EYo237

Notice

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Techspressionism a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Techspressionism. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:45, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Techspressionism (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Techspressionism and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:46, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello, EYo237! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:46, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

July 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to [[:{{{1}}}]], from its previous location at User:EYo237/sandboxCaptainCandy. This was done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there, or if you have any questions, feel free to ask me about this on my talk page. Thank you. 64andtim (chat) 02:33, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello EYo237. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Captain Candy, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:EYo237. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=EYo237|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:24, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Captain Candy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Captain Candy, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:23, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 13:20, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EYo237 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Apologize i have to read wikipedia rules firstEYo237 (talk) 14:37, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Once you have read some of (not all) the rules, especially WP:PROMO, WP:COI, and WP:PAID, can tell us how you violated them, and tell us what edits you will make going forward, please request unblock at that time. There is no deadline for this, take as long as you need. 331dot (talk) 15:50, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Apology and commitment to adhere to Wikipedia Guidelines

I acknowledge that I was compensated for writing an article about Captain Candy on Wikipedia, and I failed to use the {{paid}} template to disclose this, as required by transparency rules. I also regret using a promotional tone and unreliable sources in the article. I admit to acting without a thorough understanding of Wikipedia's rules regarding promotion and advertising.

I am committed to strictly adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines in the future and seeking assistance from more experienced users to ensure my contributions meet the platform's standards. I understand that my previous conduct was inappropriate and I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience it may have caused.

I hope you will consider my request to unblock my account, and I appreciate your understanding.

EYo237 (talk) 08:33, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Techspressionism for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Techspressionism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Techspressionism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

I would like to request the unblocking of my account

Hello @Bbb23. About 7 months ago, I was blocked by you for my contributions focused on advertising and promotion. At that time, I didn't have a solid understanding of Wikipedia and was unaware of how it works. Since then, I have made significant progress and I am now actively contributing to the French version of Wikipedia, where I have learned a great deal. I have also joined the User Group in my country to further my knowledge. Could you please unblock my account so that I can continue to contribute and enrich Wikipedia? Thank you. EYo237 (talk) 11:17, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Paid editing and other accounts

Hello EYo237, Have you accepted payment for editing on en-WP, or edited using any other accounts? Thank you, Netherzone (talk) 11:49, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

I have done it before, mostly for exchanging services. It's difficult to contribute for free from Cameroon where the internet connection is extremely expensive. EYo237 (talk) 12:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

What about other user names or accounts? Netherzone (talk) 15:30, 2 April 2024 (UTC)