Welcome!

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date).

Latha is indeed the general name for "day." But is used more often in the names of festivals and holidays, at least in their current forms. See Am Faclair Beag. Beannachdan, - CorbieV 18:18, 22 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hungarian noun cases moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Hungarian noun cases, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 15:10, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Hungarian noun cases

edit
 

Hello, CarlosJalisco. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hungarian noun cases".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. SITH (talk) 21:46, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Re your edit from "Web site" to lowercase, "web site"

edit

Hi there CarlosJalisco (talk · contribs), re this edit you made to Wiki article called "Website" ... Why no edit summary or reasoning?? Do you have a ref/cite/source for decapitalizing?? Vid2vid (talk) 18:24, 17 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

@CarlosJalisco: - I am still interested (now approx 2mos later) in your reasoning. Kindly see above please. Thanks. From, Peter aka Vid2vid (talk) 21:19, 8 August 2019 (UTC).Reply

Please consider using edit summaries; thank you.

edit

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thank you very much for your cooperation!  
With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(guestbook) 18:36, 8 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Pdebee: - Bless you for this, Patrick!! And @CarlosJalisco: please heed. From, Peter aka Vid2vid (talk) 21:15, 8 August 2019 (UTC).Reply

August 2019

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Estonian language. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 10:42, 9 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

October 2019

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Welsh language shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -----Snowded TALK 19:58, 13 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

If you are also editing as 83.226.234.81 then you need to declare it -----Snowded TALK 20:05, 13 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please sign in when editing. IP 94.234.32.22 is also clearly you and editors who have an account are strongly encouraged not to use IP edits when editing. Sirfurboy (talk) 14:39, 14 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

January 2020

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 14:59, 17 January 2020 (UTC)Reply