Dartfan20

Dartfan20, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Dartfan20! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Worm That Turned (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:30, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

DZFM-TV

It's not an article yet.Xx236 (talk) 06:46, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/75.82.92.70. Thank you. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:58, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits on Dragon Ball Z have been reverted. Please consult, or start a discussion, on the article's talk page before you make any furture changes. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. —  ProKro (talk) 20:28, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sailor Moon. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:35, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Sailor Moon. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. –Chase (talk / contribs) 00:07, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

July 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to European Broadcasting Union may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | [[PBS|Public Broadcasting Service || PBS

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:28, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Final and only warning

One more disruptive edit and you will soon find yourself blocked. Consider this a final and only warning. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 19:31, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015

Your recent editing history at European Broadcasting Union shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Wes Mouse | ^T@lk 19:54, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Notification: Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 01:13, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of two months for sock puppetry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 11:57, 2 July 2015 (UTC)