Greenfinchchick

NPOV, Political Agenda and Wikipedia Policy

Hi @Greenfinchchick: I've removed the two portals bars you added in for the United Kingdom. I have removed them and they are unsuitable for geographic articles. For geographic articles, geographic specific entries are the only thing that is useful and that is policy. If you have political agenda, for example, needing to state that Dunoon is part of the UK, then leave it at the door. Do it somewhere else. Not on Wikipedia. We follow policy in here, that is based on consensual agreement.scope_creep^Talk 11:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

I see you were working on the Dunoon article. There was a editor who was banned two weeks ago as a sock, who had the same approach and went straight for the Dunoon article as well. Are you that person? scope_creep^Talk 11:40, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

• I notice that you provide no link for this policy? I feel it is you who is politicising this! Scotland is part of the UK, it is you who seems to be in denial.Greenfinchchick (talk) 18:23, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

It is WP:NPOV. You seem to have an agenda. If you keep on this approach, I will have to report you to an admin. It is clear your the same person that was banned several weeks ago. scope_creep^Talk 13:02, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Greenfinchchick: I want to apologize for saying you were linked to the those other editor. It is clear your not. scope_creep^Talk 08:29, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

But you will need to follow consensus. There are many thousands of articles that need work. Leave the agenda at the door. scope_creep^Talk 09:59, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Previous accounts

Are any of your previous accounts currently blocked or under a topic/interaction ban? I am asking this because in this edit you say you twice joined Wikipedia and were made to feel unwelcome twice. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 11:28, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

• No my previous account was at least 10 years ago. I do not recall the username as I was not an editor for long, as had a previous bad experience on Wikipedia. Going by what has happened this time with false claims made against me, and an edit I made in good faith being reverted under the guise of NPOV. I am inclined to leave again! Two users seem more interested in their power/control, they continually in my view are harassing and vindictive. Greenfinchchick (talk) 12:10, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

If you don't like getting reverted then Wikipedia is going to be a bad experience for you. I have been an administrator for 15 years and I still get reverted. It happens, part of working in a collaborative environment. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 12:28, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

• I do not mind being reverted. I DO mind when it is totally unjustified! And being labelled a lair and a sockpuppet! My non-political edit on Dunoon has still not been fully restored!Greenfinchchick (talk) 12:34, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

• I have decided to leave. When I find out how to request my account removal? I will wait a while to see if my non-political edit onDunoon is fully restored, I am not holding my breath. I will not be editing anything on Wikipedia ever again, senior admin need to get a grip of the blatant misuse of NPOV. My edit although made under the "politics government" heading in NO way was political! Greenfinchchick (talk) 12:47, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

We don't remove accounts here. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 12:55, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Considering retirement Comment

CONSIDERING RETIREMENT

Greenfinchchick is strongly considering retirement, although nothing is set in stone...

July 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 18:12, 7 July 2021 (UTC)