Qnxkuba

Please, put your comments in the bottom of this page. Thank you!

--Entireweb (talk) 11:48, 7 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 13 September 2010 edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and notes: Page-edit stats, French National Library partnership, Mass page blanking, Jimbo on Pending changes

In the news: Public Policy Initiative, Houellebecq plagiarism?, Article revisions as book

Public Policy Initiative: Experiments with article assessment

Sister projects: Biography bloopers – update on the Death Anomalies collaboration

WikiProject report: Getting the picture – an interview with the Graphic lab

Features and admins: "Magnificent" warthog not so cute, says featured picture judge

Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:24, 13 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

September 2010 edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the username you have chosen seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website.

There are two issues with this:

You may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, you must exercise great caution when editing on topics related to your organization.
Your account cannot represent a group of people. You may wish to create a new account with a username that represents only you. Alternatively, you may consider changing your username to avoid giving the impression that your personal account is being used for promotional purposes.

Regardless of whether you change your name or create a new account, you are not exempted from the guideline to avoid editing where you have a conflict of interest. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

bonadea contributions talk 12:40, 14 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Comments on the Entireweb article edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, just a couple of quick comments about the article you're drafting about Entireweb. The language is very neutral and NPOV, so I don't think there is any problem at all there. The references are of varying quality; http://www.i-newswire.com/entireweb-launches-new-search-engine/30495 looks like a press release from the company, which does not count as a reliable third-party source. http://searchengineland.com/etoolsch-a-swiss-army-meta-search-engine-10864 and http://news.cnet.com/FAQ-Protecting-yourself-from-search-engines/2100-1025_3-6103486.html are good sources - especially cnet.com - but the mention of Entireweb is brief and rather trivial. The Ny Teknik article, http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/it_telekom/internet/article757032.ece , on the other hand, is a good reference, a full-length article in a reliable third-party source. But it would be good to see more references, because one good ref, two trivial mentions and one press release is a little bit thin, I would think.

The introduction to the article only says that it's a search engine; I would have added the fact that it was developed in Sweden (not because I'm Swedish, but because it is a relevant fact!)

This is not an in-depth review of your article, you understand, just the thoughts that occurred to me when I looked at it. Please do look into changing your username, as mentioned in the note above this one, because it's important that Wikipedia editor accounts don't represent companies or groups of people. Cheers, --bonadea contributions talk 12:52, 14 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 20 September 2010 edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

From the editor: New ways to read and share the Signpost

News and notes: Dutch National Archives donation, French photo raid, brief notes

In the news: Rush Limbaugh falls for Wikipedia hoax, Public Policy Initiative, Nature cites Wikipedia

WikiProject report: All Aboard WikiProject Trains

Features and admins: The best of the week

Dispatches: Tools, part 2: Internal links and page histories

Arbitration report: Discretionary sanctions clarification and more

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:57, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Entireweb, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 12:18, 27 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 27 September 2010 edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and notes: French million, controversial content, Citizendium charter, Pending changes, and more

In the news: Wikimedia moves into India, critical conference, Vandalism detection contest

WikiProject report: Designing WikiProject Architecture

Features and admins: The best of the week

Arbitration report: EEML amendment requests & more

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:00, 27 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

{{unblock|I have already changed my username to Qnxkuba, which should meet the criteria for usernames on Wikipiedia. Please unblock as soon as possible. Thank you.}}

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

There appears to have been an overlap between when you posted your UNC and when this block occurred. Remember: this does not exempt you from WP:COI, WP:PROMO - in other words, trying to recreate the Entireweb article is still a no-no

Request handled by: (talk→ BWilkins ←track)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.