Constance wu
Speedy deletion nomination of Civil Aviation Passenger Service Evaluation
editIf this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Civil Aviation Passenger Service Evaluation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Chetsford (talk) 05:31, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Help me!
editThis help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Please help me with review of Draft:Civil Aviation Passenger Service Evaluation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Civil_Aviation_Passenger_Service_Evaluation. It has been waiting for review more than two weeks, I saw the volume of submissions for review is always increasing, and there is still no change for my draft. So, I am afraid of endless waiting. Do you know any AfC reviewers who can review Chinese references? Or, are there any ways to make it reviewed as soon as possible? By the way, if there is nothing I can do just wait, how long does it take at most? Looking forward to your early reply. Thank you!
Constance wu (talk) 03:44, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Response: Sorry, there is nothing that can be done to speed the process up. As the message states, this may take 5 weeks or more. Please be patient. Drafts are reviewed in no specific order. Snowycats (talk) 04:47, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
editHi Constance wu! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Is this your real name?
editSince there is a celebrity with the name Constance Wu and I assume you are not her, you are only allowed to use the name if it is your name. See Wikipedia:Username.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:32, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Civil Aviation Passenger Service Evaluation has a new comment
editYour submission at Articles for creation: Civil Aviation Passenger Service Evaluation (September 17)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Civil Aviation Passenger Service Evaluation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Civil Aviation Passenger Service Evaluation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Constance wu!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 23:46, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
|
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Civil Aviation Passenger Service Evaluation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:37, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
December 2018
editPlease do not use Wikipedia to promote businesses, like you did in the article Draft:Civil Aviation Passenger Service Evaluation. Wikipedia is not a trade directory. If you want to list a company for potential customers to find, please consider alternative outlets. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:38, 15 December 2018 (UTC)