Enigmatic666

Could you stop with the Edit Warring & at least discuss or justify the complete removal of verified content that is in any way critical of the company that you seem to defend, or perhaps represent.

Perhaps discussing the issues at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Genieo#Edit_War will be helpful ?,

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:18, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Your recent editing history at Genieo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 15:20, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Enigmatic666 reported by User:Jianhui67 (Result: ). Thank you. Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 15:21, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Genieo‎, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hqb (talk) 16:24, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Genieo with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — MusikAnimal ^talk 17:06, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Genieo. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 17:38, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry investigation

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Therealthings for evidence. Make sure you are familiar with these notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. - Brianhe (talk) 05:45, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

• You have been blocked for one week per the findings of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Enigmatic666. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:38, 17 December 2013 (UTC)