Cricetus
Welcome edit
Welcome!
Hello, Cricetus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
mgiganteus1 (talk) 22:52, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Just a small note of appreciation of your very sensible contributions to the "Aquatic Ape Hypothesis" page. Algis Kuliukas (talk) 12:05, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Do not engage in original research edit
Edits like this are inappropriate as they are taking sources, which should be used to verify text with explicit statements, and turning them into examples. In other words, you can use Graham to indicate basic information about the AAH. You can't use it to say that this means support for the AAH comes from doctors because Graham is a doctor. All you can say is that one doctor thinks this, and you can't even say that. You are engaging in original research by using the text as an example rather than to verify what the text says. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 23:30, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
- What the text said is that "The most explicit supporters of AAH come from fields such as paleontology", which seems a pretty obvious observation given the available literature. But if this is too original for WP, I'd be happy to see it reformulated so that it conforms to WP policy. However, such a stylistic issue should not be solved by eliminating all the RS sources mentioned in that sentence, as you have now done, because that leads to giving the reader no information at all of the fact that several scientists representing different research fields have supported AAH. Cricetus (talk) 13:22, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case edit
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Algis_Kuliukas for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. IRWolfie- (talk) 21:32, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 11 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pteridophyte, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Egg cell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Happy Earth day! edit
Hello! Wishing you a Happy Earth day on the behalf of WikiProject Environment and WikiProject Ecology.
|
What is this?
What you can do!!
Newly nominated content
Similar events
|
  
|
| |||
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:51, 22 April 2020 (UTC)