Jo-Jo Eumerus
Joined 4 September 2012
(Redirected from User talk:JoJo Eumerus mobile)
Latest comment: 4 days ago by Jo-Jo Eumerus in topic Aston Martin DB9
| This is Jo-Jo Eumerus's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
FAC candidates edit
 | This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived. |
- Cerro Panizos
- Socompa
- Licancabur
- Llullaillaco
- Sabancaya
- Misti
- Macauley Island, needs prose cleanup
- Aucanquilcha, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar
- Cerro Guacha, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar
- El Laco, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar
- Lastarria, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar
- Purico complex, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar
- Aguas Calientes caldera, needs a rewrite (and some mergers) with Google Scholar
- Pastos Grandes, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar or shortened.
- Mount Okmok
- Mount Aniakchak
- Candlemas Island
- Laguna Verde (Bolivia), needs expansion with talkpage sauces
Most of 'em need a root-and-branch rewrite first, though. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Answered your question about source of PDF file for NM. Bur Mines Miner. Res. Bull edit
I apologzie for bothering you. but I could not make the "ping" work. Anyway, I answered your question about source of PDF file for NM. Bur Mines Miner. Res. Bull. It is Link to PDF of entire Bulletin 131. Paul H. (talk) 03:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
1921 Centre vs. Harvard football game edit
Hi Jo-Jo. This article has had a sources spot check, but not - so far as I can see - a source review, if you follow me. Any chance you could oblige? Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 10:54, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello Jo-Jo Eumerus, could you possibly perform a source review on the AM DB9 featured article candidacy? Best (don't feel obliged), 750h+ | Talk 14:02, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- It will also need a source to text fidelity spot check and a over-close paraphrasing review. Cheers. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:04, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe, although getting some reviews from others in first might be better before asking for spotchecks and the like. Oxford Mail is described as a "tabloid", which makes me wonder about whether it's a "high-quality reliable source". Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Nevermind, did this one as well. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:53, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe, although getting some reviews from others in first might be better before asking for spotchecks and the like. Oxford Mail is described as a "tabloid", which makes me wonder about whether it's a "high-quality reliable source". Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
You've got mail edit
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 14:14, 13 April 2024 (UTC)