Welcome

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia, the greatest encyclopedia on Earth! You seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics!

You may wish to review the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, as well as the avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some helpful links:

By the way, an important tip: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments.

Hope to see you around the Wiki! If you have any questions whatsoever, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Who?¿? 05:40, 26 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Re: Admin

edit

Thank you. I am most happy to accept it. :-) (although I'm afraid I have to accept it with conditions..) — Instantnood 06:40, 28 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks again WP for your encouragement, although I have now decided to decline the nomination. :-D — Instantnood 17:28, 29 September 2005 (UTC)Reply


internet in newzealand

edit

i moved the free ISPs section that you added so that it was futher up the page and thus in the part of the history section that dealt with peroid of history where free isps existed.

I have also included some other sub titles to split up the history section if you have time could u have a quick look.

thanks

Digmores (talk) 01:24, 27 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Editing problems

edit

WP: there seems to be a problem with some of your edits, in that you are replacing symbols with codes for symbols. Among other effects this messes up formatting tags such as comment start and stop indicators (see your recent edits to The Beatles for example). Jgm 19:54, 7 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for contribution at 29 October 2005 New Delhi bombings.
- P R A D E E P Somani (talk)
Feel free to send me e-mail.

edit

I notice you've tried to add an image to the flag of Hong Kong article [1] . Is that a wrong link? — Instantnood 13:22, 25 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. — Instantnood 08:18, 26 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Regina Ip

edit

The picture of her that you've uploaded as been deleted [2] as per CSD criteria. — Instantnood 17:38, 3 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Swedish election 2006

edit

I see you've added a comment to add the current positions of the parties in Parliament but that information is already in the article. Let me know what you were thinking... - Jord 14:51, 4 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

 

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on an article you wrote requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Quarl (talk) 2006-01-07 01:50Z

HKCOTW

edit
 
Hong Kong Collaboration of the Week
 
The current HKCOTW is Hongkonger .
Please help improve it to featured article standard.
Every week, a Hong Kong-related topic, stub or nonexistent article is picked to be the HK Collaboration of the Week. The previous HKCOTW was History of bus transport in Hong Kong - see improvements.
edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Lr_route.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 11:25, 1 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Merge

edit

I noticed that you have placed a merge tag on SKY Network Television and Optus Fleet of Satellites. Could you please provide some reasons on either talk page. Evil Monkey - Hello 22:14, 2 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
List of international schools in Hong Kong
ABC (Yet Another BitTorrent Client)
TelstraClear
James Tien
Bank of East Asia
United Democrats of Hong Kong
Central People's Government
BitSpirit
Tsang Yam Pui
Ronny Tong
Hong Kong Geographical Association
Michael Suen
Functional constituency
RainbowCrack
Kai-to
Entertainment Expo Hong Kong
7.1 People Pile
I-CABLE Communications Limited
Alan Leong
Cleanup
Poon choi
Document of Identity
Hong Kong Re-entry Permit
Merge
Mozilla Application Suite
Yew Chung International School of Shanghai
Queensway, Hong Kong
Add Sources
Electronic Privacy Information Center
Chris Pirillo
HongCouver
Wikify
Export subsidy
Domestic support
So Lo Pun
Expand
Once Upon a Time in China
At the Threshold of An Era
Prison on Fire II

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 22:54, 6 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to VandalProof!

edit

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, F! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. PS2pcGAMER (talk) 09:35, 16 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello, vandal!

edit

Why did you vandalize the Los Angeles D-League page? I tried to put it back the way it was before you screwed it up, and it doesn't work. What's more, your clarity tag is all that shows up in the edit history. Thanks to you, it's a mess! YOU ARE THE ULTIMATE VANDAL! —Preceding unsigned comment added by M. Burmy (talkcontribs) 00:56, 20 April 2006

Just read the page history. WP 01:11, 20 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

User:Bartik removed your deletion tag from article Alan Freeman(Kalamazoo)

edit

I'm not quite sure what's going on here. His first article, Alex Biles, looked okay but got speedied. He then made Alan Freeman(Kalamazoo), which you also tagged for speedy deletion, and which he got around by removing the tag. He then made AFree to support something written in his Alan Freeman article. He also added Alan Freeman to the article on Kalamazoo, Michigan.

Special:Contributions/Bartik

--Lantoka 01:39, 20 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Update: Both remaining articles were deleted by administrator Bkonrad. --Lantoka 02:10, 20 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

New Zealand Sign Language

edit

Hi, I'm not sure whether your statement about NZSL being the first official sign language is entirely correct. I know that BSL has been officially recognised in the UK for quite a while, but I'm not sure on the exact details. --Avxxv 13:31, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Reminder

edit
 
When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template.

Ian Manka Talk to me‼ 03:34, 12 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:Mandy Tam baptism.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Mandy Tam baptism.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:05, 14 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit

Use of {{stub}} is no longer recommended

Hello,

Thank you for your stub submission. You may wish to note that it is preferable to use a stub template from Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types instead of using simply {{stub}}, if you can.

Thanks! -- Where 03:26, 19 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Chinese name for Seoul

edit

I've reverted you deletion of 漢城 (Hànchéng) from Names of Asian cities in different languages. The Chinese term 漢城 (Hànchéng) for Seoul cannot yet be considered obsolete. While the Korean authorities declared several years ago that 首爾 (Shǒu’ěr) was their preferred translation, this request was reciprocated at official levels by Chinese and has not seen widespread adoption by the general public. (See Seoul article for some info). Although this situation might change in the future, the 漢城 (Hànchéng) is still the primary way many Chinese refer to the city. AjaxSmack 05:21, 25 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

World Cup Sponsorship AfD

edit

Hi, I just wanted to tell you that I’ve made some rather large additions to 2006 FIFA World Cup sponsorship and would appreciate if you could take a look at them and possibly reconsider your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 FIFA World Cup sponsorship. I thought it was a worthy topic, even though it had a wretched article, so I added information about revenue and the sponsorship process, the sponsor related controversies of this World Cup (tickets distribution, Budweiser in Germany, Mcdonalds at a sporting event), and took out the copyvios. Please take a look. Thanks! Vickser 19:42, 8 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hoi polloi

edit

Thanks for changing the quote style at hoi polloi. I was not aware of that kind of quote style, proving yet again that you can learn something new everyday. I also thank you for your comments about the article. I have changed the image format and moved the wiktionary box. They were both good suggestions. Best, Johntex\talk 06:54, 13 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

SVG Format

edit

How is it possible to save it as SVG? I can save it as PNG, but the thumbs are still JPEG (I guess) Anyway, please inform me how to do so, and how is it possible. -- Omernos 16:57, 16 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I got the same comment on my recent FAC. It should be noted by WP and those that push this - there is a significant difference between an SVG and a JPG or PNG. SVG is based on Vector graphics and computes the image using math. This is very different from a JPG or PNG that is based on Raster graphics or pixels. This is why SVG graphics resize without quality loss. This is all great if you have a vector graphics editor and want to recreate the images from scratch. You can not convert one to the other. I think opposing based on this makes no sense. It might be worth a comment if that. The PNG format does not always produce the smallest file size and in many cases JPG is a better option. It is even recommended that "only convert it to PNG if this reduces the file size without causing artifacts". See Wikipedia:How to reduce colors for saving a JPEG as PNG on how to convert for the best results. Again, this is a recommendation and should only be a comment. Converting JPG to PNG is not a huge deal. Forcing someone to create a new graphic in a completely different format (SVG) is nonsense. Morphh 23:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Boy Scouts of America membership controversies

edit

At the FAC discussion you asked "why is the ACLU logo there?". The short answer is that we were having a hard time finding images for the article, and the ACLU logo was one we could come up with. By you question, were you suggesting it should be moved to elsewhere in the article , or that we should remove it entirely? .. Anything to get your vote. --Alecmconroy 02:14, 19 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Signature tip (or how to save two bites a page).

edit
Short link pipe trick

Many article titles are disambiguated with parenthetic qualifiers, like this: [[Self (psychology)]]. But when you want to include such a link in the body of an article, this would look rather awkward. So all you have to do is use the "pipe trick", like this: [[Self (psychology)|]]. Notice the "|" character stuck in there at the end of the link? That makes the link look like this: Self, without having to type the name of the link after the pipe!

This trick also works with namespaces, so that [[Wikipedia:Tip of the day|]] (again notice the pipe character) displays like this: Tip of the day.

Prior tip - Next tip Will (message me!) 21:44, 19 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Libya

edit

Hello,

Regarding changing maps and the seal from jpeg to a suitable format on the Libya page, that has now been done. Could you now please reconsider your objection to the article being featured.

Thanks very much,

--User:Jaw101ie 11:17, 20 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Question on your oppostion to the Bears FAC

edit

What is SVG? What does the logo, helmet, and uniform being in SVG have anything to do with it being a feature article? --Happyman22 17:42, 21 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Not one featured pro sports article uses SVG, but if you want me to use it I will, but they me how can I create an SVG image and where can I get the program. --Happyman22 15:12, 22 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:BrandHK.PNG)

edit
  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:BrandHK.PNG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 19:54, 7 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Comment on Atomic Line Filter FAC

edit

Hi, I've resolved the issue regarding SVG diagrams in the Atomic line filter FAC. Would you mind reevaluating? Phidauex 15:41, 10 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ohio Wesleyan University

edit

Quick question regarding the Ohio Wesleyan University. You left a very helpful comment regarding the page candidacy back in July. Since then, a lot of the issues that you mentioned have been improved on. Could you take a look and tell me what are some of the major areas that still need work and what work exactly? I'd greatly appreciate it! WikiprojectOWU 18:44, 23 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Collusion between business and government AfD

edit

Just to let you know, I've put Collusion between business and government up for deletion. You can contribute to the discussion here: AfD discussion if you like. - Richfife 06:18, 21 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ohio Wesleyan page

edit

3 months ago you noted some problems with the content and formating on the page. I am working with user:Bluedog423 on improving some of its formatting and content. Could you provide your opinion on outstanding issues in case of a future FA nomination? Your time is greatly appreciated! Any help is greatly appreciate it! WikiprojectOWU 03:32, 26 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Change to Common.css

edit

Per recent discussions, the way in which Persondata is viewed by Wikipedia editors has changed. In order to continue viewing Persondata in Wikipedia articles, please edit your user CSS file to display table.persondata rather than table.metadata. More specific instructions can be found on the Persondata page. --ShakingSpirittalk on behalf of Kaldari 02:17, 25 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

your username

edit

Has anyone approached you about your username? I highly recommend you WP:CHU or your name could end up on WP:RFCN. --frothT C 04:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your Username (F)

edit

Hello F, unfortunately the username you have picked is inappropriate. Please consider changing it. You can do this by following the instructions at the Changing username page or by just creating a new account. Note that changing your username will allow you to keep your current edits credited to you. If you do not change your username, a Wikipedia administrator may block this account. If you feel this message is a mistake and your username does not violate the rule, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. . Asteriontalk 21:32, 15 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Username Block

edit
 

Your username has been blocked indefinitely because it may be rude or inflammatory, unnecessarily long/confusing, too similar to an existing user, contains the name of an organization or website, or is otherwise inappropriate (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

You are encouraged to create a new account and contribute to Wikipedia under a more appropriate username. Wikipedia:Username provides guidance on selecting an appropriate username. You may also edit Wikipedia without creating an account.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia under an inappropriate username. If you would like to discuss the block, you may appeal on your talk page or email the administrator who blocked you. Due to Wikipedia's mechanism for enforcing name changes, your IP address may be temporarily blocked. Unless you have also been engaging in vandalism or impersonation of another user, we will remove that block as soon as possible.

If you want to keep the contributions from your old account for your new username, please follow these directions: (1) Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} to your user talk page. This is possible because even when you are blocked, you can still edit your own talk page. (2) Soon, an admin may come to unblock you. (3) You will have 24 hours after the unblock to file a request on Wikipedia:Changing username before you may be re-blocked. Note that this can only be done before you create the new one. For more information, please visit Wikipedia:Changing username. In many cases (especially if your account has few or no edits), it is a lot easier to create a new account. Cbrown1023 01:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unblock

edit
 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

F (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Decline reason:

Sorry, as noted below, F is already in use. -- Yamla 16:55, 16 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your account or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by Cbrown1023 for the following reason (see our blocking policy): username

Your IP address is 203.109.174.164.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks for the help. WP 10:06, 16 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about this, but F is already registered as a username. See [3]. Please choose another, and adjust the template as appropriate. Cheers, and best of luck with all this, Daniel.Bryant T · C ] 10:39, 16 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:PiratePartiesMap.svg listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:PiratePartiesMap.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigrTex 21:31, 27 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Utorrent-web-mini.jpg)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Utorrent-web-mini.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 01:48, 31 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:FFviii world map 1.png)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:FFviii world map 1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 22:51, 2 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Images listed for deletion

edit

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion if you are interested in preserving them.

Thank you. BigrTex 20:04, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

User:WP/a

edit

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article User:WP/a, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on [[Talk:User:WP/a|its talk page]]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Calton | Talk 01:04, 22 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Question

edit

How to make a '.svg' file from '.pdf' ? (Like  )Michaellaumy 11:47, 17 April 2007 (UTC)Michael From Hong KongTalk 19:48, 17 April 2007 (UTC+8)Reply

Your image is not showing. It's just showing a copyright warning. --Ωfrogger3140Ω (talk) 11:13, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Username usurpation

edit

Hello. While looking through Wikipedia, I noticed the issue with your username. Since you don't disagree with the block and would like simply to change your username to F, I'm happy to inform you of username usurpation! Because F has no edits or log entries, it is available to be usurped. If you'd like to do this, just place {{unblock|I want to request usurpation of the username F on Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations.}} I certainly hope this helps. WODUP 21:44, 25 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Utorrent-web-screenshot.png)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Utorrent-web-screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:51, 14 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:BrandHK.svg

edit

Hello, WP. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:BrandHK.svg) was found at the following location: User talk:WP. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:17, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unblock

edit
 Y

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

To allow change of name request. Please submit your request immediately to avoid being reblocked.

Request handled by: - auburnpilot talk 01:56, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Single Letter

edit

Hi F! See here for a group just for 26 of us. :) --(Review Me) R ParlateContribs@ (Let's Go Yankees!) 23:27, 15 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

If you want, can you join it? --(Review Me) R ParlateContribs@ (Let's Go Yankees!) 16:43, 30 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Nintendo DS.svg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Nintendo DS.svg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ejfetters 01:41, 30 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:HK08.svg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:HK08.svg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ~ Wikihermit 01:32, 7 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:NHS.svg

edit

I have tagged Image:NHS.svg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ~ Wikihermit 02:15, 7 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for Image:KenjiNagaiIraq.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:KenjiNagaiIraq.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:07, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:KenjiNagaiIraq.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:KenjiNagaiIraq.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:00, 10 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Taiko DS 1.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Taiko DS 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Taiko DS multiplayer.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Taiko DS multiplayer.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:KCR.svg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:KCR.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:40, 15 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Flybuys.svg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Flybuys.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TelstraClear.svg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:TelstraClear.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:ChurchOfSpritualTechnologyLogo.svg

edit

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:ChurchOfSpritualTechnologyLogo.svg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 01:59, 20 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SciFi channel.svg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:SciFi channel.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:55, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TelstraClear.svg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:TelstraClear.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:ChurchOfSpritualTechnologyLogo.svg

edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:ChurchOfSpritualTechnologyLogo.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 11:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC) --Cirt (talk) 11:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BrandHK.svg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:BrandHK.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ASB.svg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:ASB.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:10, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Flybuys.svg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Flybuys.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Del sol.svg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Del sol.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Habitat for humanity.svg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Habitat for humanity.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Remember to Rewind

edit

Hi. I see you changed a speedy tag on Remember to Rewind to a prod. I deleted your prod because it wasn't formatted correctly. I suggest formatting it like this: {{subst:prod|non-notable future film}} if you still want to delete the article. Thanks for removing the G1 (nonsense) speedy template. People over-use "nonsense" terribly -- it's not supposed to mean "anything I feel like deleting". :-) --Coppertwig (talk) 03:20, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:ChurchOfSpritualTechnologyLogo.svg

edit

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:ChurchOfSpritualTechnologyLogo.svg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 21:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:ChurchOfSpritualTechnologyLogo.svg

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:ChurchOfSpritualTechnologyLogo.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:50, 24 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 03:50, 24 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:ChurchOfSpritualTechnologyLogo.svg

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:ChurchOfSpritualTechnologyLogo.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:36, 25 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 14:36, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Missing image Image:Citibank.svg

edit
 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Citibank.svg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Citibank.svg is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Citibank.svg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 20:02, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:ChurchOfSpritualTechnologyLogo.svg listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:ChurchOfSpritualTechnologyLogo.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 22:24, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Prime logo.svg

edit

Thank you for uploading Image:Prime logo.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Mandy_Tam_baptism.jpg

edit

I have tagged Image:Mandy_Tam_baptism.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 13:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:ParisOlympicBanner.jpg listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:ParisOlympicBanner.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Crimsone (talk) 22:48, 14 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Civic Party.svg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Civic Party.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 13:43, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Funny

edit

If that sentence shows something of fenqing as you claimed, you should move that sentence to the article on fenqing, but not put the sentence in the article on Jin Jing.--Jingandteller (talk) 11:15, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ikariam

edit

I deleted Ikariam under speedy criteria A7. Number of google hits is not an assertion of importance. If, from those hits, you can extract some reliable, significant, independent coverage then reference them and give it another shot. Marasmusine (talk) 13:04, 29 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Since the ref desk page is archived...

edit

Ill talk to you directly. I customized the first couple of levels, and the appearance of the overworld. i also changed some of the message box text. im going insane, please halp!!!1!11!the juggresurection IstKrieg! 03:21, 5 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

well, i couldnt really test it because i cant get it over to the original rom. i tried using an IPS patch but it didnt work either. why, can you just play the rom without the patch anyway?the juggresurection IstKrieg! 13:30, 5 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
it doesnt work. :'( the juggresurection IstKrieg! 14:19, 6 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
do you know of anyone who could help? i cant really put up a {{helpme}} tag on my talk page that would specify for that.the juggresurection IstKrieg! 14:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
got it under control. thanks for your time.the juggresurection IstKrieg! 00:50, 28 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TWA.svg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:TWA.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:03, 6 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Broomhead.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Broomhead.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:46, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Conver Word to Wiki Format

edit

Hi WP, ages back you answered a question as follows:

[edit] Convert Microsoft Word to Wiki Is there a converter that will convert text from Microsoft Word to Wiki format? I would copy and paste, but subscripts, bold, etc. are not kept using that method.

Thanks --CoolGuy 04:53, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Found this on Google, see if it works for you. WP 11:36, 19 August 2006 (UTC) Hooray University of British Columbia!Anchoress 12:13, 19 August 2006 (UTC)


It looks like Anchoress got some progress here, but the link does not work any more. Do you know of a current solution? Joesydney (talk) 03:49, 18 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Botany

edit

The Botany (NZ electorate) article was clumsy and seemed overly concerned with National winning it, but I rewrote it. Le me know if you think it's better, and if you want to take the MPOV tag off. Cheers. plan 8 (talk) 21:45, 27 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:Mandy Tam baptism.jpg

edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mandy Tam baptism.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ohconfucius (talk) 07:19, 9 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Mingpao.svg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 09:06, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of RaboPlus

edit
 

I have nominated RaboPlus, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RaboPlus. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Moondyne 12:05, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Nintendo DS storage devices

edit
 

I have nominated Nintendo DS storage devices, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nintendo DS storage devices. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Rgoodermote  23:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

April 2009

edit

  The recent edit you made to Teeline Shorthand has been reverted, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. I fully expect the reasons to be unintentional but by linking to a pdf file at diesel.com/ceaseless this was sharing a document originally created by the Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering. There is no evidence that this has been made public domain. Ashleyvh (talk) 11:12, 15 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

  The recent edit you made to Teeline Shorthand has been reverted, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. By linking directly to the material (a PDF file) that has the name of the copyright holder embedded in it you are acting counter to the advice of WP:LINKVIO. This link adds no value to the article in question and so also fails WP:EL in several respects. I have added a note on the talk page, please discuss on the talk page if you are tempted to add the link again. Teahot (talk) 21:58, 15 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Whoops

edit

[4] Sorry about that -- I pressed the wrong button on my watchlist. [[Sam Korn]] (smoddy) 11:57, 19 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:OldHKflag.gif listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:OldHKflag.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:03, 24 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your suggestion

edit
 
For your input in helping me figure out how to convert .jp2 files to .jpg easily. --BrokenSphereMsg me 22:18, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Andy Wisnie

edit

You beat me to the punch, was about to remove that speedy tag as the article already passed a previous one.— dαlus Contribs 05:17, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Excellent

edit

Nice work with the powergirl vandal. Everytime I tried to revert you alread did it, but at least someone did.Drew Smith What I've done 11:17, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I'm finding Huggle to be a highly useful tool. F (talk) 11:20, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'm fairly new to huggle too. Only problem is the occasional need to manualy warn a user because huggle claims they haven't edited since their last warning. But it's so much better than Lupins anit vandal tool, which is what I was using before I got rollback rights.Drew Smith What I've done 11:23, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Check this one out. Very disturbing [5] Drew Smith What I've done 11:38, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Indeed. F (talk) 11:45, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Consider Archiving...

edit

Hi, I notice that youe talk page goes back to when you first joined, may I suggest archiving? --Frozen4322 Talk Stalk 13:19, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:ChurchOfSpritualTechnologyLogo.svg

edit

Thank you for uploading File:ChurchOfSpritualTechnologyLogo.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 01:56, 17 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


Proposed deletion of Wireless Multiboot

edit
 

The article Wireless Multiboot has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No citation of reliable sources and no suggestion from the article's content that these might be available

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cynical (talk) 14:04, 12 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Auckland City mayoral election, 2010

edit

Thanks for that. I thought Banks had actually declared, but it seems there's no actual announcement anywhere. --Lholden (talk) 06:18, 3 September 2009 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Powershop specials.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Powershop specials.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:56, 13 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 17:56, 13 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for File:Powershop specials.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Powershop specials.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 17:56, 13 November 2009 (UTC)Reply


Orphaned non-free image (File:Telecom.svg)

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Telecom.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 09:36, 23 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

To-do List in WP:HK

edit

Hi, I saw your edit in the To-do list. I moved your addition to the "To Destub" section, since the article is still a stub class quality article. Please also make use of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Hong Kong/Requests page next time. Thanks. Tavatar (talk) 20:12, 8 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Mount Albert by-election peer review

edit

I notice you have contributed significantly to Mount Albert by-election, 2009. A peer review of the article has taken place, and your help on fixing the listed criticism would be appreciated. Thanks, Adabow (talk) 09:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Wired Country

edit
 

The article Wired Country has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Minor ISP - no evidence of notability given or found after search per WP:BEFORE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 06:22, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply


Disputed non-free use rationale for File:ChurchOfSpritualTechnologyLogo.svg

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:ChurchOfSpritualTechnologyLogo.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Cirt (talk) 21:37, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Auckland Meetup 5 on 9 May 2010

edit

You are invited to Auckland Meetup 5 on the afternoon of Sunday 9th May 2010 at Esquires Cafe, Ground Floor, Auckland Central City Library, Lorne St, Auckland. Please see Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland 5 for details and RSVP. You can also bookmark Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland to be informed of future NZ meetups. - Linnah (talk) 12:46, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for File:ChanFlyers.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ChanFlyers.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:13, 20 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for File:ChanLoDebate.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ChanLoDebate.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:25, 20 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for File:Citibank.svg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Citibank.svg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:18, 2 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Mana by-election, 2010

edit

The DYK project (nominate) 06:02, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Earth day.svg

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Earth day.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:21, 6 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:21, 6 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Terrorism in New Zealand

edit

The actions of the peace activists were cleared by the court, but are still relevant to a discussion of terrorism in New Zealand. Could you see a way to reinstate the paragraph, possibly with some amendments?-gadfium 05:42, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Replied on Talk:Terrorism in New Zealand F (talk) 08:51, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
I have added more explanation to the Talk:Terrorism_in_New_Zealand page - briefly, it meets the criteria given in the law, but I realise it is an unpopular and unsupported view (and maybe not 'encyclopedic' for that reason as well. Egmason (talk) 12:16, 9 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of GPOD Party

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on GPOD Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Shirt58 (talk) 08:55, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Non-free files in your user space

edit

  Hey there F, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:F/GPOD. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

  • See a log of files removed today here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:06, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:GPOD Party logo.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:GPOD Party logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:04, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:GPOD Party logo.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:GPOD Party logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:19, 18 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

fukishima reactor

edit

hi. could you please take a view on whether there should be a separate section on evacuations or whether info about evacuations should be dispersed through the text. Sorry, but it is quite urgent to settle this as lots of edits are running by while we argue about it. thanks. Sandpiper (talk) 02:26, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I don't really mind. F (talk) 02:28, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Fukushima explosion.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Fukushima explosion.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:43, 1 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Fukushima explosion.jpg listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fukushima explosion.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 293.xx.xxx.xx (talk) 10:08, 21 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:TWA.svg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:TWA.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:34, 3 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Perp walk edit

edit

re this: It's interesting, but I'd like to see a reliable source for that being HK police procedure. Daniel Case (talk) 15:38, 28 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

New Page Patrol survey

edit
 

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello F! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Possibly unfree File:ChurchOfSpritualTechnologyLogo.svg

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ChurchOfSpritualTechnologyLogo.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:33, 24 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jiayou for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jiayou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jiayou until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GotR Talk 06:18, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Dispute resolution survey

edit
 

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite


Hello F. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.

Please click HERE to participate.
Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.


You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 02:02, 6 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Non-free rationale for File:TellMe.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TellMe.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:53, 17 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of New Zealand asset sales referendum, 2013

edit

Hello F,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged New Zealand asset sales referendum, 2013 for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Shadowjams (talk) 12:27, 4 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Just an FYI, I have deleted the page. In addition to the tag being correct, the referendum hasn't actually been ok'd yet - only the claim that enough signatures have been reached. I would wait until the referendum is confirmed before recreating. Cheers, Number 57 13:18, 4 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
As you have recreated it anyway, I have now prodded it (at the moment it's a WP:CRYSTAL violation). Cheers, Number 57 13:27, 4 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

If you contest the prod and this gets taken to AfD, I'll support it being moved to your user space so you can work on it, and it could then be moved back to article space once a referendum is approved and a date set.-gadfium 22:36, 4 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Sausage sizzle

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sausage sizzle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the page be "userfied" or emailed to you. Kevin12xd (contribs) 01:29, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Aereo antenna array1.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Aereo antenna array1.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:53, 1 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:TelstraClear.svg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:TelstraClear.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:46, 5 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Popcorntime screenshot 2014mar.JPG

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Popcorntime screenshot 2014mar.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:56, 18 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Harmeet Sooden

edit
 

The article Harmeet Sooden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

redirect to a deleted page

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brad Dyer (talk) 00:30, 25 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 24 August

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 25 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Pending changes reviewer granted

edit
 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, F. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Powershop specials.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Powershop specials.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:02, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:PowershopProducts.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:PowershopProducts.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:03, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Botany byelection 2011 pamphlet.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly hi! 09:45, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Broomhead.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Broomhead.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 15 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, F. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Nintendo DS homebrew for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nintendo DS homebrew is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nintendo DS homebrew until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:39, 10 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Nintendo DS homebrew for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nintendo DS homebrew is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nintendo DS homebrew (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Chevvin 20:10, 28 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, F. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:SafeguardsTransporterTruck.jpg

edit
 

The file File:SafeguardsTransporterTruck.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 18 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Popcorntime screenshot 2014mar.JPG

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Popcorntime screenshot 2014mar.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:46, 25 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Jrwest-amagasaki.png listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jrwest-amagasaki.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 06:36, 18 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Internet in New Zealand

edit

Dear F,

I'm not sure whether you consider the list of internet speeds in the talk page of Internet in New Zealand still relevant or useful.

Cheers, Egroeg5 (talk) 06:28, 10 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Del sol.svg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Del sol.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 8 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:AECT ballot and campaign material 2009.jpg listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AECT ballot and campaign material 2009.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:58, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:October 2022 Conservative Party leadership election

edit

 Template:October 2022 Conservative Party leadership election has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ITN recognition for Cyclone Gabrielle

edit

On 15 February 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Cyclone Gabrielle, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 00:40, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Auckland children bodies found in suitcases for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Auckland children bodies found in suitcases is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auckland children bodies found in suitcases until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 09:25, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Nintendo DS homebrew

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Nintendo DS homebrew indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 22:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)Reply