AfC notification: Draft:Groundfloor has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Groundfloor. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:56, 8 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Sheemarekha has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sheemarekha. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:42, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello, Denim11, and welcome to Wikipedia! Checked your profile, You are a new user, Welcome Again to Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Vrisle Vrisle (talk) 06:31, 13 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Be nice to new users

edit

Your responses to MeKLT can be seen as too harsh. While MeKLT's questions at TeaHouse were not appropriate, leniency is a better approach to new users. If you agree, you could go fo MeKLT's Talk page and delete the Warning. David notMD (talk) 17:45, 13 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hey, Denim11. I dropped by to raise my worries, only to see David notMD has already raised them with you. Look, I'm going to remove your level 3 warning from MeKLT's page, rather than ask you to do it yourself - that'd be quicker, and I really don't think it's warranted. We have a duty not to put off or intimidate newcomers who simply get confused by all our rules, ways, guidelines, policies and so forth. So, like David, can I also ask you to have a bit more consideration for other newcomers like yourself, please, and treat them gently? Many thanks, Nick Moyes (talk) 23:38, 13 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
@David notMd: and {{reply|Nick Moyes) I am sorry for being rude to MeKLT but I thought he was not assuming good faith but from now on I shall be gentle to new users.Denim11 (talk) 10:42, 14 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I hate to bring this up again, but you're still being pretty harsh to MeKLT. There's nothing intrinsically wrong with someone trying to get their account deleted; it's not a possibility on Wikipedia, but it's not an unreasonable question to ask. They're clearly frustrated with Wikipedia, and we should try to cut them slack when we can. Writ Keeper  15:34, 5 December 2018 (UTC) Hey Writ Keeper maybe I was a bit harsh and I am happy to apologise for it. But I don't think MeKLT's questions at the Teahouse was appropriate. I think he is very frustrated about Wikipedia and wants to delete his account but that is not possible.Denim11 (talk) 15:43, 5 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sheemarekha (November 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 14:11, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Denim11! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 14:11, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Groundfloor (November 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SamHolt6 (talk) 16:46, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Denim11! You created a thread called WikiCup at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply


apology

edit

hi there I am sorry for what i have wrote, it was misunderstanding. I am so ashamed that i wrote bad things about wikipedia but i say sorry for all wikipedian community and can you guide me as I am a beginner.

I saw what you wrote to Cullen if you want to remove my accounts don't worry it doesn't matter i am the one who made mistake.Thanks 😭😩😰

--MeKLT (talk) 11:06, 17 November 2018 (UTC) Hey MeKLT there is no need to apologise as you have understood your mistake and would not do it again. You are welcome to edit Wikipedia and if you need any guidance contact me on my talk page and I saw you have also apologised to User:David notMD and User:Nick Moyes. I suggest you start by reading the useful links posted on your talk page in the message entitled 'Welcome'!. If you have any queries you can ask at the Teahouse.Denim11 (talk) 12:04, 17 November 2018 (UTC) Don't worry about what I wrote to Cullen that discussion is closed now.Denim11 (talk) 12:11, 17 November 2018 (UTC) And as you told me to guide you I suggest you remove that 'I don't know what to write help!' from your talk page.Thanks.Denim11 (talk) 12:15, 17 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

Thanks! Vdh m (talk) 15:14, 17 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2018

edit

  Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you. Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 21:26, 17 November 2018 (UTC) User:Thegooduser can you please tell me where I did harrassment and whom did I say it I will be happy to apologise.Denim11 (talk) 04:43, 18 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ah, Shit! Wrong user. Sorry!--Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 20:52, 18 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ok that can happen we all make mistakes but please be more careful next time.Denim11 (talk) 03:40, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

A cheeseburger for you!

edit
  Please accept my apologies. I left the template on the wrong page. Sorry! Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 20:55, 18 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

A delicious junk food.Thank you.Denim11 (talk) 03:41, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Denim11! You created a thread called What is the difference between vandalism and disruptive edits? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply


Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Denim11! You created a thread called How to find Twinkle in mobile view? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 20 November 2018 (UTC)Reply



Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
125   Diamonds as an investment (talk) Add sources
53   History of WWE SmackDown (talk) Add sources
3,703   Don Lemon (talk) Add sources
95   WWF Brawl for All (talk) Add sources
89   History of WWE Raw (talk) Add sources
9,229   Daniel Bryan (talk) Add sources
2,511   Sivakarthikeyan (talk) Cleanup
18   Paul Farbrace (talk) Cleanup
973   Kumar Sangakkara (talk) Cleanup
648   Attitude Era (talk) Expand
15   Ukrainian Medical and Dental Academy (talk) Expand
670   Saudi Arabia–United States relations (talk) Expand
227   Mmusi Maimane (talk) Unencyclopaedic
638   Gorakhpur (talk) Unencyclopaedic
952   Grammatical gender (talk) Unencyclopaedic
16   Keystone State Wrestling Alliance (talk) Merge
258   We (talk) Merge
78   Bhartṛhari (talk) Merge
168   German pronouns (talk) Wikify
5   DirecTV blimp (talk) Wikify
6   Ujjain Public School (talk) Wikify
3   Igor P. Kaidashev (talk) Orphan
3   Kharkiv State University of Food Technology and Trade (talk) Orphan
4   Gopal Mandir (talk) Orphan
37   T. R. Ramanna (talk) Stub
68   Rahul Chahar (talk) Stub
17   Sayan Ghosh (talk) Stub
58   Abhinav Mukund (talk) Stub
56   Mayank Markande (talk) Stub
40   Krishnappa Gowtham (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:06, 24 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Replies

edit

Thank you for your note on my talk page.  :) How do you reply to someone's message on a your own talk page? JStrikerToo (talk) 15:56, 24 November 2018 (UTC) Hi JStrikerToo you can reply on your talk page by clicking the edit source of the message and then add your topic. Denim11 (talk) 16:03, 24 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2018

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Attitude Era, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 16:12, 24 November 2018 (UTC) Hi Theroadislong the information I added was correct Eddie Guerrero and Chris Benoit were part of the attitude era and they also won world championships so can you please explain your revert?Denim11 (talk) 16:19, 24 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

The most basic tenet of Wikipedia is that all content requires sourcing, you added a lot of content with no sources whatsoever, Wikipedia has no interest in what you or I know, we only report on what reliable sources say. Theroadislong (talk) 16:24, 24 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
But always a reliable source may not be available?Denim11 (talk) 16:32, 24 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Please indent your replies, if there are no sources then the content CANNOT be added. Theroadislong (talk) 16:34, 24 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of 2019 Indian Premier League personnel changes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 16:43, 24 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ok enough I understand from now on I will try to add sources.Denim11 (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Denim11/vandals

edit
 

A tag has been placed on User:Denim11/vandals requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Any possible use would violate WP:POLEMIC. Save a newish user some headaches per WP:IAR

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. John from Idegon (talk) 00:56, 25 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ok John from Idegon I understand the reason for the deletion.Denim11 (talk) 04:55, 25 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Denim11! You created a thread called How to create a subpage? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 29 November 2018 (UTC)Reply


Attitude era

edit

Please, stop. Eddie Guerrero wans't a star during the Attitude Era. He was a mid-carter. He became a star years later. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 11:51, 2 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

HHH Pedrigree I understand my mistake Eddie Guerrero was a very popular star during 2003-05 and also won the WWE Championship in 2004. And the Attitude Era ended in 2002. But Chris Benoit was also a very top star so why he isn't in Attitude Era?Denim11 (talk) 12:03, 2 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Hi. I think it's the same. The article is about WWE. Benoit and Guerrero became stars during the Ruthless agression. During the Attitude Era they were mid carters. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:48, 3 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Yah, both of them won world championships during the ruthless aggression era. But was Kurt Angle a main eventer during attitude era?Denim11 (talk) 13:09, 3 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Well, he won two titles, one of them defeating Austin during the Invasion. He had his peak during the RA too, but well. I think Angle can be in the sentence. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 23:27, 4 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

December 2018

edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Attitude Era. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 12:58, 2 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Theroadislong sorry for that it will not happen again.Denim11 (talk) 13:01, 2 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Templates

edit

Hi! Thanks for your barnstar. Please remember to close "{{" with "}}" in order to make the template complete. Happy editing. Abelmoschus Esculentus talk / contribs 14:44, 2 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ok I will remember it.Denim11 (talk) 14:46, 2 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Groundfloor has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Groundfloor. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 07:57, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

@DGG:, thanks for the comment but I am not working on the draft anymore.Denim11 (talk) 15:41, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Denim11! You created a thread called Ruthless Aggression Era at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Reply


December 2018

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
TonyBallioni (talk) 16:38, 8 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Denim11 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I didn't have any bad intention and always contributed to Wikipedia. I have never used any other account and my account is not related to Knightrises10. I had always reverted vandalism and also my intention was good. I am not a sock of Knightrises10.

Decline reason:

Your unblock request needs to be appealed to the Arbitration Committee. See this section for information. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:49, 8 December 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Oshwah: and @TonyBallioni: my account is not a sock of Knightrises10. I don't know why I was blocked. Yah I disclose that Anit13 is my account but the other accounts are not mine.Denim11 (talk) 03:56, 9 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Well, that account is the same person that implied threats of violence against BU Rob13 today, 100% confirmed with no questions asked, so even if you weren’t Knightrises10, which you are, you have no business being on this website. TonyBallioni (talk) 06:00, 9 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

@TonyBallioni:, @BU Rob13: and @Oshwah: I apologise to the whole Wikipedia committee for it and I assure it will never happen again. I will use only this account to make constructive edits. I spent most of my time editing Wikipedia when I am not in school. I assure there will be no more harm to Wikipedia.Denim11 (talk) 07:14, 9 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Denim11 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I could have appealed to the Arbitration Committee but I don't have an email address. Anit13 is my first account and this is my second. The only reason I created this account because Anit13 was blocked for using multiple accounts. But I doubt that block. This account was blocked for being a sock of Knightrises10 but that account isn't mine. And also all the other accounts mentioned are not mine. @TonyBallioni and @BU Rob13 please check the IP between me and Knightrises10. If I am unblocked I will use only this account. Thanking You.Denim11 (talk|) 05:22, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Arbcom's email address can be found at Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee#Contacting_the_Committee. That would be the appropriate venue to appeal this block. If you meant that you don't have an email account, one can be had at a number of free mail providers such as Gmail, or Hotmail. SQLQuery me! 05:32, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Denim11 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I sent an email to the ARBCOM 5 days ago but haven't got a reply yet. So I am once again requesting for unblock. I have created 3 accounts Anit13,Denim11 and Dabid7 the only reason to create another was that my previous account was blocked as a sock of Knightrises10. But that account isn't mine neither the other accounts mentioned are mine. I will only edit from this account and will make very useful contribution and never create multiple accounts. Thank you.Denim11 (talk) 11:32, 17 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You will have to wait for Arbcom - there's no point making multiple repeat unblock requests here. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:07, 17 December 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Denim11 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am sorry for using 3 accounts and I apologise to the whole Wikipedia committee. I have emailed to the ARBCOM almost 10 days ago but haven't got a reply yet. It has been over 10 days since my block. I have disclosed that all the three accounts are mine but Knightrises10 is not my account nor the other accounts mentioned. If I am unblocked I will use only this account to make constructive edits and revert vandalism. Thanks.Denim11 (talk) 06:21, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This is - as you have been told several times - a matter for ArbCom. Talkpage access revoked to prevent further OTHERPARENT-ing. Yunshui  08:25, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@TonyBallioni: my three accounts are - Anit13,Denim11 and Dabid7.Denim11 (talk) 06:30, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

You missed Hamid331 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki), but I can understand why you’d want us to not know about that account given what led to it being originally blocked. You also missed the rest of the Knightrises10 socks, but I was only counting the ones blocked this batch or later. Anyway, if your appeal is with ArbCom they will review it, and like Boing! said, the duplicate requests don’t help much. TonyBallioni (talk) 06:39, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject India

edit
 

 

Namaste, Denim11. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. As you may know, the old newsletter for WikiProject India ceased circulation in 2010. Now we have re-launched the newsletter in a new way. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Thank you.




Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject India. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge

edit
  Hello Denim11. You are invited to join the new WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 improvements, destubs, and creations for Indian articles, covering every state of India and topic. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for India on Wikipedia! Every 100 articles submitted will be copied into the wider Asian challenge. Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing!
If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by:
{{subst:WikiProject India/The 10,000 Challenge Invite|~~~~}}

Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC)Reply