Your submission at Articles for creation: Opção Binária (October 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Whispering 22:43, 14 October 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Gabriela Costa, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Whispering 22:43, 14 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Bluklak

edit

Hello Gabriela Costa,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bluklak for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

JTP (talkcontribs) 15:03, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Circular references

edit

  Thanks for contributing to the article Draft:Tony David Nicholson ‎. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 14:28, 17 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Tony David Nicholson

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tony David Nicholson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 17:18, 17 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Tony David Nicholson

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tony David Nicholson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 11:22, 19 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Tony David Nicholson

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Draft:Tony David Nicholson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Exists as Tony David Nicholson

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 11:25, 19 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
  Hello, Gabriela Costa. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 12:32, 19 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Tony David Nicholson

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tony David Nicholson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 02:59, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Tony David Nicholson

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tony David Nicholson, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 23:43, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Tony Nicholson (personal trainer)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tony Nicholson (personal trainer), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ☆ Bri (talk) 08:05, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

April 2018

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  SmartSE (talk) 09:56, 20 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

May 2018

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gabriela Costa (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello SmartSE, I see you blocked my account. Although, I am not related to any User:Dhratik, User:Cate20, User:Thatbanker or User:Tokouchi or any other accounts, I think I am being related to them because I indeed tried to publish a page for Tony Nicholson but I already gave it up. I think he is reaching to other people to publish it but we aren't related whatsoever. Also, I received today an attempt to login to my account and I was very concerned about it. I already changed my password. I want to know why am I being related to any of this accounts as sockpuppets since they aren't mine. I only use this account in English and Portuguese wikipedia, I can share my ip if that helps to recognize the real people, but I don't have any sockpuppets whatsoever. I'll not try to publish anything related with Tony David Nicholson anymore, I don't even have any connection to it. I guarantee this is my only account, so please unblock me so I can continue to be helpful here.

Decline reason:

As per below. Yamla (talk) 11:12, 4 May 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • I won't review this unblock request, but will just make a few comments/questions. You certainly seem to have been persistent in trying to write an article about Tony David Nicholson! Considering that others have tried to do the same, and that you say "I think he is reaching to other people to publish it" I must ask you what is your connection with Mr Nicholson? Did he reach out to you? This seems to have all the hallmarks of a paid promotional attempt to me, and you need to declare any connection you have with him. If you have none, how did you come across him and why did you decide to write about him? Finally, the attempt to login to your account - that's happening to a lot of editors at the moment, discussed here. Please make sure you have a secure password. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:44, 4 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • There'sNoTime reported:
  • The following are   Likely Gabriela Costa:
  • I seem to have messed up originally in not blocking you as a sock back in February after that check was run, but regardless your block was for continuously trying to promote Nicholson. SmartSE (talk) 10:58, 4 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Boing! said Zebedee thank you for your attention to this question. Indeed, I tried several times published a page of Tony David Nicholson. I met him on the internet, on forums and instagram as a cosplayer and personal trainer, famous especially in China. He was trying to publish the page and mention that he couldn't make it. So, I offered to help since I believed in his work, I followed him on Instagram and saw some of the shows he entered in China. In fact, he wrote the page content himself and that's why the article might seem as promotional but that wasn't my intention to promote as a commercial but just make him a Wikipedia page showing his work around the world. I assume other people also tried to publish the page because I was aware he had tried to publish it before, and since I gave up of trying seems normal that he would try to reach someone else as he reached me. I understand that the article might be written in a partial point of view, although the guy is legit. Despite all that, I am no longer related to it nor have nothing to do with other Wikipedia users that might try to publish a page about him. Smartse Indeed, I not have contested my block so far because I have been busy with some projects, but today I checked this association with these sockpuppets that I don't know anything about (May 4th, 2018), because of the attempt to login in my account, I just entered here and saw this. I think I have something to say regards to it and defend myself. I don't mind that you block any Tony Nicholson content so far and in the future, but please don't block my account because of this. I explained myself above and I will be available to some extra explanation if you need it. Please ask anything you need to know in order to understand this situation. (Gabriela) 12:18, 4 May 2018 (GTM)
    Can you explain why there is a technical match between this account and two others which were also creating what looks like paid promotional material (including Tony Nicholson)? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:31, 4 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
    Boing! said Zebedee I don't know what kind of technical match is that, but since Tony wrote the page content himself might seem like he sent the same content to other people try to publish it, not paid in my case at least I was just trying to help someone that I believed. If you are able to check the origin of the accounts, you'll see that it's not the same IP or some other account origin is related, it's impossible because they're not mine. I can assure that I don't have any other account nor I am not related to any of those sockpuppets. Also, I will not publish or try to publish anything else related to Tony Nicholson. (Gabriela) 12:37, 4 May 2018 (GTM)
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gabriela Costa (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

As discussed in the previous talks I don't have multiple accounts, I just was associated to this other accounts because of Tony's page. Also, I will not try to publish anything related to Tony Nicholson again. I understand the reasons of the deletions and the block and I will not do it again, instead, I will be helpful to Wikipedia content. Therefore there's no need to block my account anymore since I understand your reasons and I don't have multiple accounts.

Decline reason:

I don't believe you. Prove it: explain why you are blocked in your own words, why we consider your actions to be dishonest and reprehensible, and what you'll do about it. Also, your first unblock request reminds me of another account I blocked a week ago. MER-C 18:44, 5 May 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.