Jiataozhang

{{Blocks review|1=Please accept my sincere apologies.I respect the regulations of Wikipedia.I understand and accepted the Block,I understanad I was wrong,onle beg and request to Unblock.But I was not been sock puppet.I was wrong.I was so wrong.I just want to impatient to let people understand how the late USSR government's reviewd about stalin,and how the late USSR's government's reviewd about stalin has changed.That will bring the Multiple point of view about stalin.Not only a stereotypes about late USSR's government was all about anti-stalin. I am so sorry.I understand and accepted the Block,I understanad I was wrong,onle beg and request to Unblock.}}

{{Blocks review|1=Please accept my sincere apologies.I respect the regulations of Wikipedia.I understand and accepted the Block,I understanad I was wrong,onle beg and request to Unblock.But I was not been sock puppet.I was wrong.I was so wrong.I just want to impatient to let people understand how the late USSR government's reviewd about stalin,and how the late USSR's government's reviewd about stalin has changed.That will bring the Multiple point of view about stalin.Not only a stereotypes about late USSR's government was all about anti-stalin. I am so sorry.I understand and accepted the Block,I understanad I was wrong,onle beg and request to Unblock.}}

{{Blocks review|=Please accept my sincere apologies.I respect the regulations of Wikipedia.I understand and accepted the Block,I understanad I was wrong,onle beg and request to Unblock.But I was not been sock puppet.I was wrong.I was so wrong.I just want to impatient to let people understand how the late USSR government's reviewd about stalin,and how the late USSR's government's reviewd about stalin has changed.That will bring the Multiple point of view about stalin.Not only a stereotypes about late USSR's government was all about anti-stalin. I am so sorry.I understand and accepted the Block,I understanad I was wrong,onle beg and request to Unblock.}}

{{Blocks Review=Please accept my sincere apologies.I respect the regulations of Wikipedia.I understand and accepted the Block,I understanad I was wrong,onle beg and request to Unblock.But I was not been sock puppet.I was wrong.I was so wrong.I just want to impatient to let people understand how the late USSR government's reviewd about stalin,and how the late USSR's government's reviewd about stalin has changed.That will bring the Multiple point of view about stalin.Not only a stereotypes about late USSR's government was all about anti-stalin. I am so sorry.I understand and accepted the Block,I understanad I was wrong,onle beg and request to Unblock.}}

{{Blocks review|=Please accept my sincere apologies.I respect the regulations of Wikipedia.I understand and accepted the Block,I understanad I was wrong,onle beg and request to Unblock.But I was not been sock puppet.I was wrong.I was so wrong.I just want to impatient to let people understand how the late USSR government's reviewd about stalin,and how the late USSR's government's reviewd about stalin has changed.That will bring the Multiple point of view about stalin.Not only a stereotypes about late USSR's government was all about anti-stalin. I am so sorry.I understand and accepted the Block,I understanad I was wrong,onle beg and request to Unblock.}}

Your recent edits

{{Blocks review|1=Please accept my sincere apologies.I respect the regulations of Wikipedia.I understand and accepted the Block,I understanad I was wrong,onle beg and request to Unblock.But I was not been sock puppet.I was wrong.I was so wrong.I just want to impatient to let people understand how the late USSR government's reviewd about stalin,and how the late USSR's government's reviewd about stalin has changed.That will bring the Multiple point of view about stalin.Not only a stereotypes about late USSR's government was all about anti-stalin. I am so sorry.I understand and accepted the Block,I understanad I was wrong,onle beg and request to Unblock.}} Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:53, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

{{Blocks review|1=Please accept my sincere apologies.I respect the regulations of Wikipedia.I understand and accepted the Block,I understanad I was wrong,onle beg and request to Unblock.But I was not been sock puppet.I was wrong.I was so wrong.I just want to impatient to let people understand how the late USSR government's reviewd about stalin,and how the late USSR's government's reviewd about stalin has changed.That will bring the Multiple point of view about stalin.Not only a stereotypes about late USSR's government was all about anti-stalin. I am so sorry.I understand and accepted the Block,I understanad I was wrong,onle beg and request to Unblock.}}

May 2013

{{Blocks review|1=Please accept my sincere apologies.I respect the regulations of Wikipedia.I understand and accepted the Block,I understanad I was wrong,onle beg and request to Unblock.But I was not been sock puppet.I was wrong.I was so wrong.I just want to impatient to let people understand how the late USSR government's reviewd about stalin,and how the late USSR's government's reviewd about stalin has changed.That will bring the Multiple point of view about stalin.Not only a stereotypes about late USSR's government was all about anti-stalin. I am so sorry.I understand and accepted the Block,I understanad I was wrong,onle beg and request to Unblock.}}

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Hui people, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 19:29, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

• Your edits are being reverted by several editors because they are so poorly written as to be very hard to make sense of. I strongly suggest you stop adding text to articles - you can use the talk pages to suggest sources and text, and other interested editors can help you with the written English. Also, I noticed that your edits are very similar to those of blocked user User:Zhanghao1987. If you are Zhanghao1987, please read Wikipedia:Sock puppetry to understand why it is against Wikipedia policy to use multiple accounts to evade a block. Cheers, Dawn Bard (talk) 19:36, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

I am sorry, but the material you have been adding to articles is so poorly-written as to make little or no sense. I think you might do better to edit another version of Wikipedia, where you have more skills in the relevant language. If you wish to respond, do so at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Jiataozhang AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:37, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gang of Four may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:57, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jiang Qing may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:59, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Zhang Chunqiao may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:02, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wang Hongwen may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:03, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Yao Wenyuan may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:04, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yao Wenyuan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 20:06, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Inner Mongolia may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:07, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. RolandR (talk) 20:57, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Can you please slow down and discuss your edits?

{{Blocks review|1=Please accept my sincere apologies.I respect the regulations of Wikipedia.I understand and accepted the Block,I understanad I was wrong,onle beg and request to Unblock.But I was not been sock puppet.I was wrong.I was so wrong.I just want to impatient to let people understand how the late USSR government's reviewd about stalin,and how the late USSR's government's reviewd about stalin has changed.That will bring the Multiple point of view about stalin.Not only a stereotypes about late USSR's government was all about anti-stalin. I am so sorry.I understand and accepted the Block,I understanad I was wrong,onle beg and request to Unblock.}}

Again, your edits are being repeatedly reverted my many different editors because they are simply not well written. If you have sources or content that you think should be in the article, please use the article talk pages. Your editing pattern at the moment is very disruptive, and you get blocked if you continue to add and re-add large blocks of confusing, badly-written text. I appreciate that you want to help improve Wikipedia, but the best way for you to help at this point is to use the article talk pages and let other Wikipedians help you with the spelling and grammar. Cheers, Dawn Bard (talk) 20:59, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Mao Zedong. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Your repeatedf reverion of several other editors, in order to restore very poorly written and totally unclear and incomprehensible edits to many articles, has become extremely disruptive. It appears that you do not have the English-language skills needed in order to edit on the English Wikipedia. I strongly recommend that you restrict your editing to talk-page requests, and that you persuade another editor to make your additions in comprehensible English. RolandR (talk) 21:03, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jiang Qing, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. RolandR (talk) 21:06, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Amaury (talk) 21:50, 27 May 2013 (UTC)