Talk:Turan

Latest comment: 1 year ago by HistoryofIran in topic Turkification of Turan

Pan-Turks are vandalizing and distorting this article with their fictional history books.

edit

Diana_marlisto is vandalizing this page with pan-Turkism propaganda. Be very cautious of this user.

--Sickofthisbs (talk) 13:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Dehkhoda source

edit

Why is the dehkhoda marked as an inadequate source and that a better source is needed? It is arguably the most reliable Persian dictionary of modern times ParsaPbt (talk) 13:21, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Turan - Is Turkic, not Iranian.

edit

When the Turks used this term, or name. They even gave this name to a region of the Mediterranean Sea.

Y = u Tyrhennia/Turhannia

Like Odin said he came from Tyrkland, Turkland.

....There was no Iran, back then. Iran was many time ruled by Turks.

Iranians are in the farrest history even Turks, read and learn and educate yourself before making the truth dirty, and a lie.

Gene D. Matlock - What Strange Mystery Unites the Turkish Nations, India, Catholicism, and Mexico? 89.205.128.211 (talk) 10:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

imagine arguing and making up so much lies that no one even entertains you panturkists anymore, imagine having such a sad history that you have you in Europe to call yourselfs the original blond haired and blue eyed europeans and in persia the original children of iran, i am waiting for the day your people will say cyrus the great was a turk. 46.251.152.200 (talk) 10:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Turkification of Turan

edit

The Article must contain all of the beliefs and theories and not focus on one source of information, Turkic people have different opinions about Turan and it's bold enough to be mentioned in the article which positively effects the Turco-Persian argument going on about the article and the ongoing edit-war

No sources or beliefs are considered to be 100% right about a historical article so do not attempt to delete or undo the added information even if the details are in opposition with the confirmed text of the article

All opinions and theories must be contained in historical articles considering that all sources are not completely right.

please do not change the information contained in the edit and let all theories to be discussed. IlyaSurkhayovic (talk) 18:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please read WP:RS, WP:CS and WP:UNDUE. --HistoryofIran (talk) 19:00, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
@HistoryofIran The Sources were mentioned in the article IlyaSurkhayovic (talk) 19:04, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Where? The primary source (WP:PST) you just cited with no pages? [1]. Stop edit warring and read our rules. The sourced sections of this article clearly contradicts what you're trying to add, which is essentially psuedo-history. --HistoryofIran (talk) 19:34, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply