Welcome edit

Hello, Jc21051979! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! -- MSTR (Chat Me!) 10:47, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

December 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Jehovah's Witnesses, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- MSTR (Chat Me!) 10:47, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

List of road routes in Western Australia edit

Hi Jc21051979,

Thank you for you recent edits adding information to List of road routes in Western Australia. However, you also reverted my subsequent edits to the above article (shown here). Unfortunately you did not leave a clear edit summary, so I have no idea why you did so. If you did so in error, you can undo your own edit. Anyway, I'll explain here what I did and why:

  1. Changed Ave→Avenue, St→Street etc: I changed the abbreviations to the full versions for consistency with the other entries on the list, and because road articles on Wikipedia use full versions in the title (eg Mitchell Freeway, Mandurah Road). Also, the Manual of Style (MOS) section on Abbreviations suggests that editors "Always consider whether it is better to simply write a word or phrase out in full, thus avoiding potential confusion for those not familiar with its abbreviation. Remember that Wikipedia does not have the same space constraints as paper."
  2. Remove some red links: In lists, it is generally better to avoid too many red links, as they start to look more like a worklist for editors and article creators, rather than a list for readers, as per the MOS section on lists.
  3. Shorten the note on SR14 and put the old route in Decommissioned section: Text in the notes column is generally better off being shorter (if it gets the same information across), as long notes stretch the table and make other columns narrower on smaller screens. The way I reworded it let readers know that it had been rerouted, a provided a link to lower down the page for the old route. Similarly, the old route had a link to further up the page for the new route.
  4. Reorder the decommissioned routes: In line with the ordering of the rest of the page, I changed the order to National Routes followed by State Routes, in numerical order.

You can reply here, on my talk page, or start a new section on the article's talk page.

Once again, thanks for the information you added. If you enjoy editing road articles, you may want to check out WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve and standardise the format used in articles about highways, freeways, expressways, throughways, and other major forms of road. - Evad37 (talk) 00:41, 23 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

6PR edit

I have again reverted your edits to 6PR.

  • The On-Air Line Up is not appropriate for an encyclopaedia. As stated in WP:NOTRADIOGUIDE, "an article on a radio station should not list ... current schedules, etc".
  • The other edits, which you undid and I have re-instated, were:
    • removal of unnecessary capitalisation, in line with WP:MOSCAPS,
    • fixing a run-on sentence

If you still disagree, please discuss the matter on the article talk page. Thank-you, Mitch Ames (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ignoring advice and reverting edit

  1. WP:3RR can see you blocked
  2. have a look at WP:NOT and WP:ABOUT - and consider that you are perhaps in a position where regular editors are tyrying to get you to underestand what wikipedia is. Well worth considering, the alterantive could see you blocked. cheers sats 11:49, 2 June 2013 (UTC)Reply