Welcome! edit

Hi HistoriaTurce! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Perokema (talk) 22:07, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

January 2021 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Turan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wario-Man (talk) 06:34, 19 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Etruscan civilization, you may be blocked from editing. It was already linked (citation #56).[1] Wario-Man (talk) 07:12, 19 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Etruscan civilization. Wario-Man (talk) 08:59, 19 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Stop please. Why you don't accept resources ? I don't speaking with any sources . You don't have history? Please stop stealing our history. Or I'm complain you. Thank you! HistoriaTurce (talk) 09:04, 19 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Etruscan civilization. --Chiorbone da Frittole (talk) 09:06, 19 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Unsourced changes at Xiongnu edit

Regarding this edit. Please don't insert your personal opinion that the Xiongnu were Turkic without providing proper sources for your claim, and without showing that the majority of historians agree with you. See the text now in the third paragraph of Xiongnu: The identity of the ethnic core of Xiongnu has been a subject of varied hypotheses…. There are at least six theories for what language they spoke. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:03, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply