Orphaned non-free media (File:Ontvlogo.png) edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Ontvlogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 21:25, 22 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your moves edit

Your recent moves of articles such as Main Street–Science World Station, in which you removed the spaces from the dashes were incorrect per WP:DASH, which says "All disjunctive en dashes are unspaced, except when there is a space within either one or both of the items" (italics mine for emphasis). I have reverted them; please try to use an edit summary in the future. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:29, 24 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Take "Main Street" and "Science World Station" for example: because they have internal spaces, the dash between them is spaced. Many websites and organizations do not follow standard dash rules; that does not mean we shouldn't. Feel free to ask more. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:37, 25 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: Non-free logos edit

I think it will work as it is a third party reliable source. Powergate92Talk 00:02, 27 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (File:Maisontv.svg) edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Maisontv.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  єmarsee Speak up! 05:33, 27 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (File:Hpitv.svg) edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Hpitv.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  єmarsee Speak up! 05:33, 27 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (File:Screamtv.svg) edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Screamtv.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  єmarsee Speak up! 05:33, 27 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

I was taking it from the OnTV website, from what I've seen, I've only seen them use the black background version and from watching the station awhile back, the black background version seems to be mroe familiar to me and I can't remeber seeing the svg file version you uploaded. But if the svg file is more accurate then I'm fine with it. musimax. (talk) 17:35, 27 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • Since it's not plain text, though (the device of the "n" hooked through the "O"), I'd still consider it to cross the threshold of originality. This may be worth a discussion at WP:PUI. Consider File:McDonald's Corporate Logo.svg, which is all text, but uses the large "M" device. Black Kite 17:52, 27 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:CHCH ONTV.svg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CHCH ONTV.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Black Kite 17:59, 27 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Television channels Wiki edit

Because of the problems we been having with old logos do to WP:NFCC, I have decided to start Television channels Wiki on Wikia. On Television channels Wiki you only need to have {{Fairuse}} on a logo to add it to an article. Powergate92Talk 02:54, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image uploads edit

Please do not upload copyrighted images and license them as CC-ATT 2.5 images from http://www.seataf.com/ (Copyright © 2009 SeaTaf Productions. All Rights Reserved). feydey (talk) 20:50, 3 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

My mistake, the CC lic. image is really tiny -- I had to look though the page for some time. Apologies, feydey (talk) 21:26, 3 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
All images restored. feydey (talk) 21:31, 3 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

WP:WQA#User:Emarsee edit

Hi -- notifying you that there's a new section about you, not that I think it calls for any response. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 00:13, 4 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Emarsee. You have new messages at Admrboltz's talk page.
Message added 06:08, 7 October 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Admrboltz (talk) 06:08, 7 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

KATU article edit

Just an FYI that I started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#Television personalities re: this edit you had made on the KATU article. Please join in the discussion. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 04:52, 10 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

"br /" issue edit

According to Darrenhusted, these
s the "/"s are needed for older computers, so please do not revert and call them a waste of space. I'm just passing on the message by the way, so don't shoot the messenger :). Thank you. Queen kitten (talk) 14:19, 11 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: TVYVR edit

Sure, go right ahead, and thanks for offering. - Hinto (talk) 19:52, 16 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

I checked my current computer, and unfortunately couldn't find the files you were looking for. I really should've downloaded them. I'm going home for Christmas, hopefully I'll find the files backed up on CDs somewhere. Keeping my fingers crossed, and will keep you posted. - Hinto (talk) 00:54, 23 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Evergreen Line map edit

Just noticed a spelling error on your SVG map of the Evergreen Line; Burquitlam station is incorrectly spelled as Burtquitlam. Also, if you get a chance, I might suggest separation between the Evergreen and WCE lines so that it's clear they're not sharing track, and having Evergreen cross over WCE just west of Ioco station. I'd take a crack at making the changes myself, but I don't have a Commons account set up, and you're probably more familiar with the file than I am. Cheers! Klparrot (talk) 21:01, 20 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

I got most of that done after an IP commented on my Commons userpage. I'll separate the WCE tracks from the Evergreen line's soon.  єmarsee Speak up! 22:17, 20 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Frontiers to Freeways pdf page edit

This pdf page from the BCMOT site might be of interest to you. It's a resource containing much info about various BC Highways including the 1 (and contains dates for events such as when the HOV lanes were built). I don't think there's anything in here about Route 7 though. I'm currently adding many of the resources available here to existing BC Highway articles in Wikipedia.
-Deltanalliance (talk) 05:35, 23 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

native choir thing on 2010 WO edit

I was gonna cite that when I got back in from being out; there's two articles on it in [1]'s The Hook news area; I think if you look on Talk:Conne River, Newfoundland and Labrador you'll find them; it's also gotten other press coverage...and belongs in the "controversies and concerns" section, as also the Powder Mountain story which also belongs in terms of controversies surrounding the Games and/or its site(s). Of course there's no room on any computer for List of promises broken by politicians. That it's a controversy to do with hte Games is why it belongs; it may not have been in the right section, but it's factual and related to the events/politics of the Games.Skookum1 (talk) 01:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

URLs edit

Emarsee, where is the consensus of which you speak? (See [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]). Please show me where to find a discussion as to where this consensus was reached. As I've explained to you before, displaying the URL provides additional information in the same amount of space: piping the channel name over it is hiding that. I don't understand why you think it is beneficial to hide useful information in this way. --RFBailey (talk) 18:22, 4 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

First, User:Bearcat was not the user who mass-reverted my edits without notification: you were. That is why I started this discussion.
Second, while I appreciate what WP:MOS is saying, it's referring to how to use external links in article text, rather than infoboxes, I still don't understand why you think that our preferred version is better. WP:IAR states "If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it."; nowhere does it say "unless that rule is part of WP:MOS" or whatever. I suggest you read Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means; one especially relevent quote is "Don't follow written instructions mindlessly, but rather, consider how the encyclopedia is improved or damaged by each edit.".
Third, you still haven't stated where this supposed "consensus" was obtained. Your interpretation of the applicability of WP:IAR is not a consensus.
Finally, I know what "WTF" means: please don't use it in edit summaries. It's incivil and unproductive. --RFBailey (talk) 03:25, 5 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
There's a clear difference between ignoring behavioural guidelines such as 3RR and NPA and ignoring style guidelines when it will improve an article. After all, there is an encyclopaedia here which is supposed to be being written. If you can't be bothered to at least try to understand why I was actually trying to make improvements to the articles, then I don't see why you feel that you can going around reverting good faith edits. --RFBailey (talk) 16:43, 5 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Also, if you look at the Template:Infobox_TV_channel#Example usage of that infobox, you'll see that it has the URL visible. I still want to know where this "consensus" exists--I'm coming to the conclusion that it does not exist. --RFBailey (talk) 19:48, 5 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Further on this topic, I have started this a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_(infoboxes)#URLs_in_infoboxes. --RFBailey (talk) 23:31, 5 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
If you're pissed off with YouTube comments (or, for that matter, anything else), you should probably steer clear of Wikipedia discussions until you have a clear head. Otherwise you just get other people pissed off with you and cause situations to escalate.
Anyway, I agree that the http:// protocol should be omitted, although the "www" should be included, as (occasionally) they are not part of the URL. --RFBailey (talk) 03:16, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
In cases such as the CTV Northern Ontario example you mention, putting the complete URL is clearly ridiculous. An alternative would be to link to www.ctv.ca/local. However, where there is an easily-remembered URL, such as montreal.ctv.ca (which, incidentally, doesn't include a "www"), it is better to display it. As a general principle, I think that showing the URL is more helpful. --RFBailey (talk) 03:46, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

PLEASE READ!!! Thmc1 IS VANDALISING ONCE AGAIN!!!! edit

I would like to report that user Thmc1 is vandalising the Chinatown pages once again with his Pro-New York/Anti-San Francisco Chinatown propaganda. This time he's falsely citing website sources. In an edit on the "Vancouver, Chinatown" page, he claims that a San Francisco promotional website (www.hoteltravelcheck.com/sfo/Chinatown-San-Francisco.html) advertises its Chinatown as "second largest", presumably behind New York. This is clearly untrue, as the website reads "THE LARGEST", not "second largest". I wonder what the logic is behind his latest actions? Maybe calling other people's bluff assuming that nobody won't bother to check?? What do you intend to do about his continuing abuses after already several warnings? IanEddington (talk)

Tonis edit

Hi Emarsee,

I edited the article about the now defunct Ukrainian TV One channel. You posted a comment that it is not possible to replace a Channel without applying for a new license. I do agree that it is true for almost all English/French and some Ethnic Category 2 Specialty Services.

It is different, however, for the majority of non English/French channels (also Category 2 Specialty Services). These licenses require to carry out Ethnic programming plus CDN content. They do not specify how you bring the ethnic content into Canada. You can entirely produce it yourself or buy the majority from different foreign companies and compile it (hence, the requirement to have at least 10% locally produced programming). In general, the licensees simply choose to buy a signal from a satellite channel they desire to and insert local programming in the channel schedule.

Here are the conditions concerning the Ukrainian TV One channel: http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2003/db2003-448.htm

Since I subscribe ethnic channels, mostly Russian plus I used to subscribe the Ukrainian channel, I know for a fact that these channels are not being re branded by the licenses. They switch the signal from one satellite signal to another. This is also true for "Russian TV Two" channel which initially was "Moscow Open World", later "Center TV International", and now RTVi+. These three Russian channels are not related to each others. Operators switch channels for different reasons, mostly to increase subscription.

Pleas note that some Ethnic channels carriers formed a partnership with specific foreign channels prior to applying for a license and subsequently were granted one. In this case, it is not possible to switch channels and a new license would be required. For example, NTV Canada (Russia) may not be replaced by any other channel from Russia.

I would greatly appreciate if you reply to me.

Rord. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rord (talkcontribs) 04:27, 15 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sorry edit

I'm not trying to be disruptive. I'm not clear on the procesure. Your notes initially made no sense to me as I wasn't adding anything of consequence, and certainly no different than stating that a book was published. I fixed some pre-existing poor grammar, which seems to have been accepted, and then I added a note about the opening of a restaurant. That's about it. Vogelp (talk) 03:49, 17 November 2009 (UTC)Reply


Orphaned non-free image (File:Cbuft03id.jpg) edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Cbuft03id.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 01:46, 18 November 2009 (UTC)Reply


Orphaned non-free image (File:Team1040.png) edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Team1040.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 03:42, 19 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

CHCA-TV edit

You obviously have no clue how this site (or debate in general) works. It is up to the person making the positive statement (YOU) to prove it. Your link was to an expired license ("The licences will be in effect from 1 September 2001 to 31 August 2008.") By your logic, the page on America should say George W Bush is President! It is up to YOU to prove your words or they can't be on Wikipedia. See WP:VERIFY --208.38.59.163 (talk) 00:06, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

And yes, it would kill me to search- why do you want me to die?? --208.38.59.163 (talk) 00:10, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Burrard Bridge edit

Would you be so kind as to use appropriate protocol to make request for pictures of effects of new bicycle lanes? I'm now 8 time zones away and not able to illus. text, as I did earlier, when reshaping article with a timeline. We don't need spectacular pictures, we need ones illus. of text content on a contentious issue of broad urban planning interest. Thank you,Alethe (talk) 18:51, 22 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Metro Vancouver edit

I made a number of changes to the Metro Vancouver page to clarify and correct a number of inaccuracies. Many of the sources of my information are not available online (such as the GVRD's Letters Patent, proof that "Metro Vancouver" is an official mark of the GVRD, the GVWD Act and the GVSDD Act). - Lynda Stokes, Legal Counsel, Greater Vancouver Regional District —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.53.110.198 (talk) 21:17, 24 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism Report edit

Hello Can you help me? the user Thenewandresutz keeps vandalizing articles http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Thenewandresutz I don't know how to report the abuse, I'm asking you because of this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Thenewandresutz Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simonhewson (talkcontribs) 06:41, 28 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Vancouver edit

  WikiProject Vancouver
You have been invited to participate in Operation Schadenfreude to restore the article Vancouver back to featured article status.

- Mkdwtalk 05:19, 2 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for that catch. Somehow I had mistaken that the Globe and Mail was a Canwest Publication. By the way, I appreciate all your help on the article. It's been quite the task to get this article ready. When Vancouver lost its FA some of us were shocked, but looking over it more in depth, it seems like how could it not have. Mkdwtalk 00:49, 7 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nix the Mix edit

67 fried my last nerve with the unsourced C1-class (!?!) license claim; the page is now editblocked to anons. I don't know if Alebowgm has been around long enough yet to get past that or not, but if their edits get too problematic I'll escalate the protection. Bearcat (talk) 01:55, 7 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Bpmtv.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Bpmtv.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:07, 8 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Cbutbroadcast1.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Cbutbroadcast1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:25, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Cbutb1set.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Cbutb1set.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:30, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Erased link about CBC Television edit

Can you tell me exactly why you have erased the link about CBC's RetroBites? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.22.141.130 (talk) 11:59, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:CFCF 12watch.gif edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:CFCF 12watch.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  єmarsee Speak up! 06:47, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: Parsons... he mentioned the restaurant himself, in a BCTV/Global interview. In any case, he appears to be on the move .... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vogelp (talkcontribs) 00:20, 16 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Save local TV edit

The reason no one else is supporting your local television cause at Digital Home Canada is because Hugh and his moderators banned all passed members arguing in favor of the broadcasters. I believe Hugh’s forum is run by BDU investors. I’m surprised they haven’t banned you yet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.49.235.49 (talk) 03:29, 20 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Save local TV edit

The reason no one else is supporting your local television cause at Digital Home Canada is because Hugh and his moderators banned all passed members arguing in favor of the broadcasters. I believe Hugh’s forum is run by BDU investors. I’m surprised they haven’t banned you yet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.49.235.49 (talk) 03:34, 20 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re Save Local TV edit

This was me prior to being banned for life! http://www.digitalhome.ca/forum/search.php?searchid=4231160

For a couple of years I was a member in good standing. One day Hugh posted (for the third time) that in the US local stations don’t receive fee for carriage from the US BDUs. This was after I posted the FCC regulation. http://www.fcc.gov/mb/facts/cblbdcst.html I stated that Hugh is in risk of harming his digital home site’s reputation if he keeps misleading people with false information. Without ever receiving an infraction Hugh banned me for life. I know of at least 4 other members that got banned for arguing in favour of Canadian broadcasters. I know for a fact that at least 3 moderators are BDU investors. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.49.235.49 (talk) 06:05, 20 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

just making sure ... edit

01:47, 3 January 2010 Emarsee (talk | contribs) (73,391 bytes) (Reverted to revision 335540022 by Rundleds; Way overblown = your opinion. H1N1 remains a threat. (TW)) (undo) 

(cur) (prev) 01:37, 3 January 2010 76.116.5.27 (talk) (72,378 bytes) (→Concerns and controversies: h1n1 way overblown. OLD OLD news. Not appropriate for main article.) (undo) (Tag: section blanking)

Just wondering why my name is associated to this treat (revision 335540022 by rundleds....) I havent modified or suggest to remove this information. If it's because you are suggesting to reverted to the last page I edit.... it's ok... just want make sure my name is not there because I'm the one doing it because I am not. This information as been modified by 76.116.5.27, not me. Many peoples doesnt like my point of view on this page in general particularly skookum1 if you look at the talk page of Vancouver 2010 so I'm trying to avoid issues and stay low profile. I'm new here so this is why I am writing you to making sure. Happy near year :)--Rundleds (talk) 06:24, 3 January 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:CTV News.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:CTV News.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:07, 4 January 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 01:07, 4 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

SexTV: The Channel and Drive-In Classics edit

There is now a copyright notice for Corus Entertainment for the two channels (SexTV: The Channel and Drive-In Classics) acquired by CTVglobemedia meaning that the transaction has officially been finalized. 99.233.133.187 (talk) 03:16, 4 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Last DJ edit

I got curious about this unreferenced claim from the KRKO article and a careful review of the video in question clearly shows the letters on the tower at approximately the 2:20 mark... and they're KRKD, not KRKO. Several stations have held these calls over the years but based on the vintage look of the film, it's possible that this was a tower for a 1970s Los Angeles radio station now known as KTLK and not the Arkansas station that now holds the call sign. - Dravecky (talk) 10:56, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Better source request for File:Breakfasttv.png edit

Thanks for uploading File:Breakfasttv.png. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:45, 9 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Breakfasttv.png missing description details edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Breakfasttv.png is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:45, 9 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:CMOrendering.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:CMOrendering.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:42, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Economic history of Canada edit

What is your source that Fraser Institute is conservative? Do you understand the difference between conservative and libertarian? --Defender of torch (talk) 05:11, 11 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

RfD nomination of "A" edit

I have nominated "A" (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — the Man in Question (in question) 05:14, 13 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:DiscoveryHD.png edit

I have tagged File:DiscoveryHD.png as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 06:29, 16 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Chch1986.png edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chch1986.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --After Midnight 0001 23:46, 27 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

TV personalities edit

Please see Talk:CIHF-TV, where I left you a note. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 15:55, 2 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
Hello, Emarsee. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 January 27.
Message added 17:30, 3 February 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Powergate92Talk 17:30, 3 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Cfjc.svg missing description details edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Cfjc.svg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:43, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Kafe.png edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Kafe.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:49, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Access Alberta.svg missing description details edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Access Alberta.svg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:52, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:ATNtv.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:ATNtv.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:54, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:54, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


Replaceable fair use File:Pitt river aerial3crop.JPG edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Pitt river aerial3crop.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:59, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:TLN en espanol.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:TLN en espanol.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:43, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:43, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:CKSA-TV.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:CKSA-TV.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:44, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:44, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:CITL-TV.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:CITL-TV.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:44, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:44, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:DIY Canada.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:DIY Canada.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:45, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:45, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Vu logo.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Vu logo.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:45, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:45, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Cfjc.svg missing description details edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Cfjc.svg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:47, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Td10.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Td10.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:51, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:51, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for File:Ckvu05news.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ckvu05news.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:54, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:0502Beatriz.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:0502Beatriz.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:55, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:55, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:0503Calvin.jpg missing description details edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:0503Calvin.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:0504Dora.jpg missing description details edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:0504Dora.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:59, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:0501Noname.jpg missing description details edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:0501Noname.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:0506Fernanda.jpg missing description details edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:0506Fernanda.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:0507Greg.jpg missing description details edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:0507Greg.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:0512Lidia.jpg missing description details edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:0512Lidia.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:0515Otis.jpg missing description details edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:0515Otis.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:GloNa.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:GloNa.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:17, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:17, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for File:GloNa.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:GloNa.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:17, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Utv.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Utv.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:21, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:21, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Vtv.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Vtv.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:41, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:41, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Ckpgnews.png missing description details edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Ckpgnews.png is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:45, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Chektv.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Chektv.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:03, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:03, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Channel6.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Channel6.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:04, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:04, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Chektv70.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Chektv70.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:14, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:14, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Atlantictv.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Atlantictv.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:07, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:07, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Gametv.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Gametv.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Mctv.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Mctv.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:09, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:09, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Calgary7.PNG edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Calgary7.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:13, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:13, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Globalbc.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Globalbc.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:24, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:24, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Globalcalgary.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Globalcalgary.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:26, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:26, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Globaledmonton.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Globaledmonton.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:26, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:26, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Globallethbridge.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Globallethbridge.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:28, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:28, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Globalmaritimes.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Globalmaritimes.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:29, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:29, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Globalontario.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Globalontario.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:30, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:30, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Globalquebec.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Globalquebec.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:31, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:31, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Globalregina.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Globalregina.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:32, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:32, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Globalsaskatoon.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Globalsaskatoon.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:33, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:33, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Globalwinnipeg.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Globalwinnipeg.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:37, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:37, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Treehousetv.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Treehousetv.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:51, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:51, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Primetv.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Primetv.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:53, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:53, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:King5.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:King5.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Komotv.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Komotv.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:12, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:12, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Logos edit

It would be helpful if you could review and flag your own contributions as well as responding to the tags :)

It would also be very helpful, if when adding the information to images that could be on commons if you could consider adding the {{mtc}} as well.

BTW One final point, once resolved, any image warnings I've left on your talk page can be removed.

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:56, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Historytv.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Historytv.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:41, 14 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:41, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Cjntmontreal.svg missing description details edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Cjntmontreal.svg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:55, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply