Welcome!

Hello, Hfedit9898.  Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm Suneye1, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information:
    Introduction to Wikipedia
    The five pillars of Wikipedia
    Editing tutorial
    How to edit a page
    Simplified Manual of Style
    The basics of Wikicode
    How to develop an article
    How to create an article
    Help pages
    What Wikipedia is not
Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
    Do be bold
    Do assume good faith
    Do be civil
    Do cite reliable sources
    Do maintain a neutral point of view
    Don't spam
    Don't infringe copyright
    Don't add original research
    Don't commit vandalism
    Don't get blocked
If you need further help, you can:
    Ask a question
or you can:
    Get help at the Teahouse
or even:
    Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the   button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Cinematic universes

edit

Please stop changing the names of film series to have "Cinematic Universe" in them. These are simply a few films in a series and are already named correctly. There are only a few film collections that are called "cinematic universe" because they include several series with different names that came from a shared source. 99% of film series would not fall under this category, and certainly not the ones that you have been changing. -- Fyrael (talk) 17:31, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

February 2022

edit

  Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. - SUN EYE 1 07:16, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Aranmanai (film series), you may be blocked from editing. Ab207 (talk) 12:22, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page disruptively, as you did at Muni (film series). Please use WP:RM when your move is reverted. Ab207 (talk) 15:39, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you move a page disruptively again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SUN EYE 1 15:58, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Most recent move

edit

Hi Hfedit9898. I noticed you've moved the Muni (film series) page once again to Muni Cinematic Universe (film series). You've already been reverted twice and have yet to produce sources that show that's the WP:COMMONNAME of this series of movies. I opened a discussion on the talk page but you decided not to participate. I ask that you self-revert your move and discuss the name change (or start a move request) so other users can leave their input. If you fail to do that, I'll have to open a thread on WP:ANI to discuss your behavior. Isabelle 🔔 15:59, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

As I was posting this, someone else reverted the move. My warning regarding WP:ANI stands, and I ask that you avoid moving the page unilaterally again. Isabelle 🔔 16:01, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Hak Foo

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hak Foo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – NJD-DE (talk) 14:29, 12 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Bigg Boss Ultimate, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 11:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

List of Indian journalists

edit

  Hello. Your recent edit to List of Indian journalists appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:38, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Madan Gowri

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Madan Gowri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madan Gowri (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CUPIDICAE💕 15:07, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

  One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:00, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

February 2022 - again

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of Indian journalists, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
It was clearly explained, above, that you should not add people to lists unless they already have their own article - but you are continuing to do so - and you have received 2 final warnings for disruptive editing, but you are continuing to do that as well - Arjayay (talk) 12:12, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Consider this another final warning. Stop your disruptive editing on Draft:Madhan Gowry. Repeatedly resubmitting and removing prior reviews as well as moving to mainspace is disruptive. Continuing to do so will result in a block. CUPIDICAE💕 15:53, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madan Gowri (February 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Praxidicae was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
CUPIDICAE💕 14:49, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Hfedit9898! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CUPIDICAE💕 14:49, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madan Gowri (February 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Slywriter was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Slywriter (talk) 16:12, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

February 2022

edit

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Rahul Vijay Kumar per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rahul Vijay Kumar. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:25, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply