Greetings (and some Milhist business) edit

First, happy new year!

Second, I've raised a couple of things here which could use swift responses. May I trouble you please to check them out?

Thanks! --ROGER DAVIES talk 19:32, 1 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thoughts for collaboration on Little-Saturn & Uranus edit

Ok, so here's my thinking for Operation Uranus and Operation Little-Saturn and the process for it. I've already started adding to Uranus, and I have less information on Little-Saturn. My thinking is that I'll start with Uranus, while you start with Little-Saturn, and then we'll switch and add anything the other misses on the article we didn't do. That way, there's some method to the madness (and we won't drive one another nuts by continuously adding over one another and reverting each other's edits) and we can build on one another's work.

One more thing, how will we work this for the wikicup? Are we both able to claim an article we jointly worked on, or does that not work?

Happy New Year! Hope everything's warm down there in San Diego! Cam (Chat) 05:50, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

sounds good to me. Cam (Chat) 05:51, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Would I be correct to guess that I have the liberty to make slight modifications afterwards as well? Cam (Chat) 05:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
sounds good. Cam (Chat) 17:51, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Holy crap! Very impressive work so far. Cam (Chat) 00:00, 4 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Excellent work - once again edit

The WikiChevrons
For continually-excellent FA-Contributions in the field of Military History (now ranking you 28th all-time at WP:WBFAN), I am pleased to award you another set of Wikichevrons. Best regards, Cam (Chat) 21:26, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


And no worries about the Uranus/Little Saturn. Take your time (I've gone off and am now working on Operation Windsor in the meantime). Cam (Chat) 21:26, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Cam's rfa and articlehistory edit

Hi, I noticed that you didn't sign your support in Cam's RFA. Would you mind signing it? It is number 41 at time of writing.

On another note, if you ever need any help with the articlehistory template, just leave a note on my talkpage. Once you get the hang of them, they are easy. The hardest part is finding the oldid, the rest is on Template:ArticleHistory/doc. So, if you have any questions, just leave them on my talkpage, regards. Woody (talk) 20:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Operation Winter Storm edit

I'm impressed (as are others I see here) with your work - so much so I'm a little intimated to note that the lead section of Operation Winter Storm seems longer than I would expect on a Wikipedia article. Do you think that much detail is necessary in the lead in this case? I've seen campaign article's much shorter. I'll look for a reply here - not need to travel to my talk page. (John User:Jwy talk) 20:24, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

My leads tend to be rather long; for example, Third Battle of Kharkov, has a fairly long lead (although shorter than Winter Storm). It will be shortened as I copyedit it to make sentences simpler and all of that. Basically, what I do is I make a lead by taking information from each section. Then I go through it many times over and take out what I think isn't really necessary. Thanks for the comments and for your compliments, JonCatalán(Talk) 20:28, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Sounds good. Keep it up! (John User:Jwy talk) 20:44, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Sure. Ping! me when you are ready for Operation Little Saturn to go through GAN, and I'll review that. Cam (Chat) 23:30, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Operation Winter Storm edit

Updated DYK query On January 7, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Operation Winter Storm, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 21:20, 7 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Conversion templates edit

As I said, I really think that putting a conversion template in every time "12-inch" is mentioned in a section in dreadnought is rather over the top. The MOS agrees in respect of science articles, why not military history ones? The Land (talk) 13:45, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


Your GA nomination of Wehrmacht forces for the Ardennes Offensive edit

The article Wehrmacht forces for the Ardennes Offensive you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wehrmacht forces for the Ardennes Offensive for eventual comments about the article. Well done! Terrakyte (talk) 14:53, 9 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wehrmacht edit

Hi, I just went to do the review you request and found that it had already been done! I think the article is excellent and would also have passed it would significant comment, but I do have a query about the title: its a little confusing grammatically. "Wehrmacht forces for the Ardennes Offensive": Does this mean German forces in the Ardennes Offensive or German forces prepared for the Ardennes Offensive. The article seems to cover both and my immediate reaction is that "German forces in the Ardennes Offensive" is probably the most grammatically correct title. I could be wrong, and it might be worth gathering further opinions on this, but it is the one thing that stands out from the article as a potential problem. Regards--Jackyd101 (talk) 17:08, 9 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Reading the discussion you link to, my preference is probably "deployed for", although its current position will do until wider consenus can be developed.--Jackyd101 (talk) 17:16, 9 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Operation Uranus edit

Updated DYK query On January 9, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Operation Uranus, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Keep up the good work! Ruhrfisch ><>°° 18:00, 9 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008) edit

The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:15, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Request for involvement edit

Dear Catalan

I was hoping I could get a return on that GA nomination I passed. ;) In all seriousness, I noticed you are a coordinator for WP:MILHIST, and I was hoping I could employ your expertise. Would you mind if I ask for your input on a discussion I've started regarding the Iran-Iraq War article? Recently, text on the prosecution and aftermath of the war was moved to other articles to cut down the size of the main one, but there still remains a huge amount on how Iran and Iraq were supported by foreign powers. I have cited the MOS on war articles to argue that the text on the prosecution and aftermath should be moved back, and that the text on foreign support should be trimmed instead. The discussion can be found here: [1]. If you do get involved, thank you very much. Terrakyte (talk) 22:09, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your comments. Terrakyte (talk) 22:32, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Request edit

Hey, would you be able to GA-Review Yamato class battleship for me? In exchange, I'm more than willing to GA-Review Operation Little Saturn when it gets to that stage. Cam (Chat) 21:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter edit

Delivered by The Helpful One for Garden and iMatthew at 00:07, 12 January 2009 (UTC) Reply


Response to A-class review comments edit

I've responded [2]. I appreciate the feedback. Cla68 (talk) 01:14, 12 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Golden wiki edit

2008 "Military historian of the Year"
By order of the Members of the Military History WikiProject, for your "extensive contributors, including 12 featured articles as well as a featured topic and a featured picture" I award you this Golden Wiki. --ROGER DAVIES talk 03:34, 12 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Congratulations! –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 03:52, 12 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


Thank you very much indeed for the barnstar and kind words :) Much appreciated, --ROGER DAVIES talk 12:51, 12 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Possible images for Operation Uranus edit

While looking through other Wikipedias' articles on Operation Uranus, I found some exceptional Bundesarchiv images on the Russian version of the article. I just thought to let you know, in case you thought any would make a worthwhile addition to the article. And congratulations on your MILHIST award! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emw2012 (talkcontribs)

Portal:Tank edit

Hi,

Congrats on ur latest award, and may you continue to get many more.

The commons link on The portal page links to Italian Wars on commons. I wonder if you were wanting to link it to commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tank and not the Italian Wars?? CHeers. Sniperz11@CS 12:36, 12 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Suggestion edit

Hi Jon, in light of your work for MILHIST would you like to collaborate on restoring some material from the Spanish Civil War? A reasonable amount of it may be public domain under the life plus 70 year rule by now, but I'm not sure which items that would be. There's a handful of material at the Library of Congress (the best online source for high res. historic graphic files), and probably more at your disposal. Ping me at my user page and let's talk. :) DurovaCharge! 22:53, 12 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

As I saw that you were getting interested in restoration, Jon, I was just about to leave a message that you might want to work with Durova. I've seen some of her excellent restorations over at Portal:Feminism. Awadewit (talk) 16:23, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
I have actually been looking up Spanish copyright laws. I think protection of Spanish images extends until 70 years after the death of the author; I would have no idea when the author of any given photograph died (let alone who the author is). So, arguing PD is going to be difficult. :( Like I said on Durova's talk page, I also lack a scanner (mine broke). Well, actually, maybe I could do it at the university. JonCatalán(Talk) 16:27, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

List of tanks in the Spanish Civil War edit

Hot damn you're actually doing it. Suh-weet! Gary King (talk) 04:40, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Spanish images edit

There are certain people responsible for images who can be contacted directly. My experience with the German military is that you always find a nice bored bureaucrat. The problem is finding this wo/man. I suggest to first establish contact for a small scale transfer with a limited purpose. The smaller and easier to handle the task seems the more likely is our bureaucrat to do the job. If we have established precedence it's much easier to launch the next request and refine the way we ask. After a series of successful requests from the different institutions we can launch a big deal. So, for getting starting, you have to provide me with some small tasks and a bit of background information on them. Greetings Wandalstouring (talk) 13:22, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

You did that before and it didn't work. The fact that you're Spanish doesn't help. The problem is how you write the email and what you ask for. As I said, give me a list of small topics and some background information. Wandalstouring (talk) 09:31, 14 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations! edit

The Milhist A-Class medal
For prolific work on – Panzer IV, Third Battle of Kharkov and Tanks in the Spanish Army – promoted to A-Class between August and November 2008, by order of the coordinators of the Military history WikiProject, you are hereby awarded the Milhist A-Class medal. -MBK004 19:48, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Wehrmacht forces for the Ardennes Offensive edit

Updated DYK query On January 16, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Wehrmacht forces for the Ardennes Offensive, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 05:42, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations - it's a great article. Cheers, Paxse (talk) 19:02, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

RE: Messines edit

You've got yourself a deal. Cam (Chat) 06:21, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

P.S. Best of luck with the semester, the course-load you described gives me nightmares just thinking about it.

IS Tanks edit

I can't think of much else. I also have Zaloga (1984) Soviet Tanks and Combat Vehicles of World War Two, and the less-useful Perrett (1987) Soviet Armour Since 1945. Glad to look up anything for you in these. Michael Z. 2009-01-16 19:38 z

Congratulations! edit

The Military history A-Class medal
For prolific work on Arena Active Protection System, Operation Winter Storm and List of tanks in the Spanish Civil War, promoted between December 2008 and January 2009, you are hereby awarded the military history A-Class medal, by order of the coordinators of the Military history WikiProject. Kirill 00:57, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Dreadnought edit

Would you mind taking another look at Dreadnought and its A-class review - I think you'll find it much more to your liking. Regards, The Land (talk) 18:44, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! What do I need to do to get you to support it? ;-) The Land (talk) 19:14, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter edit

re: A-class review edit

Sorry again for my slow response to your prompting. I had another read of the article when you prompted me on the 12th, but something else came up and I forgot to update my comments. I'm afraid that I still don't think that the article is quite at A-class yet - in essence, I think that the article needs a thorough copy-edit from a fresh set of eyes. Please let me know if you'd like me to expand my comments. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 11:11, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for List of tanks in the Spanish Civil War edit

Updated DYK query On January 21, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article List of tanks in the Spanish Civil War, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 14:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Battle of Aachen edit

Updated DYK query On January 22, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Aachen, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 19:30, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Supermarine Spitfire edit

Hi Jon,

Having come across you dealing with the peer review of the Junkers Ju 87 article and seeing you are an experienced editor, I was hoping you would have some input on the above. Some recent reversals are in progress over some "facts" on the Elliptical wing design section. As far as I can see the "cited" data (which I have marked with a verification tag) is not from a published source. Could you take a look? Regards, Dapi89 (talk) 00:49, 24 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter edit

17:23, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Good luck... edit

I saw this. Good luck with taking a break...kudos that you can get yourself off. Hope to see you around sometime! Cheers friend, —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 19:59, 25 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Since you are taking a break, should Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of tanks in the Spanish Civil War be withdrawn? Dabomb87 (talk) 22:57, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
I took care of the archiving. Have a nice Wikibreak, and come back soon! Dabomb87 (talk) 23:22, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Something for you edit

The Content Review Medal of Merit  
In recognition of your contribution in improving Military history articles through A-Class and Peer Reviews, during the fourth quarter of 2008, please accept this Content Review Medal. -MBK004 04:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter edit

20:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by J Milburn, on behalf of the judges. 20:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009) edit

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:18, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

congrats! edit

On being military historian of the year! Just found out via The Bugle.--Cerejota (talk) 04:21, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Looking to be adopted !! edit

I have been a contributor on and off for some months but could definitely use help, especially regarding in article referencing, redirects to other inter-Wikipedia articles, and so forth. I consider myself a relatively good writer but would certainly accept constructive criticism there as well.

You can see my profile...I hold a Masters in Business Administration and am currently working on my Masters in Military History. My strongest areas are probably WWII European theater and Russian History. I also am an expert in baseball (sorry to brag, but I have been following it avidly for 32 years and have over 200,000 cards).

Anyway, look forward to hearing from you!

Wayne

Waynem37 (talk) 03:46, 14 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter edit

23:02, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Photo qusetion edit

File:Ger Inf Russia 1941 HDSN9902655.JPEG
We spent hours posing for this shot. Are we PD or not?

Hi,

Third Battle of Kharkov is headed for the front page shortly, and I wanted to clarify the PD-or-not status of this image - see Talk:Third Battle of Kharkov. Thanks - Tempshill (talk) 16:19, 16 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Panzersatkharkov1943.jpg) edit

Thanks for uploading File:Panzersatkharkov1943.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 18 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations edit

...on today's vandal-magnet ;) Nice article, I enjoyed the read. EyeSerenetalk 12:47, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Congrats.... edit

...on getting Third Battle of Kharkov to the main page! :) I hope that RL is treating you well... —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 20:22, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter edit

21:42, 22 February 2009 (UTC) The Helpful Bot 21:42, 22 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Iglesia.jpg edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Iglesia.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:39, 25 February 2009 (UTC) --(ESkog)(Talk) 17:39, 25 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nevado del Ruiz FAC edit

Could you conduct a review? Ceranthor 18:36, 25 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter edit

17:48, 1 March 2009 (UTC) The Helpful Bot 17:48, 1 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Battle of Dunkirk edit

There has recently been some conjecture as to how to describe the victory by the German forces. Can you or other members of the project group please assist in the discussion on the talk page. I intend to call for a consensus decision in order to establish the infobox statement regarding the outcome of the battle. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 12:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC).Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009) edit

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:41, 3 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election edit

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:21, 8 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Imperial Napoleonic triple crown edit

It gives me great joy to award this Imperial Napoleonic triple crown to Catalan for exceptional mainspace contributions to 5 pages in the area of WP:DYK, WP:GA, and WP:FC. Thank you very much for your generous time and diligence on behalf of the project. You are a Napoleon among editors. Yours, Cirt (talk) 20:18, 11 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your Imperial Napoleonic Majesty, outstanding work! Especially on Arena Active Protection System - I would recommend formatting the Notes subsection using {{Harvnb}}. Cirt (talk) 20:18, 11 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Could you please trim your entry at User:Durova/Triple crown winner's circle/Nominations to either 5 per DYK/GA/FC line, or make them so there they each have the same number per DYK/GA/FC throughout? In other words, if 11 DYKs, GAs, FCs, etc. Cirt (talk) 20:24, 11 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Since Jon is pretty much inactive at the moment and the nomination was done on his behalf, I have tried to fulfill your request. -MBK004 20:53, 11 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, but this is not what I meant. The request was not about having some kind of formatting spacing issue - but rather an uneven number of nom entries per DYK/GA/FC. In other words, do not submit 5 DYKs, 4 GAs, and 2 FCs. If it is a regular triple crown nom, submit one of each. If it is an Imperial, submit two of each. etc. Get it? Cirt (talk) 20:55, 11 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
I don't know where the uneven number of FC/GA/DYK is coming from, there are 12 for each type. -MBK004 21:03, 11 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
So there are. Sorry about that, my apologies. I'll go and update the main list now. Cirt (talk) 21:05, 11 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter edit

16:48, 15 March 2009 (UTC) The Helpful Bot 16:48, 15 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

NowCommons: File:Leoaprd 2E gun.jpg edit

File:Leoaprd 2E gun.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Rheinmetall 120 mm gun-Leoaprd 2E.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Rheinmetall 120 mm gun-Leoaprd 2E.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:54, 15 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Proctorvalleylake.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Proctorvalleylake.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:26, 14 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

With Thanks edit

The WikiProject Barnstar
For your leadership of The Military History WikiProject from September 2008–March 2009, please accept this WikiProject Barnstar. Cam (Chat) 00:46, 17 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Coordinators edit

There are currently 13 members with 20 or 20+, and it has been less than a week so far, that means there is one spot left. The turnout has been great. Have A Great Day! Lord R. T. Oliver The Olive Branch 21:16, 18 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Military history WikiProject coordinator election edit

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:24, 21 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter edit

21:27, 31 March 2009 (UTC)


Delivered for the WikiCup by  GARDEN  at 21:27, 31 March 2009 (UTC). Queries to my talk.Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009) edit

The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:08, 3 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

With thanks edit

The WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves
By the order of the coordinators of the Military history WikiProject, you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of your distinguished service as a coordinator of this project, your thorough article reviews, and your exemplary contributions to 14 featured articles, one featured topic, and many A-Class and good articles. For the coordinators, -MBK004 20:02, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XI edit

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 21:23, 5 April 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.Reply

Thank you edit

The Content Review Medal of Merit  

By order of the Military history WikiProject coordinators, for your devoted work on the WikiProject's Peer and A-Class reviews, I am delighted to award you this Content Review Medal.  Roger Davies talk 13:46, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XII edit

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 16:54, 13 April 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XIII edit

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 09:24, 20 April 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XIV edit

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 14:07, 26 April 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.Reply

File source problem with File:T-34(172sd) 2.jpg edit

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:T-34(172sd) 2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:00, 28 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shizhao (talk) 09:00, 28 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:AssaultonKharkov.jpg edit

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:AssaultonKharkov.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:08, 28 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shizhao (talk) 09:08, 28 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XV edit

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 08:24, 4 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009) edit

The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:38, 5 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:AssaultonKharkov.jpg edit

Hi Catalan
Do you by any chance remember where exactly you found File:AssaultonKharkov.jpg? I know that there was no free alternative at the time, but a short while later the Bundesarchiv released 100,000 images under a free license and uploaded them to us, and consequently I've switched your fair use image by one with a free license.
However, it's quite possible (probable even) that the image you've uploaded is available at commons as well, but I couldn't find it. If you remember the URL or image ID at the Bundesarchiv we might be able to locate it and switch it back (or add it as a second image).
Cheers, Amalthea 13:41, 7 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well, it's been deleted now, but if you do remember I'd be glad to restore it. Cheers, Amalthea 15:23, 18 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XVI edit

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 09:04, 18 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XVII edit

Delivered for the WikiCup by The Helpful Bot at 19:25, 23 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors leave at message here.Reply

POTD notification edit

POTD

Hi Jon,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:UStankParis-edit1.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on August 25, 2009. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2009-08-25. howcheng {chat} 08:19, 25 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup newsletter XVII.V edit

This is just a quick reminder that the round ends this Friday, May 29, 2009. I wanted to let you guys know the current standings. If you are very close, but not close enough, work as hard as possible these next two days. Pool leaders are listed as usual, and under the 10 wildcards, are competitors that are still fighting for a spot. Also, if you currently have any un-reviewed GAN's up and you'd like them to be reviewed and counted for this round, you must place them on the appropriate thread of the WikiCup talk page.

Pool A
  1. Wales Shoemaker's Holiday (647)
Pool B
  1. Colombia ThinkBlue (247)
Pool C
  1. Sweden Theleftorium (455)
Pool D
  1. Denmark Candlewicke (539)
Pool E
  1. Mexico Durova (479)
Pool F
  1. Switzerland Sasata (961)
Current Wildcards
  1. United States Useight (393)
  2. Iceland Scorpion0422 (372)
  3. Thailand Rlevse (329)
  4. Japan Wrestlinglover (307)
  5. Cambodia Paxse (285)
  6. Maryland Ottava Rima (248)
  7. Mitchazenia (226)
  8. Republic of Ireland Juliancolton (181)
  9. Michigan the_ed17 (179)
  10. Isle of Man J Milburn (168)
  11. Confederate States of America Bedford (156)
  12. Toronto Gary King (147)
  13. New South Wales 97198 (142)
  14. Luxembourg Ceranthor (111)
  15. India Tinucherian (106)
  16. Vanuatu Matthewedwards (98)

 GARDEN ,  iMatthew :  Chat  , and The Helpful One The Helpful Bot 00:45, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XVIII edit

Delivered for the WikiCup by The Helpful Bot at 14:06, 31 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors leave at message here.Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009) edit

The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:21, 4 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XIX and XX edit

Delivered by The Helpful Bot at 21:51, 13 June 2009 (UTC) for the WikiCup. To report errors, please leave a message on the talk page.Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XXI edit

Delivered by The Helpful Bot at 22:25, 22 June 2009 (UTC) for the WikiCup. To report errors, please leave a message on the talk page.Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XXII edit

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 21:41, 28 June 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XXIII edit

Delivered by –Juliancolton | Talk 16:22, 5 July 2009 (UTC).Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XXIV edit

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009) edit

The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:36, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup participates in the Wikipedia:The Great Wikipedia Dramaout edit

Hello all, iMatthew here. I just wanted to let you know about "The Great Wikipedia Dramaout" which starts this Saturday. The goal of the Dramaout is to spend five days working on improving articles and abstaining from any of Wikipedia's drama. I don't think that any of you will have a problem focusing on articles for five days, because of course, any work you get done during the Dramaout will count towards your score in the WikiCup. Details are on the page; hope to see you all signing up! :) iMatthew talk at 00:27, 17 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: your contest edit

Note: I've decided to add your contest page to Wikipedia:Contests if you don't mind me doing so. -- œ 02:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XXV edit

Delivered by JCbot (talk) 16:41, 18 July 2009 (UTC).Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XXVI edit

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 15:42, 26 July 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XXVII edit

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 21:40, 31 July 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009) edit

The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:01, 9 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

== WikiCup Newsletter XXVIII ==

Delivered by –Juliancolton | Talk at 15:42, 16 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

== WikiCup Newsletter XXVIII ==

Delivered by –Juliancolton | Talk at 15:43, 16 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election edit

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks,  Roger Davies talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XXX edit

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 19:21, 12 September 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009) edit

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:19, 13 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started! edit

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators,  Roger Davies talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XXXII edit

Looking for an adopter edit

Hi Jon!

I saw that 'Adopt' project, thought I would need it and your name was listed. I have about 30 articles done (mostly in French, but this one and this one in English) but now I'm trying to start a WikiProject and a Portal with it (the subject is Java, a language for computers) and I'd like some tips, especially on the administrative side of it (members, tasks, templates for it, toolserver bots, etc.). Thanks for any help,

AlainR345TechnoWikiGeek 04:13, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009) edit

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:17, 2 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Some recent comments about the "TAM" article edit

Hi Jon, so long since our last correspondence, wish you're doing well.
Just letting you know that I just left a couple of comments in the "Talk" page of the TAM tank wikiarticle, maybe you can help answering them?
Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 15:51, 3 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XXXIII edit

WikiCup Newsletter XXXIV edit

WikiCup Newsletter XXXV edit

WikiCup Newsletter XXXVI edit

WikiCup Awards edit

The 2009 WikiCup Participant Award
This WikiCup Award is presented to Catalan for their participation in the 2009 WikiCup. Your contributions along the way have greatly improved the quality of many articles, pictures, and sounds on the English Wikipedia.

Congratulations! Hope to see you sign up for the 2010 WikiCup, here, if you haven't already! iMatthew talk at 22:54, 3 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest! edit

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:55, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009) edit

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:55, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply