User talk:Dank/Archive 53

bluebuck

Thank you for scheduling it for 17 Nov (and the rest of the month)! I am surprised that it still appears in WP:TFAR but hesitate to simply remove it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:12, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

I think I mentioned that! I said I was penciling it in, but I like to leave any vote up for 7 days before I remove it. It hasn't been 7 days yet (but almost). - Dank (push to talk) 21:14, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Btw, it's likely that changes are coming to TFAR, and that there will be new jobs soon that will be important, gnomish, and most important, fun. Stay tuned. - Dank (push to talk) 21:26, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

I remember the penciling now, thanks. - I will do what I can - as I have done from 2012 when it was chaotic, including one scheduling ;) - [redacted] --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:39, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

I apologize, Gerda, but I'm not comfortable with my userpage being used for advertising for any faction of anything. I have removed that part of the comment. - Dank (push to talk) 21:44, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

I apologize, only wanted to explain that I don't feel wanted for FA jobs, but do what I can anyway because I think it's for the readers. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

FAC reviewing barnstar

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		FAC can't function without people like you contributing reviews. Thank you for the ten FAC reviews you did during October. . Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 10:52, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Ooh! Shiny. - Dank (push to talk) 11:30, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

thank you

As always, thank you for the masses of good work you do here. Specifically, thanks for the ping re Warlugulong heading for TFA. I have had a run over it, and found an embarrassing mistake, where I had linked a cite (and an archive url) for the wrong webpage. Now fixed. Very grateful! hamiltonstone (talk) 11:33, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Happy to help! Any problems in the TFA text? - Dank (push to talk) 11:35, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

No, it all looks good. Such a shame we don't have free use images of contemporary Australian paintings to illustrate at TFA, but that's life. hamiltonstone (talk) 11:07, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Miller in 1948

I'm having a look at the article now. It's basically OK, but I don't particularly like it. I've avoided these 1948 articles as even I find them tedious! But I'll give it a little tidy up. I've already tightened the lead a little, but I don't think it will impact on the blurb much. The only thing from the blurb I'm not sure about is "He and Ray Lindwall are still regarded as one of the best duos of opening fast bowlers ever." Not sure of the solution yet! Sarastro1 (talk) 21:31, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

I found it tedious too. OTOH, it's easier to subtract unimportant stuff from a FA than to write a new FA and get it promoted, and FAC is only promoting about 60% of the articles TFA needs (averaged over this year). There's nothing wrong with that ... but it does mean we have to tidy things up sometimes. I like to use anniversaries when possible, and the Keith Miller articles are the only FAs I've got with an anniversary on November 28. If we could assemble a team at WT:CRICKET to look at some of the older cricket FAs, that would be awesome. - Dank (push to talk) 21:52, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

P.S. I'll pull the offending sentence. - Dank (push to talk) 21:58, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Cheers! The main problem at WT:CRIC is that most of those who wrote the long list of cricket FAs are long departed. AFAIK, apart from Dweller and The Rambling Man, there's no one active on there who has worked regularly at FAC and neither of those two really write cricket stuff any more. (I might be overlooking someone, and I apologise if I have) If you put in an appeal there, it is likely to receive a stony silence. FWIW, apart from the 1948 articles (which are just too similar to read and retain your sanity), the FAs by YellowMonkey were polished a year or two ago and are pretty much up to scratch. Sarastro1 (talk) 22:08, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Great to know! Pinging Dweller ... we're talking about Keith Miller with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948. Can it be salvaged with some hefty trimming, or should I pull it and find something else? - Dank (push to talk) 22:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

A cricket pedant writes... It really should be the new ball, as "each new ball" or "every new ball" does not quite sound right in cricket-speak. It's not exactly wrong, but it might draw some of the cricketing fundamentalists out of the woodwork. But it's not exactly terrible, so it's your call which looks better.

Done, thanks. - Dank (push to talk)

If Dweller does pop in, I'm trimming quite a bit but I wonder how much detail we need on tour matches. It's worth taking to the article talk if you are around. If not, I'll keep hacking. Sarastro1 (talk) 22:54, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! - Dank (push to talk) 23:34, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello. Slow on the uptake here... salvaged from what? --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 07:58, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Sarastro is working on Keith Miller with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948, it's the TFA for Nov 28. At first glance, we both thought it was a little tedious ... you're welcome to take a look if you like. - Dank (push to talk) 12:45, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

I've finished chopping now, and have reduced the word count quite a bit. There's a few parts that are perhaps less elegant than would be ideal, but I think it's OK to be TFA. I might keep picking at it over the next few days, but unless anyone else spots any clangers, I think it should be good to go. I might see if anyone else can take a look as well from a cricket viewpoint. Sarastro1 (talk) 23:02, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Dank.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dank. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Counting

Hi, some time ago I remember asking you how you counted the length of a TFA blurb since the way I tried gave a different figure. You responded, but I've since forgotten. Now that it might matter, could you me kind enough to remind me again? Thanks, Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Sure, happy to help. Copy and paste from just after the image to just before the TFAFULL template, into any character counter. - Dank (push to talk) 12:33, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

OK, that's clear, thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:23, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Ernie Toshack TFA

I notice we give bowling figures of 11/31 in the blurb. My (far from perfect) memory doesn't suggest that we usually do bowling figures in cricket TFA blurbs so this has never arisen. A cricket fan will know immediately what 11/31 means, but the general reader undoubtedly will not and will undoubtedly grumble. The full version of this would be "11 wickets for 31 runs", and cricket articles usually spell this out in full on first mention. If we have the space for it, this might be worth doing. Sarastro1 (talk) 23:20, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Makes sense, thanks, and thanks for the other edits too. - Dank (push to talk) 23:21, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Keith Miller TFA

Re Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 28, 2016, I wonder if there's a way or two of avoiding a massive bold blue link at the start here (I don't remember seeing a longer bold blue link at TFA!)

• Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 25, 2014 is an example of another article in the series at TFA
• Moving his dates to the second sentence is another way: "... undefeated in a 34-match tour of England in 1948. Miller (28 November 1919 – 11 October 2004) was an all-rounder: a fast bowler..."

HTH. Bencherlite^Talk 00:51, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

• • Very snappy ... I like it. - Dank (push to talk) 02:03, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
    • Great. Just occasionally I can find a way of avoiding re-inventing the wheel... Bencherlite^Talk 08:55, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Hawaii and the American Civil War

Hello, I want to bring Hawaii and the American Civil War up to scale and eventually to FAC. It is absolutely nowhere near that yet. Do you have any suggestions for further expansion? I'm not as familiar with writing non-biographical information.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 01:35, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

I posted a notice at WT:MIL# Hawaii and the American Civil War. I'll keep an eye out for it at our A-class nominations page. - Dank (push to talk) 02:47, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Kanaina birth month

The note explains what is in the actual source in relation to his Mahele genealogy but, the same source uses the month and day of abt May 4th. We cannot add brackets, quotation marks or a question mark unless it is used in the actual source. In the case with Kamehameha I the source(s) used the question mark and therefore was added to the dating.--Mark Miller (talk) 00:37, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

I have changed the notes to better reflect the source.--Mark Miller (talk) 00:54, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. - Dank (push to talk) 01:29, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

I should also change the text to better reflect the other date claims as they are notable.--Mark Miller (talk) 02:10, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Ike Altgens TFAR

For clarity: is this a support, and should I move it to the non-specific section? TIA. —ATS 🖖 talk 03:17, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Chris makes the scheduling decisions for December, he'll see it and make the call. - Dank (push to talk) 03:21, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Tomorrow's featured article

With the crash of LaMia Airlines Flight 2933 making headlines around the world, tomorrow's appearance of Scotland national football team as TFA is likely to be mistakenly perceived by some as deliberate and distasteful. I realize that it's been scheduled for the 144th anniversary of the 1872 Scotland vs England football match, but postponement might be prudent. —David Levy 20:46, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Pinging Chris, Mike Christie and Jimfbleak. Thoughts? - Dank (push to talk) 20:49, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Link is Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 30, 2016. - Dank (push to talk) 20:53, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

(Uninvited, but weighing in anyway since time is short) FWIW, I don't see a real potential for offence here, given that one is a Brazilian club side and the other is a national team from a different continent. Once we start saying that accidents or disasters preclude tangentially related TFAs appearing, we are on a slippery slope (although had the article been about, say, the Munich air crash then it might be different). In addition, 30th November is St Andrew's Day, Scotland's patron saint, and so there's a double reason to feature it. Bencherlite^Talk 21:17, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Consider yourself permanently invited! - Dank (push to talk) 21:19, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Just to make the point crystal clear, I added "on St. Andrew's Day (Scotland's National Day), 30 November 1872". - Dank (push to talk) 21:24, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Good idea. Incidentally, I have tweaked lead, article and blurb to update for the most recent match between England and Scotland: 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – UEFA Group F#England v Scotland Bencherlite^Talk 21:43, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

That seems helpful (and certainly won't hurt). —David Levy 21:54, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

To be clear, I don't mean to suggest that it would be logical for readers to see "football team" and draw a connection to the plane crash. Understandably, in times of tragedy, logic doesn't always prevail. —David Levy 21:54, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

I realised that you weren't suggesting that it would be distasteful, merely that other people might. Anticipating and pandering to potential offence being taken illogically at a juxtaposition of news event and TFA choice is a step too far for me, but I have no TFA role these days so don't have to carry the can for decisions anymore! Bencherlite^Talk 21:59, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

My concern is rooted mainly in the risk of a well written article's one TFA appearance (not this one in particular, but that of any featured article) being overshadowed by the perception of distasteful timing,however irrational this might be. I don't like pandering to the easily offended, but I see pragmatism in mitigating the extent to which such sentiments interfere with Wikipedia's encyclopedic goals. —David Levy 22:32, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

• I have to agree with Bencherlite here. It is a quite different article, from a different geographic region, and the date connection is strong and clear. Although we shouldn't deliberately go out of our way to antagonize readers, we should also not allow the fear of potential but tenuous "controversy" or of complaints stop articles from running. Otherwise we'd never run another video game/mushroom/military history article (all of which tend to draw complaints of "This again?!?") again  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:07, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

• I agree with all of the above. The only area of disagreement, I believe, is the extent to which TFA scheduling should be adjusted to reduce the likelihood of controversy. I've long opposed (and contested, back when Raul's "list" was in use) the practice of stopping an article from running, even when its subject is controversial in its own right (irrespective of timing). —David Levy 03:44, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

• It olloks to me as if a consensus has emerged while I slept (slacking again!), and I have nothing to add. Good decision Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:18, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

  I'm also late to the discussion, but like Jim I agree the decision was the right one. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:42, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Anbe Sivam

Hello Dank. I wish to take the article to FAC. I closed up the PR for it six months ago. I was wondering if you could do an informal PR of the article before I take it to FAC. Do let me know if you are willing by pinging me. Thanks.  — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 12:52, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

The PR was detailed; go ahead and list it at FAC. - Dank (push to talk) 14:32, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Alright.  — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 16:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

FAC reviewing barnstar

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		FAC can't function without people like you contributing reviews. Thank you for the eight FAC reviews you did during November. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:44, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Mike. - Dank (push to talk) 22:48, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy Saturnalia!

		Happy Saturnalia
		Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free. Ealdgyth - Talk 01:36, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

That made me smile, thanks. Best to you and your loved ones. - Dank (push to talk) 01:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for that. I pasted in the rendered text to the character count and forgot to go back and pick up the wikitext for the body of the blurb! Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:53, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Heh. I like your choices. - Dank (push to talk) 16:14, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Holiday card

Wishing you a Charlie Russell Christmas, Dank!

"Here's hoping that the worst end of your trail is behind you That Dad Time be your friend from here to the end And sickness nor sorrow don't find you." —C.M. Russell, Christmas greeting 1926. Montanabw(talk) 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Best of the season, Montana. - Dank (push to talk) 23:27, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry, merry!

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 14:59, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

I hesitate to make "Canada is cold" jokes, but of course Canadians can say it :) Btw we've had pretty warm December in North Carolina. Good to hear from you Bzuk, drop by FAC sometime! - Dank (push to talk) 15:43, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Yo Ho Ho

ϢereSpielChequers is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec16a}} to your friends' talk pages.

Beautiful photo, Jonathan, and good to hear from you. Best of the season. - Dank (push to talk) 18:17, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

	Happy Holidays!
	Hope you and your family are enjoying the holiday season! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:57, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Ed, hope you're doing something fun for the holidays. - Dank (push to talk) 01:33, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

	Merry Christmas, Happy New Year, and all the best in 2017! Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 01:23, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Hey Ruhrfisch, best of the season! - Dank (push to talk) 01:35, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

Happy Hogmanay!

		Happy Hogmanay!
		Wishing you and yours a Happy Hogmanay. May the year ahead be productive and harmonious. --John (talk) 21:21, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

And to you and yours. - Dank (push to talk) 21:22, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Dank!

Happy New Year!

Dank,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Donner60 (talk) 09:11, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Thanks, same to you. - Dank (push to talk) 14:58, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your copyedits to 2003 CWC final. And, happy New Year! —Vensatry _(talk) 15:23, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Happy to help. - Dank (push to talk) 15:36, 2 January 2017 (UTC)