User talk:Gogo Dodo/Archive 25
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A barnstar for you!
|
The Admin's Barnstar |
| You deleted that page within seconds! ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 19:30, 1 April 2012 (UTC) |
I don't see how this was a speedy a7-- it asserted he was a university professor, and a national hero. It's minimal, sure, but while it'll need some checking, and I'm not sure we'll find the evidence for WP:PROF, we might. (I know I have the ability to do so myself, but I want to ask you first.) DGG ( talk ) 21:32, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
I've written a draft stub article for the film Whole Lotta Sole
Hi - I've had a go at creating an article which is currently living in my sandbox ([[1]]). I think it might be reasonably OK to go live but spotted that you'd deleted a vandalised edition and wanted to check with you first about recreating the page. Thanks, Jo :) JoBrodie (talk) 21:41, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Thank you - will load it up now and see if it survives :) JoBrodie (talk) 21:55, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
"User:X179396828, doing the typical WoW gold spam thing"
I don't remember ever seeing this kind of thing before. Has Willy on Wheels come back and started spamming instead of moving around pages? Nyttend (talk) 03:27, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Chaotic Void
Did you mean to block him? — foxj 07:01, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:10, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- Foxj, it ain't happening yet, Chaotic Void will be indeffed some time in April 2014, as their username may suggest :-D Materialscientist (talk) 07:09, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- Urgh, busted by my own sloppy typing. I know, I know, go use some automated tool... Sigh. -- Gogo Dodo (talk)
- and get automated glitches which nobody can predict/understand :-D. (I also don't use tools, just copy/paste a few templates from a text file on a USB drive). Materialscientist (talk) 07:18, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- Heh - I worded that badly. My point was, he hasn't actually been blocked despite receiving a block notice. — foxj 07:13, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- (See here). — foxj 07:14, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- Wait for 2014 :-D. Materialscientist (talk) 07:18, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- Urgh, busted by my own sloppy typing. I know, I know, go use some automated tool... Sigh. -- Gogo Dodo (talk)
Sigh. I handled the "unblock" request and apologized to the editor. Ugh... what a mess. -- Gogo Dodo (talk)
- Where is that stupid fish? Does {{call for trout}} work? -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:29, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
|
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
— foxj 07:43, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Request to lock Survivor: One World
Hello there! I would like to request a lock of the Survivor: One World article due to numerous unsourced possible spoilers from unregistered users, especially over the past week. Thank you! SilentGanda (talk) 09:25, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Good Humor |
| This actually did make me laugh. It states the correct thing with humor for other editors rather than newbies
You have been doing great work as an admin. Keep it up! Yasht101 16:39, 12 April 2012 (UTC) |
Keith Russell Judd
Please undelete Keith Russell Judd. I placed the prod on it several months ago because the individual was non-notable, but now after additional coverage, it seems the subject merits an article. I asked the deleting admin Fastily to do this, but he appears to be inactive. Thank you. --William S. Saturn (talk) 06:46, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Curius
Why doesn't Special:Contributions/Tylrrgrts contain any log of an edit when the user obviously has edited before? (you deleted several of his pages and warned this user) Just a curious question, maybe its my browser's cache, do you see any contributions? ---Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 20:16, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Help on Phil Schneider
Hey,
I'm writing about the Philip Schneider page that you deleted. He's the guy who claims to have been in a shootout with aliens and then died (supposedly murdered). My girlfriend is convinced this dude is real and the absence of a wikipedia page only provides her with more evidence of a conspiracy. I'm more skeptical.
I'd like to start an objective, sourced page. I've already contacted snopes, so I'm hoping they'll help with research. Any thoughts on reopening the page? I think this story needs to be drug out into the light of wikipedia....
Let me know what you think!
Thanks, TRSH — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chetrasho (talk • contribs) 12:06, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply and very helpful advice. Peace.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chetrasho (talk • contribs) 14:28, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Jeffrey Saad
Hey! Jeffrey Saad was A7ed back in 2009 for good reason, but since then he's had two shows and is doing a run right now on Chopped All Stars. Could you recover the deleted copy someplace that I can view or edit it? He now meets notability guidelines and I'd like to massage whatever was there back into shape (or throw it out). JRP (talk) 03:15, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Abuse Filter on the Article Feedback Tool
Hey there :). You're being contacted because you're an edit filter manager, At the moment, we're developing Version 5 of the Article Feedback Tool, which you may or may not have heard about. If you haven't; for the first time, this will involve a free-text box where readers can submit comments :). Obviously, there's going to be junk, and we want to minimise that junk. To do so, we're working the Abuse Filter into the tool.
For this to work, we need people to write and maintain filters. I'd be very grateful if you could take a look at the discussion here and the attached docs, and comment and contribute! Thanks :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 18:17, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Why?
|
Why? |
| Why did you vote for my page to be deleted? Kill Joy. Baxi247 (talk) 22:44, 19 April 2012 (UTC) |
deletion
An absolutely righteous speedy of yours on Hashtag ABJproblems, THE USH! (Ultimate Scavenger Hunt!) was challenged at WT:CSD, [2], and I replied there, but you may want to look in. DGG ( talk ) 01:41, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Sankat Mochan Hanuman Temple (Varanasi)
As I indicated in my edit summary for the original request, I believe your move of the Talk page to match up with Sankat Mochan Hanuman Temple (Varanasi) was in the wrong direction, both the general convention on placename dabs and the specific guidance on Hindu temples is to dab the placename with a comma not parentheses. Please can you re-move it? I can't remember if there's any meangingful history that's been lost in the process, I don't know if that can be rescued.FlagSteward (talk) 11:27, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:ITNRSCE
Hi, I noticed that you deleted Wikipedia talk:ITNRSCE. I am guessing this was a good faith deletion, so I would like to ask you to restore the page, since it was being linked from various other pages as a reference to an important community discussion about ITNR. Cheers, Colipon+(Talk) 17:46, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Message from Sexyyboi69
why did you change my change to the issaquah middle school page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sexyyboi69 (talk • contribs) 20:22, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Dog meat
You are right to revert the inclusion of information about the President, but you are giving I think not the right reason, WP:TRIVIA. I think you will find WP:COATRACK will be more effective. Thanks for your contribution! Chrisrus (talk) 20:28, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Personal
As long as Quackpots like Barret, are allowed to contribute, Wikipedia will never have a neutral point of view! He and his ilk try hard to get rid of all alternative forms of health care and that needs to be broadcast widely so people see there is another side to the story. Madawaskaboy (talk) 21:16, 22 April 2012 (UTC)Madawaskaboy
Message from TopGarbageCollector
There is no "legitimate" way to express my contempt and disgust for Wikipedia. I have tried correcting obvious and important mistakes - in one case, the incorrect definition of a unit of radiation - and have come across an infantile mafia of "editors" whose sole interest is to preserve their turf. The fact that Wikipedia articles can *only* be backed up by poor-quality sources explains why, as shown in a recent article in the UK national press, Wikipedia is no longer taken seriously.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/9211336/Six-out-of-10-Wikipedia-business-entries-contain-factual-errors.html. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TopGarbageCollector (talk • contribs) 16:48, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
R.A.H.C. Guide page deletion
Hello. I am new to Wikipedia and the page R.A.H.C. Guide was deleted for copyright violations. I am sole writer of this guide that has been available for a year. I read your "common reasons why I have deleted your article" and did not see anything about copyrights. Any help would be greatly appreciated. In the mean time, is there a stage where I can have a page prepared for review so that's it's not deleted and with the hopes of modifing it until it complys with wikipedia conditions? Thanks. KuuKuuSon (talk) 14:08, 25 April 2012 (UTC)KuuKuuSon
Unfortunately, dealing with Wikipedia is a nightmare. As you have discovered, most of the editors are more interested in preserving their turf than in improving the quality of the website. Most probably the editor who deleted your piece did so as a knee-jerk reaction to anything new or original. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TopGarbageCollector (talk • contribs) 12:14, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
- Gogo Dodo left a detailed message at the user's talkpage explaining the deletion, with which I concur. I fail to see how this is "protecting turf" or a "knee-jerk reaction." Your message above does little to help the user who had a question and can be viewed as a personal attack. Acroterion (talk) 12:46, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Why do you keep deleting our submissions on Acopoco?
We have reviewed the submission guidelines numerous times and can't seem to figure out why our submission keeps getting deleted - can you help us? Thanks, Steve — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.244.168.247 (talk) 13:39, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- The article was deleted because it did not establish why the company is notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia by either the guideline for companies or the guideline for web sites. Before you continue recreate the article, I recommend that you review Wikipedia's Business' FAQ on what you should and should not do regarding editing an article about your company. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:43, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Pro-death
Hi Gogo Dodo, you seem to have the experience so perhaps you can tell me what I am not getting about this G8 deletion. Did you "consider notifying the page creator"? Did you consider that G8 "excludes any page that is useful to Wikipedia", such as reasonable proposals? I would appreciate your undeleting the talk page, or userfying it, or at least explaining why people should not use "pro-death" as a dab to be directed to capital punishment, apoptosis, or the like. I'll watch here. JJB 22:32, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- The talk page was deleted because it was an orphaned talk page (i.e., no corresponding article page) listed on an automated report of orphaned talk pages. The deletion was purely a technical manner and had nothing to do with my opinion on usefulness of a dab article. I did not "consider notifying the page creator". As for "exclude any page that is useful to Wikipedia", I believe that would not apply as those are usually reserved for talk page where there has been a lengthy discussion regarding some matter. Your post was the only post in the talk page.
- As for undeleting it and leaving it there, I do not think that would be appropriate as the orphan talk page would still apply and you had not linked to the talk page to open a discussion on creating the article dab. The likelihood of somebody noticing your post and discussing the matter with you is very low because it not linked anywhere. I think a better venue to open a discussion about creating a dab would Deletion Review (though you should check with HJ Mitchell first since they set the recreation protection) or the talk pages of the various articles that you think the dab should link to.
- I would be happy to userfy your post for you so that you do not have to recreate what you wrote when you decide upon whatever venue you wish to open a discussion regarding the dab. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:34, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- Yes please. JJB 00:39, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- I have userfied your post to User:John J. Bulten/Pro-death. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:42, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
PLDT - Dragon2016
Hey Gogo Dodo. Dragon2016 has instigated numerous altercations with me, somehow connected with his vandalism of the Dota 2 article, pertaining to the I.P. address of 121.54.32.xxx that he frequented last year. What has been proven is that Dragon2016 is operating in the Philippines, particularly from PLDT. Numerous precautionary measures have been taken in the past, but nothing has permanently halted this puppeteer's idiotic vandalism spree. This may be an extreme, but is it possible to remove I.P. access for this entire service area? It's not simply 121.54.32.xxx; Dragon2016 has used other I.P. addresses, including the 120.28.xxx.xxx range to vandalize Wikipedia. If we take this measure, we will not have to deal with him anymore. WayKurat, who lives in the Philippines and has had numerous negative encounters with this individual over the years confirms that PLDT is where he is operating from. DarthBotto talk•cont 01:19, 03 May 2012 (UTC)
Changes
Godo I heard that the terms of use are going to change does that mean my article has a chance to get published? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Ilovethebeach.com Paulmcanders (talk) 06:39, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Sonata
|
The Copyright Cleanup Barnstar | |
| Thanks for the Cleanup! Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:50, 5 May 2012 (UTC) |
Article Bashir Copti
As requested, I have added one reliable source to above subject article, basically, it is a local biweekly magazine. And added and external reference from the arabic wikipedia however, I still have point 2 & 4 which states: Copy editing and wikified. would you kindly check the same and advise
Thank you in advance --Baselc (talk) 12:59, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Gogo Dodo! Back in January you deleted an article about Anthony DeVitis because it was created by a banned or blocked user. An article about that subject has now been recreated; I came across it while doing New Pages Patrol. The author of the current piece, Adv43, was blocked a week after creating the article I am asking about, for abusing multiple accounts. Does that mean the current article about Anthony DeVitis needs to be deleted? In my opinion the subject Anthony DeVitis is clearly worthy of an article, and the article is reasonably written and neutral. But I don't know what Wikipedia's rules are about articles created by users who later get blocked, so I thought I would let you know about the situation and leave it up to you what to do. Thanks. --MelanieN (talk) 01:21, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
- While you are at it you might also take a look at Robert Sprague. Articles about this subject have been deleted several times in the past because of creation by blocked/banned users; you were involved in one of the deletions.[3] The article was recently recreated by a brand new account named RS76, who smells a lot like the previous sockpuppets. Again, I found the article on New Pages Patrol. IMO the subject Robert Sprague clearly deserves a page, and the article seems to be acceptable on its face and neutrally written, but I don't know if there is some Wikipedia rule that applies here. --MelanieN (talk) 21:33, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Haha I like the message you have when I edit your talk page, must be a fun preemptive counter to people asking you why you delete poor articles lol. Anyway, I stumbled onto this page and did some research on this guy, he has been a very influential political adviser and has made significant contributions to American Politics. I wanted to create a section about his theories of presidential power, and wanted to know if you would like to help :) Or if you know of anyone who might be interested in it, or where I could find someone who might be. You did some general revisions, nothing to serious I think, but as an admin I thought you might have some advice or something like that. Anyway, thanks for your help! Have a great weekend. CouchSurfer222 (talk) 20:57, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
User:Openhost101
You left a block message at User talk:Openhost101 but did not block the user. —teb728 t c 23:00, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Excuse me.
Why did you delete my article? And hey! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AliSmith7 (talk • contribs) 23:56, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Problem with editor User:Eaglestorm
Hello, I am having a problem with this user about a How I Met Your Mother episodes Good Crazy (see User_talk:Eaglestorm#Regarding_this_edit_.5B1.5D). Based off their edits from their talk page, they like to edit while logged out. I and several IP editors have made edits about a continuity reference between this episode and Last Cigarette Ever. This is their most recent revert of the edit [4]. Originally, they asked for references, so I provided them [5] [6], but then they reverted anyways. TV episode reviews would in my mind at least seem to be valid references. Can you come in here to arbitrate? Thanks Thegreyanomaly (talk) 04:12, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- Just to clarify, Thegreyanomaly has assumed that I am Eaglestorm. I am not, nor have I ever claimed to be Eaglestorm. 99.192.75.44 (talk) 04:15, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- Fair enough; you were monitoring his/her talk page closely, so it seemed liked a valid assumption, I guess I was wrong. Nonetheless, arbitration would be nice. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 04:17, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Since the both of you appear to be hanging out on my talk page, I decided to reply here. I've never watched the show and it appears to me that this is one of those cases where if you haven't watched the entire show from episode 1, you just don't get any of the references to past episodes. For example, it took me awhile to realize that Future Ted was a plot device, not a particular episode. It is noted in the main article that Future Ted is an unreliable narrator, so stating for certain Marshall had his last cigarette is a bit iffy to me. But that is my opinion from an outsider's point of view, having never watched the show.
I think that you should open an discussion on the article talk page about it. Perhaps the importance of the last cigarette is greater than I realize (again, I haven't watched the show), so maybe it should be included. Discuss it amongst yourselves and see if you can come to a consensus. Ask other interested editors (hopefully ones who have watched the show) about their opinions.
You might also considering opening up a general discussion on the inclusion of the continuity section as was briefly touched upon in the talk page. Removal of the sections from the episode articles may be preferred. I noticed that The Simpsons episode articles (which I know references past episodes a lot) seems to have avoided inclusions of self-referential lists. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:04, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Sorry (and note about Survivor)
- Sorry for bringing you into this, I think I've made the mistake of dragging you into conflicts about shows you don't watch or know much about before. But on the note of something you are knowledgeable about, I think there is a discussion at Talk:Survivor:_Philippines#One_Tribe.27s_Name_Confirmed you may want to jump in on. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 17:33, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Survivor
Seeing that you and me both follow the article Survivor: Philippines do you think its worth asking to protect the page? Most of the additions ever since the page has been made have been unsourced rumors. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:51, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:38, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
- I went ahead and added it to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection based on the recent edit you undid (I was going to see what would happen but it turns out this is ongoing) - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:42, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Deletion of Ofer Gabber
I strongly protest the deletion of the page Ofer Gabber, though I can not see what its content was at the time of deletion. He is one of the main living researchers in pure mathematics and deserves an entry in English wikipedia. German wikipedia has a page for him [7], which is still very incomplete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoran.skoda (talk • contribs) 21:05, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Robert Downey Jr.
I understand why you deleted my changes to the article but... are you sure? I mean, like, I've seen many other pages before that made my day about a reference from a movie they are in and I was just hoping to do that to my favorite character's page. I just really want to make his page as ~rad~ as he is. I'm sorry I'm basically arguing the point and I just want to thank you so much for helping his page be what it is today and contributing to it. Once again, I'm sorry I want to do this so badly and thanks. --76.227.103.99 (talk) 23:40, 20 May 2012 (UTC)Insertrandomizerusernamehere
A barnstar for you!
|
The Special Barnstar |
As always, I enjoy seeing your username at the recent changes patrol. It seems you're busy this morning.  Have another barnstar. SwisterTwister talk 06:35, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
|
|
The Editor's Barnstar | |
| For you true dedication to Survivor articles. –BuickCenturyDriver 23:10, 22 May 2012 (UTC) |
It's been one heck of a season. Betcha could hardly wait for the next one. –BuickCenturyDriver 23:10, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Input
You may now want to have your say here about One Sonic Society.HotHat (talk) 00:04, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Prof_John_Mark_Bishop
Hello,
I am very new to Wiki authoring and apologies in advance if my questions are very naive.
I was wondering if there are anything in particular I should do to avoid the page being deleted.
I was asked to give links to Prof Mark Bishop's academic page as well as the LinkedIn profile which I did, yet the page got deleted.
I appreciate your response and help.
best wishes
Danny Noriega
Hi Gogo,
Can you please remove the redirect restriction on Danny Noriega? I have a page in my sandbox that I'd like to fill it with.
Thanks!
--MrIndustry (talk) 22:13, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Quite the list of disruptive accounts to go through. Thank you for helping out--much appreciated, as always. 99.153.142.225 (talk) 03:07, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- No problem. It was quite a mess. Thank you for your dedication in dealing with it. Materialscientist handled your RFPP request at the same time I was dealing with your AIV request, which is why the double protection happened. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:12, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- I hate to double-report, but when that stuff drags on for more than 15 minutes I just wanna holler until the firemen get there. And I get really tenacious about not allowing BLP violations to stick, even for a moment. Often the subjects are pop culture wunderkinds I've never heard of, but boy do the adolescents know who they are.... got to be a better way of preventing that from even getting started; perhaps one day policy will require protection for all BLPs. 99.153.142.225 (talk) 03:18, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- Wow. And I thought global warming and Wall Street greed were the harbingers of civilization's end. Twitter buzz about a pop star's vandalized Wikipedia page (shakes head at the banality of technological usage, pours another glass of ale, a virtual gift from Drmies). 99.153.142.225 (talk) 03:37, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Dave Lang Page Deletion
I understand under the requirements of A7 that I have failed to show the significance of Dave Lang and therefore why someone would use wikipedia to search his name. I'm still getting used to understanding all the required criteria for producing a page, apologies. I mentioned it briefly under the heading "Twitter" on the Dave Lang page that his name is becoming somewhat of a meem around Nottingham University campus, a trend if you will, and indeed is spreading to other universities close by. It speaks for itself that Dave Lang has become a phrase whereby no-one understads the origin, hence the need for students to use wikipedia and find out who this person is. Please reply back to me with what you think about this subject and I will be happy to take advice and provide any information that may be required.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smithydosser (talk • contribs) 20:24, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your speedy reply. Ok that seems fair and I was unaware that Wikipedia do not support the production of personal pages due to me using Wikipedia all the time to search various writers and actors etc. However, if I provide reliable sources of the various published articles Dave Lang has been a conversation topic in, will this be enough for the acceptance of this page?
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smithydosser (talk • contribs) 20:54, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Hey dude
what artical was dealeted — Preceding unsigned comment added by XRaZoR- -HDz (talk • contribs) 20:11, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
CRATE STORY
CAN YOU GIVE SOME IDEA OF HOW TO CRATE A STORY — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshmel (talk • contribs) 01:42, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
what is right not right on here
WHAT CAN POST ON HERE CANT POST USER JOSH — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshmel (talk • contribs) 01:51, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
sing you name
how you do that — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshmel (talk • contribs) 21:18, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Message from Brittanyholloway70
i am telling you people have asked for bios of the boys, an so just bc they are not as big as other bands they get deleted i think that shows a favoritism im sure others would like to know this dont you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brittanyholloway70 (talk • contribs) 06:31, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Would you help fix the formatting error at this page? I was patrolling the log of articles containing deleted files and found that the formatting needed fixing. I attempted to fix the formatting but with no success. I appreciate your assistance, SwisterTwister talk 04:03, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks again, I hadn't noticed the Spain sentence. I believe perhaps the 1453 to 1923 was for the list of emperors together? SwisterTwister talk 04:17, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
User:Slytherining Around32
If you look at most of his other uploads (Slytherining Around32 (talk · contribs)) they are from the National Portrait Gallery - is this possibly leading to National Portrait Gallery and Wikimedia Foundation copyright dispute again? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nthep (talk • contribs)
Reverting Glitch?
I had to rollback the IP address that substituted an article on your talk page. For some reason I couldn't simply undo the edits. -WarthogDemon 04:47, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
sock case
Hello Gogo Dodo, The outcome of this sock case was WP:DUCK but Checkuser declined due to older accounts' edits being stale. You blocked the account for 72 hours but that will expire soon. The account needs to be indeffed provided that you agree with the evidence. I haven't closed the case because I was waiting on a patrolling admin. Cheers,
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 14:44, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- Cheers. :)
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 04:25, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
pictures
Some of the images that you have deleted are not in fact duplicates as I have just checked the wikipedia commons for the picture of George Rooke and the picture that was supposed to be the duplicate of the one I had uploaded was not there as this is the one I uploaded http://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/portraitLarge/mw116905/Sir-George-Rooke?search=ap&npgno=6769 but there are non like that already uploaded, also the pictures I had uploaded of the Marquess of Londonderry and Sir Charles Saunders were of a higher resolution and better quality then the ones that are currently on the wikipedia commons as if you look here here at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AdmiralCharlesSaunders.jpg?uselang=en-gb you will see just how small and blurry the image of Charles Saunders is whilst mine was not. So I was wondering could those three deleted images please be reverted as my particular versions were either not already available or were of a better quality for wikipedia! Thank you Slytherining Around32 (talk) 19:00, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
You know what?
This is Iantevenmad, and I certainly do not know why you erased my article. Emiliano Rodolfo Rosales-Birou is in fact a notable person, just look his pseudonym, Chuggaaconroy. I don't have time to read pages and pages and pages and pages and pages... of guidelines, so you tell me why he is a notable person. I provided the below info:
- He is amongst the most subscribed youtubers
- He is practically famous
- He is the most popular let's player. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iantevenmad (talk • contribs) 01:40, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
The deletion template.
Hey, Wasn't this G3? [[8]] . You deleted it for A1.Max Viwe | Viwe The Max 05:24, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
BRING BACK THE AFROBETA PAGE!!!!
You removed the band page of Afrobeta. They are the criteria to be on the Wiki. So do it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.176.0.126 (talk) 09:14, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
- The article was deleted because it did not state why the group meet the notability guidelines for musical acts. The article was moved back to the original author's userspace at User:AchedDamiman/Afrobeta so that they can continue to work on it. However, they have not done so and have not edited in over a year. You are welcome to create an account and make a new article for the group. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:41, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Antwone Taulton
The Antwone Taulton page is a very legit page. New to Wiki, need to know how to remove page from deletion discussion. You are welcome to lookup the sources pertaining to Antwone Taulton, by simply conduction a google search.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Writer254 (talk • contribs) 21:18, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Dearest apologies
It has come to my attention that my son has left unconstructive articles on an article while i was away from the computer dearest apologies Sincerly, Lukě Prin P.S. please message back — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beastsesus (talk • contribs) 21:43, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
deleting my article
because of what you did people have made complaints and had been mentioning @wikipedia for taking the page out of keisha chu on twitter and other social networks. there is a reason why she is on wikifashion how come she cant be on wikipedia? whats the difference? just because shes not verified? for example nathalie kelley (@natkelley) shes not even that big but you have her here on your site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackdavis (talk • contribs) 16:09, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
seaorbiter
Hi. I know I am not the best artist, but the image I provided is better than anything currently available. You draw something else or provide something else and then you can remove what I provided. Seem fair? Cheers, Nesnad (talk) 18:05, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:17, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
- If you are truly waiting for a 3rd opinion why did you go about trying to delete it on commons before anyone else could discuss this? You are attacking me in bad faith, and going about deleting instead of trying to help create. I find your behavior antagonistic and aggressive. Sigh. Nesnad (talk) 18:22, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:28, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is about growing and evolving. I personally think my SVG is a slight improvement over the pencil drawing on the French Wiki that I based it on. And someone else can come along later and improve that. That's how Wikipedia works. Deleting it kills that process. I'm disappointed in your attitude. If you can make a better picture than I provided, please do. If not, why are you acting like you are so much better than me? Sigh. 18:32, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
- Talk Page Stalker Opinion: I have seen no indication of bad faith on Gogo Dodo's part. His role in the original deletion of the image was by the book. When you objected, he did not stand in your way when you reposted the image. Now, he has initiated a process to determine what editor consensus is in the matter. These are all good-faith actions. He is not suggesting he is better than you. Rather, he is suggesting that we should all, as a group, decide if your image meets Wikimedia standards. Sincerely, Ebikeguy (talk) 18:37, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:10, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is about growing and evolving. I personally think my SVG is a slight improvement over the pencil drawing on the French Wiki that I based it on. And someone else can come along later and improve that. That's how Wikipedia works. Deleting it kills that process. I'm disappointed in your attitude. If you can make a better picture than I provided, please do. If not, why are you acting like you are so much better than me? Sigh. 18:32, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:28, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
- If you are truly waiting for a 3rd opinion why did you go about trying to delete it on commons before anyone else could discuss this? You are attacking me in bad faith, and going about deleting instead of trying to help create. I find your behavior antagonistic and aggressive. Sigh. Nesnad (talk) 18:22, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Playing Around
Im hear to ask if what it the article is about my freind and that we play around. We play around like that and I will include that we play around, because we call eachother funny names, can you not delete my artical about Jonathan Ngyuen? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delirious x (talk • contribs) 00:11, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Paulet High School
Hi there
I have noted that my update for paulet high school has changed, I have put the content up on behalf of Paulet High School so am confused as to how I have infringed copyrights?
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahsan.Ashraf86 (talk • contribs) 00:23, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your time, will look in to this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahsan.Ashraf86 (talk • contribs) 00:31, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia Help Survey
Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.
Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 18:12, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)
sigh.
We're edit warring over User:Dhamu82/sandbox and other contribs. Good times. tedder (talk) 04:49, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Legaci (band) , vandalism by anon IP 67.188.48.4
The anonymous user had added gay porn website links, and slanderous edits as well as replacing entire paragraphs with erroneous items. I created an account to correct those entries, and thank you for pointing out my n00b editing miscues. I love that you actually reverted to a version that reversed some of the morons edits as well. on purpose, or not. :-) R1-Squirrel (talk) 05:34, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Meenewa socks
Message from Nutterduck
Dear mre dodo... i am extremely inoyed buy yur behavier — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nutterduck (talk • contribs) 09:42, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Nvidia protect
Just came here to say thanks. This message was human-generated and is valid without a reply. Nczempin (talk) 18:26, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Is this a candidate for AfD?
Hi Gogo Dodo,
I stumbled across this article, Bosulachi. The English is awful. The ref's are questionable. Maybe this is a notable concept, but the presentation is terrible. Unfortunately, I don't have time or willingness to fix the article up. Do you think it is a good candidate for AfD? Or would you recommend another course of action? Many thanks, Ebikeguy (talk) 17:13, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
reply to your message on my talkpage
Ok- really sorry bro. I won't attack any more users. Thediamonddealer2 (talk) 07:43, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Spammer
I posted an image that is stored on wikimedia that clearly shows a diesel generator which is the topic in question. This isn't spam! The article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diesel_generator) talks about generator sizes and calculating kVA's. I am pointing the user to a FREE kVA calculator to help them calculate the size of generator they need.
They are NOT forced to buy anything! The page doesnt sell anything. It's a FREE calculator.
Why should you stop people from using a free facility? I cannot see a legitimate reason why you deleted it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MinisitePro (talk • contribs) 15:13, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- The image has been deleted as spam and copyright violation. It is clear spam as is your contribution to the Cornwall article, which has also been removed. I suggest you read the spam policies linked to on your talk page. --Biker Biker (talk) 15:19, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Should I have someone check to see if SovietMonster is a Sock of FishingKing?
On the one hand, SovietMonster's vandalism started at my page shortly after I put up a warning on FishinKing's page and seemed directed at me and other editors who had expressed concern over FishingKing's recent actions, as well as deleting incriminating comments from FishingKing's talk page. The edits made by SovietMonster were quite a bit more sophisticated than one would expect from a newbie. On the other hand, it seems like an IP might be trying to get FishingKing in trouble, and so that editor could have gone to great lengths to frame FishingKing. Should I report SovietMonster as a suspected sock of FishingKing? Or is there not enough evidence to support the accusation? Thanks. Ebikeguy (talk) 19:48, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Wow, you beat me to that exact same thought.... --Biker Biker (talk) 19:49, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Agreed, I was thinking the same.--Chip123456 (talk) 19:51, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Group meeting! (Sorry, couldn't resist.) I agree that it is likely that SovietMonster is FishingKing since he was attacking both you and Tide rolls. Rather weak insults tossed around by SovietMonster, but hey, whatever. Filing an SPI would be fine with me. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:54, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Lesbian! --Biker Biker (talk) 20:00, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- I'm on it. I've never done this before (flutter eyelashes), so if I screw it up, please bail me out. Ebikeguy (talk) 20:02, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Already done!--Chip123456 (talk) 20:03, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- You're fast. Thanks! Should we give Gogo his talk page back at some point? ;) Ebikeguy (talk) 20:07, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- What if I don't want it back? -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:08, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- We will have to negotiate terms if they want it back! All I did was press a few buttons on twinkle and there on sock case, filed!--Chip123456 (talk) 20:10, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- What if I don't want it back? -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:08, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- You're fast. Thanks! Should we give Gogo his talk page back at some point? ;) Ebikeguy (talk) 20:07, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Already done!--Chip123456 (talk) 20:03, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Vandal sock
Hi Gogo, Here is a case for your review. You blocked the master so I thought you would want the opportunity. Cheers,
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 14:14, 27 June 2012 (UTC)