Judge Josie

Judge Josie, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Judge Josie! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Bsoyka (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Hey I just wanna say that I got a reliable source, Sorry, I am to wikipedia

Andrew Gentes Article Help

{{Re|Meatsgains}

Hey, I think I got a new reliable source for it. It is from the Courier Mail so I think it should be good enough. I am new to Wikipedia so I was not aware that I needed more sources. Thanks!

Judge Josie (talk) 21:37, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Our Lady of Mercy Academy (Keene, New Hampshire) (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Rusalkii were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Our Lady of Mercy Academy (Keene, New Hampshire) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Our Lady of Mercy Academy (Keene, New Hampshire), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 23:39, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Amongophobia

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Amongophobia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 13:55, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 14:28, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Judge Josie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Irrational based conclusion of multiple accounts Judge Josie (talk) 17:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

 Confirmed sockpuppetry. I'll upgrade the block to reflect this. Yamla (talk) 17:58, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Judge Josie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Not sufficient evidence for banningJudge Josie (talk) 20:31, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The accounts are indistinguishable from each other. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 21:57, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It was my friend and me who were helping each other with our articles. I will contact you myself if need you actual evidence that I am no sockpuppeteer.

• TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:55, 17 December 2021 (UTC)