User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus/Archive 43

Archive 40 Archive 41 Archive 42 Archive 43 Archive 44 Archive 45 Archive 50

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
76   40th century BC (talk) Add sources
522   Quarry (talk) Add sources
28   Groene Hart (talk) Add sources
6   University of Cape Town Libraries (talk) Add sources
48   Puyehue-Cordón Caulle (talk) Add sources
100   Heinrich event (talk) Add sources
30   Tollmann's hypothetical bolide (talk) Cleanup
2,218   Neolithic (talk) Cleanup
876   Timeline of historic inventions (talk) Cleanup
28   Nevado del Tolima (talk) Expand
33   Pluvial (talk) Expand
831   Khoisan (talk) Expand
226   Urheimat (talk) Unencyclopaedic
116   Old Europe (archaeology) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
845   Proto-Indo-Europeans (talk) Unencyclopaedic
110   Neolithic Subpluvial (talk) Merge
3   Messinian erosional crisis (talk) Merge
117   Neanderthal genome project (talk) Merge
22   Baltic Ice Lake (talk) Wikify
34   Prehistoric Georgia (talk) Wikify
268   Lower Egypt (talk) Wikify
29   Tropical Easterly Jet (talk) Orphan
2   Desert Locust Control Organization for Eastern Africa (talk) Orphan
3   Great Salinity Anomaly (talk) Orphan
47   38th century BC (talk) Stub
8   National Geology and Mining Service (talk) Stub
18   Ceboruco (talk) Stub
23   Milena Minkova (talk) Stub
6   Nevado San Francisco (talk) Stub
27   Merimde culture (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:48, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

18:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Three Wise Men

Hey you put in a request in the resource exchange for a page out of Volcano: A Visual Guide. The text is pretty short, so here it is verbatim:

"The floor of the Pacific Ocean has more seamounts, or underwater volcanoes, then any other ocean. Undersea volcanos, as other volcanoes, form from molten lava produced where the edges of the Earth's plates bump into, slide under, or grate against each other. A row of three submarine volcanoes, called The Three Wise Men, grew along a spreading mid-ocean ridge called the East Pacific Rise. The Three Wise Men are a part of a seamount field called he Rano Rahi in the Pacific Ocean. The Rano Rahi seamount field is known for its numerous chains of submerged volcanoes. The Three Wise Men are between 1000 and 2000m tall. In his image, green indicates deep areas and red and white more shallow.

Alongside a bathymetric illustration.

Hope that's helpful! ResMar 01:49, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, @Resident Mario:. As it happens to be, someone else already sent me a screenshot of the page. I just needed to know that these volcanoes are part of the Rano Rahi seamounts, since I wrote the article about them. Cheers. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

Your GA nomination of Sairecabur

The article Sairecabur you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Sairecabur for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ceranthor -- Ceranthor (talk) 20:42, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monowai (seamount), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Talus, Plume and Venting (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

I'll work on this as part of the general article expansion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:17, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

17:12, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

toggle ref check

Hello, just a note to say that User:Lingzhi2/reviewsourcecheck has been update to add the option to toggle it on or off.

 

The installed script will add a tab to the drop-down tab at the top, located between the 'watchlist star' and the search box (using the vector.js skin). The tab toggles between "Hide ref check" and "Show ref check" with displaying the errors as the default option. Please do drop me a line if you have any problems or suggestions. Tks. ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 15:19, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

  • Sorry to bother you again. After the addition of a toggle option in the tab atop the page, one editor requested a revised version in which the toggle link appears in the "Tools" section of the page's left sidebar. So now there are two versions of this tool. If you prefer the links in the Toolbar section on the side, the slightly altered script is named User:Lingzhi2/reviewsourcecheck-sb.js (just add "-sb" before the ".js"). Finally, both versions should now also store the page state (whether reference errors/warnings are "hidden" or "shown"). The state persists between page loads and between the browser closing and reopening (unless cleared by the user, for example by deleting data in your browser's cache etc.). Huge thanks to User:Evad37 for much coding help. If you have any questions or problems, please drop me a line. Thanks again. ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 08:20, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:34, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Homeric Minimum

On 6 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Homeric Minimum, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Homeric Minimum may have been responsible for permanent snow on Mount Olympus, as referred to by Homer and in Greek mythology? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Homeric Minimum. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Homeric Minimum), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

To expand

Arago hotspot. JoJo Eumerus mobile (talk) 10:43, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Horizon Guyot with [3], Lamont seamount chain and Researcher Ridge. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:50, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
10.2973/odp.proc.ir.199.111.2002 isn't working. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:23, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Payún Matrú

  Hello! Your submission of Payún Matrú at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mhhossein talk 13:09, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

18:45, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Lava balloon

On 18 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lava balloon, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that lava can form gas-filled balloons that float on water? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lava balloon. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lava balloon), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

23:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Talk to us about talking

Trizek (WMF) 15:08, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

To look for

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040195111002460 JoJo Eumerus mobile (talk) 22:19, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for African humid period

On 22 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article African humid period, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that changes in Earth's orbit around the Sun over 10,000 years ago led to the disappearance of the Sahara desert? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/African humid period. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, African humid period), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:03, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Talk pages consultation 2019

The Wikimedia Foundation has invited the various Wikimedia communities, including the English Wikipedia, to participate in a consultation on improving communication methods within the Wikimedia projects. As such, a request for comment has been created at Wikipedia:Talk pages consultation 2019. You are invited to express your views in the discussion. ~ Winged BladesGodric 05:18, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
79   Ecotricity (talk) Add sources
957   Atoll (talk) Add sources
6   Society hotspot (talk) Add sources
23   Alkali basalt (talk) Add sources
531   Los Alamos National Laboratory (talk) Add sources
24   Ocean Drilling Program (talk) Add sources
265   Mount Agung (talk) Cleanup
44   Cold blob (North Atlantic) (talk) Cleanup
361   Ocean gyre (talk) Cleanup
153   Mount Rinjani (talk) Expand
22   Southwest Indian Seamounts Marine Protected Area (talk) Expand
40   Ferromanganese (talk) Expand
37   Geomagnetic excursion (talk) Unencyclopaedic
415   La Palma (talk) Unencyclopaedic
442   Maunder Minimum (talk) Unencyclopaedic
56   Iceland hotspot (talk) Merge
297   Xenophyophore (talk) Merge
1,669   Squid (talk) Merge
113   Cumbre Vieja (talk) Wikify
29   Lunitidal interval (talk) Wikify
86   Roadstead (talk) Wikify
6   Tropical Atlantic SST Dipole (talk) Orphan
3   Campeche Knolls (talk) Orphan
2   Ferrel Seamount (talk) Orphan
4   Lemkein (talk) Stub
4   Sepia novaehollandiae (talk) Stub
6   Cerro Macá (talk) Stub
3   President Thiers Bank (talk) Stub
3   Sepia pulchra (talk) Stub
2   Los Colorados (caldera) (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:03, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tropic Seamount

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tropic Seamount you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adityavagarwal -- Adityavagarwal (talk) 12:21, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

21:16, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Payún Matrú

On 26 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Payún Matrú, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Payún Matrú volcano, last active about 500 years ago, is the source of the longest Quaternary lava flow on Earth? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Payún Matrú. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Payún Matrú), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

Your GA nomination of Haruj

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Haruj you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Atsme -- Atsme (talk) 18:00, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Haruj

The article Haruj you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Haruj for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Atsme -- Atsme (talk) 21:21, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Note to self

Check https://ovs.igp.gob.pe/volcan-coropuna. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:31, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

16:38, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sillajhuay

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sillajhuay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Squeamish Ossifrage -- Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 17:21, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sillajhuay

The article Sillajhuay you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Sillajhuay for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Squeamish Ossifrage -- Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 16:01, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Deletion review for Marianna Yarovskaya

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Marianna Yarovskaya. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:56, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

The deletion review unsalted the title, and I accepted a new draft.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:38, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Allison Guyot scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the Allison Guyot article has been scheduled as today's featured article for April 12, 2019. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 12, 2019, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

We also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors on the day before and the day of this TFA. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:51, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

@Jimfbleak: Um, why is the blurb using an image of a different guyot in a different ocean? Otherwise it seems OK. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:06, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
We are keen to have an image for every TFA if humanly possible. Normally for this sort of article I'd use the map if all else fails, as I did for your last guyot TFA I ran, but this has a push-pin type, so all we would get is the Pacific. If you can find or make anything more suitable, please feel free to replace, the image is only there because I couldn't locate anything else Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:11, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Sometimes I wonder what the standard of copyright protection for no-frill bathymetric maps like the one here is. [10] and [11] suggest that it might be too uncreative to be copyrightable but that needs some input from copyright experts at Commons. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:34, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
As a general rule, contour maps (whether terrestrial or bathymetric) have had copyrights. It has take a fair amount of work and creative talent to take a grid of height/depth points and turn them into a usable map that more or less accurately reflects the contours of the land or the sea. I say "has taken" and "have had" because we have come into an era where it is possible to produce such maps from the points without human intervention. Thus it is possible that one could have two similar countour maps, one with a copyright and one without.
BTW, I have a fair amount of experience here and have never before seen {{bcc}}. Being notified that someone has named me without finding it took me several minutes to figure out. Perhaps it is more common on WP:EN, but I think it should be avoided, at least when communicating with people who might not have seen it. .     Jim . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:27, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Maps were one of the first types of works to be granted copyrights in U.S. law. The case you cite (Darden v Peters) was a case where someone started with U.S. Census outline maps (i.e. PD-USGov), then added a color and state name labels. If Darden had created the outlines himself in some way, it probably would have been easily copyrightable. It was just the minimal additions which were not enough for their own copyright. It's possible that some basic outline maps are ubiquitous enough today to not have a copyright, but I wouldn't count on it. Carl Lindberg (talk) 05:24, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
An alternative would be to take the existing commons blank map and add a location dot so that it looks like the pushpin version. Or half the hotspot diagram (whole thing is too vertical for blurb)? Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:37, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
@Clindberg and Jameslwoodward: Thanks for the input. I didn't find out about {{bbc}} until recently, either. @Jimfbleak: The only one bathymetric map that comes to mind are these light blue ones here but it ain't clear which of these several basemaps in there might fall under PD-USGov if any. I dunno, does the CCBY4.0 license of this map set apply to the actual maps? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:26, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Isn't the NOAA stuff PD unless otherwise stated? I've used NOAA software to generate weather maps, which appears to be OK for copyright. Not sure about the other one, Google seems to be claiming copyright. The image doesn't have to be a map, but that would be simplest option Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:06, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

As a general rule, works created by NOAA itself are PD. I would think that https://maps.ngdc.noaa.gov/viewers/bathymetry would be OK. On the other hand, http://www.marine-geo.org/tools/new_search/search_map.php is not OK -- there is an explicit statement of a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike at http://www.marine-geo.org/about/terms_of_use.php which applies to the whole site. Neither Commons nor WP:EN accepts an NC license. .     Jim . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:55, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

@Jameslwoodward:Buh. It seems like I did not notice the "noncommercial" bit. The problem with the NOAA map is that it has more than one basemap, two of which (Esri and GEBCO__2014) are unquestionably not freely licensed as they appear to be by a third party while the GMRT isn't so clear - there is a website here that offers such a thing and gives a CC-By4.0 license but The Global Multi-Resolution Topography (GMRT) synthesis is a multi-resolutional compilation of edited multibeam sonar data collected by scientists and institutions worldwide, that is reviewed, processed and gridded by the MGDS Team and merged into a single continuously updated compilation of global elevation data. makes me wonder whether it's a derivative work. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:27, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
In view of your misgivings about the TFA map, I've made File:Allison Guyot location.png using your ref and a Commons base map, and replaced the image at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 12, 2019, I hope that's OK Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:48, 8 March 2019 (UTC)