Jwalia012

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jai Walia (December 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jai Walia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:48, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Jwalia012, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 08:48, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Usha Chavan

Hi, I've just seen your edits on this page. Undoubtably, the information added makes the article better, so I am leaving it be. However, the tone of voice used isn't really WP:ENCYCLOPEDIC (it seems to be excited about the new movies, which violates WP:NPOV). When you get time, I would greatly appreciate it if you adjusted the wording.

∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 12:24, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dattatray KaduDeshmukh (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dattatray KaduDeshmukh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dattatray KaduDeshmukh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 10:43, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   09:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

The reference sources provided are accurate. Dada Kondke was a very famous actor. His notability can't ever be challenged. After his death, Dada Konkde Trust was founded according to his WILL. all relevant sources are been provided. Pls give me a good reason for deletation of article. We at wikipedia try making things informative. But some experts sitting abroad don't even know whom the article is about apply for proposed deletation.

Speedy deletion nomination of Dattatray KaduDeshmukh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dattatray KaduDeshmukh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 11:19, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dada Kondke Trust

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dada Kondke Trust requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 11:23, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Drm310 may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 00:07, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

I will also remind me that you are bound by Wikipedia's civility policy which states that "editors should always treat each other with consideration and respect. They should focus on improving the encyclopedia while maintaining a pleasant editing environment by behaving politely, calmly and reasonably, even during heated debates.". Getting angry when someone does something you don't agree with, and lashing out with comments such as these will not help you. I don't even remember if I nominated one of your pages for deletion, but even if I did, it didn't justify that kind of response. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:11, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

I had created a page of an actress' spouse who had contributed a lot to the society. He gave off his more than 15 acres land to poor people. The worth of the same is around 25-30 crore here. I had provided proper references and citations. Still you gave me a reason saying that marrying an actress doesn't makes famous or notable The person's notability was depending on the newspaper citations and other sources which I had provided! Anyways, I apologize for getting mad. I'll try working out more on the article in draft view. Let's not have any grudges against each other.

Agreed. I wish you good luck with your draft. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:18, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Please keep netuality on Wikipedia

Begin auto message

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Zanygenius (talk • contribs) 18:02, 22 January 2018 (UTC) Hello, I'm Zanygenius. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Dada Kondke Trust seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

End auto message Begin manual message

Greetings, Jwalia0212, I want to be easy, though I have to let you know that you reverted some edits that removed some material found to not match our neutral policy. This policy has been reviewed and consensused , and so it has stuck.

Now I know there is a lot of controversial talk around "Dada" right now, though that doesn't mean Wikipedia shouldn't become "a firey rage storm across the sky". Who knows rather this info is true, or shows bias. Wikipedia is trying to earn a trustworthy reputation, and we can't do that if there is a lack of neutral means.

Now don't take this hard, you should just learn from your mistakes, and we can forgive and forget. Also, we hope you're enjoying your time on Wikipedia! (Wikipedia: Welcome, Newcomers!) Sincerely, User: Zanygenius(talk page) 17:57, 22 January 2018 (UTC) Sincerely, User: Zanygenius(talk page) 17:57, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Correction

I feel I can't hold you to our standarlized system unless we make an example for the system. So let me explain.→ Words such as "Surprisingly" mark opinion, and many sentences were like this: "along with the Land Mafia came together and are said...". If you can replace it with non feeling words, I'm willing to overlook this. Sincerely, User: Zanygenius(talk page) 18:26, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

References

Concerns

My own concerns are around the neutrality of the description of issues around land Mafia. First, this is an unfamiliar term in the U.S. and probably elsewhere, so you should link it for those of us who don't live with this. Second, be careful in describing things that are alleged as facts. Have any charges been brought or convictions related to this supposed illegal land conversion? In either case, "land grab" is definitely not neutral terminology. ☆ Bri (talk) 21:03, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello Bri, I'm glad you helping me out dealing with this topic and letting me improve myself in neutrality concern of the article. Actually, I stay in the same country where the subject is of. So here, land mafia is a famous term to the person who is involved in illegal encroaching lands. And I have studied over this that the person involved in this case is famous with the name land Mafia and that is been flashed in newspapers too. I have attached the citation of newspapers too. The news reporters and other politicians here refer that person as land Mafia because he is involved in many such cases. Jwalia012 (talk) 07:34, 23 January 2018 (UTC)jwalia012

Speedy deletion nomination of Abhinay Chitra

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Abhinay Chitra, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. FITINDIA 12:27, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jwalia012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello sir, im jwalia. i had posted one article which was tagged for deletation by FITINDIA sir. i contested the deletation by asking on how to improve? it was even cool with me if my article would have been deleted. i am new and i wanna learn thing about wiki. and surely experts like you will help me with the same. But apparently, so uniseller9 was purposely deleting the tag of deletation and that created a huge misunderstanding. pls understand my side. pls give me a change by unblocking. i have always made good and appropriate edits. this was my first article and it went for deletation. i'm okay even if it gets deleted. but atleast i'll get to learn. uniseller9 created some sort of misunderstanding. i request you to rethink on blocking me sir. Jwalia012 (talk) 17:31, 23 January 2018 (UTC)jwalia012

Decline reason:

You don't explain why you set up that other account. It certainly doesn't look like a big misunderstanding. We know you violated WP:SOCK with this account, but you haven't explained why or given us any reason to be sure you won't do so again. Yamla (talk) 17:40, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jwalia012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sir that was a mistake. and i stopped it once i was warned by FITINDIA about blocking. i'm new sir. pls spare me this time. next time if i repeat anything of this sort, you can block me and my ip address forever. I PROMISE IT WON'T EVER HAPPEN AGAIN. I'll keep my promise. just give me one last and final chance. everything is in your hands sir. you can keep a watch on my activities. i'll surely read every guide before ever making my next edit. I beg a pardon of appeal sir. pls! just a last n final chance. Jwalia012 (talk) 17:45, 23 January 2018 (UTC)jwalia012

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, I must decline. You are blocked for using multiple accounts inappropriately, per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jwalia012. You seem to be speaking of the sock, uniseller9, as though they were someone else. This is not acceptable. Please explain your abuse of multiple accounts. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:52, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Jwalia012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #20410 was submitted on Jan 24, 2018 03:58:14. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:58, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Overall, I tend to be the "good cop", and rarely apply consequences. (Not that I can do anything anyways, I'm NOT an Admin). Though I should let you know that Wikipedia has a pet-peeve with excessive unblock requests, and that could block you from using your talk page. I recommend waiting a week or two, then applying another request. Right now, the evidence is strong against you, so I would recommend including a sentence saying that Uniseller9 is yours. But what if you're sure it's not you? I would take this to the Village Pump.

Sincerely, User: Zanygenius(talk page) 16:36, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

User: Zanygenius I have no harm in accepting. I would have expected if I was at fault! Sir, to be honest, I owe an Internet cafe in India. I was new to wikipedia and had started my editing. That day, I was editing on page after lot of research. At the same time, there was one more person present at my Internet cafe! He stalked me of what I am doing and then for fun or may be purposely he just kept on deleting the speedy deletation tag. All this got recorded in cctv cameras as my Internet cafe! Like the person peeping from behind in my computer. Sir, if I had to delete the tag of speedy deletation, I wouldn't have asked for other people on Wikipedia to help me with the article. I would have directly kept deleting. I am innocent! This is what I and God knows. I didn't do anything wrong as of from my part and that's final! But ya, I do have to suffer and face all this because of some person who came to my Internet Cafe and ruined everything without my knowledge. I last time plead and reappeal. I request to pls investigate properly because the reason for blocked was Ip address being same. Ya, it's true! Ip is same because mine is an Internet Cafe and the person uniseller9 was using one of our shop's computer and was ruining things without my knowledge. I Request last time to give me last chance! I assure this won't happen as I will be blocking wikipedia on all my other computers so that such people with wrong intention won't be able to ruin things! I wanna be a good editor and have to go a long way! I Request once again to rethink and support me! I will never let you guys down. Jwalia012 (talk) 19:28, 2 February 2018 (UTC)jwalia012

@Jwalia012:, I'm sorry to hear that, but I don't know what to say. I don't plan to be an admin until Oct 2020, so I won't be able to unblock you, but what I can say is that you should confront the internet café about the problem, and maybe try a local libraires' computer area. And I wish you the best of luck. But serisouly, I can't do anything. Sincerely, User: Zanygenius(talk page) 19:57, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jwalia012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have no harm in accepting. I would have expected if I was at fault! Sir, to be honest, I owe an Internet cafe in India. I was new to wikipedia and had started my editing. That day, I was editing on page after lot of research. At the same time, there was one more person present at my Internet cafe! He stalked me of what I am doing and then for fun or may be purposely he just kept on deleting the speedy deletation tag. All this got recorded in cctv cameras as my Internet cafe! Like the person peeping from behind in my computer. Sir, if I had to delete the tag of speedy deletation, I wouldn't have asked for other people on Wikipedia to help me with the article. I would have directly kept deleting. I am innocent! This is what I and God knows. I didn't do anything wrong as of from my part and that's final! But ya, I do have to suffer and face all this because of some person who came to my Internet Cafe and ruined everything without my knowledge. I last time plead and reappeal. I request to pls investigate properly because the reason for blocked was Ip address being same. Ya, it's true! Ip is same because mine is an Internet Cafe and the person uniseller9 was using one of our shop's computer and was ruining things without my knowledge. I Request last time to give me last chance! I assure this won't happen as I will be blocking wikipedia on all my other computers so that such people with wrong intention won't be able to ruin things! I wanna be a good editor and have to go a long way! I Request once again to rethink and support me! I will never let you guys down. Jwalia012 (talk) 19:32, 2 February 2018 (UTC)jwalia012

Decline reason:

Even without CheckUser access, this explanation does not agree with the available evidence. Huon (talk) 16:56, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is not accurate. This is not what the checkuser information showed. Try again. --Yamla (talk) 19:33, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Vajau Ka for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vajau Ka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vajau Ka until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —usernamekiran(talk) 05:26, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Dattatray KaduDeshmukh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Dattatray KaduDeshmukh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.marathi.tv/actress/usha-chavan-bio/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 07:54, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Jai Walia concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jai Walia, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 8 May 2018 (UTC)