Confermusearename, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Confermusearename! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:09, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi Confermusearename! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 23:58, Tuesday, March 17, 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Confermusearename! You created a thread called Database error at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:05, 9 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 26 April 2020

edit

The Signpost: 31 May 2020

edit

The Signpost: 28 June 2020

edit

The Signpost: 2 August 2020

edit

The Signpost: 30 August 2020

edit

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

edit

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

edit

Edit to Mid-Autumn Festival

edit

Hi @Confermusearename: when you say that it was clearer before, do you mean the labels for simplified and traditional? I hid them because that was the third time those particular characters appeared on the page, but considering that there are other languages in that section, I understand it might be clearer to specify that they are simplified and traditional Chinese. Given that, would my edit be clarified by removing the "|labels=no"? I feel that this would resolve the issue you bring up while complying better with MOS:FOREIGN, which was my intention with that edit. ChromeGames923 (talk · contribs) 23:56, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

@ChromeGames923: I didn't think enough before reverting your edit, I'm sorry. I think your edit was fine in retrospect; but as you said it could be confusing if it is not identified which one is in Traditional/Simplified Chinese, so maybe removing the "|labels=no" might help? I do see what you're talking about where they appear multiple times on the page. confermusearename (talk, contribs) Have a nice day! 00:08, 2 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Confermusearename: no worries! I wasn't very clear about what I was doing in my edit summary either, so that part is my bad. I've restored the edit with the labels shown, and I think it should be sufficient. All the best, ChromeGames923 (talk · contribs) 00:13, 2 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 1 November 2020

edit

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 29 November 2020

edit

New message from Justarandomamerican

edit
 
Hello, Confermusearename. You have new messages at Justarandomamerican's talk page.
Message added 20:28, 20 December 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Kind regards, Justarandomamerican (talk) Also, have a nice day! 20:28, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Season's greetings

edit
Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

The Signpost: 28 December 2020

edit

The Signpost: 31 January 2021

edit

The Signpost: 28 February 2021

edit

The Signpost: 28 March 2021

edit

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

edit

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

edit

The Signpost: 27 June 2021

edit

The Signpost: 25 July 2021

edit

The Signpost: 29 August 2021

edit

The Signpost: 26 September 2021

edit

The Signpost: 31 October 2021

edit

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

edit

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

edit

The Signpost: 27 February 2022

edit

The Signpost: 27 March 2022

edit

omg hello

edit

yo its me helios im such a girlboss 😍

edit: prolly shouldn't use Wikipedia as a chat website lmao STIK2009 (talk) 22:41, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

how do i delete these things STIK2009 (talk) 22:56, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello! In the future, please don't use Wikipedia to chat with me. confermusearename (talk, contribs) Have a nice day! 01:11, 30 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 24 April 2022

edit

The Signpost: 29 May 2022

edit

The Signpost: 26 June 2022

edit

The Signpost: 1 August 2022

edit

The Signpost: 31 August 2022

edit

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

edit

The Signpost: 31 October 2022

edit

The Signpost: 28 November 2022

edit

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 1 January 2023

edit

The Signpost: 16 January 2023

edit

The Signpost: 4 February 2023

edit

The Signpost: 20 February 2023

edit

The Signpost: 9 March 2023

edit

The Signpost: 20 March 2023

edit

The Signpost: 03 April 2023

edit

The Signpost: 26 April 2023

edit

The Signpost: 8 May 2023

edit

The Signpost: 22 May 2023

edit

The Signpost: 5 June 2023

edit

The Signpost: 19 June 2023

edit

The Signpost: 3 July 2023

edit

The Signpost: 17 July 2023

edit

The Signpost: 1 August 2023

edit

The Signpost: 15 August 2023

edit

The Signpost: 31 August 2023

edit

The Signpost: 16 September 2023

edit

The Signpost: 3 October 2023

edit

The Signpost: 23 October 2023

edit

The Signpost: 6 November 2023

edit

The Signpost: 20 November 2023

edit

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 4 December 2023

edit

The Signpost: 24 December 2023

edit

The Signpost: 10 January 2024

edit

The Signpost: 31 January 2024

edit

The Signpost: 13 February 2024

edit

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

edit

The Signpost: 29 March 2024

edit

The Signpost: 25 April 2024

edit

The Signpost: 16 May 2024

edit

The Signpost: 8 June 2024

edit

The Signpost: 4 July 2024

edit

The Signpost: 22 July 2024

edit

August 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you recently removed content from J. Hutton Pulitzer‎ without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You can't simply remove sourced content (that was in the article when first created, by the way) just because you don't like it. The violation of WP:NPOV was your edit. Doug Weller talk 07:48, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Sorry for my edit on J. Hutton Pulizer, and thank you for informing me of this. I do have questions, though, so I can avoid similar mistakes in the future. The reason I changed the link is that "patent troll" is a pejorative term, whereas "patent holding company" is neutral, and the actual plaintext in the link is "patent holding company". So I assumed that since there is an article on "patent holding company", the link should go there. I was under the impression that Wikipedia should not make judgements about whether Pulitzer's company is a "patent troll" or not (I don't have any personal affinity for the man or his company myself). What is the reason that the link should go to the pejorative term for that kind of company rather than the article for the type of company itself? confermusearename (talk, contribs) Have a nice day! 17:46, 10 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
I’ll respond tomorrow. Meanwhile reds WP:VERIFY and WP,RS and remember we are a mainstream encyclopaedia. So if good sources say someone is a racist, our article will.. Doug Weller talk 18:29, 10 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
I went and read the actual source for the sentence with the link I changed, and it makes no reference to the company being a "patent troll". In fact, it simply calls it a "patent holding company". By WP:VERIFY there is no reason for the link to point to patent troll instead of patent holding company.
By the way, I didn't make the edit because I like Pulitzer or patent holding companies (I don't), I was just reading the article, clicked on the link, and was surprised that it lead to "patent troll" instead of the article with the name of the link. So I guess that's evidence for the link potentially being confusing and counterintuitive for readers. confermusearename (talk, contribs) Have a nice day! 23:09, 10 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Good catch. The author of the article was the one who made that link and used that source. I've asked him about it but I'm not sure he's around. Looks like he's been ill. Anyway I agree and reverted myself. Thanks for being patient. Pulitzer tried to sue two people I know because they called him out on his fraudulent archaeology claims. He failed of course. Doug Weller talk 08:58, 11 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
You did right, all the sources describing the litigious Pulitzer as a patent troll have been scrubbed. He is most assiduous about threatening people who draw attention to his shenanigans. Guy (help! - typo?) 09:41, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply