Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 11:09, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Gepind! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 11:09, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 9) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
Theroadislong (talk) 11:15, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

June 2019 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Draft:THE CONTRADICTION OF EVOLUTION BETWEEN MAN AND APE ~A question that I longed to wonder~ has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:57, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is your original research and is of no interest to Wikipedia
Theroadislong (talk) 12:10, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Gepind edit

 

A tag has been placed on User:Gepind requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 23:15, 24 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion edit

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Gepind (talk) 23:22, 24 June 2019 (UTC) I am writing a book and will be publish sooner --Gepind (talk) 23:22, 24 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

June 2019 edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guideline. If you believe that your user page does not violate our guideline, please leave a note on this page. Alternatively, you may add {{Db-u1}} to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, or you can simply edit the page so that it meets Wikipedia's user page guideline. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 23:27, 24 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may place {{unblock}} on your user talk page to have the block reviewed. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:43, 24 June 2019 (UTC)Reply