User talk:BrillLyle/Archives/ 8
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
For your fine contributions to the Rachel Owen page, I'm really sorry for the upset I caused over trivial matters. Theroadislong (talk) 15:28, 21 December 2016 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 22 December 2016
- Year in review: Looking back on 2016
- News and notes: Strategic planning update; English ArbCom election results
- Special report: German ArbCom implodes
- Featured content: The Christmas edition
- Technology report: Labs improvements impact 2016 Tool Labs survey results
- Traffic report: Post-election traffic blues
- Recent research: One study and several abstracts
BLT Living Room Salon
Hey there I'm doing a living room editathon tomorrow 3-7. I thought I'd create a meetup page for it just to keep track of our edits. Maybe if you have time tomorrow or this weekend you could look at whatever pages we create. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/Black_Lunch_Table/2016_Living_Room_Salon Thanks! --Heathart (talk) 23:45, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Upright parameter
Hi, BL. The upright= parameter is a scaling parameter. If no scaling multiplier is used, then the default scale is, I believe 70%.
A scaling factor of 1 would keep the image scaled to the thumbnail size set in user Preferences, assuming that the image is equal to or greater in size than the thumbnail size.
Out of the box, on enwiki, our thumbnails are set to 220px
So if you want an image to be 400px wide you would use a scaling factor of 400/220 which would be: upright=1.82
If you use the naked upright= parameter, the image size would be 220px wide times 70%, which would equal 154px
I hope this helps. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk}
07:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Desmin Borges
Looks like you can delete him from your to-do-list! Desmin Borges (and yes, I've been reading up on you ;) ) (Sacha Kay (talk) 10:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)) P.S. Found a new challenge for once Brandon Jenkins gets to be approved
- Hi @Sacha Kay: I think that Desmin Borges page is shamefully brief and could use some TLC, which is why it's on my huge To Do list. It's not always about the fact that someone already has a page, but is more about the fact that the page needs help.
- Ah ha! Unfortunately: I have a lot on my plate, and can only do a select number of rescues, usually related to editathons here in NYC -- or people really vocal about their pages on Twitter.
- I would encourage you, if you have time, to go through this great Wikipedia tutorial. It was the best thing I did when I started out and has all the nuts and bolts. Will support your future work as an editor by giving you a lot of the information you might need. Best, Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 19:50, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
- I'm really happy that you found the time to come to the rescue of Brandon Jenkins. I've learned a lot from what you did. And I hope I can come back here to ask questions from time to time, if needed. (Sacha Kay (talk) 20:20, 1 January 2017 (UTC))
- Thank you for the link to the tutorial! I'll most definitely look into it! :) (Sacha Kay (talk) 20:20, 1 January 2017 (UTC))
- @Sacha Kay: I'm so glad it was helpful. I have followed other people's edits and it has helped me as well.
- Please definitely reach out if you need help. I would recommend working on improving existing articles first while you build your skills. You are very enthusiastic but I don't want you to get discouraged. New articles are very difficult!
- Happy New Year to you too! -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 20:27, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
AfD Brandon Jenkins
I just wanted to say thank you for your comment on the article for deletion page of Brandon Jenkins. It's nice to see that there are people thinking like you, for I found the whole editing experience more or less hostile, so far. Looking forward to what kind of improvements you can show (and teach) me! (Sacha Kay (talk) 16:46, 29 December 2016 (UTC))
- @Sacha Kay: Thanks for the kind comments and notifications. Would it be possible to hold off editing the page while I work on it? I'm getting edit conflicts and am trying to do a major overhaul and improvement on the page, but need a bunch of time to do the scrub? Let me know -- Erika aka 18:34, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- You've already done such an amazing job on the page!!! Sorry for having caused edit conflicts. I saw you asked for a source/reference and thought to insert it right away, in all my enthusiasm. Never figured it would cause you any problems. I'll stay away from the page. Thank you so, so much for everything you're doing for the article. (Sacha Kay (talk) 19:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC))
- @Sacha Kay: Oh no, I don't want to discourage you from editing the page at all. And good for you for updating your user page! #yay -- just give me a couple hours to try and do a scrub and add citations. I want this to be a positive experience where you can channel your obvious -- and WELCOME -- enthusiasm onto Wikipedia. I want to help here, not stop you at all! -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 19:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Believe me, all you did was Encourage me. You've reinstalled my faith in humanity here on Wiki. :) You've truly worked magic on the Brandon Jenkins page. I would have >>never<< been able to make it like this. Question: how do I put a picture on his page? Does a picture automatically become "public domain"? Or is it possible to put up a picture here (with permission from Brandon Jenkins) without it becoming public domain? I really don't know how to thank you for all you've done for the article, by the way. (Sacha Kay (talk) 06:46, 30 December 2016 (UTC))
- @Sacha Kay: Oh no, I don't want to discourage you from editing the page at all. And good for you for updating your user page! #yay -- just give me a couple hours to try and do a scrub and add citations. I want this to be a positive experience where you can channel your obvious -- and WELCOME -- enthusiasm onto Wikipedia. I want to help here, not stop you at all! -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 19:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- You've already done such an amazing job on the page!!! Sorry for having caused edit conflicts. I saw you asked for a source/reference and thought to insert it right away, in all my enthusiasm. Never figured it would cause you any problems. I'll stay away from the page. Thank you so, so much for everything you're doing for the article. (Sacha Kay (talk) 19:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC))
Do you think that the "Sand Spring Line" (from his song Refinery Blues) is the same as this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sand_Springs_Railway ? You really don't stop amazing me, incredible, all the information you found on Brandon Jenkins!(Sacha Kay (talk) 07:45, 30 December 2016 (UTC))
The Article Rescue Barnstar | ||
Thank you so much for all you've done (for the Brandon Jenkins article) ánd taught me.
You're my hero. Sacha Kay (talk) 17:57, 3 January 2017 (UTC) |
Happy 2017!
Wishing good health and happiness as we start the new year! --Rosiestep (talk) 20:09, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Review page?
So the people who were at the living room meetup are slowly completing pages. There should be one on Kambui Olujimi up soon- I'm not sure how to review:monitor it like you do so when you have time would you take a peek at it? Right now it's in the girls sandbox but I just told her to move it over. Thanks! Hope your holidays were wonderful! --Heathart (talk) 14:57, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Heathart: Hey, if you can send me the link next time I would really appreciate it, will make things go a bit faster on my end.
- The review and/or monitoring I do is to fix the citations and build the page from there. Which sounds sort of simple and is inadequate I know. The pages -- because of notability and inherent bias (and I am not saying this is right in any way) -- need to be better than new pages usually need to be. It's completely unfair but that's the truth. Otherwise I think there could be significant backlash to your project and/or wide-spread deletions. Also, I would like to avoid the rescue process after the article goes up as it takes a ton of energy and time and effort that if the page was vetted more closely, could be avoided from the start.
- Specifically: There are too many self-focused citations on this page right now, not enough neutral third party citations. The citations are not full citations, either.
- Also, please tell folks NOT to paste copyrighted information from websites on pages, even in the sandbox or draft or user space areas. It's better to paste the link and make it a To Do list on the page so they can go through links as they build the page. No copyrighted or info of unclear origin that exists online can be on the encyclopedia, even in these "safe" spaces.
- I am also concerned that you are using your entry as an example, as it also needs help and is not fully vetted. I guess I will fix that too.
- The page I linked to above is not ready for the main space. It needs a lot of help so I will need to do some major work to get it in submittable shape. Also, I hope no one submits these for review, as they will definitely get deleted. I will do what I can but maybe we should meet or talk on the phone again as a way to empower you and arm you with more info.
- I want to help I do but I think you are not getting enough support in all of this terrific work you are doing. I don't want to be patronizing in any way, just want to empower you. As you know I am very impressed with what you are doing and love your low-key, practical, smart approach to things. I want to encourage and enable success here and I fear I haven't provided that support adequately. -- Best, Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 15:52, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Need an extra hand?
Hey BrillLyle! I noticed that you're organizing some NYC events focused on women journos on Wikipedia next month. I'm not in NYC but if you need help doing any on-wiki prep (pulling together lists of articles that could be improved, redlinks, how-tos for new editors, other!) I'd be delighted to pitch in--a lot of the articles I've created fit the bill, I've come across plenty more that could use attention as well, and I'd love to help in whatever way I can to encourage participation and collaboration on these! Let me know, no task too menial! Innisfree987 (talk) 03:20, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Innisfree987: Profuse apologies I didn't respond earlier. I just now saw this. Yes, would welcome remote participation 100%. As far as organizing the event and providing how to guidance for editors, the group sponsoring and organizing the event is working offline so not everything is migrated to the page just yet, and I think they are doing a great job. I am going to be doing the training for new editors with the support of the WM NYC-based contingent of WikiFacilitators, so I think the editor onboarding is probably covered. But please definitely be part of this editathon! You are more than welcome! And again, sorry I didn't respond earlier. -- Best, Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 18:36, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Sunday January 15: Wikipedia Day NYC Celebration and Mini-Conference
Sunday January 15: Wikipedia Day NYC 2017 | |
---|---|
You are invited to join us at Ace Hotel for Wikipedia Day NYC 2017, a Wikipedia celebration and mini-conference as part of the project's global 16th birthday festivities. In addition to the party, the event will be a participatory unconference, with plenary panels, lightning talks, and of course open space sessions. With special guests Katherine Maher of the Wikimedia Foundation and Tim Wu of Columbia Law School speaking on our Post-truth panel! Also featuring an International/Multilingual panel, a Documenting Activism panel, a Multimedia/Tech Panel, a Science panel, an Art panel, and more. And there will be cake. We also hope for the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects.
We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 14:57, 8 January 2017 (UTC) |
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can now use datasets on Commons. You can see an example that is using this source. [1]
- There is a new opt-in beta feature of a wikitext mode for the visual editor. You can try it out.
- When you update a page with translations on wikis with the Translate extension the existing translations will be marked as outdated instead of removed. [2]
- The new version of MediaWiki was released to all wikis last week (calendar).
- MoodBar has been removed from the Wikimedia wikis. [3]
- The
live
option for the Tipsy notice tool has been removed. Gadgets and user scripts which use it need to be updated. [4]
Problems
- Editors who use Firefox 50 might get logged out or fail to save their edits. This is because of a browser bug. Until this is fixed you can enter
about:config
in the address bar and setnetwork.cookie.maxPerHost
to 5000. Firefox 50 is the current version of the Firefox. [5]
Changes this week
- There is no new version of MediaWiki this week because of the Wikimedia Developer Summit.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
19:12, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: December 2016
|
Orphaned non-free image File:Witi.com logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Witi.com logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:10, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can now upload WebP files to Commons. [6]
Problems
- video2commons was down for two weeks. This was because of a problem with Commons video transcoders. It is now back up. [7]
Changes this week
- There is a new magic word called
{{PAGELANGUAGE}}
. It returns the language of the page you are at. This can be used on wikis with more than one language to make it easier for translators. [8] - When an admin blocks a user or deletes or protects a page they give a reason why. They can now get suggestions when they write. The suggestions will be based on the messages in the dropdown menu. [9]
- You will be able to use
<chem>
to write chemical formulas. Before you could use<ce>
.<ce>
should be replaced by<chem>
. [10] - You now can add exceptions for categories which shouldn't be shown on Special:UncategorizedCategories. The list is at MediaWiki:Uncategorized-categories-exceptionlist. [11]
- The "Columns" and "Rows" settings will be removed from the Editing tab in Preferences. If you wish to keep what the "Rows" setting did you can add this code to your personal CSS:
#wpTextbox1 { height: 50em; }
You can change the number50
to make it look like you want to. [12] - Sometimes edits in MediaWiki by mistake are shown coming from private IP addresses such as 127.0.0.1. Edits and other contributions logged to these IP addresses will be blocked and shown the reason from MediaWiki:Softblockrangesreason. This should not affect most users. Bots and other tools running on Wikimedia Labs, including Tool Labs will receive a "blocked" error if they try to edit without being logged in. [13]
- When you edit with the visual editor categories will be on the top of the page options menu. [14]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 17 January. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 18 January. It will be on all wikis from 19 January (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on January 17 at 20:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
23:24, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 January 2017
- From the editor: Next steps for the Signpost
- News and notes: Surge in RFA promotions—a sign of lasting change?
- In the media: Year-end roundups, Wikipedia's 16th birthday, and more
- Featured content: One year ends, and another begins
- Arbitration report: Concluding 2016 and covering 2017's first two cases
- Traffic report: Out with the old, in with the new
- Technology report: Tech present, past, and future
Books and Bytes - Issue 20
Books & Bytes
Issue 20, November-December 2016
by Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs), Samwalton9 (talk · contribs)
- Partner resource expansions
- New search tool for finding TWL resources
- #1lib1ref 2017
- Wikidata Visiting Scholar
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Get well soon
be well - miss you. Hannah Silverman (talk) 21:11, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Hannah Silverman: Thanks Hannah! Hope you had fun! Xo -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 05:42, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can see a list of the templates on a page you edit with the visual editor. [15]
Changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 24 January. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 25 January. It will be on all wikis from 26 January (calendar).
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
20:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Question for you!
How do I add discussion in front of the Reference, as you would in a footnote? for example as in this article, reference 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri-Louis_Duhamel_du_Monceau Thanks! Lregouby (talk) 20:54, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hi @Lregouby: I'm not 100% sure what you mean with your question. Can you give me more details? -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 04:32, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hi @Lregouby: I still need more specifics. I think you are trying to add content to the article on Henri-Louis Duhamel du Monceau, and want to add the content with an existing -- or possibly new -- citation/reference? Maybe if you did the self-guided introduction and went through the Tutorials, those would help?
- I will try to follow up your edit to the page you edited on Carolyn Wilson Harris and maybe this will illustrate what can be done?
- I would like to help but I am unsure what your specific question is, apologies. If you have specific content you want to add, and a specific citation, I could try to walk you through how to add that to a specific page, maybe? We could work on your sandbox and then when it seems clear, add the information to the page itself, maybe? -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 23:49, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hi @Lregouby: I still need more specifics. I think you are trying to add content to the article on Henri-Louis Duhamel du Monceau, and want to add the content with an existing -- or possibly new -- citation/reference? Maybe if you did the self-guided introduction and went through the Tutorials, those would help?
February 2017 at Women in Red
| |
---|---|
Black Women & Women Anthropologists online editathons |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Ipigott (talk) 14:34, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Changes this week
- ElectronPdfService will be enabled by default on Meta and German Wikipedia. This is a new way to get articles as PDF files you can download. It will come to more wikis later. [17]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from January 31. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from February 1. It will be on all wikis from February 2 (calendar).
Future changes
- The Community Tech team will develop more tools to handle harassment of Wikimedia editors. The goal is to give the communities better tools to find, report and evaluate harassment. They will also work on more effective blocking tools. [18][19]
- The Wikimedia technical community is doing a Developer Wishlist survey. Developers can propose ideas before 31 January 23:59 UTC. This is soon.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:45, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Regarding this. Policy (WP:NOT) states that we are not writing linkfarms, and that inclusion should be warranted. The guideline (WP:EL that is specifically for external links states that social networking sites are discouraged, ánd that we only include one external link to an official website of a subject. Here, the official website is linking prominently to facebook, twitter, etc. etc. The template instructions for Twitter reads that we should also not include the links if another official website is already linked, especially if that official website is linking to the twitter as well.
I agree that there are exceptions to this, e.g. for subjects who have a prominent official website, but who are very much known for, e.g. their twitter use. I do not see this as such a case.
You also state that twitter is prominent, but so is instagram, facebook, etc. etc. On that account, all of them should be included. Moreover, you state that in a general sense, which would mean that you suggest that we may not have consensus on our inclusion standards (WP:NOT/WP:EL etc.). If the latter is the case, then I suggest that a discussion is started to re-establish a consensus whether we should link to (all) social networking sites of a subject. --Dirk Beetstra T C 09:24, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Beetstra: Yeah, none of these WP:RULEZ or arguments will convince me this is correct. Especially given Twitter's current usage today. It is a valid and actually very important external link. Especially active accounts like the one I linked to. Twitter is a lot different than Facebook, etc. so that isn't a compelling argument either. So respectfully and vehemently disagree. -- BrillLyle (talk) 09:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- That is what I mean, I think you then disagree with the current consensus as written in our inclusion standards. --Dirk Beetstra T C 09:47, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Beetstra: As feedback, I guess I don't find it helpful or the best use of time for you to explain what I mean, when (a) I can clearly do this myself, and (b) I am stating what I am meaning to communicate, i think pretty clearly. What is the solution here, or the benefit of this discussion beyond WP:RULEZ? I disagree. Now what?
- The fact is I see the linking of Twitter in Wikidata regularly -- and it appears in many external link pages of highly public figures like the subject of the article in discussion. It is fact that Trump uses Twitter to set government policy and publish information that is taken as primary source material by press and public alike. This is the reality that I don't believe WP:RULEZ takes into account. I believe the current so-called consensus (on Wikipedia, sort of makes me smile, this) does not reflect current usage nor does it reflect a practical approach to common sense inclusion of valuable information for BLPs. I think the use of the Twitter link should of course be judicious, but if the account is notable and active -- and relevant to the BLP -- then it should be included. BrillLyle (talk) 11:01, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Beetstra: And now you've reverted my edit. I thought this was a discussion. I see this as very hostile, not maintaining good faith. Not sure why I should continue this discussion with you. This seems pointless. I'm very unhappy, and again as feedback, think maybe you might want to re-evaluate both the discussion and the actions you are taking here. BrillLyle (talk) 11:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- BrillLyle, you state that you don't agree with the rules, that is fine. However, that is how our consensus works. You can also invoke WP:IAR, but for that you do need good reason. If we, on every article, invoke WP:IAR then that is not ignoring rules anymore, then it means that the rules need to be changed.
- I know that it is there on WikiData regularly, and there it should be. WikiData's inclusion standards are different than en.wikipedia's inclusion standards. That it is inclusion standard on WikiData does not mean that the individual wikipedias, or en.wikipedia, have to use the data that is available. That is a local choice. At the moment, we strongly suggest against using this data, see WP:NOT/WP:EL/{{Twitter}} for usage of external links, social networks and twitter specifically.
- 'It appears on many external link pages of highly public figures' .. that is a Wikipedia:WHATABOUTX argument. It does not belong there either (barring the few exceptions, like Donald Trump (I think the quote was along the lines of 'every fourth Tweet of Donald makes world headlines')).
- Your last sentence says it all: "if the account is notable and active -- and relevant to the BLP -- then it should be included. ". If you can show me that the twitter use of Patricia Phelps de Cisneros is a significant part of what she is known for, then yes, it can be included. I do not believe that her Twitter use is significantly different from her Facebook use, her Instagram use,
- That re-evaluation has been done a couple of times in the last months, but you are free to re-start that thread. You are also free to see whether the current consensus to exclude social networking still stands. Some people have vehemently opposed my removals, others have strongly agreed with the removals as the inclusion was not in line with policy/guideline/general use in the first place (I have not seen significant discussion to convince the community to include the links). And on the thousands and thousands of removals I have performed, I see minimal resistance (less than 5 reasoned reverts/re-insertion), and regular thanks (including for the specific removal in question).
- Regarding discussion - per WP:EL, we are discussing the inclusion, not the removal. --Dirk Beetstra T C 12:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Beetstra: And now you've reverted my edit. I thought this was a discussion. I see this as very hostile, not maintaining good faith. Not sure why I should continue this discussion with you. This seems pointless. I'm very unhappy, and again as feedback, think maybe you might want to re-evaluate both the discussion and the actions you are taking here. BrillLyle (talk) 11:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 February 2017
- Arbitration report: WMF Legal and ArbCom weigh in on tension between disclosure requirements and user privacy
- WikiProject report: For the birds!
- Technology report: Better PDFs, backup plans, and birthday wishes
- Traffic report: Cool It Now
- Featured content: Three weeks dominated by articles
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- The block log sometimes showed blocks as being much longer than they were. This has now been fixed. [20]
Changes this week
- Wikimedia pages will now be better at showing pictures when you share them on social media. The descriptions will be different too. You can see an example of before and after. [21]
- There are some changes to the OOjs UI. Some old functions will not work anymore or not work as they used to. This could be a breaking change. [22]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 7 February. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 8 February. It will be on all wikis from 9 February (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 7 February at 20:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- Tidy will be replaced later this year. Instead, the HTML 5 parsing algorithm will be used to clean up bad HTML in wikitext. This will cause problems on a number of wikis. They need to be fixed first. You can see if your wiki still has something to fix here for one of the HTML problems. This list does not cover all problems. You can read about more problems. [23][24]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
19:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: January 2017
|
Wednesday February 15, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC | |
---|---|
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop at Babycastles gallery by 14th Street / Union Square in Manhattan. Featuring special guest presentations on WikiProject La Guardia and Wagner Archives, WikiProject Metropolitan Museum of Art, Wiki Loves the Dominican Republic, and more. We will include a look at the organization and planning for our chapter, and expanding volunteer roles for both regular Wikipedia editors and new participants. We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming edit-a-thons, and other outreach activities. We welcome the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from all educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects. After the main meeting, pizza/chicken/vegetables and refreshments and video games in the gallery!
We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 22:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC) P.S. Get ready now for Black WikiHistory Month Weekend:
|
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- EventStreams is a new way to show activity on Wikimedia wikis. For now it works with the recent changes feed. It will do more things later. It will replace RCStream. Tools that use RCStream should move to EventStreams before 7 July. [25]
Problems
- The Firefox add-on Firefogg can cause problems with the Upload Wizard. This will not be fixed, because Firefox will not support Firefogg in the future. The Upload Wizard will no longer work with Firefogg. [26]
- Tool Labs and Wikimedia Labs databases will be under maintenance on 15 February. This will start at 17:00 (UTC) and last for about six hours. Some tools could have problems during or after this. [27]
Changes this week
- The TwoColConflict extension is a new way to solve edit conflicts. It makes it easier to copy and paste the relevant text to the text field. It will come to Meta and German Wikipedia this week. It is already available on MediaWiki.org. It will come to more wikis later. [28]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 14 February. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 15 February. It will be on all wikis from 16 February (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 14 February at 20:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- Page Previews will be turned on for logged-out users on the Catalan, Greek, Russian, and Italian Wikipedias in the middle of February. Page Previews shows readers a short part of a linked article when they rest their mouse pointer on the link. This is to help them understand what it is about without leaving the article they are reading. Page Previews used to be called Hovercards. It will come to more wikis later this spring. [29]
- The Developer Wishlist is a list where developers prioritize tools they need. The voting closes at 14 February 23:59 (UTC). This process is only for developers.
Review
- You can read the 2016 product summary from the Wikimedia Foundation Product group to see what they did with things they said they would work on in the annual plan.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:06, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Ernie Chambers intertitle.png
Thanks for uploading File:Ernie Chambers intertitle.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:12, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Artsy
Hello, I'm Smjg. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Artsy have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Smjg (talk) 20:45, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Smjg: -- This wasn't vandalism on my part. I know I didn't set it up correctly but it seems like Artsy should be a disambiguation page. Because there's no way to link Artsy to the Artsy (website) link -- and there should be, correct? Sorry I don't do disambiguation pages often. -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 20:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hmm. Thinking about it now, I think the best plan would be to redirect Artsy straight to Artsy (website), since this seems to me what people would usually be looking for when they search for "Artsy".
- But more generally:
- If an article currently redirects somewhere else, you can use {{Redirect}} on the page that it redirects to. In this instance, a suitable one would be
{{Redirect|Artsy|the website|Artsy (website)}}
. - If there's a case to turn a redirect into a disambiguation page, it would be better to rewrite it from scratch as one, rather than to try to add links to the existing redirect page.
- If an article currently redirects somewhere else, you can use {{Redirect}} on the page that it redirects to. In this instance, a suitable one would be
- — Smjg (talk) 21:14, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The edit summary box is now a little bit bigger. This is to make it follow the Wikimedia design guide. [30]
Changes this week
- Page Previews will be updated on 23 February. This fixes many bugs. Page Previews can be turned on as the Beta Feature called Hovercards. [31]
- There has been a problem where the CSS of gadgets has been loading twice. The Gadgets extension has two new options:
type
andpeers
. Thetype
option solves this problem. You can usepeers
to create gadgets with more than one style module. Read more about type and peers. [32] - OAuth will handle blocked users in a more consistent way. [33]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 21 February. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 22 February. It will be on all wikis from 23 February (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 21 February at 20:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
19:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- On 22 February the wikipedia.org portal did not work for an hour. This was because of a problem with a JavaScript file. [34]
Changes this week
- You will be able to use
<chem>
to write chemical formulas in the visual editor. Previously this only worked in the wikitext editor. [35] - The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 28 February. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 1 March. It will be on all wikis from 2 March (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 28 February at 20:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- You can soon upload 3D files to Commons. The file formats are AMF and STL. The plan is for this to work later this week but it could be later. [36]
- The name "Wikipedia" will be more obvious at the top of the page when you read Wikipedia in the mobile view. This is because many readers don't realize they are on Wikipedia. [37][38]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
19:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 February 2017
- From the editors: Results from our poll on subscription and delivery, and a new RSS feed
- Recent research: Special issue: Wikipedia in education
- Technology report: Responsive content on desktop; Offline content in Android app
- In the media: The Daily Mail does not run Wikipedia
- Gallery: A Met montage
- Special report: Peer review – a history and call for reviewers
- Op-ed: Wikipedia has cancer
- Featured content: The dominance of articles continues
- Traffic report: Love, football, and politics
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can now search on English, French, Hebrew and Greek wikis and find words even if you forget the diacritics. It also works if you use diacritics in your search but the wiki doesn't. [39]
- When you use the mobile view and click on a link to an article in another language you will see that article in the mobile view. Previously it changed to the desktop view. [40]
Problems
- Some watchlist gadgets didn't work for a period of time last week. This has now been fixed. [41]
- Admins who click on "mass delete" on a user's Special:Contributions will be taken directly to a list pages created by that user. It has worked like this before, but not lately. [42]
Changes this week
- The way you switch between wikitext and the visual editors in the desktop view has changed. It is now a drop-down menu. This is the same as in the mobile view. [43]
- The "flag the edit in the abuse log" checkbox will be removed from the abuse filter interface. This is because the edits are always flagged in the abuse log. [44]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 7 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 8 March. It will be on all wikis from 9 March (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 7 March at 20:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Clarification
- The 2017/09 issue of Tech News mentioned 3D file formats you can soon upload to Commons. The AMF format will be available later.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
23:23, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
March 11: Art+Feminism Edit-a-thon @ MoMA (and beyond!)
Saturday March 11: Art+Feminism Edit-a-thon @ MoMA | |
---|---|
Join us at the Dorothy and Lewis B. Cullman Education and Research Building at the Museum of Modern Art, 4 West 54th Street, on Saturday, March 11, 2017 from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. for an all-day communal updating of Wikipedia entries on subjects related to art and feminism. There will be childcare, snacks, multiple trainings and panel discussions. People of all gender identities and expressions welcomed and encouraged to attend. This year’s edit-a-thon kicks off at 10:00 a.m. with a conversation about information activism with writer Joanne McNeil and Data & Society Research Institute Fellow Zara Rahman, moderated by Kimberly Drew, the social media manager for the Metropolitan Museum of Art, creator of the Tumblr “Black Contemporary Art,” and the person behind @museummammy on Instagram. Afternoon breakout groups will engage in focused discussions about related issues, including intersectionality and librarianship, power structures in notability guidelines on Wikipedia, and radical archives. --Pharos (talk) 18:46, 7 March 2017 (UTC) And a broader calendar of events on the theme this week/weekend, and the next:
|
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
This Month in GLAM: February 2017
|
Disambiguation link notification for March 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anonymous Was A Woman Award, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Catherine Murphy and Terry Evans. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
hey sandbox
thanks for helping again. i moved Gia M. Hamiltons page live as you saw, but i think i did something wrong? It seems like all my sandbox history went with it and my sandbox is spanking clean with no history. yikes. any clues?--Heathart (talk) 01:09, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Heathart: -- Sorry for the delayed response. Hellacious weekend and this week is very busy too. I think what you describe here, this is why I prefer not to use sandboxes, instead prefer to create a subpage on your personal namespace -- something like User:Heathart/Gia M. Hamilton instead. That way the history of that sub page on your namespace can move seamlessly and the history of your sandbox can just be on your sandbox. Sorry, not sure if this is clear. I use my sandbox only to play with information -- I don't use it as a space to build pages for this reason. It's more of why Art+Feminism recommending using the sandbox for this purpose I think is terrible advice. I'm sure others in the Wikipedia community subscribe to using the sandbox this way. But from this practical and functional standpoint -- and the concern you have about losing your page history when you move the page -- that's why. Ping me off Wiki if you want more info, etc. -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 10:50, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Heathart: I'm among those who suggest that newbies start an article in sandbox on the theory that moving it with its edit history makes the history conveniently available to strangers. This of course is also the theory that the additional complication for the originator is less important. Naturally we old-timers will choose methods that suit us. Making a new article is rare for me, so the question doesn't arise. Jim.henderson (talk) 18:41, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Jim.henderson: I use my Sandbox as a testing place but that's probably not its actual purpose so I am definitely limited to this approach. I think maybe the unexpected move of the history was more of the issue than the location of where the work happened. If you don't want the history moved another subpage might be helpful. There's no way to restore the history, right, Jim? -- Best, Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 18:14, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- I figure the Sandbox, being the most easily accessed subpage, is to be taught to new editors. The use of other subpages is a more advanced lesson, to be omitted from a one-day session that must cover more vital details. No, I don't know of a way to duplicate an article history. On the other hand, newbies don't have the page mover right, so unless they call for service by us old-timers, they must cut and paste anyway, leaving the history behind. When an article is created by page move, or whatever method, the editor might want to put it on a userpage list of created articles, analogous to my list of created commonscats for ready access. Jim.henderson (talk) 22:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- ah, ok @Jim.henderson: @BrillLyle:... understood. So I guess my question is this... I know its bad for newbies to create new pages. But if they're stubborn about it and they attend an all day workshop where I'm by their side and I think they have a good article... they will maybe need to do the sandbox and forego their history... or create a subuser page... but how do they eventually earn that "move" button?? Thanks for the help! Wish me luck this weekend! I've pinged all the wikipedians I can find in the area but not many are available... would love to get more bodies here!--Heathart (talk) 00:06, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Jim.henderson: Ah, I am learning from you Jim! Thank you for this explanation. That makes it make more sense if that makes any sense.... Xo -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 11:42, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- It does my heart good to see that you followed my suggestion and made your list of article originations, @Heathart:. I had forgotten that the Wikipedia:Page mover right is a fairly rare one, with only 120 of us who are not Admins; fewer than have the Wikipedia:Account creator right. There ought to be more; almost any coach should be ready to do it. As for my attending your Saturday session, it depends on how quickly I recover from yesterday's indisposition. I am stronger this evening and hope to reach my usual old-fogie physical and mental powers by then. Jim.henderson (talk) 00:44, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Jim.henderson: Saturday is in Toronto, so if you feel like joining remotely, I welcome you. Otherwise I'll be back soon. :) --Heathart (talk) 20:43, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes this week
- You will be able to show references from
<references />
tags in more than one column on your wiki. This is the list of footnotes for the sources in the article. How many columns you see will depend on how big your screen is. On some wikis, some templates already do this. Templates that use<references />
tags will need to be updated, and then later the change can happen for all reference lists. [45][46] - The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 14 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 15 March. It will be on all wikis from 16 March (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 14 March at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- Some old web browsers will not be able to use JavaScript on Wikimedia wikis in the future. If you have an old web browser on your computer you can upgrade to a newer version. [47]
- CSS in templates will be stored in a separate page in the future. [48][49]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:26, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello!
Blacklunchtable (talk) has given you a fresh pie! Pies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a piping hot pie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appetit!
I am so thankful for your help I am handing you a pie of thanks!
Spread the tastiness of pies by adding {{subst:GivePie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Blacklunchtable (talk) 14:44, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Sorry
I am sorry my comment on the deletion discussion for Alice Cling came off as combative. That was not my intent. I have not been banned from nominating articles for deletion. I would encourage you to understand restrictions before making claims on what they are. I am allow to nominate one article for deletion per day, and that does not cover speedy deletions or prod deletions. I really don't want to antagonize people, but I know for a fact that Wikipedia does not have enough editors to keep up 800,000+ articles on living people.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:04, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The
Save page
button now saysPublish page
orPublish changes
on the Wikimedia wikis except for Wikipedias and Wikinewses. This change will come to Wikipedias later. The point is to make it more clear that the edit will change the page immediately.Publish page
is when you save a new page andPublish changes
when you edit an existing page. [50] - DMOZ no longer works. Templates that use DMOZ can be redirected to archive.org or another mirror. DMOZ has been removed from the RelatedSites extension on Wikivoyage. [51]
- You can see monthly page views when you click on
Page information
in the sidebar. Developers can also get monthly page views through the API. [52] - The Linter extension is now on smaller Wikimedia wikis. It helps editors find some wikitext errors so they can be fixed. It will come to other Wikimedia wikis later. The extension will be able to find more errors later. [53]
- The MediaWiki-Vagrant portable development environment has been updated to use Debian Jessie. This means local development and testing will be more like on the majority of Wikimedia production servers. [54]
Problems
- On 15 March some interwiki links to other languages were not correctly sorted. This has been fixed. If you still see pages where the interwiki links are not sorted as they should be, they should be fixed automatically with time or you can edit the page and save it without changing anything. If this doesn't work, please report it. [55]
Changes this week
- When you edit with the visual editor, you will be able to switch the direction you write in from right-to-left to left-to-right as you are editing. This is especially important for editors who edit in languages that write from right to left. You can do this with a tool in the editing menu. You can also use the keyboard shortcut
Ctrl
+Shift
+X
on PCs orCmd
+Shift
+X
on Macs. [56] - The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 21 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 22 March. It will be on all wikis from 23 March (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 21 March at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
22:03, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- When you edit with the visual editor, you can see a visual diff as well as a wikitext diff when you review your changes. [57]
Problems
- Special:AllPages was disabled for two days due to some performance issues. It is back, but the filter for redirects is gone as the cause of the performance problem. It still needs to be fixed. [58][59]
Changes this week
- New filters for Recent changes will be released on Portuguese and Polish Wikipedias and MediaWikiwiki on March 28. Other wikis will get it progressively. The new filters include filtering, highlighting and, on certain wikis, user intent prediction.
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from March 28. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from March 29. It will be on all wikis from March 30 (calendar).
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
14:47, 27 March 2017 (UTC)