BushidoBrown, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi BushidoBrown! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:02, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jam Master Jay, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Juvenile (rapper). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:40, 26 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Prodigy (rapper) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! - FlightTime (open channel) 11:54, 26 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Daz Dillinger. - FlightTime (open channel) 11:55, 26 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Juvenile (rapper). - FlightTime (open channel) 16:24, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

July 2017

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Game (rapper). - FlightTime (open channel) 21:28, 10 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please stop

edit

Please take a moment to read Template:Infobox musical artist. The birth place parameter follows "City, State/Province, Country". There is no need to write United States of America, because, as you can see by clicking on it, it redirects to United States. Please stop adding this. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:48, 10 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

July 2017

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Mobb Deep. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:50, 10 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 22:07, 10 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

July 2017

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to 300 Entertainment, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. NZ Footballs Conscience(talk) 00:20, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Neva Eva (Trillville song). Magnolia677 (talk) 22:58, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:20, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Notorious B.I.G.. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jennica / talk 08:10, 29 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Metta World Peace.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Jennica / talk 08:13, 29 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Third block

edit

I've blocked you from editing for 1 month, but quite frankly, I'm thinking about making it indefinite. Every single one of your edits seem to be about making changes that are incorrect, or making articles worse, and no amount of warnings or blocks is changing your actions. What are you doing? What exactly is your purpose and end-goal here on Wikipedia? Sergecross73 msg me 13:06, 29 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Okay, since your only response was profanity, your account has been indefinitely blocked, and you are no longer able to edit your talk page. Sergecross73 msg me 14:06, 29 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation

edit
 

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BushidoBrown, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

JesseRafe (talk) 13:20, 17 August 2018 (UTC)Reply