Welcome!

edit
 
Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello Darnathiss, welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Liance, and I've been editing here for a while. I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:Enex Technologies to WikiProject Articles for Creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

I highly recommend visiting The Teahouse if you are unsure about anything Wiki related. It's a place where experienced editors answer questions and assist newcomers in the editing process. In addition, please do not hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome! I hope you enjoy your time here. ~Liancetalk 20:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enex Technologies (June 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chaotic Enby was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 21:30, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Darnathiss! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 21:30, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enex Technologies (July 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OnlyNano was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
OnlyNanotalk 00:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enex Technologies (July 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 14:16, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

July 2024

edit
 

Hello Darnathiss. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Darnathiss. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Darnathiss|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:21, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi DoubleGrazing,
I have no relation with Enex. I'm new to Wikipedia and I decided to start with something familiar for me, as the company has one of its offices in my hometown. It is a very well-known multinational, often covered by media, and I thought that I could write an article on it. This company has also a significant relevance abroad.
I’m new here and I am facing some difficulties. I am trying to understand what I might be doing wrong before attempting to write something else.
About the sources, in general, I would like to understand on what basis a source is judged not independent when it comes to the main general and sector-specific newspapers, all of which are supposed to be independent.
In detail, about the information sources that I inserted on Enex Technologies please see my notes:
1. True, but it indirectly supports exactly what you wrote: Girotto is an expert in CO2refrigeration systems and actually he introduced their commercial use. He was the first.
2. Okay, but Repubblica is still the second national largest Italian newspaper. Wikipedia entries often include paywalled articles, why shouldn't this be acceptable?
3. Affari Italiani is a main economy independent digital magazine in Italy, https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affaritaliani.it
4. Corriere della Sera, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corriere_della_Sera, is the leading Italian newspaper. Accusing it of bias needs to be proven…
5. Industria Italiana is the most well-known and widely read independent online magazine in Italy on Industry, Manufacturing, Automation, B2B ICT, and related economic topics.
I believe this article meets all the necessary criteria, yet it has not been approved.
May you please help me understand how it can be published?
Thank you for your help and understanding. I look forward to your answer. Darnathiss (talk) 09:28, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Reply