DesiKindInMahMind

Desi

Why are you disrupting Desi? Why have you removed names of countries? Why have you failed to look at the sources? Why do you continue to insist that some South Asian countries are Desi? Have you looked at the sources? You opened up a discussion but you didn't even reply to anything that I posted, that's not a discussion. Why are you doing this? (121.214.40.194 (talk) 03:27, 17 October 2016 (UTC))

Comment: You need to get your own facts right. The term Desi is used by not just Indians and Pakistanis, but Bengalis, Sri Lankans, Maldivians and Nepalese as well. All nations that speaks Indo-aryan/Sanskrit! So it's not something westerners came up with. It was a term in use centuries before even the western world came to existence! — Preceding unsigned comment added by DesiKindInMahMind (talk • contribs) 02:30, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

What is wrong with you? Please read the sources provided, it is a Western construct and stop disrupting the article, please. The page was protected because you continue to damage that article. It doesn't matter if that word is used in those languages, the word translates roughly to "local" or "native" in English and doesn't have the same meaning the Western construct "Desi" has, which applies to the cultures of South Asia specifically India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. You need to look at the sources, you have not done this so stop destroying that page. (110.148.132.188 (talk) 05:20, 1 November 2016 (UTC))

Comment: No it is not a western construct. Europeans started using this term to call South Asians during the colonization when they heard the desi people using that term. It is a Indo-Aryan SANSKRIT TERM meaning LAND or whatever belongs to that land! It's already in use in many nations speaking the languages that descends from Indo-Aryan language family like Hindi, Urdu, Punjabi, Sinhalese, Bengali, etc. And it's STILL IN USE to this day! So stop changing this you're pathetic!

@DesiKindInMahMind: You can't speak to me like that, why are you making this personal now? It should have been a civilized conversation. Read the sources because none of that information you claim is actually in any of the sources provided. (121.219.56.150 (talk) 22:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC))

November 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. (110.148.132.188 (talk) 05:36, 1 November 2016 (UTC))\

Please stop pretending to be Wiki admins! Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DesiKindInMahMind (talk • contribs) 16:30, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Desi. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Dane2007 ^talk 18:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

@Dane2007:, they're ignoring a discussion I opened up at the Administrators' board. I left them a message but they removed it. You can ignore this message because I noticed you have already seen the discussion. (121.219.56.150 (talk) 22:47, 2 November 2016 (UTC))

Wikipedia: Administrators' noticeboard message

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. (110.148.130.249 (talk) 05:03, 2 November 2016 (UTC))

I'm not trying to be the admin, I placed this template to inform you that there is a discussion going on to solve this issue. (121.219.56.150 (talk) 22:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC))

It's required that we notify you of any discussion involving you at the administrator noticeboard, whether we're admins or not. — Gestrid (talk) 23:18, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

User:DesiKindInMahMind, you are risking a block if you continue to revert at Desi without getting a prior consensus on the talk page. The report at AN reflects how serious this is. Consider yourself warned. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:47, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DesiKindInMahMind, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

-- Dane2007 ^talk 11:18, 3 November 2016 (UTC)