Thank you for experimenting with the page Brendan Loy on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.Tony Fox (arf!) 22:40, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
I have removed your non-serious additions to Brendan Loy. Since the sum total of your edits to Wikipedia are 2 examples of blatant vandalism[1][2], a comment that could be construed as a personal attack[3], and your latest addition, which contained some decent edits along with contemptuous statements like "Mickey Kaus has refused to comment on whether his comment was facetious" and "uninformed journalists and blog visitors," I'll leave you with this: Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Scientizzle 18:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Your most recent edit to Brendan Loy was perfectly fine, but your previous edits were decidedly not. I reverted those comments that were simply not fit for an encyclopedia. Who do you think you are, adding statements like "Loy is wanted in no less than 4 jurisdictions for acts which common decency prevents mentioning in this forum. Suffice to say, it involves a lot of pizza, gallons of diet coke, and a monstrous hideous creature who is prone to wearing sweatsuits"[4]? It's difficult to take your contributions in good faith when your track record is simply low-grade to blatant vandalism of a single article and trite personal attacks. That you have some apparent beef with Brendan Loy is of no interest to me, but I will continue to revert any edits that I feel are vandalism on this and every other Wikipedia article. -- Scientizzle 19:56, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Please do not vandalize my talk page. -- Scientizzle 22:20, 15 December 2006 (UTC)