Disarjun

December 2017

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Necklace. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) 03:55, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: HighSpark (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SeraphWiki was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:HighSpark and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:HighSpark, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SeraphWiki (talk) 02:16, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello! Disarjun, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SeraphWiki (talk) 02:16, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: HighSpark (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:HighSpark and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:HighSpark, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Drover's Wife (talk) 22:41, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Eugene Cheng You Jin

The article Eugene Cheng You Jin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Propose to delete due to lack of notability. Subject only has passing coverage in local media as a millenial entrepreneur for HighSpark. HighSpark article contributed by you was also rejected for lack of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NoCringe (talk) 07:28, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Whitney White (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Whitney White and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Whitney White, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:55, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Whitney White (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Whitney White and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Whitney White, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:33, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Whitney White has been accepted

Whitney White, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 03:43, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  SmartSE (talk) 10:40, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Disarjun (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello SmartSE, I respect Wikipedia editing policy and I understand what wrong I did :-( By the way, when I go through All India Management Association page; I feel this page can be improved that is why I edit as I indepently do. This edit goes wrong and I abused Wikipedia editing policy without my knowledge which I admit. Could you please guide me how can I get back my account as previous? Disarjun (talk) 17:28, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are not eligible for unblock consideration here, as you are the same person as Dhratik (talk · contribs) or Gabriela Costa (talk · contribs). All unblock requests must be made on your original account. Yamla (talk) 17:33, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello Yamla, Could you please investigate properly, I don't know who they are. If you need my IP address I can share with you.

There is nothing more I can do for you. You are welcome to request another admin review your block, by placing another unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 17:44, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Disarjun (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello admin, I respect Wikipedia editing policy as I editing Wikipedia last four month and I understand what wrong I did this time :-( By the way, when I go through All India Management Association page; I feel this page can be improved that is why I edit as I indepently do. This edit goes wrong and I abused Wikipedia editing policy without my knowledge which I admit. Could anyone please guide me how can I get back my account as previous? I don't have any connection with any other Wikipedia user and I am open to help admin to do investigate properly Disarjun (talk) 17:53, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

After consulting with the blocking admin, the evidence I have seen convinces me that you are not telling the truth. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:09, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To reviewer: Please email me before considering an unblock. Thanks SmartSE (talk) 17:58, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello SmartSE I emailed you. Thanks Disarjun (talk) 02:03, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello Boing! said Zebedee, I don't know how you are judging me or what evidence you have. I was edited indepently. Could you please confirm me that I will not be able to edit Wikipedia permanently? Thanks Disarjun

It's really not for me to decide whether your block will be permanent or whether a future unblock request might be successful, but I would strongly oppose any unblock while I remain convinced that you are not being truthful. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:52, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Boing! said Zebedee I was edited with help of previously removed content, this was my guilty that I did not consult with Muhandes. Please help me to get back my account as previous. I will not violate editing policy again. Disarjun (talk) 04:05, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

You are free to make a new unblock request if you wish, and someone else will review it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:32, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Disarjun (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello admin, I respect Wikipedia editing policy as I editing Wikipedia last four month. I was independently edited All India Management Association page with help of previously removed content, this was my guilty that I did not consult with Muhandes. This edit goes wrong and I abused Wikipedia editing policy without my knowledge which I admit. Could anyone please guide me how can I get back my account as previous? I don't have any connection with any other Wikipedia user. I will not violate editing policy again. Disarjun (talk) 18:33, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Per below. Make that three in agreement. MER-C 12:43, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This isn't why you were blocked. You were blocked because it is obvious that you are related to Dhratik who was already blocked. To have any hope of being unblocked you need to address what your connection is. SmartSE (talk) 19:57, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

I don't have any connection with Dhratik as I admit before. I got a request (which I disclosed) from Leslie Prendergast to upload NTT i3. Disarjun (talk) 03:23, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Regardless of disclosure, you were proxying for a blocked user. Then there's your attempts to add spam and the fact that this is clearly not your first account. It could be summed up as WP:NOTHERE. SmartSE (talk) 09:46, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

I have only one account and I don't have any connections with other Wikipedia user. I was not aware about it that previously it had been attempted to publish above mentioned article. If you go through my contribution you may notice I contribute here independently. I am assuring you that as I respect Wikipedia policy, I will not violates guidelines at all. Disarjun (talk) 10:38, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

OK, so you're saying you wrote the contents of the now-deleted NTT i³ article independently yourself, are you? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:02, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Yes, I had written it myself.Disarjun (talk) 12:08, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

No you didn't. I'm revoking your talk page access. SmartSE (talk) 12:28, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Seconded. I was about to do the same, but I was beaten to it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:31, 26 April 2018 (UTC)