User talk:Eastmain/Archive 14

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting -- ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

---

Canvassing?

I'm curious how you decided which people to notify about that afd? Spartaz ^Humbug! 14:41, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

@Spartaz: people who edited the article or participated in the previous AfDs Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:54, 13 September 2021 (UTC) Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:54, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

You only asked 4 people and two of them were admins closing debates. There were a lot more people then that. Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:01, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Claire A. Pierangelo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Claire A. Pierangelo, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claire A. Pierangelo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Reference for article

References

Your contributions at AfD

I've been noticing your comments at various AfDs recently. Sadly, it's not been the positive kind of notice. I'll abstain from commenting on respective examples, except maybe the most egregious ones, but I'd suggest you get a good read of WP:AADD and WP:GNG. All of these ultimately lead back to WP:V - i.e. information in articles must be verifiable in reliable sources, and not merely based on some arbitrary criteria of what is "notable" and what is not. Thanks, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:34, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

• @RandomCanadian: The biggest problem with AFD is that people nominate articles without doing a proper WP:BEFORE. Participants need to assess the references that exist, not just the ones that are already present in the article. WP:NMUSIC makes it clear: "Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart" establishes notability. And a music chart is an independent reliable source. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:55, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

(ec)(talk page watcher)Eastmain was arguing from WP:BAND#2, a notability guideline, not an arbitrary criterion of what's "notable". I think you will need to provide examples if this is about more than the one AFD. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:59, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

"Charted = Notable" is a fundamental misapplication of policy; as in practice if that's the only significant thing that can be found about something then it isn't enough to write an article on, and Eastmain's comment turns out to be a WP:VAGUEWAVE... As for other examples, there's Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El ultimo ke zierre, where the added sources by Eastmain are unimpressive to say the least; and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Yarrow where in essence they don't appear to have looked at the links they found (which are at best routine and unexceptional coverage from local sources), in addition to this dubious edit where they added unsourced material back in. A look at their AFD history ([1]) also shows they almost always !vote keep, which isn't that good of a sign when it also appears to frequently be in disagreement with the outcome of the discussion. [broken links] or bare assertions of notability (without anything to support it) are not enough to keep something. And this is not a new issue; see this great "it's interesting" argument or Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casey James (second nomination) (on which I shall pass no further comment...) from June 2006!! RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 11:58, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Most of the time, I only participate at AfDs where I have attempted to improve the article. If I think the article has been improved to the point where it is worth keeping, I will say so. If it is hopeless, I will say so as well. And when I see an article name like John Williams (mixed martial artist), I have no particular interest in improving it or voting. This explains why I most commonly vote keep, often accompanied by the phrase "I added some references." Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:46, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Then you should still take a look at WP:GNG/WP:RS, because the kind of references you add more often than not are not really good ones. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:56, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

2006 should be left alone in 2006 where it belongs. This one was not bad either. Yes, it fails to make a case for notability, but the nomination did not make a valid case for deletion. It was acceptable reply to a non-policy-compliant nom which could have been speedy closed at that point. I watchlisted this page because I noticed Eastmain trying to improve articles I believed were about to get deleted. I look for sources and don't make any edits unless I am sure I can get it kept, but it's up to Eastmain to decide where they put their effort. You might have a point with regard to the sources. And I leave you two to figure that out. But, in all, I don't see Eastmain among the editors who consistently fail to contribute positively to AFDs, by arguing delete or keep all the time, regardless of the merit of their arguments. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 10:34, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

It certainly would be better if your revisited an AfD where your "keep" argument was found to be factually incorrect, like at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sung-Hee Kim-Wüst. Fram (talk) 10:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ontario Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Centre (September 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PK650 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ontario Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Centre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ontario Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Centre, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PK650 (talk) 11:16, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Eastmain! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! PK650 (talk) 11:16, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Bangladesh Sanskritik Muktijot

Hello, I've added references as you have suggested. Rsakib188 (talk)

:Hi, I've made edits following your suggestions  Rsakib188 (talk) 16:08, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021

New Page Review queue September 2021

Hello Eastmain,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.

---

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brian Bruckbauer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drone.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Washington High School in Kansas City

I see we're having trouble finding sources for Washington High School in Kansas City. Thankfully, I have found old newspaper sources about a kidnapping that got a lot of coverage. I'll add them to the talk page. If the referencing is improved, I will move the draft into the mainspace. Scorpions13256 (talk) 05:22, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nimble Australia (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Salimfadhley was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nimble Australia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nimble Australia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Salimfadhley (talk) 18:38, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alpha, Nevada has been accepted

Alpha, Nevada, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Waddles 🗩 🖉 19:41, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Draft/Maine Academy of Natural Sciences moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Draft/Maine Academy of Natural Sciences, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – robertsky (talk) 20:49, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

New message from TrangaBellam

Hello, Eastmain. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charumitra.
Message added 17:53, 20 September 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TrangaBellam (talk) 17:53, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Leopard Signet 1960s.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Leopard Signet 1960s.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Discussion relating to your use of Citation bot

See User talk:Citation bot/Archive 27#Please_exclude_draft_space_from_batch_jobs. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:47, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mitare, Venezuela has been accepted

Mitare, Venezuela, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Hannah Green (British author) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hannah Green (British author). Thanks! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 14:46, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

A pie for you!

Thank you for your work salvaging those articles I AfDed! — Qwerfjkltalk 19:51, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael DeVine (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael DeVine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Michael DeVine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 02:02, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Vizianagaram (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Vizianagaram and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Vizianagaram, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 22:38, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The PuLi Hotel and Spa, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ministry of Culture and Tourism and Weibo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John C. Biggins has been accepted

John C. Biggins, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 23:54, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

TheeFactChecker (talk) 21:33, 15 October 2021 (UTC) Thanks very much. I appreciate your addition to the page.

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Leptolalax lateralis

added links pointing to Dubois, Delorme and Grosjean

Guy Millner

added a link pointing to Palm Beach

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Francis Allen-Palenske has been accepted

Francis Allen-Palenske, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curbon7 (talk) 01:27, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Eight Club

Hi Eastmain, I've left a reply to your vote on the Eight Club AfD, if it is of interest to you. Zetana (talk) 05:22, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

• @Zetana: Thanks for your note. I don't think references have to be very long to be useful. I think the article should be kept, but I'm grateful for your feedback. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:39, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

  OK, no worries. Thank you for commenting on the AfD. Zetana (talk) 05:40, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Börs Anders Öhman has been accepted

Börs Anders Öhman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

bonadea contributions talk 20:47, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of American Academy of Craniofacial Pain

The article American Academy of Craniofacial Pain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

To my surprise, I can find almost no independent mention of this organization. Google brings up a few lines on members' personal websites, but nothing else. Google Scholar brings up some mentions, but weirdly all of them are in a single journal called "CRANIO" which I'm assuming is somehow connected to the organization? Either way, seems like this topic doesn't meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ajpolino (talk) 05:04, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, just a further bit of explanation. I came across this page while looking through WikiProject Medicine pages tagged as having no sources (list). When I get a few moments, I try to find a source or two to help fill out the page. I fully expected to find lots of source material for this one, but was surprised to come up empty. Maybe it isn't that broadly recognized? Anyway, if you know something I don't, I'm happy to be educated. I hope you're well! Ajpolino (talk) 05:08, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

• @Ajpolino: I don't understand either. It's often difficult to find reliable sources of sufficient length for specialist associations like this one. You might want to send your "Proposed deletion notify " message to other editors in the article's history. I added a reference about the specialty (not the organization) to the article as well as another reference that probably started out as a press release. I have not removed the prod. There is a similar group that dos not have an article yet: American Academy of Orofacial Pain. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

  I looked again for sources today but came up empty. Unfortunately, their own website doesn't even have a useful history section I can find. I don't know why I didn't think of this earlier, but rather than PROD it, if we really can't tell if it's notable, perhaps I'll redirect it to List of dental organizations in the United States. At least then anyone could see the past revisions and restore them if interested, rather than needing to ask an admin for a refund. Anyway, thanks for sharing your thoughts. Stay well. Ajpolino (talk) 01:42, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

  Went ahead and changed it to a redirect. Feel free to undo any time if you disagree or are interested in looking for more sources. Cheers. Ajpolino (talk) 01:44, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Yvan Roy (justice) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yvan Roy (justice), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yvan Roy (justice) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Popex

added a link pointing to Paul Clarke

William James Hushion

added a link pointing to Promoter

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Parker Intermediate College has been accepted

Parker Intermediate College, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eternal Shadow Talk 21:37, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Anti-Wikia Alliance for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anti-Wikia Alliance, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Wikia Alliance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Belkheir Hammouti (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Belkheir Hammouti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Belkheir Hammouti, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 17:36, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Magnolia Independent School District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Axios.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021 backlog drive

New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive
On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. (t · c) buidhe 01:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hannah Green (British author) (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deb was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hannah Green (British author) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hannah Green (British author), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Deb (talk) 12:26, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Presbyterian Children's Homes and Services (October 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Presbyterian Children's Homes and Services and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Presbyterian Children's Homes and Services, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 14:04, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hillsboro High School (Ohio), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WKRC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Mwenitete has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mwenitete. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 13:59, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Graham & Brown (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Graham & Brown and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Graham & Brown, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 15:57, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Techwear (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Techwear and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Techwear, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 19:54, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 130th Maneuver Enhancement Brigade (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:130th Maneuver Enhancement Brigade and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:130th Maneuver Enhancement Brigade, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 14:19, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Meagan Day has been accepted

Meagan Day, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Andoni Island for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andoni Island, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andoni Island (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moroccan Journal of Chemistry (November 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ThadeusOfNazereth was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Moroccan Journal of Chemistry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Moroccan Journal of Chemistry, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 21:03, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

2022 Indianapolis 500 at AfD

Hello, I am sending notices to everyone who participated in the previous AfD that the article 2022 Indianapolis 500 has again been put up for AfD discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 Indianapolis 500 (2nd nomination). Have a lovely day. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 10:07, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Find a Grave

Hey, are you aware that Find a Grave is redlisted at WP:RSP which means that it doesn't contribute to notability? I'm asking because you offered it as a source at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cedar Green, Virginia. –dlthewave ☎ 16:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Agbau, Democratic Republic of the Congo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Agbau, Democratic Republic of the Congo, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agbau, Democratic Republic of the Congo (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Kirpichli, Turkmenistan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kirpichli, Turkmenistan, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirpichli, Turkmenistan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Kaporo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kaporo, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaporo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Mitare, Venezuela for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mitare, Venezuela, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitare, Venezuela until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Fatima High School Badlapur for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fatima High School Badlapur, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatima High School Badlapur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zilitene, Namibia has been accepted

Zilitene, Namibia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 17:27, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Clinton Island (Ontario, Canada) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Clinton Island (Ontario, Canada), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. –dlthewave ☎ 17:55, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

• @Dlthewave: The article already includes a reference indicating that the community is recognized by the Geographical Names Board of Canada. Please undo your move. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:14, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Faribault, Quebec moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Faribault, Quebec, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. –dlthewave ☎ 17:57, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

• @Dlthewave: The article already includes a reference indicating that the community is recognized by the Geographical Names Board of Canada. Please undo your move. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:14, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Centre, Nova Scotia moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Centre, Nova Scotia, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. –dlthewave ☎ 17:58, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

• @Dlthewave: The article already includes a reference indicating that the community is recognized by the Geographical Names Board of Canada. Please undo your move. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:14, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Iroquois, New Brunswick moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Iroquois, New Brunswick, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. –dlthewave ☎ 17:59, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

• @Dlthewave: The article already includes a reference indicating that the community is recognized by the Geographical Names Board of Canada. Please undo your move. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:14, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
  • National geographic databases can be useful for basic information like name and location, but we don't typically accept them as legal recognition. I would suggest adding secondary sources that provide in-depth coverage to establish notability. –dlthewave ☎ 02:54, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Eastwood International School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eastwood International School, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eastwood International School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Khunn Hsett Han for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khunn Hsett Han, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khunn Hsett Han until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mwenitete (December 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mwenitete and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mwenitete, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   13:56, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Shendy, Kazakhstan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shendy, Kazakhstan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shendy, Kazakhstan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

–dlthewave ☎ 04:21, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Glenn Spears for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Glenn Spears is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenn Spears until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

–dlthewave ☎ 04:29, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rhino Foods Logo 2011-11-22.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rhino Foods Logo 2011-11-22.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Taxa named by Vladimir Dubatolov

A tag has been placed on Category:Taxa named by Vladimir Dubatolov indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 20:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Charlotte Elizabeth Battles

Hello, Eastmain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Charlotte Elizabeth Battles, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Saaberie Chishty Society

Hello, Eastmain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Saaberie Chishty Society".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Rebecca Mearns

Hello, Eastmain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rebecca Mearns, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Royal Alexandra Hotel

Hello, Eastmain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Royal Alexandra Hotel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Pataha Creek

Hello, Eastmain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pataha Creek, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:John Ricketts (agricultural educator)

Hello, Eastmain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John Ricketts (agricultural educator), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Harold Cox (historian)

Hello, Eastmain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Harold Cox (historian), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Bolero Lava

At the time of the deletion in 2008, the article featured absolutely no sources whatsoever that would meet a contemporary standard of reliable sourcing: it was referenced entirely to an unreliable fanpage that doesn't even still exist anymore and an audio clip of one of their songs, and just didn't say anything about them that would actually pass WP:NMUSIC. I'd be perfectly willing to restore it to your userspace if you want to attempt to upgrade it into something better than it was — but by 2022 standards, I'm not willing to go to war for it in its existing state. Even if reprodding it a second time was technically improper, there's no point in fighting that since it would never survive an AFD discussion — the WP:SNOWBALL rule applies here, in other words — but if you want to see if you can improve it, let me know and I'll sandbox it for you. Bearcat (talk) 01:27, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Southwestern University Mascot Insignia Pirates.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Southwestern University Mascot Insignia Pirates.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of AVB Matriculation Higher Secondary School

The article AVB Matriculation Higher Secondary School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:MILL institution. Fails WP:NSCHOOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:07, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Robert C. Bannister has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Robert C. Bannister. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 01:52, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rolland Weber

Hello, Eastmain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rolland Weber".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:56, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Serge Milville

Hello, Eastmain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Serge Milville, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:51, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Maine Academy of Natural Sciences

Hello, Eastmain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maine Academy of Natural Sciences, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Frumit Cohen

Hello, Eastmain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Frumit Cohen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:04, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Belkheir Hammouti

Hello, Eastmain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Belkheir Hammouti, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:04, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Serge Milville

Hello, Eastmain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Serge Milville".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:06, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Isadore Barmash

Hello, Eastmain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Isadore Barmash".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 02:14, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Moroccan Journal of Chemistry

Hello, Eastmain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Moroccan Journal of Chemistry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Clinton Island (Ontario, Canada)

Hello, Eastmain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Clinton Island (Ontario, Canada), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Centre, Nova Scotia

Hello, Eastmain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Centre, Nova Scotia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Harold Cox (public health)

Hello, Eastmain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Harold Cox (public health), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:03, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Moroccan Journal of Chemistry

Hello, Eastmain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Moroccan Journal of Chemistry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:48, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022

New Page Review queue March 2022

Hello Eastmain,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 818 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 859 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Faribault, Quebec

Hello, Eastmain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Faribault, Quebec, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of SKP Degree College for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SKP Degree College, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SKP Degree College (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gorkha United Public Higher Secondary School

The article Gorkha United Public Higher Secondary School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable private school. No independent secondary sources located on a search. Nepali language name not included, and not found on their website, so can't search by that.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:36, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022

New Page Review queue June 2022

Hello Eastmain,

Backlog status

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000 at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

Backlog drive

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.

TIP – New school articles

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

Misc

There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:

Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 11319 articles, as of 10:00, 10 May 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

Reminders

• Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
• If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
• To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Notes

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on!

New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022

New Page Review queue August 2022

Hello Eastmain,

Backlog status

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.

Coordination

MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.

Open letter to the WMF

The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.

TIP - Reviewing by subject

Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.

New reviewers

The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.

Reminders

• Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
• If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
• To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kegley station (Illinois)

The article Kegley station (Illinois) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unlikely to meet GNG - there don't seem to be any reliable sources with more than incidental mention of the station

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:24, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Kegley station (Illinois) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kegley station (Illinois) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kegley station (Illinois) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:31, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP message

Hi Eastmain,

Invitation

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:10, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of West Virginia Central Junction, West Virginia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article West Virginia Central Junction, West Virginia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Virginia Central Junction, West Virginia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 16:59, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:John Ricketts (agricultural educator)

Hello, Eastmain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "John Ricketts".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:27, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive

New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022

Hello Eastmain,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022

Suggestions:

• There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
• Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
• Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
• This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
• If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Vertoz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vertoz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vertoz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

☆★Mamushir (✉✉) 00:50, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gulf Indian School

The article Gulf Indian School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSCHOOL, only its own website is given as a source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Frumit Cohen

Hello, Eastmain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Frumit Cohen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:46, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Maine Academy of Natural Sciences

Hello, Eastmain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Maine Academy of Natural Sciences".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:49, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SafeNetLogo2008.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SafeNetLogo2008.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023

Hello Eastmain,

New Page Review queue December 2022

Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Your draft article, Draft:Harold Cox (historian)

Hello, Eastmain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Harold Cox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:40, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Iroquois, New Brunswick

Draft:Iroquois, New Brunswick, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Iroquois, New Brunswick and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Iroquois, New Brunswick during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. –dlthewave ☎ 04:39, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Centre, Nova Scotia

Draft:Centre, Nova Scotia, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Centre, Nova Scotia and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Centre, Nova Scotia during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. –dlthewave ☎ 04:40, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Faribault, Quebec

Draft:Faribault, Quebec, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Faribault, Quebec and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Faribault, Quebec during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. –dlthewave ☎ 04:40, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Clinton Island (Ontario, Canada)

Draft:Clinton Island (Ontario, Canada), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Clinton Island (Ontario, Canada) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Clinton Island (Ontario, Canada) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. –dlthewave ☎ 04:41, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Requesting edits

Hi Eastmain. My name is Phil and I work with Hillhouse Capital Group, an investment group. In compliance with WP:COI, I'm trying to request a few changes to the page at-a-time on the Talk page. I was hoping you might be willing to review a few suggested changes at Talk:Hillhouse_Capital_Group#Requested Edits (under the Requested Edits discussion string). If you have a minute, your time as an impartial editor would be greatly appreciated. Best regards. Phil2600 (talk) 16:20, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of PitchBook Data for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PitchBook Data is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PitchBook Data until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

331dot (talk) 09:08, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Canoe Island (Ontario)

The article Canoe Island (Ontario) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insignificant island with no evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 18:46, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Canoe Island (Northwest Territories)

The article Canoe Island (Northwest Territories) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insignificant island with no evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 18:47, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Canoe Island (Ontario) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canoe Island (Ontario) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canoe Island (Ontario) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 20:50, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Canoe Island (Northwest Territories) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canoe Island (Northwest Territories) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canoe Island (Northwest Territories) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 20:54, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Children's Food Festival for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Children's Food Festival, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children's Food Festival until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:International Life Sciences Institute Logo 2019.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:International Life Sciences Institute Logo 2019.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Category:Heritage registers in Estonia has been nominated for merging

Category:Heritage registers in Estonia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:43, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leland Milling Company, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KSL.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Karin Vogel

The article Karin Vogel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only of trivial interest, and may well only hold this distinction for a limited time, e.g. loses it if she has children.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PatGallacher (talk) 21:12, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Belkheir Hammouti

Hello, Eastmain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Belkheir Hammouti".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:13, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rebecca Mearns

Hello, Eastmain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rebecca Mearns".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:55, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Royal Alexandra Hotel

Hello, Eastmain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Royal Alexandra Hotel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:53, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Bishops Bridge station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bishops Bridge station, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:37, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive

New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 May, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of redirects patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Article patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here! There is a possibility that the drive may not run if there are <20 registered participants. Participants will be notified if this is the case.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Villafranchian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galerian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:34, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thanks for saving my small translated page from deletion by adding proper references! Behnam (talk) 23:51, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Guinea Town reference

Hello, I am researching the Hyde Park, NY Guinea Community. You reference the prior residents of Pleasant Plains as having resided in Guinea Town, LI, NY. I don't see a reference to the citation when I click on the Guinea Town site. Can you provide it to me please? Thank you. Wing&Pryr (talk) 13:47, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

• @Wing&Pryr: I didn't create the article. The editor who created Guinea Town, New York is Adjoajo (talk · contribs · count). Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:01, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Temple Mills

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Temple Mills, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:53, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Unreliable sources

Thank you for contributing to the article Charles Low, 2nd Baron Aldington. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. User-generated content, such as EntiTree or Prabook, should never be used as a source. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:04, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited GS25, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darkhan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Grafton, Sierra Leone

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Grafton, Sierra Leone, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:56, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Citation Bot

This error was in the bot logs generated by your submission. Not sure what you were trying to do, but it did not work. AManWithNoPlan (talk) 15:33, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

@AManWithNoPlan: I pasted a list of pages into the category box by mistake. When I saw that error, I realized what had happened, and pasted the list in the correct box. That worked fine. Sorry for causing any confusion. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:44, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Excellent. As long as you noticed the mistake, all is well. AManWithNoPlan (talk) 20:13, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Bad title "Category:Flock (messaging service)|Flock (web browser)|file locking|F-Lock|Flock (sculpture)|Flock (Bell X1 album)|Flock (Jane Weaver album)|Flock (upcoming video game)|The Flock (band)|The Flock (album)|The Flock (film)|James Robert Smith|Flock!|Raven's Nest|The Flock (video game)|Flocking (film)|Bob Flock|Fonty Flock|Tim Flock|Carmella Flöck|Dirk Flock|Dorothea Flock|Hans Flock|Janine Flock|Kendra Flock|Robert Herman Flock|Flocking agent|Flocking (behavior)|collective noun|Flock (birds)|herd|crowd|Species flock|Flock-1|Flock-2|mattresses|Flocking (texture)|Flock (literary journal)|Flock bronzewing|Congregation|Flocke|Phlox". AManWithNoPlan (talk) 15:33, 17 May 2023 (UTC)