JosefHe
Welcome, and apologies
editHi JosefHe, and welcome to Wikipedia. Apologies for reverting your comments here, that was an accident - I hit the wrong button by mistake. Thanks. — Amakuru (talk) 11:29, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
February 2020
editPlease stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 14:04, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Notice
editThere is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Nazi block needed. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:08, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
February 2020
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Drmies (talk) 14:09, 15 February 2020 (UTC)- If you were to stop sounding like a Nazi apologist you might get unblocked. I mean, "Hitler's multiple offers to end the war in 1940"--that is not going to happen here. Drmies (talk) 14:10, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hitler offered to end the war with the British Empire in May 1940 and on 19 July 1940. Churchill prevented the first offer from being debated by the House of Commons. (JosefHe (talk) 14:11, 15 February 2020 (UTC))
JosefHe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
There has been much discussion lately in the Telegraph about Churchill's partial responsibility for the Holocaust and the Bengal Famine. He prevented parliament from hearing Hitler's offer to end the war in May 1940, even though the German leader offered to withdraw from France and Norway. Churchill also ignored Hitler's offer to end the war on 19 July 1940. Pat Buchanan and other historians have argued that Churchill's refusal to end the war led to the Final Solution, as in 1940 the Nazis were only talking about deporting Jews from Europe in the Madagascar Plan. Defenders of Churchill's actions have argued it is unlikely he could have survived the May 1940 War Cabinet Crisis had he allowed Hitler's peace offers to be debated in the Commons. JosefHe (talk) 14:15, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This has nothing at all to do with Adolf Hitler, and amounts to a talking point for apologists for the Nazi regime looking for a way to deflect the blame for genocide away from the perpetrators. Wikipedia isn't a forum for such views. Acroterion (talk) 16:41, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Churchill's refusal to accept Hitler's peace offers in 1940 led directly to the Holocaust. This is fact. If the UK had ended the war the Madagascar Plan would have been carried out and the Final Solution would never have happened. (JosefHe (talk) 16:43, 15 February 2020 (UTC))
JosefHe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
It is silly for Hitler's article lede to describe him as evil when Stalin's article lede does not do likewise. It is a fact that several historians have partly blamed Churchill for the Holocaust - see Pat Buchanan's "Churchill, Hitler and the Unnecessary War" (2008). JosefHe (talk) 16:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Are you actually defending Hitler in an unblock request? No way, not having it. – bradv🍁 16:55, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
JosefHe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not defending Hitler at all, I am just saying it is silly for his article on this site to call him evil when Stalin's article does not do likewise. If I were accused of defending Stalin I would not get blocked. In any case the word "evil" in unencyclopedic and POV. Stalin killed millions of Jews and the British and French colonial empires exterminated millions of people all over the world. Churchill and Stalin also carried out genocide, so why is only Hitler described as evil on this site? The British Empire and the Soviet Union were built on the subjugation and elimination of entire races. In Britain's former colonies Hitler's actions are not regarded as evil. I have studied modern history at degree level, I am convinced the editors who have blocked me are not even aware that Hitler offered to end the war during the May 1940 War Cabinet Crisis and again on 19 July 1940: http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/policy/1940/1940-07-19b.html JosefHe (talk) 16:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Go troll someplace else. Yamla (talk) 18:44, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Now CU blocked without TPA.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:22, 15 February 2020 (UTC)