John Harkins

What is vandalism

Read Wikipedia:NOT VANDALISM and Wikipedia:VANDTYPES before you accuse of vandalism again. Bladesmulti (talk) 17:02, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Sock puppetry

Stop abusing mutliple accounts or IP addresses, try gaining consensus on the talk page if you are in dispute with another editor. If you continue to edit war and engage in sock puppetry, you would be blocked from editing. Bladesmulti (talk) 17:02, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Bladesmulti (talk) 17:58, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

You are welcome.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:08, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Okay.John Harkins (talk) 19:13, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

"Your own propaganda", "just stop lying" contravene Wikipedia:No personal attacks rule.

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did on Talk:Death by burning [1] you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on issue, not on other people. Bladesmulti (talk) 13:02, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Stop giving me non-sensical warnings. You are not a dictator over here. You also said that my addition of the article was nonsensical. Wasn't that should be counted as a personal attack. John Harkins (talk) 13:08, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

It is not, especially when you claim your statements to be truth and truth, which is not even useful. Bladesmulti (talk) 13:09, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Now you stop yourself from threatening me like this saying my version is non-sensical and other non-sense stuff. And don't lie on talk pages when you edit them. Because you don't have any respect for the writers. John Harkins (talk) 13:16, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

I cannot see where I have lied. Also which writer you are talking about, are you talking about yourself? Bladesmulti (talk) 13:20, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

You lied when you said in your edit summary that it is not about death by burning when in reality is really so. Simply your claim that the writers or the content is outdated doesn't work here on Wikipedia. So refrain from such tactics. John Harkins (talk) 13:23, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Yes it was metaphoric outdated translation that was not related with the article at all. Later sections were undue. How any of them falls under the notable incidents or wide ranging practices of death by burning? Just repeating same paragraph with different and disputed content is no help for the article, read Wikipedia:UNDUE again, Wikipedia should not present a dispute as if a view held by a small minority deserves as much attention overall as the majority view. When later paragraphs were already added to Sati, why it is needed on this page? Bladesmulti (talk) 13:28, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Alleged of sock puppetry

Look at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Siddheart. Bladesmulti (talk) 15:07, 26 September 2014 (UTC)