Joan Crawford as Venus de Milo edit

Accidentally came across a reference to this in a review in the TLS and immediately thought of you. Cheers, Choliamb (talk) 14:45, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Choliamb – what a fascinating article. It's hard to imagine a celebrity magazine today running such a feature! Their numbers are also just completely bizarre. I'd have to check Pasquier when I get home for the chest and hip measurements, but the supposed height of 5'4" for the Venus de Milo is just completely divorced from reality – she's fifteen inches taller than they claim. I also have no idea how they calculated her weight – clearly the actual marble statue does not weigh 135 lbs Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 12:33, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ha, I see that over the last couple of months that photo has worked its insidious magic on you, so much so that it finally made its way into the article. When I saw the edit summary on my watchlist, I knew without looking that "20th-century reception of the statue" must be code for Joan Crawford. Good edit! – Choliamb (talk) 23:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
It's just such a good image! (And most of the 20th Century artistic reception is still in copyright, so harder to justify using) Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 18:37, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Sappho: A New Translation edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sappho: A New Translation you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of UndercoverClassicist -- UndercoverClassicist (talk) 18:24, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Diocletian edit

Hi, sorry about my edits to the above. On reading the article, I noticed that there was a mix of Br & AM English. As the article uses dmy dates, I assumed that Br English was more correct and also it is not an American-related article. Again, sorry. Best Regards Denisarona (talk) 16:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Denisarona: no problem. In future it would be helpful to explain this in an edit summary - I couldn't work out from your edits what the point was. Looking again at the article, I've found and fixed a few Briticisms - did you notice any more? (Re DMY dates, as far as I can tell there is nothing in MOS:VARS which actually says that the date variety and the English variety should match, bizarrely, so as far as I can see it's totally legitimate to have AmEng spelling but DMY dates) Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 19:17, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Again, sorry for my mistake. With regard to the dmy dates, the alternative mdy dates is definitely American use and that is why I made the changes. In Europe, the normal use is dmy dates. Regards Denisarona (talk) 20:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Alcaeus edit

Do you think Alcaeus should redirect to Alcaeus of Mytilene with a hatnote? The other three (Alcaeus (comic poet), Alcaeus of Messene, Alcaeus and Philiscus) seem sparsely notable. Thinking about starting a move request Aza24 (talk) 19:53, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Aza24: I think that Alcaeus of Mytilene is the clear primary topic and should be at Alcaeus, with the disambiguation page at Alcaeus (disambiguation); failing that I would take Alcaeus as a redirect to Alcaeus of Mytilene.
I made a move request to this effect many years ago but it got no traction. I continue to think that my proposal there was correct: Alcaeus is clearly the common name for Alcaeus of Mytilene, and Alcaeus of Mytilene is clearly the primary topic for Alcaeus. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 21:49, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Indeed. Will ponder further... Aza24 (talk) 03:11, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your photos of Venus de Milo's hand and foot edit

Hi! Can you please add to the description of this your pictures[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Venus_de_Milo_(possibly_missing_parts)] the location. Are items in Louvre? Or other place? Permanent exhibition or temporary? What exactly the museum labels said? Thanks! --Shakko (talk) 11:12, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Shakko! They are permanently exhibited in the Louvre, in the room with the Venus de Milo – they've been there since the 2010 reinstallation of the Venus. I've added links on commons to the online catalogue entries on the Louvre's website for the objects. I'm afraid the computer which has the images of the museum labels on, if I took such photos (I normally do, but I might not have bothered as I was specifically looking to photograph these are I knew I would remember exactly what they were!) is currently in storage, so it's unlikely I'd be able to check what the labels say before June Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 09:11, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
thank you! the location is very important for the authenticity, off course. So it isnt' hypothesis or copy. Perfect. Didn't they show the piece of hand between shoulder and elbow, that is in this picture? I've seen the photo of this marble part long time ago, but can't find now. --Shakko (talk) 10:50, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes, there's a piece of arm on display – the catalogue entry for that is here. I didn't get a good photo of it unfortunately, but it's in the same case. I think it's actually only the lower part of the bicep, though – de Clarac's drawing shows the entire upper arm restored, but I don't think the fragment on display is big enough for that. Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 11:56, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notice edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. PenmanWarrior (talk) 18:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

March 2024 GAN backlog drive edit

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
 
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ngrams edit

N-grams for Horn Dance and Addobt Bromley Horn Dance, thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:50, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Signups open for The Core Contest 2024 edit

The Core Contest—Wikipedia's most exciting contest—returns again this year from April 15 to May 31. The goal: to improve vital or other core articles, with a focus on those in the worst state of disrepair. Editing can be done individually, but in the past groups have also successfully competed. There is £300 of prize money divided among editors who provide the "best additive encyclopedic value". Signups are open now. Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24. – Aza24 (talk) 02:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list.

Your GA nomination of Sappho: A New Translation edit

The article Sappho: A New Translation you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Sappho: A New Translation for comments about the article, and Talk:Sappho: A New Translation/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of UndercoverClassicist -- UndercoverClassicist (talk) 11:01, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply