Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. PTJoshua (talk) 18:45, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may place {{unblock}} on your user talk page to have the block reviewed. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia.
OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:47, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Getagirlinaflash (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I've just joined as a member to site, and within 5 minutes of adding a few external links to relevant pages. I've been blocked. I then was hoping after reading the term of editing a page, that the reason for deleting my pages was because to i had to many links to simular pages. I'm now hoping to have the link relating to Flirt. Please let me know how i can get unblocked or why i was blocked and my pages deleted? I'm not looking to spam Wikipedia. Thankyou
Decline reason:
But you are spamming Wikipedia. You are inserting links to a commercial site that matches your username. We don't get to promote our websites on Wikipedia. --jpgordon::==( o ) 19:43, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Getagirlinaflash (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The whole idea of external links is to share good information. I've looked at a lot of the external links on the pages i've been editing and there content is no where near as user friendly as ours. We're just trying to relate your site to ours with good content, which is what we are proving.The sites only been up a couple of months and would appreciate if you have a look and maybe review your decision we honestly aren't looking to spam, just one or two links where appropriate. I've now read the guidelines to editing external links. Please get intouch. Getagirlinaflash (talk) 20:15, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your username and edits clearly contravene Wikipedia guidelines, including those on advertising, conflict of interest, and external links. Likewise, your use of "we" etc. indicates this is a role account. You may not see it as promotion, but "trying to relate your site to ours with good content" seems to indicate exactly that. --Kinu t/c 20:26, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Comment Note that user had already been given a level 4 warning when spamming from this IP. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:25, 8 June 2011 (UTC)