pay damages). You will see that the web page specifically mentions the case in question and that it considers the wider principles associated with particular issue of law. Potentially, an external link to the same web page might be included at the following Wiki web page: Story Parchment. Thanks Lawdamages (talk) 17:27, 23 March 2015 (UTC) lawdamages.Reply

March 2015 edit

  Hi KH-1. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Navfitness, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. The article isn't about a company; it's about a product made by a company. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers, criteria for speedy deletion, and particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion or proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Thanks! Gparyani (talk) 01:49, 28 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

H. B. Beal Secondary School edit

Thanks for your work dealing with the stupidity going on with that article. It annoyed me so much that I deleted all of the revisions from when the mass attack started. I didn't want to give the students the satisfaction of saying "See what we did?". -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:54, 31 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Happy to help. -KH-1 (talk) 02:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Organic certification edit

hi - thanks for removing that "and New Zealand", i'm not sure who added it and i was in two minds as to whether to roll it back Shaztastic (talk) 03:50, 2 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Indian Tyre Manufacturer edit

Dear Mr KH-1 Wanted to add an Indian Tyre Manufacturing company, Innovative Tyres and Tubes Ltd, which I am authorized to do as member of team Innovative. No external link was included other than the reference of the company web site was there Unable to understand why you have deleted the entire entry, if you have objection to the mention of company web site, you could have deleted that portion only. In the same page where I wanted to include my company's name, a lot many web links are there. Can you claim that the existing list is complete and hence, you will not allow any more addition? Like to add my entry once again, how do I know that you are part of team Wikipedia and not an individual representing a company like me? Regards --Surabhisthan-1959 (talk) 14:32, 5 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Credit Savvy edit

Hi KH-1 and thanks for the warm welcome and words of advice. Please can I take you up on your offer to review my draft submission to ensure it is objective and does not fall fowl of conflict of interest rules. I'm happy to receive and action any feedback you might have. I've posted the draft in my user space here: Credit Savvy (Draft) Alex at CreditSavvy (talk) 04:05, 15 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sure, I'll review it once there's more content. Let me know. -KH-1 (talk) 04:25, 15 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Oooops edit

Not sure what happened here O.o — BranStark (talk) 13:54, 17 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

You didn't revert far enough. -KH-1 (talk) 13:55, 17 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Portal:Current events/Sports/Sidebar edit

Hi! Could you please have another look at this revert? It seems to me that this IP is putting a lot of work into maintaining this sidebar. You have restored some "upcoming events" that are now past. -- John of Reading (talk) 07:00, 22 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Thank You YoutubeViewer101 (talk) 09:00, 2 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Reverting my edits as refspam edit

Hi, I saw that you are reverting my edits with the doubts of refspam. I wanted to let you know that I'm a paid Wikipedia editor however I edit only those pages where I see the scope of improvement and credibility. I am fully aware about WP:VERIFY and WP:NOTE and take complete responsibility of my edits. I want to make Wikipedia a better and more reliable information source and appreciate your efforts. Mr RD 14:44, 9 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi, i have picked up a word SimilarWeb form the section "See Also", so please don't revert it. Thanks Darkwarrior92 (talk) 08:38, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Reply


Deleting my Zeenyx Software page edit

Hello KH-1, I am responding to your deletion of my page Zeenyx Software. Could you please tell me why you marked my page with the "Speedily Deleted" status? You are claiming that I have yet to state how the company is notable. When I look at the notable guide on Wikipedia, my page cites two "reliable," "independant," "verifiable" sources. Could you please give me detailed reasons why you deleted my page so that I can fix the issue(s)? I would very much prefer to hear your reasons instead of you providing a link to the Teahouse/Questions or the notable definition page. I really want to do this properly. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjt2470 (talkcontribs) 14:16, 26 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Still waiting for a response to my query above? (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 19:36, 6 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Could you provide a link to the two sources? If you want to recreate the article your best bet is to go through WP:AFC.-KH-1 (talk) 02:36, 7 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Reverting my recent edit on /wiki/Web_hosting_service edit

Hey KH-1 I was just wondering what I had done wrong in the citations, I'm still really new at editing but would like to contribute, I thought that my link was sufficient but maybe I layed it out wrong or perhaps the link wasn't strong enough being www.worldlibrary.org/ - Just wondering so I can improve. Thanks! -Understanded — Preceding unsigned comment added by Understanded (talkcontribs) 04:31, 6 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

See this, particularly the first heading in bold. -KH-1 (talk) 04:33, 6 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

I want to start my page. Please allow me to start. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srikanth.source (talkcontribs) 06:10, 16 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Cannot contest the nomination for speedy deletion of the DLL Group page edit

Hello KH-1, I cannot respond to your nomination for speedy deletion on the DLL Group page itself, so that's why I am leaving a message on your talk page. I would like to contest this nomination, because I don't see why the page seems to be unambiguous advertising. DLL Group is a global enterprise and a fully owned subsidiary of Rabobank. DLL is comparable to organizations like Interpolis and Van Lanschot which are also represented on Wikipedia. The company operates in over 35 countries and has approximately 5500 employees and therefore should be represented on Wikipedia. The article describes (the emergence of) the organization but describes in no way why DLL Group is better/more successful/etc. than other companies. I am curious in which way the page seems to be unambiguous advertising in your eyes and would like to know how I can improve it so that it won't be deleted. Waiting for your respons. Thanks Amina.Sabanovic (talk) 11:43, 20 July 2015 (UTC)Reply


Deletion of SilverNeedle Hospitality edit

Hi I am writing on behalf of the page SilverNeedle Hotels which you have nominated for a speedy deletion. I would like to contest for this nomination however the page has been deleted already. SNH is a very popular hotel chain in Australia and there is no need to harp on for advertising on Wikipedia. As one of the main 3 star hotel chains in the country it should be represented on Wikipedia. Please let us know which part that you thought made it look like advertising as we would like to fix this and get this approved. Thanks World Trotter, Talk

Speedy deletion of CineCoffee edit

Hello KH-1,

You have nominated the page that i have created for CineCoffee to speedy deletion. I would like to contest for this nomination. Cinecoffee is a entertainment portal serving South Indian film industry. It has got 28% of traffic from search engines. Please let me know which part of the article is violating the wikipedia rules, so that i can remove the violating content to save that page. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maari87 (talkcontribs) 11:58, 10 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, KH-1. You have new messages at Kudpung's talk page.
Message added 03:22, 12 August 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Why the deletions? edit

Hi there,

I am trying to understand why you have deleted valid info in regards to kit cars I have edited. Im just trying to understand why things like a company website would be reverted back to a website list that has a blurb about the company. I would think the company that produces the vehicle would be a better link then a website that references a company name and address. Am I mistaken? What about removing text that adds value to the article by listing what models of cars that a particular company produces?
Im also curious how you can have a list of manufactures in any given country and when a new company (not a company I own) gets added to the list it gets removed. I thought the idea was to show what is out there?

As a long time kit car Enthusiast/Historian any insight you can provide to me in regards to edits you have reverted would be most helpful .
Thanks Kitcarguy (talk) 01:13, 18 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Assume good faith edit

In regard to this, I would advise you to assume good faith. The user appears to be a good faith editor with real concerns. A report to AIV is unnecessary, and perhaps even pointy. --ceradon (talkedits) 05:28, 18 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

I do not even understand how changing a page from "Bradley Automotive" to say something like "Bradley Automotive - Produced the Bradley GT and Bradley GT2" adding a new kit car company to the UK list, updating a company to include their official website instead of a reference to a web list with the companies name, address, and a photo, or better yet capitalizing the first word of a sentence is considered self promotion or better yet vandalism? These were all valid edits based on facts and correct grammar. What did I miss? Kitcarguy (talk) 07:27, 18 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

incident noticeboard edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Kitcarguy (talk) 02:30, 19 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

I have unreviewed a page you curated edit

Hi, I'm Mecnunsaskin. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Geeksohel, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Mecnunsaskin (talk) 14:30, 20 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

I have unreviewed a page you curated edit

Hi, I'm Mecnunsaskin. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Sumerian Europe, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Mecnunsaskin (talk) 14:30, 20 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Sunday Times (Western Australia) edit

Hi KH-1. I've noticed that you reverted an edit of mine on the The Sunday Times (Western Australia) article. Could I ask on what grounds you made that edit? It was web traffic data for the website of the newspaper and it is as important to be on the article as the physical copies circulation is. Nut that's my opinion. Yours? Thank you. Hansi667 (Neighbor Of The Beast) a penny for your thoughts? 07:55, 23 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

This is with regard to your edit of the content in the wiki page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Versant_Online_Solutions stating that it sounds like an advert. When the message initially appeared I had posted the concern in the help channel, and was suggested a few changes which I addressed immediately and the message was removed by the volunteer. However, three days later, i.e., today, the same message appears on the article, and I was told that I need to talk to you with the following message "the user who re-added the tag did so with an edit summary suggesting they feel the article still reads like an advertisement. I'd suggest contacting that user directly to see what they feel could do with rewording."

So, kindly help me with the guideline on how do I go about with the same. Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chennapanaidu darapaneni (talkcontribs) 06:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sport in Australia edit

Looks like someone beat me to it. :) --User:Woohookitty Disamming fool! 11:54, 14 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Misc edit

Would it please be possible to retrieve the information for future reference. A lot of work and investigation went into writing the page and for it just t be deleted when its clearly of relevance is a little frustrating. I would therefore be grateful if we could retrieve the information so that we can use it for improvement in future. Kindest regards Christian (Christian Crofts (talk) 13:54, 21 September 2015 (UTC))Reply

You should speak to @Euryalus:. -KH-1 (talk) 00:40, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Replied on their userpage, thanks for the ping. -- Euryalus (talk) 02:30, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


I got your message about spam links... I do not understand why you have deleted all links and I'm sure you made a mistake. Please specific case where the link is a spam ? please explain. because all links are in accordance.

thank you

ivek99 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivek99 (talkcontribs) 10:33, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


~~Emcgregor21~~ Hi my name is Emma McGregor I created a page a couple of months ago called Somos Next, I think I have more articles to back it up. What can we do to restore it? Best. Have a great day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emcgregor21 (talkcontribs) 16:06, 1 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

You can recreate the article via WP:AFC. -KH-1 (talk) 06:07, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Jade Goody edit

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:MDLI A lot of your refspam mentions are pages which have dead links and you keep reverting to those dead pages. This does not help wikipedia in any way. Let me guess you will revert this edit too? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.161.119.90 (talk) 05:37, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Read WP:KDL, WP:DEADLINKSPAM. -KH-1 (talk) 06:07, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Why assume this is deadlink spam? Do you have any basis or proof of this grave accusation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.161.119.90 (talk) 08:12, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

It's considered spamming if you target deadlinks in order to switch it to sites that you own or are affiliated with, and there is enough circumstantial evidence to suggest that you have some connection with the source in question.-KH-1 (talk) 05:29, 7 October 2015 (UTC)Reply


Circumstantial that means made up by you to connect the dots as you see it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.147.33.195 (talk) 05:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Therefore every person who makes an edit on wikipedia for a dead link must be affiliated with that site? Sorry, but that is extremely paranoid and anyone would say complete nonsense. If you cannot prove your case here I will edit the page again and then seek measures for your misbehaviour with moderators. Wikipedia is not owned by you or your paranoidism! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.147.33.195 (talk) 05:06, 8 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

The use deadlinks for SEO purposes is a well documented practice, according to both investigations on Wikipedia (see these reports [1] [2]) and off-Wiki evidence (see this search result). There are exceptions of course, but the point is that there is cause for suspicion when dealing with editors who target deadlinks, particularly new or unregistered editors. As I said earlier, it's only circumstantial but I find it odd that your edits coincide with the social media activity of Celebritynewsio. What's particularly strange is that this is a story from 2009 and there's no reason for the site to suddenly repeat (on Twitter + Fb) something that occurred six years ago. It's not an update on the perfume range, the post is the exactly story from 2009, closely paraphrased (plagiarised) from the MTV article. The timing itself is odd and suggests that it was probably coordinated by the same person(s). My guess is that contrary to the date stamp, the article was actually created recently and hence the social media accounts were used to promote a new post. By the way, if you want to edit the page again, why not make yourself useful and add the new MTV link.

Why was my draft about Highground Industries deleted? edit

That was just mean.

I had barely started adding information to the page. I was still here compiling info & sources & you wiped out the meager notes & info I had saved to the draft! Why would you do that? I didn't have that info saved anywhere else & I would appreciate getting it back please. That basic info took more time to find & verify than you apparently think.

It had only been there for an hour or so & I left a note that I was collecting sources. I am working on adding several underground hip hop artists & musicians to wikipedia & this Highground label released a lot of their early material. Some of the original releases from this label sell around the world for hundreds of dollars per copy because they are so rare in comparison to industry releases.

I am getting a lot of resistance to the creation of these articles when these people obviously have millions of fans, listeners, users etc... By nature underground hip hop does not get a lot of mainstream press but when some one is the author of art, music, or other media that are this popular or culturally significant/influential they deserve a place here. When a song, album, painting, typeface, photo or some other item is in the hands of 10s hundreds of millions it deserves a place here.

In looking at many other published wikipedia listings for similar artists I find them facing the same prejudice with pages slated for deletion & full of comments expressing doubt as to the validity of the references... I witness 2 people JUST TODAY trying to add extremely well known hip hop artists & hitting a brick wall with the editors. Has it occurred to you that there are a lot of things in this world that are relevant, notable or important & yet not the subject of mainstream media attention? I do understand your concerns as to truth & verifiability. I am trying to help. There are people in the arts who are in possession of priceless, first-hand information. I & others are working to collect record a lot of this info before it is lost.

You did not give me any opportunity to add any citations or links to any other wikipedia pages or even the discography or artist roster... I resent this immediate rejection of a simple attempt to record some factual history about an important phenomenon in American culture. What you are doing is the equivalent of saying that Steve Jobs is relevant but Linus Torvalds is not. You are making a mistake and a hasty one at that to delete something so incomplete so quickly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Graffitihistory (talkcontribs) 01:53, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Best to speak to @Bbb23: and ask for an archived copy of the page. If you wish you can then recreate it as a draft via WP:AFC. -KH-1 (talk) 02:20, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

about external links to Wikipedia edit

I don't know why you removed this, it was very relevant information. and the wiki value did miss a cite, it has only 1! any way have a nice day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pageveteditor (talkcontribs) 04:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yeah I wasn't trying to be constructive I was just proving a point to somebody that anybody can edit these pages. good thing u got people to edit them back quickly — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.183.232.166 (talk) 08:36, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

A cup of tea for you! edit

  With this ever dramatic world and winter coming, here's a cup of tea to alleviate your day!  This e-tea's remains have been e-composted SwisterTwister talk 06:21, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

You have removed all my contributions, including the old ones edit

Dear KH-1, you might be right that one of the contributions I made today are not worthy, but you have also removed the ones placed in May 2015 to a useful research study which was cited by multiple sources on the web. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sergiy11 (talkcontribs) 23:27, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

All spam. All removed. -KH-1 (talk) 23:29, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Why a relevant research report is considered spam? -Sergiy11 (talk)
Please look at the referenced reports before labeling them "spam". Also please check the other sources which cited them.
Your edit history suggests that you're here to populate articles with links to the Keytocasino website. Your attempt at targeting deadlinks (see WP:DEADLINKSPAM) is more evidence of this. A link can still be considered spam even if it's relevant. -KH-1 (talk) 00:26, 24 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
I never argued about the dead links I replaced. If it is against the rules, then so be it. However you keep removing the contributions which have absolutely nothing to do with the dead links. They refer to the reports with real relevant research cited elsewhere. Please look into those carefully and let's stop the corrections and discuss it instead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sergiy11 (talkcontribs) 01:31, 24 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Delete fixed dead link edit

Hello I fix a dead link to a relevant reference and you remove it and marked it as spam. Can i know why so i wont do this mistake again? Thank you 2bet48 (talk) 00:38, 24 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I saw WP:DEADLINKSPAM and that answer my question. I didn't know that before. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2bet48 (talkcontribs) 00:59, 24 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of J&J Corporation page edit

I think that the speedy-deletion of my page is fair, but why exactly does Wikipedia not allow such things, also how do I prove that what I wrote is significant, considering I am the owner of both the page, and company? Herronjo (talk) 01:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Take a look at WP:YFA and our conflict of interest guidelines. -KH-1 (talk) 01:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Which section exactly?

Herronjo (talk) 01:28, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nevermind. Saw it.

Herronjo (talk) 01:30, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I have reported here edit

They are spamming www.filmymantra.com

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist#filmymantra.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Avengers (talkcontribs) 13:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Why was my edit with reputed Lancet links supporting Ayurveda reverted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amruth M D (talkcontribs) 06:18, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Which article are you referring to? -KH-1 (talk) 06:59, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Company page deletion edit

Hi, You recently requested for speedy deletion of our company's wiki page and looking to see if you can provide a reason for your actions. The page was https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Way2Wealth_Brokers_Private_Limited

you tagged it as spam and unambiguous advertisisng, even when the page had mentioned all the information available from reliable third party sources. Please explain the reason.

Also, please suggest how can we have the page back?Arundhatisingh (talk) 04:44, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Contact @SuperMarioMan: and ask for the archived copy of the page. If you wish to recreate the page I suggest you do it through WP:AFC. -KH-1 (talk) 04:46, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@KH-1 i do have the content of the page with me, but if i create the page again will you again delete it? earlier too i had created the page via Wikipedia Article Wizard, still it was tagged spam and proposed for speedy deletion. Please suggestArundhatisingh (talk) 05:12, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply


also, i have reference of all the reliable third party sources to support the facts mentioned in the article. moreover, the tone of the article was neutral too, then why was it called unambiguous advertising. Please suggestArundhatisingh (talk) 05:14, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

removing links edit

Hi

Thanks for your message about removing the link on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_in_the_United_Kingdom

The original link was to the home page of a broker, I updated this to the news page of another broker - more relevant as the title was energy industry news. It seems you've now removed the link completely which is fine.

Where the most relevant content is on a site that I'm affiliated with, what is the best/correct way to add/update that content?

--NickEastwood (talk) 11:39, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I'm sure you'll be able to find relevant content elsewhere. KH-1 (talk) 11:47, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
some of the content is to fill dead links by recreating the original content - as such it's the most relevant. Surely it's better to use the most relevant? Or do I have to find someone non affiliated to add the same link? --NickEastwood (talk) 15:25, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hidden by the eclipse edit

I would like to keep my article would you add it back you deleted if I need to add something tell Article name is Hidden By The Eclipse — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exsertsizer (talkcontribs) 19:41, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Regarding the reason behind nonacceptance of content modification edit

Hello

I made some changes on page of wikipedia that goes by the name of "Resonance Kota". The changes were discarded citing the reasons of posting promotional content. As far as I know, I just uploaded the basic information about the institute with the help of their website and content available on Internet. I also provided proper reference for the content used. I am new to wiki, therefore would like to know the mistake I made so that I can keep them in mind in future to become a better editor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harshit291990 (talkcontribs) 13:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Take a look at WP:NOTPROMO. -KH-1 (talk) 04:24, 4 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Delete fixed dead link edit

are you mad or something ...i mean the dead link was pointing to yahoo where there is no information to it and i edited to point to the source info and you deleted it. Give me reply soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pushpendra Singh chahar (talkcontribs) 04:08, 4 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Tumblr is not a reliable source. -KH-1 (talk) 04:24, 4 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I am adding more references to the page,then it is all deleted by you, I was doing my coursework and I have to hand it in today.I want to know the reason why you deleted it and can you recover it for a moment.Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sherylzhang (talkcontribs) 12:37, 5 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

195.194.74.141 edit

Blocked for 3 years, school block. GiantSnowman 12:53, 5 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hey there edit

Hey There! This is my first time using Wikipedia, thanks for your help. Could you by any chance help me with an experiment I am doing? I am with the University of Denver and seeing how many users on Wikipedia, on any desired page have knowledge on their topic. So, if you are interested, and because I found you on a page about Titanium, could you explain to me Titanium's atomic radius in comparison to both its period and group? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.203.105.199 (talk) 04:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply


Why was my contribution about the social media marketing video deleted? The video was very informative and I thought added value to the article.

About the reverting of changes on page Book rental service edit

I have spent time researching the topic and tried to add value to the page. If the references are corrected are the other changes ok? Should I resubmit. Please understand that this entails a lot of time so I wouldnt like to repeat the exercise with the same result. I am surprised if no value was seen for the content addition.

Removed link on Roman Shades edit

Hello there!

I just logged in to my Wiki and saw your message about the edit you made which removed a link I added.

I do see that the website linked is not strictly informational, but it was what I used as a reference when I made a number of updates to the post, so I was attempting to cite the source of my material. Should I have added it as references instead of an external link? I would think a specific figure would need a citation, but a general source of info would be a External reference.

Thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arowls (talkcontribs) 17:29, 2 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

December 2015 edit

 

Your recent editing history at Mortise lock shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please cite your assumed policy that NO references may reference any commercial site. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

It takes two to tango. -KH-1 (talk) 12:45, 3 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Removed link on ad serving edit

I see you removed the citation to my blog on the ad serving topic, which I expect was because blog content typically doesn't fit the definition of a reliable source per Wikipedia guidelines. I am however a frequently cited expert in this space, and would provide the below examples to back up my claim: MediaPost<ref>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/262675/ad-ops-insider-get-your-header-bidding-on.html</ref> AdMonsters<ref>https://www.admonsters.com/blog/mobile-ops-talk-ad-ops-insider-qa-brian-hoskins-disney-technology-solutions-services</ref> AdExchanger<ref>http://adexchanger.com/publishers/webmd-kneen-publisher/</ref> KnowledgeBridge<ref>http://www.kbridge.org/en/online-advertising-explained-dmps-ssps-dsps-and-rtb/</ref> I hope you'll reconsider the edit as I felt it provided a citation to an important point in the content that wasn't otherwise explained. Adopsinsider (talk) 00:06, 6 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Reference errors on 17 December edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 18 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Kindly let me know the delete reason edit

Hi Admin,

I am from India and tried updating wikipedia page information for finance and pay day loans.

Kindly let me know the reason why my addition has been deleted.


regards, Lalit +91-9818496827 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lalitrawat8 (talkcontribs) 12:15, 18 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message
Thanks Tokyogirl79. Merry Christmas. -KH-1 (talk) 03:32, 22 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Refrence that I added is relevant edit

Hello. Please consider using translation to confirm that the reference adds more credence to the claim in the article about the artist. I see no harm in keeping an additional source of info. No big deal but it's just another source of info/evidence of critical acclaim etc... I mean here the NZ music page. Thanks! --Sayedtamim (talk) 01:51, 31 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Mistake? edit

Why did you revert this helpful edit (which verified the claim)? You check to see what the edits are before changing them, right? -- James26 (talk) 16:03, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

There was evidence of dead link spamming.-KH-1 (talk) 23:48, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

ok edit

ok — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apurvajagma (talkcontribs) 09:47, 19 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

hypnosis edits edit

very weird don't understand criteria for relevant citations and why some of my work is being deleted? Hypnosis article/ two citations in particular from a website houstonhypnosis.com which contained supporting content. Please advise. Are less citations better in this article or is there some types of domains which should never be referenced no matter what?? This is rather frustrating as time is spent searching for relevant citations which support statements made in the article but I do not see where a criteria FAQ is posted???? Please advise.

Jimmi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimiedwards (talkcontribs) 16:30, 21 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

CLEARLY PHIL TOWN DIDN'T SERVE AS GREEN BERRET OVER IN VIETNAM. THERE'S A CURRENT INVESTIGATION. edit

STOP HELPING THIS POSER. HE EMBELLISHED HIS VALORS.

Undid revision 701253825 by KH-1. The referred article is one of the most notable publications on Computer Forensic Specialisations available.

Talk page attempted to correct this issue in 2013, but was ignored by the activists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Outback1964 (talkcontribs) 11:11, 28 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wahbi Khazri edit

  Done. GiantSnowman 13:19, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Why was the original link allowed, but not my edit? edit

Hi, I'm completely new to wikipedia, that was my only contribution ever, so I'm interested in learning what part of ELNO is relevant here, particiularly what's the difference between ELNO as applied to the original link (before it died, obviously), and the working generator I linked to. Did the original one just slip through before it died, or is there a difference? I think acronymgenerator.net should be listed as it can generate, e.g. from the keywords:

"seasonal disarray melancholy emotive"

the backronym

"SAD: SEASONAL, AFFECTIVE, DISORDERLINESS",

for example. Is that not a valid backronym generator? And if not strictly, in your opinion, why not and is not the pursuit of an example of a working backronym generator any longer desired and if not, why not? Paulskypod (talk) 12:46, 7 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

There's no difference - it shouldn't have been included either. -KH-1 (talk) 02:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Cauliflower edit

Thank you. I was having some trouble undoing myself. 400 Lux (talk) 02:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Induction cooking edit

Why was my link removed? The useful magazine article I linked to was from 2009 and was clearly dead and I revived it. It shows the benefits of induction vessels and was an exact replica of the magazine article that is no longer appearing on the original website. The new link does not contain any spam whatsoever nor attempts to promote any products or services. Please kindly reconsider. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thegreatalbertlau (talkcontribs) 01:59, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Edit removal edit

Just wondering why the links I added were removed- did I make a mistake? I'm a bit new, so sorry if I was out of bounds. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bethany P. S (talkcontribs) 18:56, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Surname Lanzone/Lanzoni project by FtDNA edit

Why did you erase the external link to the surname project? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.40.101.151 (talk) 17:17, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Why did you allow a similar link but not the one i suggested? edit

I see you have allowed http://www.phdfriend.com/ on the page and not the one I inserted, which is similar.Can you tell me the reason so I could learn?I'm new around here.Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RadFalconio (talkcontribs) 06:49, 13 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Regarding your message edit

Hi KH-1.

Thanks for your message. Could you please elaborate on why the links were inappropriate? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anotheridol (talkcontribs) 10:59, 17 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello KH-1, Why were the two edits made by me was removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nazarsa (talkcontribs) 21:14, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, not spamming with external link edit

Hi,

I am not spamming Wikipedia with external links. It was a dead link which was replaced by something important to Vitality curve.

The link which was added was not part of advertising or business intention, but as a reference, to what people think of the vitality curve and how thought leadership can edit for benefits.

If you can, please do me a favour of guiding external links which help to get an article more references.

Thnaks

Rajarshi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajarshi wikipedia (talkcontribs) 12:27, 22 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

explain yourself please edit

Although I'm still upset at your approach of just removing everything added to a page... I'll attempt to justify the changes I made to your *%^* page that requested additional citations. I had added the only known united states directory(via Hostsearch) for web hosting providers and I had added another page that referenced the top hosting providers. I will agree that the last one may not have been needed for clarifications. However, I did contribute to your page by adding the only source available on the internet that can verify the statement requesting a citation. If justification is what you call collaboration then there you go. /ragequit — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.119.82.14 (talk) 23:49, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

I'm referring to this edit you made. Not only is it uncivil, but it appears to be vandalism to a portal page. This is why I removed it and warned you for civility. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC) and I'm "referring to" the edits that were made to this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_web_hosting_service — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.119.82.14 (talk) 00:11, 23 March 2016 (UTC) I did not make the reversion to that page. If you have a dispute, please speak with KH-1, or discuss it on the article's talk page and ping KH-1 so that he can explain. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:14, 23 March 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.119.82.14 (talk)

Please revisit your edits edit

Hi talk::KH-1,

Let me start by saying sorry if I made any wrong edits to the Wikipedia pages in question on my account. I truly thought that I was adding value to Wikipedia in general. If you deem the last edit I made as spam, simply leave it alone and I won't cite that source again however I believe many of my previous edits to be relevant and all from different reputable sources. In fact we can't source all citations from news websites or encyclopedias or does Wikipedia have a bias towards those types of websites? All these pages needed citations and I tried very hard to cite relevant documents and reputable sources to the full extent of my knowledge. If doing so is almost impossible, as it seems you have deemed according to your reversions of almost all my edits, I don't see anymore reason to contribute to Wikipedia.

These links were alive for more than a month since I registered and started contributing to Wikipedia. I would ask you to please revisit the following which I believe to be relevant and revert your edits if possible:

Business jet

Air transports of heads of state and government

George, Western Cape

Travel agency

Local store marketing

EdwardMatthews333 (talk) 06:55, 23 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, regarding your message. edit

I received a message that I was spamming Wikipedia. I've not logged onto Wikipedia for the past 3 months, so I'm very surprised to see this message. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.120.89.41 (talk) 10:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Unreasonable changes edit

You recently undid several legitimate changes to the page for Dakota Ridge High School, without citing a reason. Evidence was provided and sources are legitimate for the updates that were made. The edits were made as part of a senior project to update the wikipedia in an effort to "leave a legacy" at the school. Please do not change content in the future without providing a reason.

revisions edit

Please advise as to how to make this revision, Personal Injury Please see this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levin_%26_Perconti self promotion ThanksRollerusa123 (talk) 02:41, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

DELETION OF HAWKSCODE SOFTWARES PVT. LTD edit

THIS PAGE CONTAINS MATERIAL OF A COMPANY ACHIEVEMENT AND ITS MODULES THAT IS REQUIRED BY MOST OF THE STUDENTS IN THEIR PROJECTS, BECAUSE OF THEIR CONVENIENCE THIS PAGE WAS CREATED PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE IT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Priya2255 (talkcontribs) 06:19, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

please reply Priya2255 (talk —Preceding undated comment added 06:45, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

EasyShiksha edit

many other pages like shikhsa.com, edukart showing same subject still appear on wikipedia . Then why only my page is deleted??? why are you doing this again and again ?? If u want to remove then remove all others too Shiksha.com and educart remove these too, because this is not right that you are doing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Priya2255 (talkcontribs) 05:39, 20 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit warring edit

Please do not undo my change with out giving a reason, this is the second instance. My comment is relevant to the article at hand and has a cited source.

thanks, Centurytreedesigns (talk) 01:28, 22 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) Centurytreedesigns - The source you used in your edits to Carpet cleaning here, here, here, and here use an external URL that multiple editors have reverted and consider as promotional. They are not the ones that are edit warring, you are. Please do not add this content or source back to the article without coming to a consensus with those involved on the article's talk page. Continuing to edit war will result in being blocked from editing. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:32, 22 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Fetishism Hair edit

others cut short hair both men and women and differs person to person, there is no prevalence has this, between homosexuals and transsexuals and bisexuals — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.55.175.37 (talk) 00:13, 24 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

The E-commerce in Dental Industry of India edit

I noticed your speedy of The E-commerce in Dental Industry of India. This is the second time this page has been created in 24 hours by two accounts. Might want to keep an eye out. May need salted if it continues to be created. TimothyJosephWood 12:46, 28 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Stop edit

It's not promotional. It's a well-established company... Leave me alone please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AaronMHoliday (talkcontribs) 06:21, 29 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for helping keep the Chris Harris (journalist) page accurate and clean! Mpmacintosh (talk) 11:17, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Mpmacintosh.-KH-1 (talk) 14:04, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Miami Center for Media Diversity Report 001 edit

http://imgur.com/a/nkaZw — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeflytone (talkcontribs) 14:00, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Yeah? So what's your point? -KH-1 (talk) 14:04, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

NC edit

Sorry. Misclicked. DrKay (talk) 05:55, 6 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please stop. edit

Please refrain yourself from editing the Mayor of London Wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesgordon95 (talkcontribs) 14:24, 6 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Adding spam? edit

Don't believe that I added an unrelated link. The section that I added the link to had 0 citations and I added a link to it that has the relevant information!

The question about what cookware can be used is readily available on the site I added if you scroll to the table of contents or just scroll down the page! — Preceding unsigned comment added by HarryWikiWiki (talkcontribs) 09:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Troy Ave edit

Hello, I added a section on Troy Ave's legal issues and you deleted it. Can you add it back please? Or, why not? He is a rapper who was arrested for attempted murder. Thanks. 107.19.188.76 (talk) 01:08, 27 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey edit

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

I am a first time creator. My page got deleted. How do I get the page back so I can modify — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amy Swanson (talkcontribs) 05:34, 2 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Tort Reform- dead link edit. edit

I'm an licensed attorney with years in experience, so I know I'm definitely qualified to edit an wikipedia article on tort reform. How is that the link got removed when I provided the citation the dead link was trying to provide but failed to do so and I did by properly giving the author credit to it's work according to legal guidelines??? Brettcarlson (talk) 13:47, 2 June 2016 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Brettcarlson (talkcontribs) 13:19, 2 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please do not remove content unless you fix grammar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiexplorer13 (talkcontribs) 11:35, 6 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Fire extinguisher page edit

Kh-1 why are you deleting new content that I've added? This page is a mess, there was no reason to remove relevant content, including photos that I shot myself and had released all rights to through Wikimedia Commons. Explain yourself!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Firetech117 (talkcontribs) 13:55, 6 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Removed Table edit

RE: /wiki/Home_insurance

Just curious why you would remove the table I added and the information for basic, broad, and special forms. I know you don't want "commercial" citations but that's the best place I could find the information in an easier to understand way than what already exists on the page.

I feel like that table really helps readers understand the difference between structural and personal property coverage as well as introduces the concept of form limits. If you want, I can rewrite that whole section to remove what's currently there and replace it with the table, definitions of basic, broad, and special forms, and explain named perils and standard exclusions.

The current descriptions are so vague....

HO2 – Broad Form A more advanced form that provides coverage on a home against 16 listed perils (including all 11 on the HO1). The coverage is usually a "named perils" policy, which lists the events that would be covered.

This description doesn't even list the 5 new perils.

or this

HO5 – Comprehensive Form Covers the same as HO3 plus more. On this policy the contents are covered on an open peril basis, therefore as long as the cause of loss is not specifically excluded in the policy it will be covered for that cause of loss.

An HO3 plus more??? Again, no new or relevant information.

At least defining basic, broad, and special allows the users to figure out the core principals. How should I proceed?

Load Management - Revert edit

Hi,

could you please clarify, why my edit was reverted.

Thanks ≈≈≈≈≈

Some bubble tea for you! edit

    whoops! Thanks INVISIBLEknock! 06:01, 18 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

≈ --2607:FB90:6E43:EC95:C717:264B:8EFC:2EC1 (talk) 23:11, 23 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Individual Capital edit

An external link on the Individual capital page that I inserted was removed. I think it adds more value than a dead link or did I do something wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joedoohan (talkcontribs) 09:00, 27 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Made Corrections Asked by Error Messages and you reversed them edit

Hey, I corrected 2 citations in the internet marketing article, which wikipedia was marking as corrections needed and you reverted them back to being incorrect after I made the edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markobravo7 (talkcontribs) 02:47, 30 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi friend i am new to wikipedia and I think I did something wrong. Please help me correct this. edit

I had requested an edit for link [50] on the watch page of wikipedia, and you said it was spam. If you search my website through a link finder, you will see that I am not a spammer at all. In fact I have no links going to my site but this one that I requested because I was doing some research and started a blog and am now sharing interesting watch facts and stories on my blog. Please advise me friend what to do, as the link [50] is broken, and my link is about sapphire watches. Thank you Rob — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert9334rm (talkcontribs) 05:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Constantine Last editing edit

Hy, I have made some changes in the page and you reverted my changes.Please let me know if there was any deficiency or i have done something wrong according to Wikipedia policies.Please let me know :)

Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter Jhonson (talkcontribs) 15:43, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reference errors on 26 July edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 27 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Dont edit relevant information because you think its irrelevant. edit

Hi,

I am uncertain if it was an auto edit "good faith" or you personally. But please refrain from adding auto edits or editing articles of information that you deem irrelevant, as other people may deem it relevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.157.118.158 (talk) 01:03, 28 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Juanpi.com is notable in China, it should not be deleted edit

Hi KH-1, Juanpi.com is a notable website in China, it should be listed on Wikipedia.

  • Juanpi.com has more than 100 million subscribers in China.
  • Juanpi.com has obtained 3 rounds of investment, over 135 million USD in total.
  • Juanpi.com has been reported frequently by TV, websites or newspapers, like qq.com (globle Alexa rank 9) http://finance.qq.com/a/20160623/037099.htm, http://tech.qq.com/a/20160429/049002.htm
  • Juanpi.com won lots of awards, please see the picture attached. Juanpi and Alibaba are all award winners. Sorry, I don't know how to upload a image...

Would you please recover this page and let me rewrite it?

Thank you

Lisarrrsteven (talk) 18:04, 2 August 2016 (UTC)LisarrrstevenLisarrrsteven (talk) 18:04, 2 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

You'll have to speak to @Kudpung:. -KH-1 (talk) 23:54, 2 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Books Citation edit

Could i know, Why you remove my book citation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unisankar (talkcontribs) 00:45, 4 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Specific Strength edit

KH-1

Last time I made changes you revered the changes, the link is still dead, not sure what I did wrong, I have included the link to the new data, please make the changes, and let me know whats wrong with the last change

page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specific_strength link 13 is a dead link

new link http://www.pelicanrope.com/pdfs/Dyneema-Comprehensive-factsheet-UHMWPE.pdf

thanks Vladpaln (talk) 04:04, 7 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Do u want to share or conciev more information about this text — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.245.8.25 (talk) 12:49, 16 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

About dead link edit

Hi,

I write to you because you deleted my changes. I mean it: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=B._Alan_Wallace&oldid=prev&diff=733789313 I tried to add new URL with content whose is not avaliable under older link. What I did wrong?

Best regards :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaakubb (talkcontribs) 22:00, 17 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Atta Community edit

Sorry, but I do not understand why it was deleted a company page that was following the right model than this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bunchball

Please, why Atta Community was deleted twice in less than a month and why is it possible to be published en Catalan viquipèdia and Spanish wikipedia instead. Thank you very much in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parauleira (talkcontribs) 11:33, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Question on removal of edit to instruction manual edit

The edit that I added to the page ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zen_Cart ) was a link to a manual that is widely used has been since its inception. I realize you say it is spam, but how can that be any different than the entry (just a few above the one I added) that looks like this (and was accepted):

Hardy, Kerrin (2009). Zen Cart CSS Guide - A complete Guide to Zen Cart Stylesheets. Australia: Kerrin Hardy.

There is no difference (the above references an external link as well). I strongly believe the link should be added back into the page as it is one of the main books zen cart users have turned to for increasing their sales. Likewise, if you feel the inclusion I listed does not belong, then the above one I referenced by Kerrin Hardy doesn't belong either and should be removed. Please explain the difference in the two listings ... one of which IS accepted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carrie at The Fischer Group (talkcontribs) 22:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hair clipper edit

What was your reason for reverting my sourced information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Istorea3 (talkcontribs) 01:08, 27 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

May I know the reverts reasons for the contributions made by me edit

The audio Social Media Definition.wav is about the definition of analytics in social media. And the Tools for Social media analytics are also verified from sources. The external links to these tools official websites is also verified. I want these to be part of the article. May I know how to make it into this article. Thanks and Regards.

Sir, the link contains exact same content on Radio Act 1927 edit

Sir, the link contains exact same content on Radio Act 1927. I just tried to update the broken link.

You can check my updated link also - http://amarjyotiadvertising.com/radio-act-1927-product-progressivism/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sahebsingh63 (talkcontribs) 06:42, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reverting edits edit

Not sure why you're reverting all of my edits. Can you give me a reason why? Thanks.

Just sayin'. -- zzuuzz (talk) 05:36, 10 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi edit

I've changed Reference linked [1], because it was broken. I checked which information was on that page in 2009, and trying to get it back to the reference. There is some important information that probably will be vital for the students. Thanks in advance, Natalie Andersen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NatalieAndersenLive (talkcontribs) 09:21, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker)@NatalieAndersenLive: Hi, I've familiarized myself with what happened.
I think your attempt to was likely reverted because "GetGoodGrade.com" is some kind of paper mill that is using a mirror of the article to draw traffic from Google, etc. I think he looked at the navbar on top of the page and found that it is promoting the assignment-forging side of the business, and assuming they will . I, myself, don't think that you directly intended to promote this business. In future, it would be better to either look for an internet archiving service, or, in your case, the current Ministry of Education requirements. I tried the Internet Archive/Wayback Machine and found content immediately.

Please use one of these archives.

For more information on repairing a dead link, click here. Discuss-Dubious (t/c) 15:51, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Constantine Last editing edit

Hy, I have made some changes in the page and you reverted my changes.Please let me know if there was any deficiency or i have done something wrong according to Wikipedia policies.Please let me know :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by BuchiManno (talkcontribs) 22:08, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) @BuchiManno: Hi, Hi, I've familiarized myself with what happened.I think your edit that cited a review of the dating site e-Harmony in the article for Jumpdates was likely reverted because KH-1 may have thought you were promoting the site by linking the review, even though you were just trying to cite the fact that one of the sites offered a monthly subscription under a small "Pricing and payments" heading. Hmm... have you tried using official sources for e-harmony and Match? Discuss-Dubious (t/c) 16:21, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Medical Council of New Zealand edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Medical Council of New Zealand requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:41, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Edit reverts edit

The edits you reverted by giving reason 'spam'. Have you gone through WP:CITESPAM which states "Often these are added not to verify article content but rather to populate numerous articles with a particular citation." However link I added do not meed this criteria. You need to discuss before making further reverts. 39.54.137.132 (talk) 17:37, 23 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) I looked into your contribution to wedding anniversary. I think the reason he thought it was spam is because giftsreadytogo.com has banners across the top about pricing and sales-type stuff. The content, itself, does not say "buy from us", explicitly. However, I think you're saying that this is you. You attempted to use the citation in gift basket and wedding anniversary, and, in my perception, that seems to mean your editing seems to only exist to post this link across multiple articles, though not necessarily "numerous" articles. It therefore looks a bit like spam. Discuss-Dubious (t/c) 02:29, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
Also, if you see problems in articles like forced marriage, please go to the article's talk page and discuss the issue.

govedina edit

Just one question Why did you delete what i wrote for govedina. I have no idea why because i was just writing about good things about itm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Us znanstvenik (talkcontribs) 12:09, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism fix on List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events edit

I noticed that you reverted a minor change on List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events, but it seems you missed a bit of vandalism that was inflicted here. Seeing that, here is the change that I made to remove the underlying vandalism.

Since you recently touched the page and I wound up deleting the area you modified with your change, I wanted you to be aware of it. Let me know if you disagree with my fix.

Thanks.

KNHaw (talk) 05:15, 2 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Exemplar Global page deletion edit

Hi there I am new to editing on wikipedia and did not intend to violate policies. I have rewritten content for the Exemplar Global page, how do I go about updating this since the page has been deleted, will I create a new one? Thank (Michelletolhurst (talk) 22:50, 2 November 2016 (UTC))Reply

Why you put me in spam edit

Hello!

why you put my name in spam. i know i along minutes later to make minor formatting changes. i check that now. but i did't know these ips are spamming. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. Ayesha Hussain (talkcontribs) 08:50, 6 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

HEllo! I saw you reverted my change in graphene... I just replaced a dead link with a real one with the same story (different source)... So what did I do wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.132.143.23 (talk) 04:38, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reconciling Legality of cannabis by country and Legal and medical status of cannabis? edit

Your feedback invited: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cannabis#Reconciling_Legality_of_cannabis_by_country_and_Legal_and_medical_status_of_cannabis.3F

Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 02:55, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, KH-1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

November 2016 edit

  Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Electronic funds transfer: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Minima© (talk) 12:35, 23 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Inappropriate external links?? edit

Hello. You just reverted an edit I made, saying it's an inappropriate external link. I didn't realize it was an inappropriate link, so can you please tell me why, so I know for future purposes? I picked that website because it contains the citation needed for the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stefanhildebrandt (talkcontribs) 11:42, 29 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi there,

Any reason why you wanted to remove an external link I included to a web hosting database? I did not think it qualified as "spam"

External Link removal edit

Hi there,

Any reason why you wanted to remove an external link I included to a web hosting database? I did not think it qualified as "spam" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scotsworth (talkcontribs) 22:12, 29 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Common law edit

You reverted common law, no explanation. What's up? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.169.56.27 (talk) 03:45, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

"self rv." Thank you. If there's a problem, happy to receive helpful tuning edits. 50.169.56.27 (talk) 03:58, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Why did you delete the truth? Are you Jewish. I am Cody Campbell. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.37.13.182 (talk) 23:13, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Payday loans in Australia.are illegal edit

Could you please explain why you keep reverting these changes? Evidence has been provided that they are in fact illegal in Australia and have been for over 3 years, many references have been linked to not only government resources (available to public) but research, media releases, and stories in the media. What else is needed for this change to stay as people should be aware Payday loans are illegal in Australia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.100.2.192 (talk) 06:34, 6 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

What do you mean spam links? edit

I have researched what I have put in as resource links. It doesn't mean that they are not from big sites like Forbes or BBc, doesn't mean they are not legit. Basically, you've undone everything I have put in as supporting links, and mark it as spam as you have said , even if it isn't. I think both of us here are editors, so I will plead my case to anyone who are superadmins (or equal). The way I am seeing your wall, I've seen that you crazily reverted pages as spam, even though it isn't. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llcoolj89 (talkcontribs) 13:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Mind telling me which part is bothering u? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BackY (talkcontribs) 12:45, 21 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Happy New Year, KH-1! edit

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

My Edits to Social Media Optimization edit

You deleted my edits and research from social media optimization. That seems just rude to me. I just joined Wikipedia and they gave me pages to edit and I took my time on that one cuz I love instagram and could write about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Longsociety8 (talkcontribs) 07:40, 2 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hola! edit

Hi KH-1! Thanks for reverting that vandalism on Shoehorn! I noticed that you forgot to warn the IP for their edit. No worries, though; I went ahead and did it for you. Figured I'd just let you know. Cheers -- ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:29, 4 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

about the message you left me. edit

I know I might be new at this, But we all started from somewhere, I only right about what I know, I look for it in Wiki then if it's not there I add, I added sources and I'm continuing improving, thank you for the suggestion, But please use kind language with me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maometto1001 (talkcontribs) 14:10, 9 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi Thanks for your message - I am brand new to Wikipedia and didn't realise that there would be a conflict of interest. How do I change the username? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redlandsschoolaustralia (talkcontribs) 23:31, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

See WP:RENAME - but I suggest you take some time to read the COI policy.-KH-1 (talk) 00:17, 23 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello!

Please clear why my editing was canceled? I gave a link to a trusted web page.

Yegor — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yegor Petersburg (talkcontribs) 14:06, 23 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Email spam edit

Hello,

I am writing in connection of my dead link fix on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email_spam. You reverted my fix and the link is dead again. Could you please explain that?

From my side: 1. The updated link is a single source of the original article. 2. Web Archive is empty for the original source. 3. The updated domain is MUCH older (1995) than Wikipedia...

Kind regards, Denis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nekker1982 (talkcontribs) 00:43, 25 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Reza Aslan edit

Kindly explain why you reverted the changes on the R. Aslan page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azarbarzin (talkcontribs) 06:15, 3 February 2017 (UTC) Azarbarzin (talk) 07:32, 22 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Any reason why you wanted to remove an external link I included to a website? edit

Hi there,

The link to which you are reverting is Dead. That site doesn't have the copy of that content, and I even checked the archive.org/web to find that web page and the author has said himself that "content is not edited properly."

Then I added the link to the review of that product. The link that I added don't have any affiliate link on its page, nor it shows any advertisement, has images and is to the topic.

Any reason why you wanted to remove an external link I included to a website? I did not think it qualified as "spam". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blogvkp (talkcontribs) 05:04, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Question edit

Curious: Why did you delete our citation? We edited the entire page for language, grammar, and clarity, then we added a link that clarified a line about Organic SEO. Was this link considered spam? We avoided any promotion of our brand in the specific link. Just curious about your thinking--and the "house rules" around here. We're new... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex Stepman (talkcontribs) 01:52, 18 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

dead link edit removal edit

Hi KH-1, Why you re-edit dead link section which is updated to live links.

Regads, KYB — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imkru (talkcontribs) 12:50, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

March 2017 edit

Hi This is in regarding link I posted on Adsense article. Just want to know why I can't put a link in a article?

I just ciated the source from where I got the news that goggle now allow to put unlimited ads per page.

If I am wrong please tell me how should I show the reference of the site.

Further, I had add the link again.Sorry read your message lately.

I am not a spammer and I had add the link from where I got the news. If you still think it should be removed, please remove it. I will not add it again.

For your information, i had not readded the link to another edit where you had marked it as spam. Request you to please remove the spam comment from another article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaustubh1040 (talkcontribs) 08:26, 1 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Remove SPAM comment edit

You revert my changes on Adsense article. No Problem. Atleaset remove the spam comment from another article that is comment you made in adword wikipedia article in below link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdWords — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaustubh1040 (talkcontribs) 03:13, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Why was COI driven request edit removed because of COI? edit

Thank you for taking a look at my edit request for adding Edlib to a list of sequence alignment libraries. I was hoping you could explain why you reverted it? I followed instructions for COI editing: I requested edit and disclosed that I am the author. I also provided information on why I believe the edit should be made. From what I can see, you simply tagged my request with COI and reverted it - what is the point of me requesting the edit because of COI if you just tag it as COI and remove it without any explanation? Thanks! Martinsos (talk) 11:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

If you're proposing a change then it should be placed on the corresponding talk page, not the article. -KH-1 (talk) 12:22, 8 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

i want to know why you delete the citation in wikipedia.org/wiki/web_2.0 edit

hi i want to know why you delete the citation and link in web 2.0 article.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaushikone (talkcontribs) 05:00, 21 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Undid revision 777184163 in Bond insurance edit

hi. You reverted my change in Bond insurance... I just replaced a dead link in reference with a live one with the same article. So what did I do wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inesvolcano (talkcontribs) 07:03, 26 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors! edit

please help translate this message into your local language via meta
  The 2016 Cure Award
In 2016 you were one of the top ~200 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Removed a Reference Link edit

Hi,

On March 21, 2017, I have provided a reference link on Wikipedia. Refer to the history of the Smart TV page.

On April 21, 2017, you have removed the reference link.

I need to know which of the Wikipedia Guidelines were violated through this?

If this was done by mistake, kindly revert it back.

i dont understand why you constantly delete my edits — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jiandong Liu (talkcontribs) 05:29, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Logan (film) edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Logan (film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Your unexplained edit is uncalled for, and your use of rollback unwarranted. 71.91.45.233 (talk) 00:08, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

hik why you deleted my page for taxi service information in india — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanumanjiramji (talkcontribs) 09:08, 27 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

speed delete pageslogan federicus Hello, I am a new user and I notice a shameful publication, which has no real meaning, since I know the party very well, wikipedia is not related to reality, I tried to modify it, but The page is stuck while the page should be deleted Excuse me but propaganda, advertising, and slogans are allowed on wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dufresne tim (talkcontribs) 11:04, 27 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm curious why you removed the citation I added to Headphones. The top of the page says "Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources." You kept the text edit I made, but removed the link where I got the information (http://blog.zzounds.com/2017/05/24/headphones-produce-bass-frequencies). I'd like to put it back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leadsynth (talkcontribs) 05:21, 1 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

important please edit

hello KH-1

i just wanna ask you why you remove all edits ? i dont know what is error ? please reply — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohamedbasuooony (talkcontribs) 13:59, 12 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

About Dead Link for Microsoft Joins @Home Solutions edit

Hello,

My I know why yo have reverted the edit? I have found new reference link & remove dead link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toprajapati (talkcontribs) 05:23, 15 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Sadiq Khan edit

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oppulence76. Doug Weller talk 13:46, 15 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

updating PURA gene site in collaboration with GENE (journal) project edit

Currently working on adding more content and this will lead to changes in the CONTENTS box. I request patience while these changes are made. Will indicate in final comment that my changes are complete.

Are the listings in the Contents box automatically generated based on entry of new sections? Edward M. Johnson, Ph.D. (talk) 06:02, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

In regard to the warning, the content of the page that I am editing will be undergoing peer review through journal Edward M. Johnson, Ph.D. (talk) 04:27, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply


June 2017 edit

  Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ᐁT₳LKᐃ 02:57, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks/Help? edit

Thanks for correcting me my dear. Can you please guide me how to edit correctly and how to add references in a correct way that no one can revert my edit.please guide me. I will be very thankful to you in this regard. Regards: Abrish211 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abrish211 (talkcontribs) 05:55, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

A cup of coffee for you! edit

  Thank you for countering vandalism! :-)
MJ500 Fancy a coffee? 01:11, 26 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

sad edit

why you revert my edit my dear? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abrish211 (talkcontribs) 05:47, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply


Hello KH-1,

Please, may i know the reason to undo changes. Recently I did minor changes in Loan page which is relevant to the page. Should I create external links section for that?

Thanks in advance.

Regards Harsh


3RR edit

In the future, please consider other ways of handling things other than violating WP:3RR. Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:40, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

This is the article talk page. Neither of you used it. Please use it next time: Talk:Life extension. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:42, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Edit summaries edit

Please use edit summaries. It really helps us save a lot of time. Many thanks, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:44, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

hey edit

Wanna to talk. What do you want? I don't like to war edit. I am long time editor so I know what I'm doing. Sonic99 (talk) 03:18, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

If you're a long time user you should be aware of WP:V, all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. -KH-1 (talk) 03:22, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
I know. It's difficult to find sources. Do you really need sources? But some people still write things in articles without sources. Sonic99 (talk) 03:26, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Yes, it needs to be sourced. You might be able to find something useful here. -KH-1 (talk) 03:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

auto insurance revert? edit

Hi mate - sorry, am still relatively new here - so please correct me if I missed something obvious - but why the revert? Looked for an edit summary but couldn't find one.

Teel137 (talk) 02:11, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

You should avoid linking to a commercial site that overtly promotes a product/service.-KH-1 (talk) 11:51, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Ah I see - will chase down a better source for that stat when I have a chance then. Teel137 (talk) 02:43, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Reverting vandals edit

Please don't skip warnings of reverted vandals in their talk pages. They will be caugt up quicker and make less nuisance. Currently they need 3-4 warnings until got blocked. I am talking about vandalism-only M4515 1 (talk · contribs). - Staszek Lem (talk) 22:50, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

SEO page edit

Hey! Just wondering why you reverted my edit of the additional source? The one that was used was pretty out of date (2004), so I wanted to add a source that had a little bit more info & was more recent. One of my Wikipedia future goals is to become a new page reviewer, and corrections like adding newer/more reliable sources to save pages is something I'm interested in - so I was hoping to practice by adding better sources to established pages. Feedback would be greatly appreciated. :) Rtt11talk 00:03, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Adding on, since I'm trying to figure it out! There's a few large chunks of text in that section that are completely unsourced; would it be better if I sourced those? Or added a few updated sentences based on a new source? I'm just confused!
Rtt11talk 00:16, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Revert edit

  Hey, Why did you revert my works and left a warning message? I haven't done anything wrong. There are so many works and you don't even have the courage to revert those.

it wasn't the promotion edit

it was not the promotion..I have been using Psiphon since months and hence find it valuable to share it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nathanellisiam (talkcontribs) 01:50, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Tony Irving edit

This profile has a full Wikipedia page in Swedish with all confirmed Sources. The information You changed was a direct translation from that page. All material to verify is in Swedish and needs to be translated. However the entry You scrolled back was directly to information that in itself is/was not verified and is false .This profile is not related to David Irving the Third Reich historien ! (----)

Reverting an edit edit

Hello! Hope you are doing good. I'm curious to know the reason of reverting my edit on "Deer hunting". Was there anything wrong? Thank you.

Stop spamming Wikipedia with your false edits — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.21.216.224 (talk) 05:43, 22 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Investment edit

Hey there! I just re-launched the WikiProject Investment.

The site has been fully revamped and updated and I would like to invite you the project.

Feel free to check out the project and ping me if you have any questions.


 

I'd like to invite you to join the Investment WikiProject. There are a lot of Investment related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help get this project off the ground and a few Investment pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks!


Cheers! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 00:37, 23 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Countertop Revert edit

There are numerous factual errors in this section and the only citation is a permanent dead link. I am not sure why my edit has been undone.

Ufgatorharv (talk) 02:10, 28 August 2017 (UTC)ufgatorharv== reverted edit "Engineered Quartz Surfacing" =Reply

Now a second revert with no response.

You appear to be a serial reverter.

Looming edit war edit

It appears as though we are headed to edit war. Instead of blindly reverting my edits, perhaps you have some expertise or useful information on the subject of engineered stone contertops? OR you could replace the PERMANENT DEAD LINK with one you have researched on your your own.

I know you are about to revert for a third time, and I am going to report it to 3RR.

The entire countertop page is a mess but it can't be fixed if I can't even correct factual errors in one part of it.

Leave it alone or revert it and fix it yourself. If it's right, I won't touch it. You are currently standing in the way of progress.

--Ufgatorharv (talk) 02:43, 3 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Countertop edit

Would you like to self-revert to get out of the 3RR violation?C.Fred (talk) 04:11, 3 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Never mind. The article is back to where it started, so I closed the AN3 report with no action. —C.Fred (talk) 04:55, 3 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Noted. -KH-1 (talk) 00:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Regretfully, I have repoted this to AN3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring

ZORICA RISTOVSKA edit

ZORICA RISTOVSKA — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.86.236.89 (talk) 13:30, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

September 2017 edit

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pay-per-click. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexf(talk) 11:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hey there! I need help! edit

I just created a Wikipedia page, named "Neel Akash" but it's about to delete, so I just need to know "how much information of that person Wikipedia needs for not to delete that page", please help me editing the page, you can Google "Neel Akash" for more information

What's the rule for adding information? edit

I have no idea why you will remove my content in Wikipedia. Please help to mention the rule for leaving message in here.

Why? edit

It is referenced and it's stood there for some time until someone happened to stalk me, I took others to talk pages and got about one response for each, including the reverter. What then if it's just one? 86.159.163.253 (talk) 04:56, 6 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Response edit

KH-1 - You just removed my contributions accusing me of spamming. Some of the entries were based on a book I wrote with years of research behind it. I had a lot to contribute! You also removed information that was linked to a site of reference material, even sourced with it's own references. That site isn't a store and the posts were not intended to sell a product. Maybe you assume that because the sources were similar that I'm spamming. But I've spent all day being very careful to only add relevant information.

It's still considered spam even if it's not a store. See WP:REFSPAM and WP:COI. -KH-1 (talk) 01:45, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
KH-1, are you a person or a robot? I don't want to ask a bot questions. Obviously I'm new to this site and you're a veteran. How about you show me how I can be a better contributor? For example, I love to geek out on spray paint info. It's strange but I've searched all over the internet over the years, spoken to a half dozen top level manufacturer's, read books, etc to get niche info. When I added information to the spray paint article, it was only a small piece and only what I was most confident is correct. Can you show me how you would have contributed that information? How should I have done it? Since I'm doing it wrong, I need to learn how to do it right.
Your lack of response confirms to me that this isn't about how valid the information is. This is about proving that you're the gate keeper.

Reason For Revert? edit

Hello there. Just wondering why you happened to revert all 5 of my source additions to articles. Would be nice to know if that was included in the edit summary and such. Thanks. FiendYT

WP:REFSPAM. -KH-1 (talk) 02:49, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

wondering why update to ENERGY STAR page was removed edit

Hi KH-1,

I am new to editing wikipedia pages. I am trying to figure out why several updates I made to the wikipedia page for the ENERGY STAR program were removed. As the program's director of communications (and contributor to the early development of the program back in the 1990s), I am quite confident that the updates are correct. The old version was misleading in many ways.

Did I fail to add sufficient comments explaining the changes? I tried to add footnotes/references for every significant change so anyone can verify that the updates are correct.

Thank you,

Stephan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdsylvan (talkcontribs) 21:45, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

My added content is being deleted edit

Hi there, Just wanted to know why my contribution is being deleted? I'm not spamming and I'm adding valuable information to the topic. Thanks Emma — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emma7231 (talkcontribs) 12:04, 4 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Paul Smith: Good day KH-1, I have added two useful link contribution and its related to the topic just wanted to know why my contribution is being deleted? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr.paulsmith020 (talkcontribs) 06:13, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Assemblage Entertainment edit

The updated information on assemblage entertainment was deleted . It was not self promotion. It was updating of information — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aarohan123456 (talkcontribs) 03:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

I would be happy to address any doubts on veracity of informationAarohan123456 (talk) 03:43, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

You should try and write it from a neutral point of view, without the promotional language. -KH-1 (talk) 04:52, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Removing reference from List of HTTP status codes edit

Kindly explain why you removed the reference I provided for 504 gateway timeout from List of HTTP status codes. Unless you provide proper reference which violates any terms of Wikipedia, I will go for administrative attention for your account as I have noticed you have removed many relevant citations without any notice. I expect a quick response. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julia2541 (talkcontribs) 05:01, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

You're going way out of hand with your reverts edit

Stop removing my references; this was a completely reliable source and relevant to the topic at hand. You're going way out of hand with your reverts and I see that's pretty much all you do. Rather than police the site it would be great if you contribute to it as well. Stop politicizing Wikipedia and removing anything from the site that you don't deem from a "reliable source" or simply because you don't agree with the viewpoint or content. This is not a platform for you opinions.

heureusement edit

Salam — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.162.55.55 (talk) 23:55, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

revirtieron mi edición edit

Rizo la edición que hice fue para actualizar la información actual sobre Lifespring, ¿por qué revirtieron mi edición? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnHanleyPhD (talkcontribs) 22:57, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, KH-1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Spam Blacklisted edit

I added that site to the spam blacklist as well. Let me know if any new variants pop up. SQLQuery me! 00:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Will do. Thanks for the quick response. -KH-1 (talk) 00:41, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Eugene Gu vandalism edit

See this. Apparently, this IP has been on a manhunt of two inactive users and removing all instances of Eugene Gu in the same disruptive manner. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 03:04, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

There appears to be some name dropping going on though. I reverted the edits made to his alma mater, but I'm not sure about the other pages.-KH-1 (talk) 03:41, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Notice edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Eugene Gu. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 03:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Merriwa railway line edit

It seems everytime we try to tell the truth about why the project failed due to the actions of the now ex member phil buckley of sydney and how he was booted from the project you or somebody else always remove the content . The thing is u were not at any of the meetings nor have u had this guy cause you trouble by calling the police over petty crap. I really wish u lot would allow the truth to be told instead of blocking the truth — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.174.70.130 (talk) 12:25, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Fictional characters edit

Fritz Tegularius- Castalian & lifelong friend of protagonist Joseph Knecht in Magister Ludi by Hermann Hesse

) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.76.166.5 (talk) 23:26, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Citation Needed edit

Yes, I would like info on why a citation wasn't added when it valued the article for the citation that is needed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rooftech (talkcontribs) 16:27, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

I am sorry sir, that won't happy again. Thanks you for guidance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atarehmanlhr (talkcontribs) 09:21, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Oh, if there is contradiction to what you believe, u would go ahead and delete my edits without even asking me why? I am quoting from my experience living locally in Nilgiris for 40 years of my life. Thanks!!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Vikgrt (talkcontribs) 12:09, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Excuse Me! edit

Sir,

I find it very distressing that you put such disrespect on my wikipedia edits and my love of haircuts, including that of the bowl. I ask you stop reverting my edits as they are truthful, I am still looking for proper sources to back me up. Thank you for your time and service

Pichpich6299 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pichpich6299 (talkcontribs) 08:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Regarding the website optimisation edit edit

May I know why it was reverted and why the mention of Google optimise is not relavant to this topic ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jkbaseer (talkcontribs) 08:13, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Keep reverting the same message? Provide the Concerns about it before you delete edit

Hello Mr. KH. First of all provide your real name. I have been using Wikipedia for a decade. As a contributor I would like to know why you have reverted? IF it's a mistake, I need to learn what I did.

Please be a responsible contributor

Link Removal Query edit

Hello KH-1,

Can you please give the reason for removing the relevant links which I had added to the articles "Chief Marketing Officer" and "Demand Generation". As per my research, the information I tried to add was legitimate. Please enlighten me if I am wrong.

Awaiting your reply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ileana9 (talkcontribs) 06:39, 2 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Why reverting? edit

Why are you reverting attempts to avoid vandalism in one of the entries????

All good! edit

No problem! Sorry for overreacting. I was really pissed off with this vandalism. Glad to see it was stopped. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atizinha (talkcontribs) 05:29, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please remember to leave problematic editors talk page warnings edit

Such as User:Vuongquang007, who has already (perhaps inadvertently) broken WP:3RR and WP:SOCK at Chinese New Year. Templating users on their first bad edit helps later editors determine if 3RR is being broken intentionally. Thanks Psiĥedelisto (talk) 08:07, 16 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

External links matter edit

How am I putting inappropriate links? I am updating content, which is helpful and not written in Wikipedia pages. I know my domain is common, but it has all information. I am not putting any random links on any pages. Relevancy and knowledge sharing is maintained. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DK2416 (talkcontribs) 06:21, 23 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

I am still waiting for your response as to why you removed all the edits done by me. Relevancy and knowledge sharing was maintained. I have made many corrections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DK2416 (talkcontribs) 05:31, 26 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your additions were not "corrections". You were adding links (using multiple accounts) to a site which you are affiliated with. See WP:REFSPAM. -KH-1 (talk) 08:57, 26 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Edits on exterior cleaning page and window cleaning page edit

Why have these been removed? They are in no way an infringement of wiki rules and offer not only further reading but a point of reference. In both cases.

I referenced the largest window cleaning institution in Scotland and that was removed and also a site that exemplifies the varied roles of a modern exterior cleaner.

Furthermore the blog also seems to highlight the process of actually cleaning windows, for the wiki window cleaning page. These wiki pages both have barely any references on them as it is, and i work in social care and feel insulted that the message I received insinuates I have any link to these sites. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris Fotheringham (talkcontribs) 02:07, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nice try [3]. -KH-1 (talk) 02:30, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Lingonberry is a improer term for these berries from poorly understood/translated Swedish. (Lingon) The proper english name of this berry is cowberry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.216.98.89 (talk) 12:50, 1 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Whats the problem man! edit

I have added a proper citation and you just say I am spamming the Wiki. Please Help me understand what is correct Citation method. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atuljaiswal1246 (talkcontribs) 05:32, 4 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Regarding which came first egg or hen? edit

Hen came first because only hen can produce the calcium which is on the egg

About Spam edit

Hello, KH I Am Not Spamming I Just Trying To Place Helpful And Relevant Things. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apricotuk (talkcontribs) 10:48, 5 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

sbi edit

Zero a/c open — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.203.177.61 (talk) 16:46, 8 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

why did you undo my edits edit

please answer me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yourmanmohan (talkcontribs) 06:21, 13 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2018 edit

  Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to [[]]: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Kirbanzo (talk) 15:35, 15 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Can you block this guy permanently? edit

I noticed that this IP has been messing up the 2014 World Cup section in group G. Every edit made by this IP is vandalism so they should get an IP ban.

Also would it be possible to revert all these edits? I don't know how to revert changes. Thanks

User in question: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:2A00:1028:9197:BEFE:24B6:A89:E19:1D98

104.222.113.105 (talk) 00:53, 16 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'm not an administrator. You should report it to WP:AIV. -KH-1 (talk) 00:56, 16 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

I hate this edit

I not need this is hack my data — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.112.176.58 (talk) 06:02, 19 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

mcclelland delete edit

why did you delete my page from the wikipedia.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dkm12345 (talkcontribs) 21:05, 25 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Cairo edit

You reverted: this edit

as a copyvio.

The source appears to be: this site

Which claims: "This blog is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. The content is free to be republished provided you give attribution to this site."

I think there are legitimate issues. It wasn't sourced, and as a blog it is unlikely to qualify as a reliable source (unless it meets the guidelines as an exception), but I don't think it is a copyvio.--S Philbrick(Talk) 11:34, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

I thought it was taken from Lonely Planet [4].-KH-1 (talk) 12:29, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Dead Link Edits edit

Had you actually checked, you would have seen the dead link was replaced with a new link that contained content identical to the previous. Is it your goal to leave Wikipedia with dead links just to spite new users?? I am looking at the talk board here and it seems as though you are slow and incomplete to answer users' questions after reverting their edits. If I don't hear back from you in a reasonable amount of time, I will make this edit again and I expect you to not touch it anymore. I will assume your silence is a acknowledgement of your mistake. Velcom79 (talk) 16:36, 29 March 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Velcom79 (talkcontribs)

The proper way to fix a link is to find an archived version of the page. Your edits bear all the hallmarks of dead link spamming. -KH-1 (talk) 03:14, 30 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Recent Edit of "Sprained Ankle" page edit

Hey,

Sorry to bother you but I wanted to ask you a quick question. Yesterday, I made my first ever edit on Wikipedia as I included a paragraph in the "Sprained Ankle" page. I cited several journals and two websites which got removed. I noticed you left the two links in the External Links section, however, so my question is - Is it frowned upon to put anchored external links within the text and they have to be strictly in the External Link section? Or does it have to do with the websites in particular? I'm curious because some pages don't have the section External Links, so does that mean that external links are not allowed on those pages?

Like I said, sorry to bother you but I am brand new at this and I hate making mistakes. It's a stupid OCD thing. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Insomnia kg (talkcontribs) 03:33, 4 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Insomnia kg (talk) 03:43, 4 April 2018 (UTC) Insomnia kg (talk) 04:58, 4 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Both, ref formating and dubious sources.-KH-1 (talk) 13:57, 4 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

Hey, I just happened to notice this edit you made at Piranha, and I just wanted to say I appreciate you paying attention to that series of edits and doing the revert correctly. That sort of thing gets missed sometimes, so thank you for being diligent. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:45, 4 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Happy to help.-KH-1 (talk) 13:57, 4 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

ß edit

ß is a pretty cool character. I feel like there should be more content on its Wikipedia page. Just a suggestion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.61.220.26 (talk) 05:29, 5 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Eric England edit

I will provide the source of his death as soon as the Obituary is posted online. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jshook40 (talkcontribs) 16:15, 8 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Builder Brokers Wikipedia Page Edit edit

Hi,

We just received the below message below.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Builder_Brokers

I was hoping you could revise the changes we made, undo the auto DEL that occurred, and publish the updated information.

We would also be pleased, if you added the necessary links to our website in the reference section.

Builder Brokers Pty Ltd — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.128.108.46 (talk) 07:03, 9 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Adding content request edit

Can I add some content to your article on shordigo I played the game a few time completing the game as such I know quite some info on the game I was going to add without asking but I don't like getting In conflict without that why I am asking

Which article? -KH-1 (talk) 06:20, 12 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Concerning your "undisclosed payments" tag edit

Hi, I was wondering how I could improve the article so that it does not look like this tag may be suitable. Can you please clarify for me what cleanup is required to improve it? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anastasiia Kovalinas (talkcontribs) 14:36, 16 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

I understand the meaning of the tag and that if a contributor is being paid, he/she should notify the Wikipedia community. However, I am not being paid for my contributions here. I am trying to contribute to Wikipedia on a volunteer basis. What should I do to clean up the article to remove the tag? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anastasiia Kovalinas (talkcontribs) 08:18, 17 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
If you want to move forward, you will have to be honest with us. -KH-1 (talk) 00:24, 18 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Reference Link Quickly Removed edit

Hello KH-1. Please help me to understand why my reference link I have tried to replace with a dead link has been removed so quickly and marked as spam. We had no intention of putting spam link in the article and only were trying to provide value to the article.

I have reviewed the Wikipedia Spam guidelines fully and the only thing I can think is because there is an external link on our page to a corporate site we work with. If I remove that link would that make it acceptable for you? If it is something else please let me know.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cvn74oliver (talkcontribs) 07:23, 18 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Great bot edit

It IS a ridiculous concept because marriage considers both individuals to be the same person, hence the concept of rape in marriage is impossible. However, if you have developed a bot that immediately flags and reverts relevant notation then so-be-it. Good job on the A.I., sigh*

Why my contribution has been removed edit

Hi KH1,

I don't understand, even after providing all clarification, and the contribution that I made, was perfect to this section, and you removed it. Can you tell me what was wrong with it? I explained every single thing about my changes, still you removed it. Thanks, Rahul

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors! edit

please help translate this message into your local language via meta
  The 2017 Cure Award
In 2017 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation

Page: Warhammer 40,000 edit

Why did you restore the content? You do not adhere to the condition of consensus. How many sources do you need to change your mind in this decision?

Warhammer 40,000 is a whole universe. What did you doubt when making the return revision? In doing so, using the preposition "good faith". All the content that I added is not not with any negative character.

I look forward to hearing from you.

It wasn't an improvement. The wording was awkward and it was already mentioned in the following paragraph. -KH-1 (talk) 23:26, 26 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Terrell Edmunds edit

Why are you removing his draft information and NFL Profile when he was drafted?

I was removing vandalism, but reverted a bit too far. -KH-1 (talk)

Talk edit

Thank you for your reverts on my edits.

Talk edit

Thank you for your reverts on my edits. Musthaq n (talk) 03:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)musthaq nMusthaq n (talk) 03:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ekta Kapuur (talkcontribs) 07:21, 5 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please let me know what to change to revert back the changes. The content is genuinely informative with trade brushes, and you will not be able to find this anywhere on the internet. The industry-specific terms are used across the world. The Company name was removed as per the previous changes and it does not qualify to be a spam. If you need more documentation please let me know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.87.3.118 (talk) 05:23, 8 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Not sure why are my edits treated as spams?? edit

If you can respond to my earlier query and not revert my changes without any reason that'll be great. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.87.3.118 (talk) 05:43, 8 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Removal of my image edit

Hello,

My image was just taken down unfairly. I have shot most Australian whiskies and am not loyal or do not own STARWARD. The image I uploaded I thought better represented the page as STARWARD is the largest Australian whisky producer, just as the American whiskey page might have a photo of a Jack Daniels bottle. I am going to re-upload the image as the current image is of bad quality and doesn't portray the Australian whisky making community well at all.

Thank you for you time and care. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JackWHawkins (talkcontribs) 05:01, 15 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Reverting/Deleting edit

Hi, can you please help me understand why you are deleting the information I am adding to the Starkville Academy page? I am trying to add current and factual information to the information that is already on the page.

Harpy eagle edit

What is the meaning of this?--Manwë986 (talk) 17:29, 18 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Edit Reverted edit

You replied "the whole thing". I've only used public information and cited resources. What specific sections are not allowed?

Why did you remove an entire, well-sourced and informative article? edit

I'm the author of text of Carmel Snow that has been on this site for a decade.

I had deep knowledge of the subject and considered it a scholarly entry. I aimed to present her, as she was, as a cultural force who brought the work of some of the greatest talents of the last century, from Truman Capote to Cristobal Balenciaga to Henri Cartier-Bresson (and many more) in to the pages of her magazine.

I don't think readers will be served by this new version.

You have added new information re her wedding dress, etc. Fine! But why delete the original material that placed the subject in context and made a case for her enduring importance?

The details you add could be easily woven into the existing text.


Biographer1 (talk) 10:50, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

The article needs to be properly sourced with in-line citations (see WP:IC). Your version had nothing other than a link to Amazon. -KH-1 (talk) 00:21, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Adding Home Ownership and /* Alternative models and management philosophies */ edit

Hi,

I spent a lot of time adding 2 new paragraphs that you removed entirely as SPAM. You are certainly right that 3 out of the 11 total links I provided as references were from my website, but in each case they were for free services and if you have better links from somewhere else that answer the topics better than my own website (free credit boosting, a list of ways to have low cost and free unconventional shelter where I am not paid a dime, and free down payment assistance list), why not just edit my additions by replacing those 3 links? By removing my edits entirely, you removed a plethora of important information without providing any substitute. If you are unaware of a better substitute, why change anything when each of the 3 websites were for free services? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdamBGarrett (talkcontribs) 01:27, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

See WP:COIEDIT. There's not much that can be salvaged from that name dropping spiel. -KH-1 (talk) 02:36, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

That's ludicrous. Have you ever been homeless? It's very important that they are able to get quality content, especially free content.

Dear KH!

I'd love to have a chat with you about this edit and how we can collaborate on this text. My goal is to craft a well-written, informative text about a fascinating woman, Carmel Snow.

My thought was to combine the information you so recently contributed with my own information, which is based on extensive research and a fairly academic assessment of her role in 20th century culture.

My edit yesterday sought to combine both of our perspectives.

My understanding re Wikipedia is that there can be multiple contributors to any post.

I would love to collaborate with you on an excellent text that we both feel serves the subject well.

Shall we confer together to see what we can come up with? I'd welcome the opportunity. Please let me know how you'd like to proceed

Warm collegial wishes,

Biographer1 (talk) 22:58, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Why did you remove my edit ? edit

Hello,

I am very surprised you removed my edit about Convertigo Studio ? This product is very well known product available on the market since 2011 and used by many European and US companies. Also this an Open Source and free product.

My company is using this product and we are very happy about it, and I think this technology deserves to be known on Wikipedia like all the others?

There is a Web Site about the product (http://www.convertigo.com) and you can see this product is available on GitHub, proof that this is open source .. https://github.com/convertigo/convertigo

Please reconsider.

Thks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wulkanman (talkcontribs) 04:02, 17 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Deletion of {{Persondata}} edit

Hi KH-1,

I'm the bot who is deleting {{Persondata}}. I noticed your edit on Des Newton (Gaelic footballer) in which you added {{Persondata}}. This template is deprecated and deleted. Please stop adding {{Persondata}}. In case you want to support the Persondata project you can help with the migration of the dataset to Wikidata at KasparBot's tool. See Wikipedia:Persondata or contact my operator T.seppelt in case you have any questions.

Thank you very much, -- KasparBot (talk) 01:00, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Spam refs edit

Hello KH-1 Why you removed my citations? Those were according to the articles.Sbshuvo (talk) 18:40, 30 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

They're crappy content marketing links and in no way a WP:RS. Stop. Kuru (talk) 00:36, 1 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

hello,I saw that you just deleted my changes, my English is not particularly good, I am sorry. I got this emotional information from the Chinese link, and they also admitted on Weibo (a social software), can I add this information if I need to do it, thank you。 — Preceding unsigned comment added by HITJiangSiqi (talkcontribs) 02:02, 4 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Delete edit

hello,I saw that you just deleted my changes, my English is not particularly good, I am sorry. I got this emotional information from the Chinese link, and they also admitted on Weibo (a social software), can I add this information if I need to do it, thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by HITJiangSiqi (talkcontribs) 02:11, 4 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Beagles edit

Hi

Can you explain why my content was removed?

I added: After the age of 7-8, the energy levels of a beagle reduces (they are super hyper dogs in the initial years) and they enjoy their space and regular nap times. If they are not given enough exercise, their tummies tend to bloat, making them lazier.

just want to understand where i went wrong

Thanks Praneet 12:03, 5 July 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Praneet Sidhu (talkcontribs)

Changes to City Harvest Page edit

Hi KH-1,

I was wondering why you changed the edits I made to the City Harvest page yesterday. I work at City Harvest and am trying to update the information, language, and data to reflect the charities current operating level and preferred language. The edits I made all come from City Harvest's website, or internal City Harvest metrics that we have. Over the next couple weeks I will be making more changes as well. Such as getting rid of "Healthy Neighborhoods" (we no longer use this title) and updating City Harvest's programs to reflect how they operate currently.

Feel free to email me at dgans@cityharvest.org if you want to verify that I do work at City Harvest.

Best,

Duncan Gans

Changes to City Harvest Page 2 edit

Hi KH-1,

I actually just noticed your comment about my edits being self-promotion. Is there specific language that I should change so that it doesn't come across that way? I can also just update the quantitative data so that it's up to date, without changing the language on the page too much.

Best,

Duncan

Removal of recent updates edit

KH-1

I was hoping for some clarity on your removal of my edits? They all had sound attribution and addressed the concerns from wikipedia.

Thank you.

172.254.138.162 (talk) 19:50, 27 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

page entitled James J. Riley edit

After I was elected as Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, someone -- unbeknowst to me -- set up a wikipedia page for me. Unfortunately it was extremely limited, and in fact gave a very limited opinion of my career (for example, not mentioning that I am a member of the National Academy of Engineering, etc.). So my choices were to either have the page deleted, or to expand on the page with some additional information about myself. I chose to do the latter and extended the page to what now exists; all of my input on the page is is easy to verify. But I am not sure what to do next; I know very little about setting up or editing pages on wikipedia.James.joseph.riley (talk) 00:10, 4 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Kings of Wessex Academy & "peacock" banner edit

Back in February you added a "peacock" banner to The Kings of Wessex Academy. I have just got around to looking at this on the wikiproject Somerset cleanup list and wondered if you could be a bit more specific about the specific words or phrases you think are promotional as I requested at Talk:The Kings of Wessex Academy#Peacock terms or promotional langauge? I will then do my best to address them.— Rod talk 13:19, 5 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

I probably should've used the {{advert}} tag instead. The section on academics and Ofsted inspections seems excessive. -KH-1 (talk) 03:29, 6 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
I can't see a section on academics - do you mean "Academic performance" - which seems to have all claims cited. The inspections bit is again cited and although mostly positive does include less "outstanding" comments such as "recommendation for improvement was the raising of teaching standards, by increasing the proportion of lessons rated outstanding from their current good rating", "Teachers do not always check on students' learning in lessons closely enough. Consequently, some students, particularly the less able, are either not challenged enough or do not receive the help they need to succeed" & "Development plans are not clear enough about how actions will be evaluated, particularly their effect on pupils' achievement" etc. Would you mind having a go at the bits you feel are excessive?— Rod talk 17:49, 6 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Want to add some relevant information by linking about checklist of a successful audit edit

Please read this article which is very informative and consist of phases of a successful audit & how to conduct Audit? I think it will be a great source to add on Wikipedia. Thanks!!! . https://www.blogmonastery.com/2018/08/04/project-management-audit-checklist/

Please contact me by email if necessary:

abiha.ummu@gmail.com

Thanks again!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mehedi Hossain Chowdhury (talkcontribs) 09:28, 6 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Why do you keep on removing my edits? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1011:b102:9210:858b:86bf:5392:4d (talk) 04:42, 8 August 2018‎ (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Pmsltech edit

  • @KH-1: Hello KH-1, you have mentioned for Speedy deletion nomination of Pmsltech. I know there is lots of criteria on wiki to publish article. I have used the reference list that published many government websites. I believe small organization can't left information through wiki. The article written by me similar to this page Bluehost. Can you please review the article again.

Removed my notable example edit

Hey I saw you removed my notable example of a CDC from the 504 loan program page. Why so? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielthealltimegreat (talkcontribs) 16:16, 18 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your work on Duncan D. Hunter. Bearian (talk) 13:55, 22 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! -KH-1 (talk) 01:20, 23 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Revert of Significant Edits edit

Hello, I will be as polite as possible here. But I would like to know why my hard put info is straight being rejected and reverted without any justification and under some foolish concept as spam on some of them. My info as well as the time and genuine effort involved in trying to bring further information into the inquiring minds of thoughtful individuals ... simply reverted: no update, no questions, nothing. Rude. Discourteous. And quite frankly infuriating. Few hours of time for what? To be reverted to the much less informative version it was before? Really!? My info is detailed and to the point and comes from the source, me, my research. Information comes from somewhere, citations and sources are needed and expected in professional environments, providing the source of information that includes further information relevant to what the individual is seeking is absolutely needed within this age of information. The info I am trying to add and make available to people is difficult to find and only available to those within this particular, fairly individualized industry who know it or who know how to find the info.

So--if we can please avoid any further issues of this sort, it would greatly appreciated so the route doesn't have to go a different way. Thank you, A. S. Eccles (talk) 22:27, 28 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Why did you revert my edit on the Local SEO page? It was valid information; keep it, it will help people better understand what differentiates Local SEO from Normal SEO. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.179.94.117 (talk) 01:27, 29 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Intermediate Bulk Container Page edit

Respectful Question: Why is my legitimate and well-researched info being moderated and removed as ecommerce spam? You have claimed the info is sourced from spam with only sell intention, but this is not true as industry advancement and furtherance of knowledge is the main goal, and the information beyond the IBC containers on those pages is extensive and sourced from governmental regulations and certification authorities only (Title 49 CFR, DOT/UN, ANSI, NSF, ASME, UL142, NFPA, IMDG, etc.)

My additions are made in good faith. I am not erasing every other link on there. I did not remove Metano Usa nor Action Sealite, because even though they are companies that sell products, they are also professional resources in their fields and likely have some knowledge concerning the subject.

And so on that note, I would politely ask for perhaps more consideration concerning my additions and its overall source content.

Proposed deletion of Crowdfunder edit

 

The article Crowdfunder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Currently sourced to two press release - unable to find more than mere mentions in sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:10, 4 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Maybe you should check the history first.KH-1 (talk) 13:40, 4 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

给您一个星章! edit

  反破坏星章
Thank you for your contributions for anti-vandalism — phenolla 🖋 talk · contribs 13:32, 5 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Phenolla. -KH-1 (talk) 02:47, 6 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

ABOUT STAR_P.A AND HIS MUSIC LIFE edit

STAR_P.A (Was Born "Pender Augustine (Sep, 4Th, 1999. In Orere Town In Ughelli South L.G.A of Delta State of Nigeria. "Pender Augustine" is a music artist/songwriter e.t.c well known and called by the stage name "STAR_P.A"., Him has be into music since before 2010 and he had recorded many hits songs, with mind blowing lyrics., he is hot when it comes to music and that is what his fans knowns him for., He released his first track "NOV, 25TH, 2017"., and he titled that track "#E.O.N.S"., which means END OF NON SENSE., while in 2018 he released another one titled "#MONEY" in which he said ; "this the hit, the hit of the year, i done blow" the song was really a hit., In addition, STAR_P.A is really loaded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pender Augustine (talkcontribs) 11:14, 11 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

/* September 2018 */ edit

You marked an extremely relevant citation as a potential spam source. This is 100% false if you read the reference source. I've been publishing content related to these topics for over 15 years. Please explain. --SHVseth (talk) 03:30, 12 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Rolled Back Changes edit

Hi, I added a paid disclosure statement to my talk page as I work for the charity and the information on the page is incorrect, so I added sourced information from both our official website and newspaper articles. Can you help me understand why it was rolled back and what I can do to ensure the public is shown factually correct information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pressinfoaus (talkcontribs) 06:42, 27 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Learn to write in objective prose. Take a look at WP:BESTCOI. -KH-1 (talk) 06:46, 27 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Revert edit

Dear friend,

Why have you revert my contributions to article "Errors, freaks, and oddities"? The ref was linked to very relevant and high quality article.

Sigrid Rausing edit

I don't mind the reversion, but I wish you would explain. Keith Henson (talk) 05:42, 11 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Can't think of a way to "warn" prospective readers without bringing undue attention to the message. I don't think it's our responsibility anyway. -KH-1 (talk) 05:46, 11 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

on your aditing edit

Please note Pools By Nature had developed a unique method to build organic pools as described the paragraph. With reference to PbN organic system it describe the system (even more them others) and added vital and critical info on a new method that exist in the market thanks to PbN. This should be in the article on Natural Swimming Pools with Regeneration Zones as much as Total Habitat or other companies offering other options. Please let me know if you need us to add more info. Thanks, Etan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Etangm7 (talkcontribs) 18:08, 13 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

How I can submit changes versus making edit edit

Thank you for the advice on Conflict of interest! I'm new to the wikipedia. Trying to understand how to make changes. If there is a conflict, can I submit to someone for making changes? For example, if my book was written about the Intel SL Architecture for both the 386SL and 486SL, how do I submit changes if I have a conflict of interest? Thanks, Desmond... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Desmond Yuen (talkcontribs) 04:49, 15 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

talk edit

please note my open talk and corrections. I am, an expert in the field and ask you leave vital info in the article as described. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.85.60.56 (talk) 03:30, 17 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

please update last infos of hadi tv channels edit

hi what is the problem with what i had added in this wiki page, please check the official web site of hadi tv first before you revert the updates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mujysr (talkcontribs) 08:09, 31 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Piano wire, Refspam edit

Hi! Your bot just reverted my changes citing "Refspam". What is your definition of refspam? Kallekall (talk) 05:09, 9 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

reverted edit

why ya reverted my reference in denuvo??

Sorry edit

I accidentally reverted your rollback on Extinction event. I apologize for the trouble. S0091 (talk) 03:18, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi edit

Can you please block Padmakalki. This user is continuously doing vandalism at Bepannah. Adding irrelevant stuff and posting an image with a view to demean a lead of the show. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MiaSays (talkcontribs) 17:48, 17 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, KH-1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

Thanks for blocking Moonshadowstar, that was getting more than tiresome. Glennglazer (talk) 02:46, 20 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

That was @Alexf:. -KH-1 (talk) 02:59, 20 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Changes on the London School of Commerce Wikipedia Page edit

We noted that small changes to the London School of Commerce entry were reverted. We do not wish to start an ‘edit war’ but are trying to update the entry in line with the Wikipedia request to “Please help improve it by removing promotional content and inappropriate external links, and by adding encyclopaedic content written from a neutral point of view” and wish to work in accordance with the Wikipedia Dispute Resolution Guidance, in a collaborative fashion (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution). We have again made some small changes to the initial introductory text and hope to make further improvements — Preceding unsigned comment added by KetanRajpal (talkcontribs) 13:09, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Landing Page Rollback edit

Hello KH

Can I undesrstand why my link was rolledback? was is not related to landing pages?

Seasonal Greetings edit

  Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello KH-1, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,

Everedux (talk) 15:03, 25 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Not adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia edit

Dear KH-1 I am verify that I am not doing any spamming in wikipedia. Please don't thing it is spamming. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meenarawat123 (talkcontribs) 10:47, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Incorrect case of vandalism edit

All of my hard working contributions, looking to the backroots of UCL academy and revising the Construction plan of the Building and finding the people who actually started and investing into this magnificent suite. Me and my colleges have been approached by the IT manager from the Academy and we have been told to update the irrelevant information that is outdated by the old construction companies and to replenish the new stock holders and construction contracts. If you may need the files to this Evidence I would gladly sent it towards your direction.

Thanks in advance Mike Bradly IT Sub section manager — Preceding unsigned comment added by MiltonYa (talkcontribs) 09:49, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wow, that was almost (?) believable (except , of course, for the spelling and the grammar) ! It would be better using this time to get your homework done.  Velella  Velella Talk   10:00, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Dear,  Velella  Velella

I find it quite bad-mannered for you to mock me about my double deficit dyslexia publicly but I digress. I can clearly understand why you find my edits to be mendacious and believe my edits are vandalizing Wikipedia, but the fact of the matter is that I have been authorized by the IT manager to update the new construction contracts that have been outdated since the start of this year. I would gladly supply you the contracts and the evidence if you would allow me to. My colleges and I find it highly unprofessional and quite lewd about the comments you made about us, but this is the internet and people tend to say what they want. I would highly appreciate if you could allow my team to continue our work, without us being flagged for "vandalism" if you have any inquiries feel free to email me at my email mikebrad821@gmail.com

Kinds regards Mike Bradly IT Subsection Manager

Alshon Jeffery edit

Just revert back to my edit. I added content to the article that you are removing by going back to your edit. Beasting123 (talk) 01:01, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

CMG edit

Hi KH-1,

I'd like to know why my page was deleted and how I can fix it for the future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colincabana (talkcontribs) 23:12, 17 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Equidensitometry edit

Please note that Equidensitometry has no direct relation with Photometry, not even as a class. None of the units and formulae of light have direct bearing on the article of Densitometry or Equidensitometry. The only class I believe it should be linked to is Photography --Photojack50 (talk|contribs) 10:14, 19 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

OK, I'm not familiar with the topic. Feel free to make the appropriate changes.-KH-1 (talk) 01:02, 22 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hey KH,

Just noticed that you have reverted many of my edits to the previous one. I know I can repost that but I just want to understand the reason behind it. Why it was restored to the old version? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Njoy deep (talkcontribs) 12:57, 21 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

See WP:REFSPAM. -KH-1 (talk) 01:02, 22 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Black tail deer edit

Why are you changing what is fact. A mule deer is a cross between a whitetail and black tail deer. Dna has proven this. To think that an isolated Sitka or Columbian black tail on a coastal island somehow appeared after a mule deer is obsurd. If you want to rewrite it up all proper like please go ahead. But you can't ignore modern science compared to someone's accounts in 1892 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:7CDF:F528:DC26:38A1:3F70:5447 (talk) 06:02, 23 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Black tail edit

I suggest you contact Valerius Geist on the subject because he clearly knows more than you. You must spend all day modifying Wiki pages because you have no life! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rr1111jas (talkcontribs) 06:53, 23 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

My recent edits to the cabbage page. edit

Hello,

I recently edited the Wikipedia page on cabbage. I was trying to add something useful to the production section. Could you please let me know what I did wrong, so I can correct it for my future edits?

Thanks for all your help, Lord Cabbageworms — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lordcabbageworms (talkcontribs) 03:05, 24 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors! edit

  The 2018 Cure Award
In 2018 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 17:41, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Adam Levine’s bio states “male stripper” edit

We know he is male. The language and qualifier are sexist. We no linger say “female doctor” or “male nurse.” This should be edited as simply “stripper.” — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.18.228.61 (talk) 03:56, 4 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Editing Permanent Dead Link edit

Hi, This is Blanca Osuna. I had changed "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MC4_connector" for a permanent dead link to a new one to https://www.solarpanel.wiki/mc4-solar-panel-connectors/. I find you undo it. May I know what is the problem? Why you want to keep the dead link? Thanks Osuna. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlancaOsuna (talkcontribs) 05:33, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

It's not a reliable source. And in the second attempt, the link doesn't verify the content. -KH-1 (talk)

Thanks, Confirming source website is 100% reliable (with SSL certified website) accordance with the Wikipedia Dispute Resolution Guidance, content is genuine, written naturally as previous and added more information what are people finding? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlancaOsuna (talkcontribs) 13:38, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Rogers, Arkansas edit

Please stop removing my edits on the Rogers, Arkansas page. I have lived here my whole life and these are proper reflections of the city in which I live. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaloevera (talkcontribs) 03:34, 14 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Not Affiliated with any brand (Technopedia) KH-1 edit

As you have asked about being paid by Technopedia, I don't have any paid affiliation with them. The Social Media Analytics page content needed upgrade and citation sources (as mentioned in the feedbacks and the page notifications too), that's why I've just started to upgrade content from the scratch. And that was my first edit to the page. I'll surely update the whole page content that you can review before making them live you are interested in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tejpal007 (talkcontribs) 05:03, 16 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

/* Nuclear power plans */ edited deadlink edit

hello KH-1,

Recently, you have reverted my links, will you please suggest me if anything i have wrong?

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaushik buha (talkcontribs) 04:25, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Why do you erase material? edit

To KH-1... Why do you erase correct my effort to expand the information on the page about ”Fender Pro Junior”? What did I do wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sune1962 (talkcontribs) 06:28, 20 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reverted change on page "Liev Schreiber" edit

Hi, I'm unsure about why you reverted my change on the page Liev Schreiber? I fixed a broken link, which is now in there again.

So sad edit

Please why was my article deleted 😢 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mywikpage (talkcontribs) 06:27, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

k — Preceding unsigned comment added by Banfhople (talkcontribs) 04:14, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Stop Suppressing the Truth edit

Editing truth out of wiki pages doesn't change the truth. I'm pretty sure despotic regimes use a similar editing approach to hide wrong-doing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:2BD8:8300:C125:DF72:FBE9:1ABE (talk) 12:55, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia Protection edit

Hello it's gyan can you teach me how can i protect wikipedia like you look at here User_talk:75.164.65.148 i see how fast you typing ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gyan333 (talkcontribs) 00:23, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

You deleted several posts I made a few days ago. Please help me understand why. Thanks for your time.TruthMatters101 (talk) 16:53, 18 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Merrimac State High School edit

Hey man! Thanks for reverting the vandalism and disruption on this article. Can you do me a favor and double-check that your revert restored the article to a revision that's legitimate and without any issues? Your revert came just after the revert I made here, and as you can see - there are differences. I just want to make sure that we're not accidentally leaving any vandalism or other stuff in the article is all. If someone did, I'd bet that it was me that did it and not you.... lol :-) Just let me know what you find. Thanks - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:16, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

The "Reece Lynch" addition is vandalism, its not mentioned in the source. -KH-1 (talk) 08:20, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Theo Von edit

I request that you cease your vandalism of the Theo Von page. My contribution was well sourced, as it's a video of him telling the story. This is from his own mouth. It is not libel or defamatory. I implore you to stop. 47.184.107.144 (talk) 03:14, 21 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Page edit

You create pages? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerry H Butler (talkcontribs) 02:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

will not spam by adding unnecessary external link edit

As you have said not to spam by adding external link. I will not do any spamming activity over here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sagabalaji (talkcontribs) 09:57, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Reply 

Consumer protection act edit

Hello KH ,

     The information about wold consumer day was relevant to the topic so I updated it . Could you tell me the reason for its removal ?? Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ankitkhedkar94 (talkcontribs) 04:05, 29 March 2019 (UTC)Reply 

Consumer protection act edit

The information about wold consumer day was relevant to the topic so I updated it . Could you tell me the reason for its removal ?? Thank you. Ankitkhedkar94 (talk) 04:06, 29 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Why were my post removed edit

KH-1,

I made several posts as TruthMatters100. You deleted all of those posts, but I don't know why. The posts were not considered spam in any way, and they didn't violate the rights of anyone living. I wrote to you two weeks ago, but I didn't receive a response from you. All of the information I posted was factual and based on court records.

Please help me understand why the posts were removed, and how to have them restored.TruthMatters101 (talk) 01:01, 1 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Can you specify the article/edits? -KH-1 (talk) 01:12, 1 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Revert posts on John Singleton Page edit

Hey KH, I'm new to this and have been asked by the John Singleton Group to update some content on his page. Hopefully I've worked this out. Please let me know if I need to do anything differently.

Hello edit

You left a message about spammy link editing. This is an office building so there are several people sharing the same IP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.214.68.10 (talk) 12:53, 5 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

hello , alternative fuels edit edit

hello, i have added some information which is already on wiki but it is not linked to alternative fuels like pyrolysis.

please approve my edit if it is appropriate information.

thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sairahultalluri (talkcontribs) 07:04, 10 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

The removed links on Arteriovenous Malformations edit

Hi, I saw some notes on the AVM page which said they needed a citation/reference, so I added some from the curehht.org foundation which I thought were good pages explaining those parts of the Wikipedia text. I'm wondering why the references I cited were reverted. Do you need more info about the HHT foundation and which medical authorities are affiliated? Or would you prefer I cite medical studies directly, instead of medical advocacy groups who can direct people to a variety of medical studies and doctors? I don't contribute on Wikipedia often, but since there was no reason given for the reversion I'm just trying to better understand how to add contributions. And if I typed up this question wrong too, I'm very sorry. Thank you. Here's the site I linked in the article. http://www.curehht.org Packrat1 (talk) 16:42, 11 April 2019 (UTC)packrat1Reply

Wiki VNG edit

Hi,

Im Hai, from VNG. I edited information related VNG on VNG's Wiki. Our information is new and updated lately. Could you help us to update VNG's information?

I am looking forward to hearing your response. Have a good day.

Hai — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andyhai83 (talkcontribs) 09:04, 19 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

request for assistance edit

hello, am Hycent upaa by name, i currently edited a dead link on these page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Back_Home_(Westlife_album), reference number 49 which linked to a dead page ( http://www.sonymusic.co.th/album/pop/viewans.asp?id=1278 ) and changed it to another page which had rich content about the particular topic ( https://www.8o8wave.com/stream-westlifes-back-home-album-2007/ ) but the changes were reverted by you. i'll appreciate it if you would explain to me what i did wrong so as to correct me and reinstate the link i provided since i have not being about to do it right. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hycentupaa (talkcontribs) 23:12, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Umm, maybe not? edit

IMDB: "Keith Urban was born on October 26, 1967 in Whangarei, North Island, New Zealand as Keith Lionel Urban." You might want to check some more? Shenme (talk) 04:02, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

I've reverted further back [5]. -KH-1 (talk) 04:03, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I'm happy to be open about COI. Trying to add COI to page now. Struggling a bit to do it... will keep trying.

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Teamwork Barnstar
Thank you so much for allowing the page "Noam Gershov" to remain on this platform! Jen Greyson (talk) 05:20, 8 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Noam Gershov edit

Please leave the page alone. Thank you for providing such an incredible platform.

SGI Indycam edit

Why did you revert please?

And again, I give up!

Speedy deletion declined: Brittany Perille edit

Hello KH-1. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Brittany Perille, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: has actually received coverage in reliable sources if one checks GNews. Whether that's enough to establish notability is for AFD to decide. Thank you. SoWhy 07:24, 14 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion declined: Sommer Ray edit

Hello KH-1. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sommer Ray, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Decline speedy - has actually received coverage in reliable sources if one checks GNews. Whether that's enough to establish notability is for AFD to decide. Thank you. SoWhy 07:25, 14 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Issues with Betmotion edit

Morning,

I look after the PR for Betmotion, who have tasked me with updating its Wikipedia page.

Can you explain why the amends were not accepted / updated in order for me to complete the task.

For instance, they no longer list Poker on the site - yet I am unable to remove the inaccurate text.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.148.80.35 (talk) 07:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello. edit

I just want to say that my contributions on Bini the Bunny is not spam, why do you revert my contribs? — Preceding unsigned comment added by RebeccaRabbit005 (talkcontribs) 02:10, 9 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia is not the place to canvas support for your own website. -KH-1 (talk) 02:12, 9 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

The recent edit on the plastic surgery page edit

Hey, I recently added an active link on the plastic surgery page and it was changed the second time. Can i know the reason so that I don't repeat it in future? Thank you. Akash wikiedit (talk) 16:31, 16 July 2019 (UTC)akashReply

Thanks for asking. That link appears to be largely self-promoting of the commercial organisation. Therefore, it probably violates the wikipedia guideline of WP:PROMOTION. It certainly violates WP:MEDRS. It also doesn't really add anything extra that the Brachioplasty article doesn't already have. peterl (talk) 22:15, 16 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

But according to WP:MEDRS we aren't allowed to give medical advice. The article that I linked did not give any medical advice. Also the article referenced was in no way promotional. Akash wikiedit (talk) 12:14, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Got Milk edit

Source? I am the source with personal knowledge. I'm the son of David Williams, and know the facts on his idea for the phrase used in milk advertising. Before it was selected, the idea it was grammatically incorrect came up, but he was positive it'd be a catchy phrase. I'm not the only one who knows this fact. Thank you. - - - - Chris303CO — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChrisCO303 (talkcontribs) 14:49, 24 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Dead link removal edit

Good morning, KH-1

I change dead links in article without changing article text.

"What can be done with a dead external link Main pages: Wikipedia:Citing sources § Preventing and repairing dead links, and Wikipedia:Link rot Links to dead URLs in a list of external links are of no use to Wikipedia articles. Such dead links should either be updated or removed."


Regards

The Big Day edit

Hey, I believe this may have been an accident, but wanted to give you a heads-up regarding this edit at The Big Day. You removed all the featured artists that have been added on Apple Music and Tidal and instead had them relisted as uncredited vocalists. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ) 14:37, 31 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, the priority at the time was to remove vandalism.-KH-1 (talk) 01:24, 1 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

A dead link replaced by a relevant link edit

Hi KH-1, I am sorry If I made a mistake. My intention was not promotional at all. I was helping the community by removing the dead link and attaching a more relevant link to it.

Regards.

why revert my edition on xv6? edit

The wiki exists for 5 years and my slides refers to it. I could not understand.

SPAAAAMMMMM edit

 

Cheers for your valiant effort in cleaning up spam. It's a dirty job and you've apparently done well enough to piss off an SEO spammer. (Ctrl+f KH-1, it's in the comments!)Praxidicae (talk) 17:34, 16 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hmm interesting - looks like it's Mikulabc (talk · contribs). -KH-1 (talk) 00:16, 19 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

/* Risks */ edit

Hey, hope you're doing well. I thought the article was mostly missing information regarding student loans, is there a reason why the information and citation was removed? Student loan refinancing transaction costs are non-existent. I'm not doing any spamming.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vsahinid (talkcontribs) 23:55, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

GoDaddy edit edit

A reader wrote to Wikimedia ticket:2019082910002804.

They pointed out that one of the sentences in the GoDaddy article was supported by a link that is identified as a permanent dead link.

They suggested an alternative article as a replacement. I noted that the numbers and dates with slightly different so suggested that it would not work to simply replace a dead link with a working link, it would require modifying the text to reflect the source.

The individual did that, but you reverted:

here

You may well have a good rationale but I don't see it. While there may be questions about whether the alternative source counts as an acceptable reliable source, the current situation is that we have a claim that is unsupported.

The person is written back letting me know that they followed my advice and made the change but were reverted. What should I tell that person?S Philbrick(Talk) 14:10, 30 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

JDocs is not a reliable source. I've replaced it with a link from TIME. -KH-1 (talk) 00:09, 2 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Buzzkill — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2D80:5602:4200:84CD:CD7E:B867:6F1F (talk) 02:02, 3 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Why JDocs is not reliable? edit

The article I wrote on JDocs is well researched and latest updated. Compare with the TIMES one, they have not covered all the points and also look at the article length of TIMES, how can they cover all the topics in that short length? Check the article in https://jdocs.com/godaddy-domains-loses/ and also to clear you that JDocs is a 15 years old site. Please look into the matter carefully. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariaminor007 (talkcontribs) 04:09, 3 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Pocket squares edit

I shared a citation for Pocket squares for a comprehensive how to guide that is very useful for users. Can I get more insight into why it was removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garysimpsontampa (talkcontribs) 04:04, 11 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Conrad edit

Ian griffin is now the president of the school — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.185.193.186 (talk) 04:58, 2 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Appeared to be promotional edit

PLEASE don't be such a schmuckanus over every three-byte contribution by every three-byte individual.!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:589:4B00:8E00:28B8:C79D:F954:72B7 (talk) 04:48, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

/* External links */ edit

I am not sure what I have violated that should prohibit me adding external links to useful information on the related topics. (I see many others do the same thing) I know that your links are dead links and I am not looking for any sort of SEO, but merely attempting to put out useful information, on topic, to anyone interested, as I enjoy the topics involving rocks and minerals. I apologize if I have offended. TownsendJET (talk) 01:17, 4 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

What do you know about Lift edit

What do you know about Lift Ever since I was born I had so many Lift soft drinks. I can't believe you would get rid of my citations and make the article have no citation sources. I bet you never had a Lift before!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:2185:3F00:B8A6:5F74:5F85:6BF3 (talk) 08:02, 4 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proteobacteria edit

Gram is capitalized (as it should be) in the rest of the article. The list following "pathogen" is a list of genera, not pathogens per se, so I changed the wording to clarify, and I added Oxford commas where needed, per MOS. So, what part do you disagree about enough to revert? 75.111.203.5 (talk) 17:00, 8 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Gambling in India edit

Hi,

Why did you remove my text and the source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlJazzira (talkcontribs) 19:36, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Why my link deleted edit

Hello why my editing information link is deleted it's informative link is about quotes. This is the link https://www.dsmotivations.com

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks! edit

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Too ashamed to tell the truth? That American football was invented in Canada? edit

Stop lying and trying to change history: American football was invented in Canada. Everyone knows except ignorant Americans. Let's educate them.

(talk page watcher) this is lol :D DTM (talk) 13:18, 27 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Mark Walter edit

Hi KH-1, Greetings. My apologies - your revert went in first before mine and I think clicked at the same time. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:10, 12 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Merry Christmas! edit

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Happy New Year KH-1! edit

 
Happy New Year!
Hello KH-1:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Donner60 (talk) 23:20, 27 December 2019 (UTC)Reply


 


Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks (static)}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

These are facts edit

these are academic facts backed by top professors in the country. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Waseem Ezzie (talkcontribs) 05:23, 20 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

What is your name? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Waseem Ezzie (talkcontribs) 05:26, 20 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Young v Facebook edit

It seemed to me that the story had too much legal mumbo jumbo in the lead. The fact that a judge granted leave to amend is a regular thing in Federal court and hardly worth mentioning in a story about a pro se litigant case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8802:2200:2320:96D:8A56:BBE3:C375 (talk)

Uber edit

Which exemption to 3RR do you believe applies for your edits at Uber? —C.Fred (talk) 05:42, 20 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Common sense. -KH-1 (talk) 05:47, 20 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
I see that. But better to mention 3RR to the new editor and then report then to WP:AN3 for the admins to deal with. —C.Fred (talk) 05:50, 20 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for bothering you, but... edit

 
New Page Patrol needs experienced volunteers
  • New Page Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
  • Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
  • If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the granting conditions and review our instructions page. You can apply for the user-right HERE. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)(click me!) 22:36, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Edits Reverted edit

Why was the edits of me reverted by you? Malhar Thakar's Vanilla Ice Cream movie is to be shoot from June... it's a real news..why is has been reverted by you? Hiru90 (talk) 06:53, 3 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors! edit

please help translate this message into your local language via meta
  The 2019 Cure Award
In 2019 you were one of the top ~300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a thematic organization whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:35, 5 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for fighting vandalism on Radhe Maa edit

 
Denver20 has given you a brownie! Brownies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a brownie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thank you for your efforts to combat vandalism on Radhe Maa}. Appreciate. Denver| Thank you (talk) 11:06, 22 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Denver. -KH-1 (talk) 00:37, 23 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Why you are desperately removing my link when they all are relevant edit

I didn't mean to spam here and I only link the relevant article. Why you are so passionately removing all my relevant links? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parvezvai (talkcontribs) 06:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Engels's pause edit

Engels is singular, so the possessive case of it should be Engels's. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1970:4923:4900:1C4C:CFA6:AE2D:81C4 (talk) 11:35, 1 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hmm it depends on the style guide, but it's best to be consistent with the title. -KH-1 (talk) 00:09, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

That Page which I replace is not Available at this time. I found that this is a Good replacement to provide Amazing information about Eid. edit

why you revert back my changes on eid mubarak page

Dead link re insertion edit

hello sir, as you know i added a link in wiki. and you send me a message to not re insert it again for your kind information it's not my website as the page have a dead link so i changed it with a new verified (by me) link so if you not allow me to do so then it will be worth less to be a part of wikipedia. Tell me about that please


  Where is this link spam? Please stop undo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UmitAltun34 (talkcontribs) 11:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

/* External links */ edit

BUT HOW YOU KNOW I AM ADDING LINK

I AM THE NEW USER HOW TO ADD CORRECT LINK IN WIKIPEDIA

I FOUND ARTICLE THEN I EDIT — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dheeaj45 (talkcontribs) 04:33, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

please advise why you deleted my edit to payday loan page? I was planning on putting up a lot more content e.g. FOS complaints numbers etc but not much point if you are going to block it — Preceding unsigned comment added by AKindFarmer (talkcontribs) 14:56, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thank you for keeping a watch out for vandalism in general and specifically on Shehla Rashid DTM (talk) 06:02, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Pulakit.-KH-1 (talk) 06:57, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Revert edit edit

Sir, can I know that why my edits was reverted? Did I make any mistake or something else. This is my humble request to you please tell me something about my reverted edis JamesJohn82 (talk) 02:58, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

They're advertorials/low quality sources.-KH-1 (talk) 08:48, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Academica (charter school) edit

Hi KH-1, I made significant changes to a page on which you left an Advert tag. I would appreciate if you could have a look and approve (or not). Thank you, Pratat (talk) 07:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Well it's no longer an advert, but there could be undue weight given to recent controversies. -KH-1 (talk) 08:56, 11 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Revert edit

Just accidentally reverted your edit on Huggle - its restored now. Hillelfrei talk 04:32, 20 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Conjugate acids edit

Please actually read over what I changed before you just revert it. The section I edited was factually incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.211.108.72 (talk) 13:36, 23 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Marked as spam? edit

Hi, could you please explain why was my contribution reverted as spam? It didn't hold anything promotional, etc. If it was for the link, as far as I could see in the guidelines, it was important to include the original source, wasn' it? Please provide additional details so that I understand what exactly did I breach. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Information202020 (talkcontribs) 07:21, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

See WP:REFSPAM. Also, blogs (including those of commercial sites) are not considered reliable sources.-KH-1 (talk) 11:03, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

The person is dead. edit

Go and check for yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nityeshwar (talkcontribs) 17:53, 4 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Stop re-editing my work Your date is wrong fool He's 29 not 23 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.114.145.168 (talk) 10:09, 5 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Yes I know these are no follow and links, but I have write a specific article about Redmi X and it helps the user to get the desired information. i dont think they are dead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.15.151.204 (talk) 01:32, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the confirmation edit

Thanks for the confirmation and I will keep in mind that I will never make such a type of mistake in the future.

Why you blacklist my website - feedogram.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by At3812554 (talkcontribs) 17:17, 2 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 3 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pithapuram Estate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page INR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Not adding inappropriate links edit

The links which I am adding are useful links in correspondence to that particular niche. Every time you just come and say the exact words "don't add inappropriate links", but you are totally wrong there's no inappropriate links. Just go through the links and then come to talk to me. You can not always blame me like this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharpriter12 (talkcontribs) 07:24, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Why re-add vandalism? edit

I'm curious as to why you re-added vandalism to SM Entertainment after I removed it? Alex (talk) 11:13, 14 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

My mistake, sorry.-KH-1 (talk) 11:22, 14 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Tagging of Lil Hersh edit

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Lil Hersh. I do not think that Lil Hersh fits any of the speedy deletion criteria  because "rose to international fame " and "went viral" are Claims of significance. If you wish, you may try using the simple proposed deletion (PROD) process, or the full articles for deletion (AfD) process, instead. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 03:32, 20 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Inappropriate Links edit

You removed my links saying they were inappropriate, however they're perfectly valid edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sickwiki (talkcontribs) 19:18, 20 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

I need Some guide About Create New Page edit

Hi KH-1,

I have one brand new Amazon Affiliate Website www.bestproductify.com . And i want to make wikipedia page for my website Like a www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/

and other thousands of website. but i don't have proper knowledge

for this and criteria for making website page. And i already received 2 warnings from wikipedia. plz give me some information about this. and how it's impact my site and wikipedia account.

Thanks, Chavda1946 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chavda1946 (talkcontribs) 02:53, 22 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Why re-add broken link? edit

Hi KH-1. I am new to editing pages and wondered if you could help me understand why we want to leave the permanently broken link up? Any other tips you can offer about how to make edits that won't be undone would be appreciated :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by WMIteam (talkcontribs) 14:06, 31 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add link to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brachytherapy&action=edit edit

Hi! I have an information about this topic. And I want to put information into tham. (source) not some external link to promotion. In other wiki pages I can edit in wisual mode- but that type - is ... omg. Maybe you can help me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tri2ksarion (talkcontribs) 08:26, 8 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

RE: Conflict of Interest edit

Thank you for the information regarding how some of my edits may be against Wikipedia's COI guidelines. I had legitimately thought that the resource I linked to was helpful for that citation. I am new to Wikipedia, I will look into the links you gave me so I can avoid COI in the future.

--Dale at CurrentWare (talk) 12:10, 14 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Heh, welcome you to discussion. edit

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hate_group#Our_#Wikipedia_is_not_one's_Political_Instrument.

My heart is bleeding from English Wikipedia Censorship. My ancestors, who were imprisioned to labor and concentration camps because of their nationality, ethnicity and views, also would not approve your totalitarian informational policy of global source for the sake of polarisation and mobilization of population within one country before their local elections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:9E01:740:A4A5:22F0:4853:5FB3 (talk) 05:31, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Dead links in Planets in Astrology edit

Hello,

thank you for all the work you do on Wikipedia.

Yesterday I replaced two dead links in the article Planets in astrology. These links go to a website that unfortunately doesn't exist anymore (theastrocodex.com). I saw that you undid my edit, so I thought I'd let you know.

--Strawberryunicorn42 (talk) 11:58, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Just a question edit

Hey do you know how I can delete a page? GillRomesLado (talk) 02:17, 4 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Use {{db-author}}. I see that you've removed it though...?-KH-1 (talk) 04:23, 4 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

The links which I am adding are useful links in correspondence to that particular niche. You just come and say inappropriate links. I have nothing to do with the links I added. It was a dead link which I replaced. Just go through the links and then come to talk to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aqeelchpk (talkcontribs) 09:13, 13 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Just a question edit

I just noticed you removed my reference link and quoted as "refspam". The link is related to the topic. Is this intentionally?

Hi KH-1,

I am new to editing pages. Will you point out where did I make disruptive editing?

Reverted to broken edit

Hi,

I'm curious why https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trance_music reference [13] deadlink was reverted back to a an about 404 page that doesn't give the history of trance music despite my presenting alternative source?

Australian mammals edit

The article on Australian mammals is incorrect. Firstly, the article cites the largest native mammal to be the red kangaroo when it should describe the largest native Terrestrial mammal to be the red Kangaroo. The Resident Australian fur seal which is mainly terrestrial weighs up to 90 kg and clearly gets larger. Notwithstanding Resident aquatic dugongs etc which are Larger again. 203.206.19.217 (talk) 06:03, 27 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for editing that wiki page, that is my teachers daughter and I thought it would be funny. I won't do it again. edit

sorry for editing that wiki page. The wiki page was about my teachers daughter and I thought it would be funny. I won't do it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PyraminxCuber (talkcontribs) 04:36, 29 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Regarding added link has been removed edit

Hi, actually the previous external link outbound to the 404 page, and in place of that page I just made the link and that is good for the reader. So I don't think that the added link should be removed.

Thanks Tanweer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayanjash (talkcontribs) 09:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Make sure to actually warn vandals edit

with particular reference to the IP on the Kate Hudson article. There’s enough disruption to take them to AIV but be sure to warn them first with the escalation procedure on Twinkle. Patient Zerotalk 04:02, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thank you for reverting vandalism! Firestar464 (talk) 04:04, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Seconded - thank you kindly for your efforts today! Patient Zerotalk 04:05, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Firestar464 & Patient Zero.-KH-1 (talk) 05:16, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Water Vapor Windows edit

Could you please remove the username with the ip address in the history of edits on this article please?--Whodidthis9 (talk) 09:23, 17 October 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whodidthis9 (talkcontribs) 09:16, 17 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Original Barnstar
Thank you for your edits! Firestar464 (talk) 06:05, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 29 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nintendo Switch Online, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Application.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

An Apology edit

I sincerely apologize for my last edit on motivation. I found a broken link on the webpage and decided to remove it but didn't know I was doing the wrong thing.

You equally removed my previous citation on unrequited love? The web page I cited on the post is relevant to it. Please, review my article and know if it's worthy to be placed there or not. Here is a link to the article - Unrequited love Damianbest20 (talk) 10:05, 2 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For helping me fight that barrage of vandalism! Elmssuper 05:28, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Elms!-KH-1 (talk) 08:59, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

The International Ecotourism Society edits edit

Hello KH-1,

The article as it stands is defamatory, only uses negative sources, and gives false information. The articles stood for years before it was attacked. Please Allow it to revert to the original before Roi edited it. He works for a competing organization. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert James Logan (talkcontribs) 03:33, 2 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

duplicate

The text that Robert James Logan overwrote the article with was a copyright violation. Thank you for reverting their edits. —C.Fred (talk) 03:38, 2 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
The text that C.Fred is claiming was a copyright violation is not at all, this is a false claim.
Please provide proof Robert James Logan (talk) 03:44, 2 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
The text was copied wholesale from https://ecotourism.org/ties-overview/, which has an all-rights-reserved license. —C.Fred (talk) 03:46, 2 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Kh 1 help me bro edit

Someone is spamming my website (Backdroid) in Wikipedia i know that it is completely wrong. Now my website Backdroid goes in Wikipedia backlink. Help me kh1 heartly request.... Kunal Kashyap981 (talk) 07:13, 21 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Yo Ho Ho edit

WordPress Edit edit

Hi, thank you accepted some of the changes. I tried to add a sentence about the Fortune 500 companies use WordPress, you deleted that. Please can you tell me why? I'll try my best to provide useful values. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aamir717 (talkcontribs) 05:02, 4 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Help Please edit

Hey! I was just wondering if it was possible to watch edits by a specific user, if so, how? Thanks! BrownFerret (talk) 10:48, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

I don't think there's a "watchlist" for specific users, but are other tools that you can use.-KH-1 (talk) 11:13, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Reference of family ties and kinship edit

You erased controversial info about marvi Sirmed. How do I add their family ties in Wikipedia? When did controversy need reference point? PenOfEthos (talk) 11:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

You might want to read our WP:BLP policy.-KH-1 (talk) 01:19, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Dental Jim edit

Hey, I have just added a quick link to my website in the periodontal disease page, specifically signs and symptoms. I am currently a third year dentistry student at KCL. My website outlines these stages in great deal, which I believe is a great asset to this condensed Wiki page. All my information is completely up to date and clinically relevant as I am learning from some of best teachers in the world. I believe I have broken the info down to a level appropriate for patients, students and dentists alike. I would love for people to improve their knowledge of oral hygiene through this Wiki page and also my page! I invite you to read my page on the subject and I subsequently hope this minor edit can stay. Have a great day and happy Wiki'ing, James :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DentistJim (talkcontribs) 13:21, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

We don't accept self-published sources. Also, see WP:MEDRS.-KH-1 (talk) 03:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

User Warnings edit

Hi KH-1. When you revert vandalism, could you please leave the appropriate warning on the offending user's talk page? Thanks, FASTILY 06:05, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Would you mind explaining why you're still not notifying every editor you revert (ex: 1, 2)? Wikipedia:Rollback#Requesting rollback rights literally says "The requester is also expected to have properly warned users after reverting their edits" (emphasis mine). Needless to say, it's concerning I have to remind you about this. -FASTILY 02:06, 20 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Just adding resourceful pages not spamming edit

Stop removing resourceful links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vedikasharma (talkcontribs) 07:00, 20 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

ANI edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:KH-1 and rollback. Thank you. FASTILY 23:03, 20 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Andover, Minnesota edit

Thank you. You just beat me to the punch at page protection. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 05:09, 27 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Don’t remove Niko from Tigard edit

Niko my homie who passed away in HS I put his name on the page to honor him please don’t take him off notable people page again. Cdog725 (talk) 05:54, 28 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

😠 edit

Why did you erased that?? I said that I have to make a new page. Now I have made that but I am unable to open that.!!! Naresh Seema Ishita Devansh (talk) 07:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Translations should go on Hindi Wikipedia.-KH-1 (talk) 08:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Poke edit

I have just done this, so you can use User:COIBot/Poke/m:User:COIBot/Poke. You can then generate LinkReports for domains and UserReports for users before you report them to SBL or similar (like for the loomsolar, the problem seems way bigger than what you presented, not that it mattered there). (it may take a bit of time before the bot reloads its settings, ping me if after tomorrow it still doesn't work). --Dirk Beetstra T C 13:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. It'll be tempting to run everything through COIBot.-KH-1 (talk) 00:30, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Valentine Greets!!! edit

  Valentine Greets!!!

Hello KH-1, love is the language of hearts and is the feeling that joins two souls and brings two hearts together in a bond. Taking love to the level of Wikipedia, spread the WikiLove by wishing each other Happy Valentine's Day, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person.
Sending you a heartfelt and warm love on the eve,
Happy editing,

NASCARfan0548  19:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Valentine Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Slender Man edit

Hello! I see that you reverted my improvements to the punctuation on this entry. I’m curious to know why you did so. Could you please explain? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.198.154.169 (talk) 11:02, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

The previous version seemed to be fine.-KH-1 (talk) 04:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
okay. I’d suggest that, should a similar situation present itself in the future, you allow a native—-or at least proficient—-English speaker to make corrections. Best of luck to you and to your attempts at being of use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.198.154.169 (talk) 14:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Human Leukocyte Antigen article edit

Hi KH-1: I noticed you reverted my addition to the HLA page under the "Functions" section. There is substantial scientific evidence supporting HLA as a major contributor to drug-induced adverse reactions. I thought my addition of pharmacogenomics as a relevant function of HLA was appropriate. Can you please reconsider your deletion, or let me know what modifications would help make this acceptable? Thanks, Cellbiologist78 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cellbiologist78 (talkcontribs) 16:51, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Find a source that complies with WP:MEDRS.-KH-1 (talk) 03:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

I'm new, please help me to understand edit

Hi KH-1, I'm new to editing Wikipedia and thought I added a useful missing citation. But it has been removed. Would you mind explaining why, so that I can understand for next time? Thank you! ElizabethC999 (talk) 11:47, 25 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Where possible, you should avoid linking to commercial sites/vendors. -KH-1 (talk) 02:33, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Why did you delete my correction? edit

It's just a url change because the one was mentioned is old and broken so I changed it to the recent one.

Sockpuppet edit

Hi, KH-1. I'm just contributing to Wikipedia. I'm not the sockpuppet of that account you mentioned. I'm not connected to the subject at any case. Thanks. Underpants90 (talk) 01:13, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Why did you delete my contribution? edit

Hi,

I have noticed that you deleted my recent contribution to the Witchford Village College Wikipedia page. Why? Everything was factually correct and backed up with sources (that I linked to the article). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smiggles772 (talkcontribs) 05:24, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

NOT SPAMING, IS REAL INDONESIA BANKING SITE FROM GOVERMENT edit

noo im not spamming, but its real acc to website banking, just check that site

Japan national football team edit

Done. I've applied it only for 24 hours for the time being, but if the problem continues after the protection expires tomorrow, let me know and I'll bump it up to three days or a week as needed. Bearcat (talk) 23:48, 5 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

we are here to support our community and increase the information in wikipedia but you are continuously ruining this all dont insert tag for speedy deletion.

Valentine Palmer edit

Please don't delete Valentine Palmer's entry! Give me a chance to add more articles to prove he satisfies Wiki's notability policy.

SEO new globally blacklisted edit

Hi. For one of your recent reverts, I have taken the opportunity to globally blacklist that domain. They were starting to go xwiki, and it was never going to be a reliable source. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:45, 17 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

OK good.-KH-1 (talk) 05:49, 17 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Reply edit

As you can i see from the article edited, they're dead links and I have followed wikipedia editing guide and also supplies relevant links relating to the articles.If a website is repeatedly supplied by me sometimes, maybe due to the site has the information required and does not necessary mean that I am the owner of the sites because, i can see, most of the dead link I updated have been reverted by you and that's means discouragement to contributing to wikipedia for the legacy to live on. Check the history of my account and you'll see that it is an old account and I am not here to supply spam websites or links. Therefore, I urge you to revert the change or some by carefully reviewing them before taking action.

However, I by omission, I mistakenly go against the rules, my apology but blacklisting people websites where i source information without the owners knowing may be detriment to the people resource, therefore, a clear understanding is required in handling situation that we sometime holds assumption.

Best regards

>> Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. KH-1 (talk) 09:07, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

I tried to add a link as it is really very helpful. People need to know in which states short-term loans are allowed and which are prohibited. Do you think that this information is not important to people?

void Southernnews1.0 (talk) 04:02, 7 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

August 2021 edit

  Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Picard's Facepalm (talk) 03:58, 19 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ventoura for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ventoura is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ventoura until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

162 etc. (talk) 15:59, 28 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Stephen Zechariah edit

2402:3A80:19AE:7863:258D:6CDE:AF5A:C3EA (talk)Hi there, I see the article Stephen Zechariah was created by a banned user. But the person in the article is completely notable. Kindly remove the speedy deletion template.

speedy deletion on Stephen Zechariah edit

ButterSand0 (talk) hello! KH-1, i came across you are nominated the article Stephen Zechariah and I also saw it was created by a suspected/banned user. Yes it was created by a blocked user. But I believe the article Stephen Zechariah is notable to WP:NMUSICIAN and Please remove the speedy deletion. Thank you ! 🙂

Edit on Lee Joo-sung edit

Hi KH-1. I noticed that some days ago you made an edit to the page I have newly created Lee Joo-sung as a UPE. I have updated the talk page to disclose the contribution and I would like to ask if you could remove the tag. I am willing to do more edits if you advise me so. Thank you! Mvcervi (talk) 00:26, 18 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Leave it as it is until we do a more thorough review.-KH-1 (talk) 01:09, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Will do, thank you. Mvcervi (talk) 05:29, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Dimond edit

Hello guys 2409:4063:4EAB:8F54:EDEC:474:9D1E:1F2D (talk) 10:46, 29 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Revision to Simplii Financial edit

Hi,

You recently rolled back a change I made to the Simplii Financial wikipedia page - the previous link was dead and I simply updated it to an active link. Could you advise what was wrong with my revision? HughCampbellFF (talk) 05:20, 7 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Quick question about an edit you reverted... edit

Edit after going through your talk page archives: I'll just assume if you don't respond, if I do my due diligence and confirm the references I add are in fact credible and appropriate, I'll just readd them with better justifications in the edit description. (like a research article from a journal, a news article, and a blog that is better in quality than the current sources etc.)

Original question: I was trying to fix the unreferenced section in the article Baby sling by adding a bunch of sources but I neglected to read the Referencing for Beginners fully, also your tag Refspam/non-RS and reading No Original Research was helpful. Thanks for fixing that, I thought it would be ok since I really didn't add any information and just found sources for the information provided already by wikipedia completely unsourced. Anyways here's my question: Is it ok to just leave the article as it is? i.e. if I recheck the links/references I provided should I re-add them? Symphoricarpos albus (talk) 00:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Avoid sources that are affiliate marketing/e-commerce and you'll be fine.-KH-1 (talk) 01:29, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, I will! Symphoricarpos albus (talk) 06:07, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Tag on Swiss Life Asset Managers edit

Hello, I've pinged you on the article's talk page but it looks like you missed the notification. You put a CoI tag on top of the Swiss Life Asset Managers article without flagging anything in particular (which seems contrary to the template's instructions), so I wanted to know if there was any issue that needed clarification and should be worked on. Thanks a lot! Schlagzeiler (talk) 12:47, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Edits to Online Grocer Wiki Page edit

Hello. Hope all is good. I am trying to add value to Wikipedia and just edited the online grocer wikipedia page, to include additional information and expand on the article. I noticed that you undid my changes and added note refSpam. I would like to know more about why you undid the changes so I can improve my edits in the future. Simply adding a note with refSpam doesn't help explain your decision.

One of the referenced links provides data to backup the sentence and the other is a New York Times article? Are New York Times articles considered spam now? I have seen New York Times articles referenced in many pages with no issues. The references also backup the additional sentence I added via data from the referenced links. Would appreciate an explanation as to why you undid the changes, mainly to help me improve my edits in the future.

Thank you --Kingoptimizer (talk) 04:06, 20 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Organicallyblissfull" is a health wellness blog that engages in affiliate marketing (fails WP:RS) and its survey is hardly authoritative. The NYT article doesn't actually discuss online grocers so I'm not sure why you'd want to include it.-KH-1 (talk) 04:24, 20 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for explaining. That makes sense. However, I am confused about one thing. There are 1000's of links on Wikipedia from sites that use affiliates. New York Times uses affiliates - that's how a lot of sites make money, however not every page on a website/journal/blog/news outlet has affiliate offers, which is why I added the organicallyblissful link. I get the New York Times link is not relevant but again, they also have an affiliate policy and make money with affiliates on certain pages. Excluding every single website that has affiliate policy doesn't seem like a good rule of thumb (mainly because some of their pages don't have affiliate offers). Any suggestions on how to go about assessing if a website/news outlet/blog/journal can be added as a reference or not? (assuming the actual page from the website doesn't have affiliate offers off-course). Is there a link to an article about all that on Wikipedia? Thanks again for your help!Kingoptimizer (talk) 00:29, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, just realized you had posted this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources. Please disregard my last message. Will read through all that! Thank you Kingoptimizer (talk) 00:32, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply


Articles for deletion/Hani (Yadav), this is notable actor, kindly fix it edit

Dear wikipedian sir, I'm checked this article this article is transparent and it's show transparency, independently verify his acting credits, kindly checked External link, which is imdb link, all actings credit of this person are shown on IMDb — Preceding unsigned comment added by Viveknigam7 (talkcontribs) 14:39, 3 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

want to know about issue with my external link edit

I did the modification regarding the effects of dietary fiber which is published with my blog and I put an external link to my blog with intention of getting traffic and improving the content of Wikipedia too. I thought that will help both. can you tell me why my action inappropiate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandun kavinda Rathnasiri (talkcontribs) 07:38, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

UPE edit

Hi KH-1, I noticed you added UPE banner to newly created Pulpe de Vie. You may have missed my disclosure of relationship to this company in my user page. This article is a direct translation from a French Wikipedia article. Thank you! Coddy25 (talk) 08:49, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Probably best to post the disclosure on the article talk page as well. I've changed it to COI.-KH-1 (talk) 09:49, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello KH-1, do you think COI banner could be removed by now ? Let me precise that, while I have indeed helped to contribute to this page edition, several other editors without any relationship have contributed as well, making sure content was following Wikipedia ethic. Thank you ! Coddy25 (talk) 15:43, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Chamonix Cameras article edit

Hi KH-1, I realized that you deleted the entry page for Chamonix Cameras that I created. I would like to express my disappointment because this is an existing camera manufacturer producing excellent cameras since a decade ago. Thousands of photographers around the world use it. I am a private person not having economic interest on the company. As a large format photographer, I consider that is necessary to list existing manufacturers (see link below) and inform the public and new students about existing cameras. If wikipedia does not accept entry points for an existing manufacturer, then why other companies producing photographic equipment are there? I see medium format manufacturers like Bronica, Mamiya, Hasselblad(active), and large format manufacturers Sinar(active), Paubel, Toyo... etc. Leica(active)...

Please explain me the reasons, and how should an article be created so that it is acceptable. I did not include it for publicity purposes but for the sake of completeness.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_photographic_equipment_makers  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lese~enwiki (talkcontribs) 13:44, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply 
You'll need to explain why it's notable. See WP:ORGCRIT for specifics.-KH-1 (talk) 05:39, 8 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tagging pages for speedy deletion edit

Hello, KH-1,

Just a reminder that when you tag a page for any type of deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/RFD/TFD/etc.), you need to post a notification on the talk page of the page creator. It's an important step in the deletion process and helps new editors know there are problems with their page creations and what they are.

Posting notices is made easy if you use Twinkle to tag pages because once you set up your Twinkle Preferences to "Notify page creator", Twinkle will post these notices for you. Please do this in the future. Thank you!

Oak Road Estate edit

Where was the author asked about paid? Are you referring to this for example? If they have 200+ articles then they must also be a sock ... Aoziwe (talk) 12:26, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

I was aiming for a more strongly worded message, hence the level 3 warning. Turns out the wording has caused some confusion.-KH-1 (talk) 01:49, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
I agree all does not seem right . . . Aoziwe (talk) 08:14, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
She has now been blocked for sockpuppetry.-KH-1 (talk) 01:38, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wood char - reversion edit

I am curious as to why you reverted my edit. -Not all wood ash has much char. -My experience is that there is often very little char in wood ash. That is why I added 'can be' high in char.

The link I cited was, IMO, fascinating.

David

Iacoponida (talk) 06:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi David, you'll need to cite a reliable source. -KH-1 (talk) 01:38, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Kolaboy (Musician) edit

I've gone ahead and nominated it for deletion. A loose necktie (talk) 05:23, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Bedtime Math page advert tag edit

Can you please explain your addition of the advert tag on Bedtime Math? The edit had no comments, and I can't determine what's objectionable. Thanks.--Dugrless (talk) 22:41, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

It reads like an ad. I've made some changes, but it still needs a bit of work.-KH-1 (talk) 02:11, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Why you delection the page simply ? edit

Hello Sir/Madam why you delete the page. It's important page and creating page on important topics not easy everytime. Please understand the fact. Don't report or delete the page simply Dinerock (talk) 03:04, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Regarding status of page: /Conrad_Clipper edit

Hi KH-1,

First up thank you for all the great work you do in moderating and editing articles, it's appreciated. I'm Jim and I'm new to article creation. I would like to make articles for musicians I like.

My first effort was for the artist Conrad Clipper, who I'm a fan of. I tried to use non-tabloid and high quality links but still, I got the general notability guideline, esp:

"Please help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention."

Do you have any advice or suggestions as to which link / source was unsatisfactory?

Please accept apologies in advance if you are not the person to come to for this, and thanks again!

Over and out

Jim T. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JimTorrens (talkcontribs) 15:08, 1 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ideally you would want to show in-depth coverage by reputable music/news sites. The refs used in the article are more of the niche variety and I'm not sure that it meets the threshold of WP:SIGCOV.-KH-1 (talk) 03:18, 4 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

Hi KH-1 - hope you are well. THanks for requesting the page protection for Rohitha Rajapaksa. Looks like it all kicked off a few hours ago! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 12:56, 4 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Yeah thanks. Might need to keep an eye on some of the related articles.-KH-1 (talk) 06:47, 5 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

May I ask why you removed my edits to this article - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Public_adjuster&oldid=1081166497

I provided factual information for policyholders that would protect their best interest in a claim.

It is not ideal for a property owner to contact only their insurance company to report a property damage claim, it is required of them to contact the insurance provider, but it is highly recommended that they also contact a public adjuster during that process.

It is also a best practice for the property owner to have BOTH the public adjuster and their insurance company's adjuster meet at the property at the beginning of their claim.

This ensures the property owner has expert representation to start their claim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SillPublicAdjusters (talkcontribs) 18:17, 6 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

why are you delete my link. answer me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srdigital007 (talkcontribs) 08:35, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Waqar ahmed page deletion edit

Why You Delete https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waqar_ahmed this page its competely different page he is Entrepreneur. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siddharth5656 (talkcontribs) 11:11, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

World Book Day edit

In the region of Catalonia in Spain there exists a day, called Sant Jordi, devoted to celebrate books (and other things) on the same date (April 23rd) as the World Book Day. However, I have tried and failed to find any UNESCO document which states that the World Book Day is in any way inspired by the Spanish celebration. Instead, all UNESCO documents I've found point to the fact that three major writers, Shakespeare, Cervantes and Garcilaso de la Vega, passed away on that date -- which is why the Spanish celebration was established on that very same day in the first place.

The claim made in the article that the World Book Day was inspired by Sant Jordi does have a reference, but the reference focuses on the latter and makes no mention whatsoever of the former. That's why I deleted the claim as original research. You reverted my deletion, so I thought maybe you have some additional information I'm not aware of, and I would be very pleased if you were so kind as to share it with me.--Josep Amunt i Avall (talk) 17:43, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Why did you delete? edit

Hi there, Could you please explain why you deleted my edits? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walker_Corporation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hattie124 (talkcontribs) 04:05, 25 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Edit Reversion at Click-through rate edit

Hi, you reverted my edit here on CTR page, citing ref-spamming. Please explain how generalizing CTR formula and adding a reference to it, is ref-spamming. I've re-reverted your edit, and would expect at least a explanation before any other revert.
And secondly I'd recommend you to re-learn what Spamming is, it'll be much helpful in RC patrol and before calling someone else edit as spam. Thanks! AHatd (talk) 04:01, 13 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blogs are not a reliable source, and we should avoid linking to commercial vendors, especially those with overtly promotional content. The link that you inserted ends with:

And if you haven’t already started calculating CTR, make sure to check out AccuRanker. It is the ultimate SERP rank tracker tool to help you start increasing your organic traffic today. Start your 14 days free trial – no credit card needed.

Those who go around adding these types of links as "references" are typically engaged in spamming.-KH-1 (talk) 06:42, 13 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi thanks for your response. You mentioned WP:RS I wasn't able to find anything related to unreliability of blogs mentioned in the guideline, except this Never use self-published books, zines, websites, webforums, blogs and tweets as a source for material about a living person..... And secondly avoiding inline citation to commercial vendors, doesn't mean/allow reverting someone's good faith edits with assumption of bad faith from their part. Also RS guide us to replace such links with more reliable sources, not reverting whole edit all together. Thirdly, as a RC patroller, I always try to check user contributions before calling their edits, as spam. Thanks! AHatd (talk) 09:16, 13 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Pulpe de Vie edit

Hello KH-1, do you think COI banner could be removed by now ? Let me precise that, while I have indeed helped to contribute to this page edition, several other editors without any relationship have contributed as well, making sure content was following Wikipedia ethic. Thank you ! Coddy25 (talk) 07:59, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Several other editors" - there has only been one other edit, a spelling correction from an IP.-KH-1 (talk) 05:04, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yes, on the English version, I was indeed the only one to help translate it. However, on the original french article, many different people have contributed. This is why I was wondering if it could be reviewed and COI banner removed, if everything is ok. Thank you Coddy25 (talk) 12:21, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Juiceslf (musician) edit

Hi, I've declined the A7 tag on this article, as I think releasing a track on social media and claiming it "went viral" is a possible claim of significance. Obviously it needs a verifiable claim of what that means to survive an AfD, or possibly a G11 tag, but Nigerian rap music is not really my area of expertise. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:08, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

causaLens edit

Hello there - I sent a comment to the Talk section re a recommended deletion, but I wondered it it might make sense to send it to you too?

I don't think the page should not be speedily deleted because: - I wasn't aware of a previously deleted page and all content entered in this page, as submitted, has been taken by me from the public domain, i.e. company website, official announcements, media articles - a selection of specific, clear references was submitted against individual points made in the page, a good deal of it from after April 2022 which is when apparently a previous page, written by someone else whom I don't know at all, was deleted - Issues of 'advertising' langauge and tone have been addressed by me to leave a straightforward and factual short article about this company Hydra2017 (talk) 14:05, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Christian Horner edit

Hi, the updates I’ve added have been removed as you say they are “poorly referenced or controversial”. I’m. unsure how much you know about Christian Horner but information he provides is both poorly referenced and controversial. I felt the updates we balanced and accurate.

What do I need to do to get this information authorised on wiki?

Thanks

Damien Damiendobson (talk) 01:30, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

See WP:BLP for an overview. In short, you need to make sure that the content is supported by reliable sources and that it adheres to WP:NPOV.-KH-1 (talk) 03:13, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

personal harrasment edit

hi, do you have any personal conflict with Deri Lorus. I see that you're keep complaining about Deri Lorus and keep on deleting the articles and mentions about him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.37.219.128 (talk) 13:36, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Seasons Greetings edit

  Whatever you celebrate at this time of year, whether it's Christmas or some other festival, I hope you and those close to you have a happy, restful time! Have fun, Donner60 (talk) 00:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)}} Reply  

Donner60 (talk) 04:40, 24 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Happy New Year, KH-1! edit

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Moops T 05:15, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Just add the Kid From Google On The Move Name edit

Just add the Kid From Google On a Mention, Why it was removed? Krishna pearl (talk) 05:56, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

it was about Farida Jalal oe of the actor from India.

And the Mehram i try to add was from my research on the web, you can find it at https://g.co/kgs/4BL5Px .

Linda Ravenswood edit

hi there – – I was looking on the site for Linda Ravenswood, who’s been nominated for a speedy deletion. I was wondering where that stands, as I forgot to include that she has a radio show on KPFK FM 90.7 Los Angeles. It airs every Wednesday at 2 PM. A couple of years ago someone nominated the page for speedy deletion after it had been on Wikipedia for nine years. Someone said she didn’t have enough published material. But now she has a lot of books a radio show and a bunch of book prizes. it looks like because her name is Linda Ravenswood and that page had been deleted previously, there seems to be a flag coming up even though she should have a Wikipedia page now. thanks so much for lmk Jesuitsally (talk) 22:08, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

The relevant guideline here is WP:GNG. To demonstrate notability you'll have to show coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in reliable third party sources.-KH-1 (talk) 05:24, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Unnecessary deletion edit

May i know what kind of promotional content have i added? since the content that is being added is non-biased and is just added to enhance and add the latest information in that sector. It is not related to any commercial or promotional benefits such as search engine rankings or what so ever. Please read through the content that is being added and improvised, its either interlinked to wikipedia itself or major companies that are actually present in that specific field, it is for general information rather then promotional values. Kindly correct if it feels inappropriate. Ojesvi Singh07 (talk) 09:29, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

You've been name-dropping Shoghi Comms and its services at every opportunity. It's spamming, plain and simple. Also, it's been tried already [6] don't know why you think the response would be any different this time.-KH-1 (talk) 02:01, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Link removed edit

May I know why did you remove the link I added to the XISF format specification document? 88.22.79.69 (talk) 20:07, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Macdonald triad edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Macdonald triad, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

nguyen phong tran buttu 47 2402:800:62EC:3F9E:29AE:85CF:906F:1604 (talk) 23:50, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Deletion tag on Tamal Hadiul edit

Sir @KH-1, this is the first time this has happened, All the pages I created earlier got accepted. But I am aware of the mentioned music producer. He was awarded as the best music producer of Bangladesh, having completed the soundtracks of popular drama series like Punorjonmo, Mohanagar.

I fixed it by removing the deadlinked references from the page. Since it has importance, I request you to keep this article sir. Olafrozen (talk) 10:07, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Jack Rollen AfD Discussion edit

Sir @KH-1, I have addressed the issues(that led to the nomination of the page Jack Rollen for Afd and also some of the issues raised by @Willondon on the discussion page). I have removed Ref Bombs and added some reliable source. I therefore request you to check the revision out and see if your primary concern has been addressed and therefore lift the deletion tag from the page. If there is still an issue, You'll let me know. Pro Art Editor (talk) 04:35, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to let the AfD run its course.-KH-1 (talk) 05:36, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
So now What's all this about, were you just originally so determined(that no edit can solve) to have that page deleted. I've gone through your page and it's full of complaints from editors, I wonder what thorns are in your heart.
The issue you raised has been resolved and you still can't remove the tag!
I've learned one big lesson from @Willondon, "this is just Wikipedia"
So do whatever you want. Pro Art Editor (talk) 17:39, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
By the time you raised this point other users had already commented on the discussion. It was beyond the point at which KH-1 could unilaterally withdraw the nomination. Cabayi (talk) 09:19, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion contested: Zerodha edit

Hello KH-1. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Zerodha, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Some of these sources date to after the initial deletion so it probably doesn't fall under the "substantially identical" clause of G4. Thank you. BangJan1999 17:44, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

"No consensus" edits edit

Regarding your three reverts of @Unwokengarvey edits. Please take a moment to consider Wikipedia:Don't revert due solely to "no consensus": "This procedural objection gives the reverted editor no information regarding the substantive reason for your reversion and is not supported by either general or Wikipedia space policy," - Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 14:59, 27 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Why?? edit

We Just Add Wedding Invitation Making Website Nothing Bed Done... Saikam Dave (talk) 11:16, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Missing information over Prison edit

Hello KH-1, I hereby declare that I possess no conflict of interest with the Domain, and I acknowledge their commendable proficiency and expertise in the realm of prisons and correctional centers. Their comprehensive and insightful information regarding various aspects of correctional management and prison operations has been widely recognized and respected within the industry. This includes, but is not limited to, their adept management practices, innovative approaches towards inmate reform, and steadfast adherence to regulatory compliances, which collectively contribute towards a well-structured and effective penal system. My interactions and statements pertaining to Stated Domains are unbiased and do not stem from any personal, professional, or financial affiliations that could potentially influence my perspective or judgments concerning them. Omeryousaf1208 (talk) 07:18, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

RG Qluck Wise edit

Hi, there I’m requesting Article for creation for the subject RG Qluck Wise this subject’s article got deleted last year ago because he fails to meet notability but I think this time he is improving. So please try your possible best to create an article for this subject.

Best regards. Gudwise (talk) 00:53, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Send it through to WP:RA or WP:AFC.-KH-1 (talk) 00:56, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Sorry but I guess you can help me do it better. Gudwise (talk) 01:04, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
KH-1I’ll be glad to get back a reply Gudwise (talk) 01:09, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi KH-1 will do that or I should start on draft page? Gudwise (talk) 01:13, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Invitation edit

 
Hello KH-1, we need experienced volunteers.
  • New Page Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
  • Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
  • Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, it basically boils down to checking CSD, notability, and title). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us.
  • If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the granting conditions. You can apply for the user-right HERE.
  • If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message at the reviewer's discussion board.
  • Cheers, and hope to see you around.

Sent by NPP Coordination using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply