Hello, Dabackgammonator, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Happy editing! JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 01:34, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


Thanks! edit

Thank you for the barnstar. I will display it proudly! Alanraywiki (talk) 03:49, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

You bet Alan. It's an honor to have you here. Keep up the excellent work!--Dabackgammonator (talk) 04:59, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:Cal Poly Pomona banner.png edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cal Poly Pomona banner.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 16:07, 4 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

A CC template was added to it. Could you remove the PUI label from the picture? Please =)--Dabackgammonator (talk) 20:18, 7 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
I've removed the GFDL license tag from it because you can't license a CC-derived image as GFDL, and fixed up the attribution. Stifle (talk) 20:21, 7 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sweet Jesus, that's beautiful. Keep up the good work. I would suggest, though, either removing the font color formatting override for the would-be redlinks or stripping out those links without articles altogether. At present, there's no way for a reader to tell if he or she is actually going to see an article at the other end of a link (short of a close look at his or her browser's status bar while hovering over the link). --Dynaflow babble 09:09, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you Dynaflow! I will most definitely change the format of the links because you pointed out a great flaw in the design. If you want to make some changes to it... knock yourself out=)--Dabackgammonator (talk) 04:17, 9 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

I have been meaning to award this to you ever since I saw it on the Wikiproject page. You really have done outstanding work on this article and the entire Cal Poly Pomona project. Alanraywiki (talk) 16:30, 11 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you Alanray! It really means a lot to receive something from someone as well regarded as you. I will strive even harder to maintain the character of the project!--Dabackgammonator (talk) 19:03, 11 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

References for "Noted students and alumni" edit

I'm mildly concerned by your referencing the "Noted students and alumni" on the Cal Poly Pomona article. For people with their own Wikipedia articles, the references would seem to appropriately belong in the article itself, not in the list. Eddy Hartenstein is the exception, since he doesn't yet have an article, and the reference establishes notability.--Curtis Clark (talk) 14:01, 18 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

If I may weigh in on Dabackgammonator's talk page, let me give you my thoughts on these references. I believe the references should be there because 1) most of the articles about the individuals do not include a reference about their college attendance, although they should, 2) including references is a best practice when you look at all the featured lists of alumni here, and 3) having too many citations is rarely a problem on Wikipedia pages. Thanks, Alanraywiki (talk) 19:16, 18 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
My concern is that if the reference adds to the article about the person, it should be there. It's more a matter of scope than of over-referencing, although by putting the reference on the Cal Poly Pomona page, it's still not apparent whether it's in the target article. But, like I say, it's a minor concern.--Curtis Clark (talk) 01:24, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
I moved the references to the their respective articles, so the referencing wouldn't be completely gone. I have a question to either one of you. Would the same reasoning apply if the article in question was "List of Cal Poly Pomona people"? Thanks.--Dabackgammonator (talk) 02:43, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
In terms of referencing, I've seen a general best practice of placing references in the article to which they most pertain. Why have a "List of Cal Poly Pomona people"? For linking people with Wikipedia articles who are associated with Cal Poly Pomona, it seems that "Category: People associated with Cal Poly Pomona" (or something similar; check how similar categories are worded) would be more useful. If the list were to include people without Wikipedia articles, no matter how well-referenced, it might end up at AfD. See Wikipedia:Lists (stand-alone lists)#Lists of people.--Curtis Clark (talk) 13:48, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
In looking at featured alumni lists (for example, List of Athabasca University people, List of Brigham Young University alumni, List of Dartmouth College alumni, and List of Georgia Institute of Technology alumni), the references are all shown on the alumni page in addition to the person's article. If we want to bring this up to featured list status in the future, either as a standalone article or part of the Cal Poly Pomona article, we will have to meet the featured list criteria, which includes verifiability. Regarding people without articles, I think that they can stay a redlink in the short term but long term there should be an article if they are actually notable. In any case, I understand the logic of your view on referencing but I am just going by past practice on featured articles. Thanks, Alanraywiki (talk) 15:56, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why did you remove explicit reference to notable faculty from the main article? They are still there in the list, but, unless I missed it, it's unclear from the article that they can be found there.--Curtis Clark (talk) 01:19, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

OK, I changed the section's name from "Alumni" to "Notable faculty and alumni". I apologize for making all these changes without consulting anyone, but I'd rather do and get erased/modified than to over think it and not. By the way, if you think anything I made is wrong and should be changed, smashed, blown to pieces, please do so! (P.S. my feelings won't get hurt =P).--Dabackgammonator (talk) 07:21, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Great job on the List of Cal Poly Pomona people. I wouldn't worry about consulting anyone, at least not me. Thanks, Alanraywiki (talk) 15:18, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
I agree. Plow ahead and we can tweak later. I'd as soon mention things here because I may have missed your intent or looked at the page at an intermediate stage.--Curtis Clark (talk) 16:51, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Project Cal State edit

Wicked idea. I've never participated in a project before on Wiki - how can I help? Sawagner201 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 05:41, 20 October 2008 (UTC).Reply

You live in Ontario? Ha! So do I. Kind of random. Sawagner201 (talk) 06:03, 22 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
What are the odds!? That's awesome! Isn't the Inland Empire the greatest?--Dabackgammonator (talk) 03:51, 23 October 2008 (UTC)Reply


WPCSU edit

Glad to see you have started WikiProject California State University. About time the CSU starts catching up with the UC system and its WikiProject University of California. One of the big needs is adequate biographical articles on CSU campus presidents. Only a couple are more than stubs, and most aren't even started. I've done some work referencing Sonoma State University and its president Ruben Arminana (I'm an emeritus professor at SSU), and modest edits on a couple others. Obvious need for a systematic approach. Dwalls (talk) 01:46, 30 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

transparent images edit

On my talk page a couple of weeks ago, you asked how I turned Image:CSU.PNG transparent. For things like .GIF and .PNG images, I usually just use Paint.NET to add the transparency. Essentially, I use the "magic wand" tool to highlight everything that's not part of the image itself and just hit "delete"—it turns the backgrounds transparent (indicated by the grey-and-white checkerboard pattern). I use Inkscape to create .SVG images, but it's a bit more complicated. In those cases, I have to use a .EPS file, extract the .SVG image, and then edit it by hand in a text editor. I'm sure there's an easier way, but I'm not expert enough to figure it out. The .EPS files usually come directly from the college or university's website. Make sense? Esrever (klaT) 15:03, 4 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

WPCSU Importance Assessment edit

Greetings, Dabackgammonator. I've been thinking about a consistent approach to assessing the importance of WPCSU tagged articles. You have appropriately tagged the CSU campuses as Top importance. I would assign the biographical articles on campus presidents as High importance (I've done that for our short list of five or six existing articles). Should notable faculty bio articles be assigned Mid importance? That category also seems appropriate for special single-campus-related programs or facilities, e.g., Fairfield Osborn Preserve at SSU. Are there other categories that could "automatically" be assigned certain levels of importance? What are your thoughts? Dwalls (talk) 06:55, 6 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

It seems to me that notable alumni/former student bio articles also be assigned Mid importance.--Curtis Clark (talk) 14:46, 6 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
Agree. Thus, so far we agree on:
  • Campuses - Top
  • Presidents/Former Presidents - High
  • Notable faculty/alumni - Mid
I would disagree with a "mid-" categorization for campus facilities. In my opinion they should have a "high-" level of priority as I think they are a key part of the university's identity as a campus and for the university system as a whole.--Dabackgammonator (talk) 17:16, 6 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
I can see your point, and I can go along with you on "high" priority for facilities as significant as Fairfield Osborn Preserve. Dwalls (talk) 20:39, 6 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

It might be a good idea to post the above points of agreement to the Discussion page for WikiProject California State University, along with any other principles, standards or points of agreement you and others may have arrived at. I'll leave that decision and summary to you, Dabackgammonator. Dwalls (talk) 20:10, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

We should take take further discussions to the project's talk page.--Dabackgammonator (talk) 21:07, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Vanderbilt University edit

Howdy! I reverted a series of edits that you made to Vanderbilt University tonight. It seemed to revert to an older version of the page (one where Nicholas S. Zeppos was still interim chancellor, for example), and there was no explanation given for the change. I didn't want you to think I'd just rolled stuff back willy-nilly though. Feel free to revert if I've just screwed everything up. :) Cheers! Esrever (klaT) 05:40, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

I just edited the unit convertor from sqkm to km2. I don't recall making changes to Nicholas S. Zeppos, but if I accidentally messed it up I'm terribly sorry.--Dabackgammonator (talk) 23:57, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
Holy crap dude! I just saw how badly I screwed up the Vandy article.... wth was I doing? My bad. Go Vandy!--Dabackgammonator (talk) 00:00, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

As a person who expressed interest in WikiProject Universities COTM... edit

We are starting WP:UNI/COTM, please review the ten randomly selected nominees and vote for the articles you wish to improve. (Category:WikiProject Universities COTM candidates) The COTM will run throughout the month of December. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or comment on WT:UNI/COTM. Have a great day! (I kept your nomination for this round) - Jameson L. Tai talkguestbookcontribs 21:43, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

COTM edit

You get as many votes as you like... I've restored your vote. - Jameson L. Tai talkguestbookcontribs 22:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sweet. Thank you.--Dabackgammonator (talk) 22:35, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Mexican universities edit

  1. Please stop adding information without sources. Some people have spent countless hours trying to improve those articles and you are just trashing them with wrong or just plain outdated info.
  2. People are not required to give you "a through explanation" of why they are deleting your unsourced editions. You are the one who must justify your additions with references if you want them to stay.
  3. Do not make a zillion editions in each article. That's why the Show Preview button is there.
  4. There is no such thing as the "Big 12 Conference" anymore; its dead.[1][2] Stop forcing its inclusion and read before writing.
  5. There are rules for adding fair-use images. Read them. "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." We are trying to keep this encyclopedia as free as possible.
  6. It doesn't matter if the UNAM anthem calls it "universidad". It goes without saying that every human being singing that song would clearly know what they are talking about. However, the word means "university" in Spanish and is way too generic, even in Mexico City. Has it ever occurred to you that every university student, staff and faculty member calls its own university "university" in daily speech?
  7. Stop fabricating "conventions" out of nowhere. The convention for the Monterrey Tech campuses is Tecnológico de Monterrey, Campus Xyz. That's clearly specified by the school,[3] supported by the Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(use_English) (It can happen that an otherwise notable topic has not yet received much attention in the English-speaking world, so that no established usage exists. Very low google counts can but need not be indicative of this. If this happens, follow the conventions of the language in which the entity is most often talked about.) and that's the way they were named before you appeared and trashed them. Stop asserting your fabricated "Tec campuses convention". You made a mess.

- Esteban Zissou (talk) 10:15, 13 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

1 "Some people have spent countless hours trying to improve those articles and you are just trashing them with wrong or just plain outdated info." First, you are talking about the underdeveloped article National Polytechnic Institute. Second, making a good faith edit is not "trashing". "Please stop adding information without sources." if you can go to the article's references, you can see that 4 out of the mere 9 references in the article are are ones I added.
2. "People are not required to give you "a through explanation" of why they are deleting your unsourced editions." Well, maybe not necessarily a "through" one, but definitely more than "-unsourced" for wiping out over 2000 kbytes of information. 1
3. I totally give you that one! I'll try to force down on myself from now on. lol.
4. "There is no such thing as the "Big 12 Conference" anymore; its dead.[4][5]". Dude, if you count with this info why don't you just edit my clear mistake rather than erasing it altogether?
5. "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." Exactly why:
and several more have their athletic departments' logo on the infobox and on the Athletics section of the article.
6. "It doesn't matter if the UNAM anthem calls it 'universidad'. It goes without saying that every human being singing that song would clearly know what they are talking about. However, the word means "university" in Spanish and is way too generic, even in Mexico City. Has it ever occurred to you that every university student, staff and faculty member calls its own university 'university' in daily speech?" Usually I would agree with these but look at the University of Virginia. Most people in Mexico, and specially Mexico City refer the "UNAM" athletic programs as "Universidad" just like people refer to the University of California, Berkeley as "California" or the University of Texas, Austin as "Texas".
7."The convention for the Monterrey Tech campuses is Tecnológico de Monterrey, Campus Xyz." Now who is the one using "just plain outdated info". If I'm an English speaking reader in the English language Wikipedia would I rather have an article titled "Tecnológico de Monterrey, Campus Monterrey" or "Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education, Monterrey"? The extra word "campus" makes it sound awkward. In addition, the Tec system article is titled Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education so I don't understand the big fuzz about this move. It's clearly one or the other.
--Dabackgammonator (talk) 17:04, 13 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

TUSC token 222745672f81b7dd6ef2fe1a12869293 edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

A new round of Collaboration of the Month is about to begin! edit

The current University Collaborations of the Month is
University of California, Berkeley
 

Every month a B-Class higher education-related topic is chosen for you to improve. Be bold!
This COTM is organized by Wikipedia:WikiProject Universities. (Nominate future collaborations or see past collaborations.)
This WP:UNI/COTM is effective: Dec 01 2008 ~ Dec 31 2008.
Pick your next WikiProject Universities COTM Candidate!

Yes, it's that time! A new article has been chosen our COTM next month.

Here's something I want to try, start treating it as a peer review. Start by skimming through the article, making sure the article fits our article guidelines. Then review for content: any copyvio, notability issues, reference listings, following the Manual of Style. Again, let's make sure we stick to the objectives listed on WP:UNI/COTM. Feel free to use the talk page of the article or COTM page to reflect or express opinions on how to make this program even better. Feel free to utilize #wikipedia-en-robotics connect if you wish, that channel doesn't get used enough and I'm usually there if I'm near a computer.

And here's something even more radical. See if you can attract authors currently maintaining the different COTM articles to join our WikiProject and better yet, our COTM project. I found when I started this program, jumping ships and editing other universities' articles was a big leap, but it's been very fun so far. I'd like to see more people actively participating.

Let's start off the new COTM program the right way. I want to see those articles in GA and FA soon. Hope everyone had a good Thanksgiving holiday and enjoy those Black Friday deals. - Jameson L. Tai talkguestbookcontribs 09:14, 23 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

CSU Chancellors edit

I've started articles on Glenn S. Dumke and Barry Munitz and expanded W. Ann Reynolds. (Dumke is scheduled for a DYK? feature later this Saturday afternoon). All could use more work, but the stub article on the current chancellor, Charles B. Reed is most in need of expanding. I plan to start an article on the California Faculty Association, and hope eventually to start articles on Collective Bargaining in the CSU and Continuing Education in the CSU. They may have to wait a while as I have some outside writing commitments coming up. Dwalls (talk) 19:42, 29 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Backgammon edit

Hey, awhile back you invited me on my talk page to the Cal Poly Pomona project (I'm a fellow alumnus). Just wondering if you are playing in the California State Backgammon Championship this weekend.Alanmjohnson (talk) 19:56, 1 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Loves Art edit

First off, I apologize for the spam. You are receiving this message because you have indicated that you are in Southern California or interested in Southern California topics (either via category or WikiProject).

I would like to invite you to the Los Angeles edition of Wikipedia:Wikipedia Loves Art, a photography scavenger hunt to be held at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) on Saturday, February 28, 2009, from 1:00 to 7:00 PM. All photos are intended for use in Wikipedia articles or on Wikimedia Commons. There will be a prize available for the person who gets the most photos on the list.

If you don't like art, why not come just to meet your fellow Wikipedians. Apparently, we haven't had a meetup in this area since June 2006!

If you are interested in attending, please add your name to Wikipedia:Wikipedia Loves Art#Los Angeles County Museum of Art. Please make a note if you are traveling to the area (train or plane) and need transportation, which can probably be arranged via carpool, but we need time to coordinate. Lodging is as of right now out of scope, but we could discuss that if enough people are interested.

Thank you and I hope to see you there! howcheng {chat} 23:41, 9 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia Loves Art LACMA meetup edit

Due to some unforgivable confusion on my part, the meetup on Saturday the 28th needs to be rescheduled. Please see Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Loves Art/LACMA rules#Rescheduling poll to vote for a day/time that works best for you. Thank you and I apologize for the inconvenience. howcheng {chat} 05:52, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia Loves Art new date edit

Based on participants' votes, Wikipedia Loves Art LACMA has been rescheduled to Saturday, February 21, 2009 starting at 1:00 PM. Unfortunately, I have a prior commitment and cannot attend. I will need someone to be coordinator for that day. Let me know if you are willing. Thanks, and have fun! howcheng {chat} 17:53, 17 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia Loves Art preparations edit

Are you read for WLA this Saturday? Here are some last minute preparations you should do before you arrive.

  1. Be sure you have a spiral bound memo pad or notebook (and pen) to take notes and to use for writing the accession numbers, which you then have to photograph (see Wikipedia:Wikipedia Loves Art/LACMA rules for details).
  2. Be sure to print out the scavenger hunt list at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Loves Art/LACMA rules/list. You may also wish to visit http://collectionsonline.lacma.org/mwebcgi/mweb.exe?request=onview1 to make a plan of attack.
  3. Since tripods and monopods are not allowed in the museum, consider making a string tripod (not as good as the real thing, but better than nothing).

Additionally, we will plan to eat out afterwards at a nearby dining establishment (TBD) -- hope you can join us for that. And finally, I was able to make arrangements for my daughter so I will be able to attend after all. Looking forward to seeing you there! howcheng {chat} 19:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi! edit

I would like to know how do you contribute to the spanish wikipedia, if you do so (i read your catagoris). Do you have a seperate account on the spanish wikipedia? Please write back! House1090 (talk) 03:34, 17 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well i would like to work onthe spanish wiki, but I dont know if I need a seperate account. House1090 (talk) 22:22, 18 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi there! edit

R U by any chance familiar withe the Inland Empire Metroplotan Area of Southern California? If not how about with the Greater Los Angeles Area? itzzHouse1090duhh (talk2me) 23:29, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yes I do need smoe help, user Amerique and I are have a HUGE discussion on wheather the Greater Los Angeles Template should become the Los Angeles-Orange County Area Template. I am for the move because the G. LA template is missing alot of cities of the IE (it is missing more than half), and also there is all ready an IE metropolitan area template (that includes all its cities and towns, that I have well organized). The LA-OC area has none and there is very little to no information about that area. Please see the talk page of the Greater LA Area by clicking here or just tell me instead if the Greater LA template should be the LA area template to solve that problem or at least give me your thoughts/suggestions, Thank-You and itzzHouse1090duhh (talk2me) 22:51, 22 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

2009 NFL Draft edit

Gracias, Señor. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 22:02, 25 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I totally missed the fact that you gave me a Barnstar, until I recently looked at my user page. Thank you very much again! If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 03:26, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Template:Greater Los Angeles Area is up for deletion. I believe it should be deleted because it includes all the cities in LA/OC as well as Ventura. It includes some of the IE cities, I think it should be deleted because its too long too may cities and also it doesent include all the cities in that metro and if added it will be WAY too long! I think it should be deleted or trimed into the LA/OC maby Ventura, since the IE has its own template and it not that long, so if its created into the LA/OC it wont be too long, and thats the way I think it should go so please visit the deletion log by using the information below:

Hell's Kitchen (U.S. season 5) edit

Please do not give final results for this program until after the show airs next Thursday, even if the official sources already reveal the winner. The revelation of spoilers of shows such as these are frowned upon here. Thanks for your cooperation. -- azumanga (talk) 11:55, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

It wasn't the final result, only the results for this week's challenge (which Danny won). I wish I knew the final result!Dabackgammonator (talk) 17:59, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD edit

Since you are interested in Pomona College you might want to check out this AfD of a professor's bio: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick Sontag. Borock (talk) 20:42, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Comment Wanted edit

Please see: Template talk:Greater Los Angeles Area a third opinion is highly needed please. itzzHouse1090duhh (talk) 23:29, 18 June 2009 (UTC)Reply


Hi There! edit

It seems that you are intrested in the Inland Empire (California) area. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Inland Empire and join if you like. It is a newly formed wikiproject that I just created so please cheak it out. Any questions contact me! Thank-You. House1090 (talk) 05:32, 7 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

hey, thanks for your contributions to WP edit

Cal Poly Pomona isn't far from GA and the CSU wikiproject has a good infrastructure thanks to your efforts. Best, Ameriquedialectics 19:32, 10 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Welcome Back edit

It's great to see you've returned. Now let's see if we can get Cal Poly Pomona up to GA status with a little collaboration (and thanks for working on University of Zurich too). -Mabeenot (talk) 06:10, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Mexican Baseball Hall of Fame edit

 Template:Infobox Mexican Baseball Hall of Fame has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 09:22, 13 March 2010 (UTC)Reply


File copyright problem with File:Mexico Climate.png edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Mexico Climate.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 21:35, 17 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Pomona College banner.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Pomona College banner.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:39, 28 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:ALFAlogo.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:ALFAlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:37, 8 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:BMV logo.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:BMV logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 10 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:CCAA Logo.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:CCAA Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:56, 15 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Anjunabeats Logo.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Anjunabeats Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:38, 3 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Cal Poly SLO Banner.png edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cal Poly SLO Banner.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk 03:04, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Wp cpp listed at Redirects for discussion edit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wp cpp. Since you had some involvement with the Wp cpp redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). — ξxplicit 05:11, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

WPCSU listed at Redirects for discussion edit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WPCSU. Since you had some involvement with the WPCSU redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji 05:20, 9 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:San Diego State Aztecs Logo 2.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:San Diego State Aztecs Logo 2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 15:30, 18 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Grupo Carso logo.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Grupo Carso logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:18, 18 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Voorhis Vikings 1.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Voorhis Vikings 1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 07:56, 1 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Mexican War on Drugs.png edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Mexican War on Drugs.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:36, 23 May 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 02:36, 23 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:CSU People.png listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CSU People.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 00:34, 14 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Category:Cal Poly Pomona College edit

Category:Cal Poly Pomona College, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger One ping only 05:40, 20 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:I-Poly logo.png edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:I-Poly logo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Marco Guzman, Jr  Talk  19:40, 18 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of U.R. Bronco edit

 

The article U.R. Bronco has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I created this article. In retrospect, it does not appear to be notable enough to have its own article, but warrants a paragraph or two at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Marco Guzman, Jr  Talk  04:23, 4 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Cal Poly Universities Rose Float for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cal Poly Universities Rose Float is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cal Poly Universities Rose Float until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 22:39, 9 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Voorhis Vikings logo.png) edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Voorhis Vikings logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:53, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cal Poly Pomona College of Business Administration logo.png) edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Cal Poly Pomona College of Business Administration logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians edit

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 15:21, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Cal Poly Pomona transparent gold est 1938.png listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cal Poly Pomona transparent gold est 1938.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 22:27, 26 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Cal Poly Pomona Banner.png listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cal Poly Pomona Banner.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 22:28, 26 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Cal Poly San Luis Obispo Banner.png listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cal Poly San Luis Obispo Banner.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 22:29, 26 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:FSU banner.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:FSU banner.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 02:36, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cal Poly Pomona presidents edit

 Template:Cal Poly Pomona presidents has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Corkythehornetfan 06:20, 11 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:The Poly Post cover.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:The Poly Post cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 26 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Cal Poly Pomona Associated Students edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cal Poly Pomona Associated Students, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Regards, James (talk/contribs) 16:55, 24 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Howard University seal.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Howard University seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 15 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Tigres del Mexico logo.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Tigres del Mexico logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of List of engineering programs in the California State University edit

 

The article List of engineering programs in the California State University has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable list that fails NOTDIR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James (talk/contribs) 23:05, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:CSU Stanislaus Seal.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:CSU Stanislaus Seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 21 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Fresno State Baseball Logo.png listed for discussion edit

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fresno State Baseball Logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Corky 00:01, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:CSU Stanislaus Seal.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:CSU Stanislaus Seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Cal Maritime banner.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Cal Maritime banner.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 23 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:UNAM College of Engineering logo.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:UNAM College of Engineering logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 20 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:CPSUSLO self-ade logo.png edit

 

The file File:CPSUSLO self-ade logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 05:35, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:CPP listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:CPP. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:CPP redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Mathglot (talk) 01:18, 16 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Aguilas Blancas banner.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Aguilas Blancas banner.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:CCAA Map.png edit

 

The file File:CCAA Map.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:CCAA map - Current members.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 15:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Mexico City montage.png edit

 

The file File:Mexico City montage.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned file with no obvious value in transferring to Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 15:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:RETIRED.png edit

 

The file File:RETIRED.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned file with no obvious value in transferring to Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 15:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Cal Poly Pomona Bronco Athletics Logo.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Cal Poly Pomona Bronco Athletics Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. IagoQnsi (talk) 18:46, 23 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:WikiProject California State University articles edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject California State University articles indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 18:06, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:LMB Labelled Map edit

 Template:LMB Labelled Map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:53, 7 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Grupo Carso logo.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Grupo Carso logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 16 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:LMB Map.png edit

 

The file File:LMB Map.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Severely outdated map. Replaced with templates at Mexican_League#Teams

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:05, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Cinvestav seal.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Cinvestav seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply