November 2021 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 14:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FromTheDepthsOfDarkestMoo (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Maybe it's me, but I'm not seeing what it is about my posts that allegedly shows I am not here to help build Wikipedia. Since the blocking Administrator seems ambivalent about the reason for this block, I suppose I can only say in my defence that I didn't come here to troll, the person I directly messaged hasn't taken it as trolling, and I am not knowingly violating WP:SOCK. If you would like further information, perhaps you can be more specific about why my editing privileges have been been revoked summarily and without warning. FromTheDepthsOfDarkestMoo (talk) 15:46, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Fifteen minutes after you created your account, you posted on a talk page related to the ArbCom election, an unusual thing to do for a new user. I'm not sure what the claim that you are not "knowingly violating WP:SOCK" means- if you are unknowingly doing so, please explain how that would be possible. You have also not made a single contribution to article space or stated how you intend to contribute. The block seems good to me, so I am declining your request.331dot (talk) 16:31, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FromTheDepthsOfDarkestMoo (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

If I am blocked because I merely did something unusual and didn't immediately edit articles, then I think you already know, or you should know, I wasn't violating SOCK or any other policy, and so this block is entirely without merit. FromTheDepthsOfDarkestMoo (talk) 17:41, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

As a sock of the WMF globally banned user AttackTheMoonNow/Brian K Horton/etc, you are not permitted to edit. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:34, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.