User talk:ChrisTheDude/Archive 16

Awards edit

hello,

please have a look at santana's awards. I found a few grammar mistakes (thank you online spellchecker :)). Thank you.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 15:46, 3 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ok, I will try to find another source, which must be reliable, though I think I will never find such source. If not, I will just delete the awards or nomination with this reference. Thank you.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 16:16, 3 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sorry edit

I did not know that itself justified... :( « CA » Talk 16:19, 4 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Greetings & request edit

Greetings ChrisTheDude - I'm following up a long shot and need confirmation on the edition to Dean McDonald as of 12:46, 4 December 2010. I know nothing about the subject and how to go about checking it, but the two checks of two I've been able to carry out so far have been positives. Cheers!--Technopat (talk) 13:27, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Source of an image edit

Do you happen to know where/if File:AshingtonAFC1898.jpg was published? During a peer review of Ashington A.F.C., Jappalang pointed out that unless it was published somewhere before 1923, it would not be eligible under public domain until 2019. [1] - Wmcduff (talk) 15:09, 9 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

I don't know, sorry. I found it on some website and at the time was under the impression that merely being that old was sufficient for it to be in the PD. I still don't fully understand image policy even now....... :-S -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:27, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

No worries. I know you probably pulled the photo from ashingtonafc.com, so I can ask them if it was published, and if not, I'll pull it down. - Wmcduff (talk) 15:32, 9 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Alas, not 130 years old, and no other information available. :/ Therefore... - Wmcduff (talk) 13:27, 13 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:AshingtonAFC1898.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AshingtonAFC1898.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

License tagging for File:StMichaelsPelsall.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:StMichaelsPelsall.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:07, 20 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Duncan Edwards edit

I see you have reverted my additions to the article. I am in the process of creating an articlon on Francis Skeat who designed stained glass windows for about 400 churches in England, so there will be no problem with notability. Likeqwise, what is wrong with a link to an actual photograph of the window - how is that unreliable? Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 13:48, 22 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

In the order of service for the dedication of the window (see [2]), Skeat is listed as the artist. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 13:59, 22 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Seeking advice edit

After hearing of his plight, and the planned scarf tribute to him, I decided to do my bit by expanding Neil Young (footballer born 1944). I've been pondering whether or not to add the material in the second paragraph of the Personal life section (particularly the suicide attempt), what with it being a BLP of someone currently going though difficult times. I deliberately waited until after it had been on the Main Page for DYK for this reason, but ultimately included it on the grounds that Young himself put it in his autobiography. So basically I'm looking for some feedback from a couple of editors whose opinions I hold in particularly high esteem. Oldelpaso (talk) 21:01, 12 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Reference edit

The link to the UK Rock Chart was fixed on Nightwish discography; i didn't know about that. Any other mistake? Rodrigo15 (talk) 16:42, 17 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Maybe there's another way easier, i'm gonna make some edits and ask your opinion later. Rodrigo15 (talk) 17:09, 17 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Done, UK links to BPI, and i added a note below the list explaining about the different charts. Is it good enough?Rodrigo15 (talk) 17:15, 17 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia Ambassador Program is looking for new Online Ambassadors edit

Hi! Since you've been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, I wanted to let you know about the Wikipedia Ambassador Program, and specifically the role of Online Ambassador. We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Wikipedia in their classes.

If that sounds like you and you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors during the current term, which started in January and goes through early May. If that's something you want to do, please apply!

You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).

I hope to hear from you soon.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 01:55, 28 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

List of FA Cup winners edit

Hi Chris - I know this was some time ago now, but can you recall why you removed the names of the goalscorers from the List of FA Cup winners with this edit? This seems to me to be useful information which is not recorded elsewhere. Cheers. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 09:08, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

One more to strike off the list. Regards, —WFC— 21:30, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:FAVaselogo.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:FAVaselogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Mahahahaneapneap (talk) 19:03, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Forest FC Wiki edit

Hi, Any chance you can help with related wiki and web search promotion for www.forestyouthfc.co.uk also at Roffey?

Europeada deletion nomination edit

Hi, your nomination isn't appearing in the log here Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2011_February_18. Dunno why. Would add it myself but don't want to do it wrong! Stu.W UK (talk) 21:51, 18 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Vicki Leekx edit

Hi I added some review scores from Rolling Stone and Popmatters for Vicki Leekx which I saw you've nominated for GA - you might want to take a look at those reviews and see if they have anything for the "Release and reception" part in the article :) --Regards, Mottenen (talk) 19:50, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Stephen O'Brien (footballer) edit

Hi there. I've just prodded the article, as I believe he never played for Gillingham. Just wanted to double-check that with you to ensure that the PROD is uncontroversial. Regards, —WFC— 06:08, 22 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Paul Antony Smith edit

Hi, the above page should be known as Paul Smith (footballer born 1976) in line with naming conventions. Unfortunately it was moved from that title with this edit from someone who should have known better. Can you move it back? Thanks. —Half Price 14:18, 23 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oops I never expressed my gratitude. Thanks! —Half Price 23:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Latin Grammy Award for Producer of the Year edit

Hi Chris. I think that your concerns on the nomination for Latin Grammy Award for Producer of the Year had been answered. Would you be kind enough to review it again? Thank you. Jaespinoza (talk) 01:13, 26 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Chris, I hate to be a bother, but can you revisit the above FLC when you get the chance? Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 22:51, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Vicki Leekx edit

The article Vicki Leekx you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Vicki Leekx for things which need to be addressed. Adabow (talk · contribs) 01:33, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Passed. Lemme know if you want a sample. Adabow (talk · contribs) 03:37, 2 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

1878 FA Cup Final edit

I see that you have removed the details of the scorer of one of the Wanderers' goals as well as that for the Royal Engineers. I have four books all of which credit the Wanderers' goals to Kenrick, Kinnaird and Kenrick, so I'm not sure why Warsop begs to differ. I note that the article at [3] credits the goals the same way in the header, but in the narrative seems to imply that the second goal was an own goal ("one of the Engineers put through his own goal") whilst the newspaper clipping doesn't mention the scorer ("the excellent play of the Wanderers resulted in a second goal for them").

As for the Engineers' goal, most sources give this as a result of a "scrimmage" or "rush". Gibbons ("Association Football in Victorian England – A History of the Game from 1863 to 1900") unequivocally credits the goal to W. Morris ("the Engineers levelled the scores through inside forward Morris"). The Cavallini history of the Wanderers merely says "the Engineers did equalise before Kinnaird restored the lead". If you want, I can write this up in full and add it to the article's talk page. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 20:53, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

The truth is that we will never know for certain. Match reports from that era were often contradictory. I'll put a note on the talk page with full citations. Cheers. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 22:32, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Diego Lugano edit

I started a discussion on its talk page. Matthew_hk tc 08:33, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

1873 FA Cup Final edit

Hi Chris - I hope you've recovered from the Real Bigone insults thrown at you.

Well done for the work on the 1878 FA Cup Final article. Could you possibly re-visit the article on the 1873 FA Cup Final - the layout of the match details is different to that on the 1878 article and causes strange gaps in the lists of players.

Keep up the good work and don't let the buggers get you down. Best wishes. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 17:23, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I don't know if you're aware of it, but the 1876 FA Cup Final featured three sets of brothers: Francis and Hubert Heron, Edward and Alfred Lyttelton and Albert and Charles Thompson. I'm sure that this has never happened again, but I can find no reference to this anywhere. Also Francis Birley and Jarvis Kenrick were brothers-in-law. Definitely a fraternal final!. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 19:56, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

José Belman edit

Hi there CHRIS, VASCO from Portugal here,

regarding this chap, i wish i had interesting news for you, but i have not. By all means man, i 100% believe you when you say the guy never played for Gillingham, so i browsed the web in search of some reliable data, found nothing (most probably, all the sites that contain that info - the info being he DID play for the Gills - must have relied on WP, so we are at a dead end on that shootout).

I also asked User:Mega60, who has an "abnormally" large database on Spanish footballers (he hails from that nation), and he told me the same, no primary sources found :( Thirdly, i started a WP:FOOTY discussion to see if any "magicians" would volunteer but, like 90% of the stuff i bring up there, received zero feedback (don't ask me why, dunno the answer).

Maybe Belman was just up for a trial with Gillingham, nothing else. If you decide on removing that stuff from his box and story, i am 100% cool with that, even though the box could look somewhat odd (one season out of football, hey happens to the best!). Attentively, happy weekend - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 02:27, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

That name did ring a strange bell wit me from some unspecified "way back": whether it was a trialist, a "linked name" or what I can't remember, but I'm sure his appearance in the main team would have impacted on me more. Kevin McE (talk) 07:21, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Wanderers F.C. edit

Hi Chris - well done getting all the FA Cup Final articles up to GA. I have started the book at Book:Wanderers F.C. honours. Cheers. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 05:25, 30 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi again. Is there any reason why the match details for the 1873 and 1877 FA Cup Finals are formatted differently (i.e. with the strips and match rules central between the player lists) to the other three (which have the strips above and the match rules below the player lists)? -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 12:35, 31 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Jivesh Here edit

Hi Chris. We have never talked before. I was having a look at M.I.A articles and then i saw that her albums have been nominated for Good Topic. That's also where i saw a link to your user page. I was amazed by seeing the number GA And FA you have accomplished. There is no suitable word or group of words to praise what you do. I was wondering if you like R&B Hip Hop music and if you join Wikipedia:WikiProject Beyoncé Knowles? It will be an immense pleasure as well as an honor to count someone like you among us. Jivesh Talk2Me 09:03, 4 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Joe Dorsett edit

I'm trying to work out if Joe Dorsett had one or two spells with Manchester City, and saw that you created his article. According to the article he played for Colne in 1919–20. Given that his only post-WWI appearances for City occurred between January and April 1920, playing for Colne before this would make sense. He appears to have been elsewhere in wartime (though that could have been the Front). He made sporadic City appearances in the first season of wartime football, then nothing other than a single app in Jan 1919. Does Joyce shed any light? Oldelpaso (talk) 20:54, 4 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, will go with one spell. Who would have thought cross-checking the stats on List of Manchester City F.C. players would be so awkward? Oldelpaso (talk) 21:48, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Have you seen... edit

Fabregas 2001's version of the Tony Cascarino article? I have rarely felt so disinclined to revert an inappropriate edit... Kevin McE (talk) 22:12, 15 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

"Irresistible (Jessica Simpson song)" edit

Hi ChrisTheDude! I saw your amazing contributions to MIA articles. I've nominated the above song article for an FA. If you're free, could you go through it? Your comments are always welcome. Thank you. Novice7 (talk) 10:03, 20 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Re: my so called vandalism - how about you stop using material stolen from the Margate FC History site ? Everything I've edited was stuff taken directly from the site - things like managers records, season by season records, photos etc. The vandalism is you taking it upon yourself to steal other peoples hard work.Voiceofnoreason (talk) 12:53, 29 April 2011 (UTC)Reply