January 2024

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 18:45, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Dear MrOllie,
I appreciate that you contacted me about this matter, but I do not think that I added any original research. If you could tell me what exactly I wrote that is original research, I will give you a reliable source.
Sincerely, Evan O'Neill Evan Y. O'Neill (talk) 19:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia VII: The Rise of Jimbo

edit
 

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Wikipedia VII: The Rise of Jimbo, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ForsythiaJo (talk) 22:41, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

The page was intended to be humorous, unfortunately I forgot to add the humour template. I apologize for any trouble.
Sincerely, Evan O'Neill Evan Y. O'Neill (talk) 00:37, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
How long have I been blocked? Evan Y. O'Neill (talk) 00:59, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

March 2024

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 00:34, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Please see my above comment in the section "Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia VII: The Rise of Jimbo." Sorry for any trouble.
Sincerely, Evan O'Neill Evan Y. O'Neill (talk) 00:40, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
How long will I be blocked?
Sincerely, Evan O'Neill Evan Y. O'Neill (talk) 00:52, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply