Ellayhere

In response to your feedback

Hmmmmm...let me link you to our Manual of style regarding linking; we've got interwiki-links, external links and.....okay, you'll see when you get there. Don't give up yet; there is more to come :).

Lectonar (talk) 12:43, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

 

OK ... what's the right approach to this set of issues?

Page A is a biography of an individual. It names his father and mother and links are set up for them.

Page B is the page for the father. It links back to the individual who is the subject of page A as his son. So all's good there. It identifies his wife, mother of the son, but gives her a different version of the name (the vagaries of medieval naming), and does not have a link set up for her, even a 'red link'.

Page C is the page to which page A links for the mother. This is the wrong woman as she died over 100 years before the son was born (and doesn't link to page A).

The mother, ironically, seems the most interesting of the three individuals but does not currently have a page. Her grandfather does, at page D.

So ... I think that the right approach to resolving this is as follows -

I add to pages A and B, describing the mother/wife as grandaughter of the person at page D and linking to page D.

I edit the links to the mother on page A so that they no longer link to the wrong woman but instead to an as yet not created page. (Here's the bit I'm least sure about since I'm still learning about how links work.) I do this by using the piping functionality, so the name appears as it still does but points to a non existant page and therefore appears in red. Finally, I create a stub (if that is the right thing to do) of an article on the mother while I do some more tracking down of source material. Ellayhere (talk) 14:02, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Yes, you got that right (and yes, it is allowed to have redlinks). I'm rather relieved that your brain didn't give out. I'll give you yet another link (this is getting surreal :)), to our cheatsheet; it makes coding that much easier. Keep up the good work. Cheers and happy editing. . Lectonar (talk) 14:45, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Adoption

Hi! I see you are requesting adoption and so would like to offer to adopt you. Myself and my replacement/assistant, RexRowan have an adoption school, which can teach you all the basics of Wikipedia. We believe the adoption course is a great beginning to your Wikipedia life and User talk:RexRowan, who has completed the course himself, will happily tell you how useful the course was.

The adoption school contains a series of 10 lessons, each focusing on a different aspect and with a short test at the end of each. The lessons are then followed by a final exam.

Should you be interested in getting adopted, please read this Code of Honour, then return here and press the button below, filling in USERNAME with your username with out the User: prefix. This questionnaire gives me an insight into you and allows me to adjust the course should I need to, so please fill it in.

Also, please drop a line to say you are interested either below this message or on my talk page at User talk:Adam mugliston.

Thanks,

 Adam Mugliston  Talk 

 RexRowan  Talk  09:54, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Adam, thank you for responding to my adoption request, the advice etc, which I am in a position to respond to now - I got sidetracked for a while onto a new project that consumed most of my waking hours. My apologies for taking so long to respond. I will fill in the questionnaire and take it from there. Ellayhere (talk) 14:18, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Regarding adoption

Hi Ellayhere. I notice you've put a "request for adoption" template on your userpage. Given the number of users starting on the encyclopedia each day and the number who look for adoption, there can often be a backlog when just displaying the request. You are much more likely to find an adopter if you are pro-active about it, perhaps asking an editor or two from the list of adopters if they would consider adopting you? Good luck in finding someone to help out. Worm^TT(talk) 09:34, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for noticing and the advice :) Ellayhere (talk) 14:18, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

In the meantime, someone removed the according template from your userpage...do you still want to be adopted? Lectonar (talk) 14:48, 1 October 2012 (UTC)