User talk:Deiaemeth/archive1

Welcome!

Hello, Deiaemeth/archive1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Havok (T/C) 11:21, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

World of Warcraft: The Burning Crusade

I see you have edited World of Warcraft: The Burning Crusade, thank you. But, there is a matter of removing content that has a place in the article. I am refeering to the picture of the leaked image of Pandaren in said article. When making such changes, it is important that you explain why in the edit summary and in most cases discuss it with the other editors on the articles discussion page. Hope to see more of your edits in the future. Havok (T/C) 11:21, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

Revert

Can you please read the talk page before (re-)adding your material to the Liancourt Rocks article. I have stated my reasons for the removal there. Have a nice day! Kokiri 17:14, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

3RR on Liancourt Rocks

You're already in breach of the three revert rule on the Liancourt Rocks article. If you continue with such edits, you're be immediately blocked. Please take your concerns to the article talk page and try and reach a consensus version. Alai 15:13, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Source, please

Dear Deiaemeth,

While your constructive contributions to Wikipedia are welcome, what seem to be your brazen insertions of nationalist POV into Korea-related articles are not. Please begin to provide some authoritative sources for your assertions that Buyeo/Fuyu, Goguryeo/Gaogouli, and Balhae/Bohai were ethnically Korean. Also it would be nice if you could provide an explanation of what those sources mean by "ethnically Korean," when referring to states that seem to long predate the construction of modern national identities.

That these states were part of Korean history can hardly be disputed; yet to forcefully assert that they were Korean (and not Manchurian, Tungusic, or simply themselves) seems problematic. I'm really not interested in an edit war over something as trivial as this, which is why I (and many other Wikipedians) would appreciate it if you would cite your sources.

Also, I'm curious -- if Goguryeo and Balhae were Korean, doesn't that mean that the Malgal/Mohe tribes were also Korean?

Happiness, -- Visviva 14:48, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

What i meant to say is that most internationally recognized publications refer to Balhae and Goguryeo as part of History of Korea, as contrary to Chinese claim that Balhae and Guguryeo people are part of Chinese ethnic groups. Sorry if you misunderstood me, I guess my statement was unclear. As usual, thank you for your great contributions to many articles on Wikipedia :). I try to maintain NPOV and neutral position on Wikipedia, yet I've seen too much POV in Wikipedia, so I tend to fall off course. Have a nice day! Deiaemeth 20:37, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Reporting vandalism

Hi, I saw your note on Administrator intervention against vandalism, I removed the entry as there didn't seem to be any warnings on the users page. By the time it's put on that page there should be several warnings. You should go talk to him if he'll listen, otherwise drop a warning on his talk page. From what I saw it looks like their should be some conversations going on....anyway, let me know if you need something! Thanks! Rx StrangeLove 07:16, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Yi Su-gwang

I wanted to suggest someone do an article on Yi Sugwang, but couldn't figure out the right category. I really think there is a need for more articles on the thinkers and intellectuals of East Asia in the pre-modern era. What do you think? Bathrobe 11:32, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Although I'm not personally an expect on subject of thinkers and intellectuals of East Asia, an article on Yi Su-Gwang would be a great idea indeed. There aren't much English information on his life though. I currently do not have the time to write the entire article, but I could start the basic structure for it, and have more editors participate in the article creation process. Deiaemeth 23:59, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Great! I'll look around for editors specialising in Korean history, although they don't seem easy to find. But this should be a start. Bathrobe 00:23, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

RfM

Hi -- User:Endroit has filed a RfM with regard to East Sea, &c. You were not a named party, but please see if you want to be involved. Thanks. --Nlu (talk) 08:09, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

An RfM (Request for Mediation) has been filed, titled East Sea (disambiguation) and related pages.

If you strongly feel that you are involved in this issue, and wish to be involved in RfM as well, please indicate so by marking "Agree" in the section titled Parties' agreement to mediate, and signing your name with four tildes ~~~~. If you mark "Agree", you may also add any issues that have not yet been included to the section marked Additional issues to mediate.--Endroit 18:06, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Request for Mediation

Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/East Sea (disambiguation) has been accepted by the Mediation Committee; mediation will begin on that page as soon as a mediator is assigned. Mediators are generally given several days to review and volunteer on cases which they feel particularly suited to mediate; if no mediator volunteers to take the case, one will be assigned. Please pay careful attention to the mediation subpage, as further communication from the Committee will occur there. (Adding that page to your watchlist would be very helpful.)

For the Mediation Committee, Essjay ^{Talk • Contact} 17:20, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Please vote on move request

You should vote on your proposed move at Talk:Baitou Mountain. Nominations are not always counted as a vote. LuiKhuntek 22:18, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the heads-up on voting procedures on moving pages.

I actually don't know the official rule. I've been chastiz/sed by other users both for voting and for not voting on my own proposals. I've voted on several of my own and never had complaints from an Admin so I figure its kosher/cricket. LuiKhuntek 22:26, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

? Welcome

You put up a Welcome on Currywurry overnight? If you check out the 7 contributions of this user you will note that they are all vandalism. I didn't realise Wiki welcomed vandals? I've reverted the Huddersfield related vandalism. perhaps you would like to deal with the rest? 86.2.138.123 10:15, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

oops, I was trying to greet newcomers today. I usually check their contrib history before greeting them, but I guess I overlooked him. Sorry!

Thanks for welcome and BTW ...

Thanks for the 'welcome' ... BTW I notice you put one on Talk:Schibsted as well ... not a user page. DogsBreakfast 10:35, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

반갑습니다 nice to meet you ^^

안녕하십니까, Deiaemeth씨. Deiaemeth씨는 저에게 인사를 먼저 해주셔서 고맙습니다. 한국학 화이팅! Thanks for dropping by my user page and thank you for you concern about the editing of Korean-related articles. Korean prehistory has been ignored and undervalued in the past, but everybody all over the world who works in archaeology, anthropology and all social sciences can learn so much about the secondary origins of agriculture AND how complex societies formed if we simply present the prehistory of Korea as it is -- incredibly rich, interesting, and meaningful. The key is to give archaeological scholarly endeavors equal time with the results of historical studies (i.e. Dangun, Gojoseon, Wiman Joseon, etc), especially in cases in which vast time periods are not informed by historical materials. Have a nice day. 그럼 건강하고 수고하세요! Mumun 16:02, 22 February 2006 (UTC)올림

Welcome

Please take another look at the Currywurry user page and the contributions in the talk page of Martin_Kelner. This guy is a self admitting vandal of Wikipedia and should be barred permanently from the site? All his contrubutions to date consist of vandalism! 86.3.1.72 16:11, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

thanks

we need all the help we can get with korea-related articles, especially history/culture/arts. i've been meaning to go through the history articles, but it's so easy to get sidetracked. i'm learning a lot just by working on articles here, i hope you are too, and that you can stick around to continue the great job. thanks. Appleby 19:27, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/East Sea (disambiguation)

I'm offering to take on this mediation. Please note that I am not yet a member of the mediation committee and am under trial. If you are happy for me to mediate please email me using Subject:"East sea mediation", a summary of your view of the issue. MyNameIsNotBob 10:14, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

hey, just wondering if you're participating in the mediation Appleby 05:23, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:SeoulSkyline.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SeoulSkyline.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 13:24, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Peaceful reunification ub

As a fellow Korean-American, may I use the peaceful reunification between the two Koreas userbox on my userpage as well? (Btw, could you respond on my talk page--thanks). :) —Mirlen 16:20, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Okay, thanks :). —Mirlen

Cheonghaejin

thanks for the Cheonghaejin article! on another note, though, are you sure Image:20060219114035907727601400.jpg was released for free use? couldn't find the license terms at the cheonggyecheon website. have a nice wikibreak. Appleby 00:25, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

History of Korea

Hello and thank you for your query about using MR Romanisation in my edits regarding the history of Korea.

The MR romanisations are used in the sources that I have cited in editing the page, and I merely reproduced the sources from Samguk Yusa and Kim Jong-il regime's KCNA. I felt this was necessary to maintain the integrity of the sources: If you are citing a source, you should not temper with a word within it to create a mythical view that is not valid. I hope that helps to answer your question. Sydneyphoenix

Yi Su-Gwang

A stub? It's great! In fact, it's even more interesting than I thought it would be! Thanks for that!

PS: You also need a redirect from Yi Sugwang. User:Bathrobe 13 April (not logged on)

I notice that Yu Su-Gwang is identified on this site [1] as one of the "four Sirhak scholars, Yi Sugwang (1563-1628), Yi Ik (1681-1763), An Chôngbok (1712-1791), Hong Taeyong (1731-1783)".

There is no Wikipedia article on Sirhak, but there is a page on Silhak, which is just a redirect to Neo-Confucianism. Do you have any idea what the Sirhak/Silhak school was about? There isn't a lot on the Internet.

User:Bathrobe 14 April (not logged in)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Korean nationalism Korean animation Wonsan List of Korean painters Buyeo County Syngman Rhee line Later Three Kingdoms Kim Jeong-ho Korean court music Cho Tae-yong Ara Gaya Heo Jeong Korean studies Chung Dong-young Xin Dynasty Second Korean War Pusan Perimeter Kemmu restoration Sin Saimdang

Cleanup Contemporary culture of South Korea Hwarang Gangpeh Merge Heisei Korean War casualties Lee Hyung-Taik Add Sources Battle of Hakusukinoe Jin (Korean history) Chosun Ilbo Wikify Choi Yong-kun Floristry Jardine Matheson Holdings Limited Expand Ten Point Programme for Reunification of the Country Bjornar Simonsen Hagwon

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 03:24, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Thx

Thx for the encouragement. Unfortunately i am rather busy as of the moment and will not be able to continue for a while. I have also done some work in the Korean Mythology section, but like i said, it will be a good while b4 i continue. Mikhail Koh 23:57, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Mugu...

sounds like a great topic. i see there's already an article on Jikji, but it's not linked from any major articles.

i guess 무구정광대다라니경 means something like the Great Mugu Jeonggwang Dharani, but maybe these documents are just romanized from korean, except i'm not sure how syllable spacing would work. sorry, i couldn't find an english name either but will keep looking. [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. Appleby 06:54, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

According to Acmuller's handy Digital Dictionary of Buddhism [7], the English title is "Dharani of the pure immaculate light." However, it isn't entirely clear if that name is in common use (or if any name is in common use). Personally, I would recommend a title like "(South Korean) National Treasure 126," which could also include some information on the other items excavated from the Dabotap at that time. Good luck! -- Visviva 08:08, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

I Changed image license

image:A-50.jpg

cc-by-sa-2.5 -> Promophoto

I know that picture's copyright holder is ROKAF...^^ -- WonYong (talk) 10:32, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

developed country

i've just left a message at WP:RFP asking for semi-protection, i dunno if you want to leave a brief comment there. if you flip through the edit history of developed country, it may or may not be User:Cantus, who's been banned from making the same edit to this article by arb com Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Cantus 3. i can understand if someone wants to have a legitimate debate about it, but right now, it's obviously just intentional vandalism by sockpuppets. Appleby 00:12, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Crazyarcade logo.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Crazyarcade logo.JPG. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:05, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Tsushima

There has been a spur of controversy on the Korean naming conventions.

For me, I find that there is nothing wrong on the Korean etymology. The Koreans have exerted political, cultural and historical influences on Tsushima, and since time in memorial you would notice that the Koreans refered Tsushima as Daemado. Concerning the official reference of South Korea as "Ssusema Seom", I got it from the archives of Tsushima's talk. Furthermore, with a section on former disputes on Tsushima being refered to in a section at Korean-Japanese disputes, I feel that there is a need to highlight on the Korean way of refering Tsushima, also for adminstrative reasons.

I have no intention of spurring or hurting Korean-Japanese relations. Yes, I'm the one who authored the paragraph, but let's resolve the matter step by step with the pro-Japanese users who otherwise opposed to my Korean naming reference, seen from their User page profile and the way they wanted a consensus. Indeed, I can't find what's wrong with the paragraph, possibly because of sheer fanatical anti-Korean sentiments.

As for the sources this User:Dwy suggested in order to support my statement, we need sources. We can look for it, but such sources are certainly indeed only avaliable in Korean.

For now, I have to concentrate on my exams, and I can't be too distracted. If the oppposition rouses the (possibly unnecessary) fuss again, do hold on until 10th May, if you wish/could. I hope that won't trouble you too much. Also, I have posted a similar message to User:Appleby. Cheers! Mr Tan 04:36, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

One step at a time. We need to consider their interests, at the same time protecting ours too, with caution. Until this section is solved, I won't be able to start a new etymology section combining this section together with new content which I want to edit on how the Japanese refered to Tsushima in the respective variants. You can still see it in the current talk page of Tsushima, at the section of Korean naming conventions.

No, I am taking my high school mid-year exams, from Singapore. I am a Singaporean, really. Are you now in Korea, by any chance? It's lunch time in Singapore right now, and Korea's time zone is just one hour ahead, I believe. Cheers! Mr Tan 04:44, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Ah yes, good luck too. Wikipedia should not be part of one's life. To freeze or recontinue a discussion is certainly within one's control. You must not forget that wikipedia is only an interest encyclopedia. Concentrate on your exams, and don't let your body and mind tear apart. Cheers! Mr Tan 04:48, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Wongaksajisipcheungseoktap

Deiaemeth: Thanks for the help. I got the name from the Cultural Heritage Administration [8]. That and Seongdeokdaewangsinjong both seem really unruly but I don't think I've ever heard an English name for them or a shorter name. Any help would be appreciated because the title looks pretty ridiculous right now. Although with Seongdeokdaewangsinjong, I also made a redirect from Emille Bell which is a smaller mouthful that aajdifadfjahflajfhagaower and we can always change it to that. Let me know what you think. Thanks! Tortfeasor 06:10, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Deiameth: I saw this link: <in>%20z_title)&requery=0 while doing research. And I thought I read somewhere that you were interested in making an article for the first extant printed material. (It was a woodblock print of the Dharani sutra). I'm not sure if you actually did make the article. But, if you didn't and you are still interested, I hope this helps. Hope all is well. Tortfeasor 23:31, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

User notice: temporary 3RR block

====Regarding reversions[9] made on May 8 2006 (UTC) to Liancourt Rocks====

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 19:10, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

User notice: temporary 3RR block

====Regarding reversions[10] made on May 11 2006 (UTC) to Japanese history textbook controversies====

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. The duration of the block is 12 hours. William M. Connolley 20:28, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Owning islands

Hello and how are you? I have some information that everyone should know but I would like to discuss with you.

I think South Korea owns Dokdo. Administering or controlling sounds like Japan has a foothold in trying to make Dokdo their own territory.

And please remember that Korea and Japan are not in a dispute over Dokdo. Dokdo is Korean territory! Japan just wants the islands. "Dispute" sounds like it might be either Korean or Japanese land! Dokdo is Korean territory and Japan is just claiming it. It is NOT a dispute. I am wondering if this is eligible to write on the article of Liancourt Rocks...

Please reply regarding this, thanks! Good friend100 14:33, 14 May 2006 (UTC)Good friend100

NPOV

Don't call adding NPOV tag vandalism. I can't believe it. It is true that there is a dispute on Talk page. I call what you did vandalism. Thanks. 59.141.42.53 10:22 17/05/06

Sock Puppet?

I just forgot to log in. 입다물어라! 당신은 실례다! Robert Houdini 16:22 17/MAY/2006

Military equipment of South Korea

Thank you for pointing out my mistake. I do agree with the UH-60 in Korea; my father was on of the pilots, perhaps I removed them by accident. I hope to work with you more in the future.

Thank you, David (davidoseven) —Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

Thank You

I appreciate your help, and your welcome. I am quite interested in the martial affairs, and would love to contribute to the extent of my knowledge. I feel that there is some discussion to be done about the ROK military equipment section. I am sure that our efforts will make the article better. Thank you for your time. Dave 23:58, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi

So, tentative proof and generally regarded are the reasons why u see it not a ironclad. Maybe. But in my opion , a so-called tentative proof is just sth subjective. According to someone's definition of ironclad in this article, 'were wooden ships or ships of composite construction (wooden planking on iron frames) sheathed with thick iron plates for protection against gunfire', this chinese boat is the very ironclad,or if not at least 'a pioneer', i think. If you really disregard it as a 'generally regarded ironclad' (by who?) , maybe u can see it as a pioneer, not a full-scale one, just a boat with some elements of ironclad. Ksyrie 07:59, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

are u so eagered to delete all the thing i have edited? What the hell u thought of my contribution to wiki as a alternative viewpoint to the wiki-community？I have given all I can offer to justify my paragraph, and i thougnt that's enough to make nearly all people to understand and partly support my POV.What u so called Copy editing means？ All your behaviors made me sick.I had no idea about koreans before, till now, how can I find a just or a sound reason to keep a good idea of you？ Or Is there anything which i edit really disturbing you？ The content or the way i wrote in my poor english？Give me a clear reason，OK？ Ksyrie 13:52, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

cann't find copy editing either in Wikipedia:Editing policy or Wikipedia:List of guidelinesKsyrie 23:40, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

I read Wikipedia:How to copy-edit,if i didn't make any mistakes in understanding the meaning of copy-edit, it should be correcting spelling, grammar, and punctuation.and rephrasing for improvements in tone, style and voice.But what you did to my stuffs is just deleting, give an exemple of copy-edit！Ksyrie 23:56, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

sorry for my words, my brother,i didn't take notice of your moving it downward.I just got a bit crazy cause my stuff being removed so many times.Showing my respect to you!Ksyrie 00:12, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Subst: for Warning Templates

When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. -- Saaber 12:17, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

3RR

You're already in breach of the three revert rule on the Go (board game) article. If you continue with such edits, you're be immediately blocked. Please take your concerns to the article talk page and try and reach a consensus version.

Blocked for 3RRV

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

Incidentally, I blocked your friend Revolver as well. JoshuaZ 01:46, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Nonsense, vandalism

Please try to be a bit more careful when using these terms in edit summaries. "Nonsense" and "vandalism" are not blanket terms for inappropriate edits. For example, you were right (IMO) to revert the anon who added the excessive details about Joseon's surrender to Qing in the Korea article. However, calling the addition "nonsense" is inappropriate and can mislead observers into thinking that it was a matter of simple vandalism. The revert was called for, I believe, by Wikipedia:Summary style, since such minute details of Korean history belong in sub-sub-sub-articles of Korea. Since you do quite a bit of vandal-fighting (thanks!) as well as quite a bit of other stuff, it is best to keep the two separate. -- Visviva 08:18, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

3RRV

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. RevolverOcelotX

• You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on a page. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. RevolverOcelotX

Repeated 3RRV Violations

• You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Lots of pages. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. RevolverOcelotX

Repeated 3RRV Violations

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Lots of pages. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. RevolverOcelotX

Korea poetry

Thank you for your message.　but I think I didn't touch your article, did I?

By any chance,Are you Appleby??-TOMATOBOMB 15:12, 2 June 2006 (UTC)