EatIcecream2

So, it's 0-1 to the CVU so far...

Hello, I'm Edgar181. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to carbon dioxide because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:10, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Age of sorcery. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 19:20, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Generator potential

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Generator potential requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Jasper Deng (talk) 19:37, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

How do I make a hard redirect?EatIcecream2 (talk) 12:36, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Replace the contents of the page you wish to redirect with the following:

#REDIRECT [[destination page]]

There isn't really any such thing as a "hard redirect", just a regular redirect (although "soft redirects", for sending users to project space pages or other sites, do exist). Yunshui 雲‍水 13:03, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

How do I send users to an external site?EatIcecream2 (talk) 13:56, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Depends. With another Wikimedia project (say, for example, MediaWiki) you use {{Soft redirect|target}}. For another website, you would use single square brackets, like this: [http://www.example.com]. However, you can't redirect a page on Wikipedia to an external website - the most you can do is add an external link to a page, but even then, it will need to comply with the external links guideline. What precisely do you want to link? Yunshui 雲‍水 14:02, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Interview admins like me?

What about? It's not like I'm shy about expressing myself. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:56, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Your question at the Help desk

	Hello EatIcecream2. Replies have been posted to your question at the Help desk. If the problem is solved, please place {{Resolved|1=~~~~}} at the top of the section. Thank you!
	Message added on 20:39, 21 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{helpdeskreply}} template.

give me some easy tasks to do in my talk page

Category:Wikipedia articles needing copy edit from February 2013 88.104.27.2 (talk) 23:14, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, EatIcecream2. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help desk.
Message added Dismas. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

May 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks for disruptive editing and vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Bbb23 (talk) 17:58, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EatIcecream2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have already apologized. Although, I expected a warning before the block. EatIcecream2 (talk) 17:59, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I don't see any indication that you intend to stop your disruptive behavior. Just the opposite. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 18:29, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Your history shows that you like to play games, both on and off Wikipedia. You repeatedly make bad edits and then you revert yourself. It's like your having fun at the project's expense AND you know what you're doing. Apologies are hollow when you don't even address why you do these things. This comment ("Congratulations on your reversion of my edit, that was less than a second. Looks like the community is still very swift!") just before your "apology" on User:Mike Rosoft's talk page confirms that you're being deliberately disruptive.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:08, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

What, I enjoy games! And my last real edit was useful. Look, wikipedia's daily views ARE falling (http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/wikipedia.org ).--EatIcecream2 (talk) 18:11, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Every edit you make is "real". I'm glad you enjoy games, but playing games here is not acceptable. I looked at your edit to Wikipedia, and your edit summary was childish, automatically raising red flags, at least for me. Whether you're right about the "decrease", frankly I can't tell from the Alexa site as it doesn't clearly say "this is the rank now" and "this was the rank before". But even assuming your edit was sound, or at least made in good faith, it doesn't explain all the other problems. If you're not willing to take Wikipedia seriously when editing, you shouldn't be here.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:17, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

How do I know I am not the only person that exists and you are not all parts of my imagination. Answer that and I will definitely take Wikipedia seriously. I can never let thousands of visitors see my "disruptions".--EatIcecream2 (talk) 18:21, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Respect me.--EatIcecream2 (talk) 12:22, 21 May 2013 (UTC)