Frederick W. True edit

I've made some changes on this article you started, but because I have no knowledge in this area, I'd appreciate it if you could make sure the sources and facts I'm using are appropriate. Thanks i kan reed (talk) 20:16, 5 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Joseph Edgar edit

*sigh*

Face, meet palm. Sorry - I'm so unused to editing articles on Canadian political figures that I just slid into automatic mode. Consider me well and truly smacked with the wet Wiki-noodle. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 20:26, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Whoops, too late, sorry. :-) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 20:54, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

A cheeseburger for you! edit

  Thanks for starting the Thomas Aston Blakelock article. Awesome! Whpq (talk) 13:43, 10 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Harold James Kirby edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Harold James Kirby, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/members/members_all_detail.do?locale=en&ID=1377.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:34, 11 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Problem reported to bot wrangler. --Big_iron (talk) 11:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Joseph Hunter edit

Thanks for writing an article on Joseph Hunter, then linking it from several articles on Wells Gray Park where I have mentioned his surveying work. When writing a book on the park, I never researched Hunter's work or life outside his railway surveys through the future park. Your info is really interesting and I would like to include it in the next book edition, whenever that is.Roland Neave (talk) 05:01, 22 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Survey for new page patrollers edit

 

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello Big iron/archive 4! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:39, 25 October 2011 (UTC).Reply

George Alexander Walkem edit

Hello Big iron, I'm posting this message on your talk page because I noticed that you've recently created the new article George Alexander Walkem--The layout of the article makes it very clear. It's nice to see you editing!Amy Z (talk) 19:09, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Marie Geddes edit

 

The article Marie Geddes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references or evidence of notability, other than one event.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PKT(alk) 19:44, 20 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification edit

Hi. In George Churchill Moxham, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Halifax, Nova Scotia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:59, 14 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

I agree with you - Halifax is a disambiguation mess. I've had to disambiguate links to Halifax, Nova Scotia before and had similar confusion. I would start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board (Wikipedia:WikiProject Nova Scotia doesn't appear to be especially active). Also, you could ask at WP:DPL, but you wouldn't have any guarantees of Canada-related expertise. --JaGatalk 16:10, 15 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Template:DictCanbio edit

I have been altering template:Canadabio. As Template:DictCanbio called {{Canadabio}} with two parameters the same as those set in {{Canadabio}} rather than expand the interface to handle the two new parameters I have simply redirected the template as its stated difference of starting with a bullet point was removed back in October 2010. If you do not agree then reverse the edit to Template:DictCanbio and please drop me a line on my talk page so we can discuss it further. -- PBS (talk) 06:03, 8 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yellow-breasted chat edit

I am the author of the article about Dolichonyx oryzivorus in the Spanish Wikipedia and I found a paper that said that the bobolink, an icterid, is closely related to the yellow-breasted chat. When I wrote that in the article’s taxonomy section, it aroused some controversy due to the fact that the yellow-breasted chat was originally classified as a parulid. Then I resorted to the article in English about this bird to learn more about its taxonomy and it suggested that its classification as a parulid is obsolete. I saw in the history page of that bird’s article that you’d made several contributions to it and I was wondering if knew anything about its current classification. Have you heard or read anything about its phylogenetic links with Icteridae? If you happen to know any free-access paper available in the internet about this matter, I’d appreciate you let mi know in my talk. Thank you! --Pablo.ea.92 (talk) 10:43, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Dead link in article 'John Cawthra' edit

Hi. I tried to fix the dead links in 'John Cawthra', but there was one that I couldn't fix. I marked it with {{Dead link}}. Can you help fix the last dead link?


Dead: http://www.newmarket.ca/userfiles/HTML/nts_1_347_1.html

  • You added this in February 2009.
  • I tried to load this link on 20 March, 22 March, 24 March and today, but it never worked.
  • I looked in The Wayback Machine and WebCite but I couldn't find a suitable replacement.

Please take a look at that article and fix what you can. Thank you!


PS- you can opt-out of these notifications by adding {{Bots |deny=BlevintronBot}} to your user page or user talk page. BlevintronBot (talk) 04:01, 7 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Fixed. --Big_iron (talk) 10:57, 7 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sources for James Lyons Biggar and relatives edit

I'm currently engaged in a discussion about some details of the early Biggars in Canada at User talk:Michael Biggar, related to an article draft on Robert Biggar. According to Michael, Robert Biggar was the father of Charles Biggar, born in Bath, New York, in 1797. Charles would presumably be James Lyons Biggar's father; you wrote in the article on James Lyons that his father's family came from the town of Biggar in Scotland, but you gave no reference. On the other hand, there is a History of Brant County which says on p. 186 that Robert Biggar's son James was born in Biggar, Scotland, in 1803 and came to Canada with his father in 1806. I cannot see how we can reconcile Charles Biggar's birth in New York with James Biggar's birth in Scotland, unless there are two different persons named Robert Biggar. Can you help us? Where did you get the information about James Lyons' ancestors from? Huon (talk) 17:20, 28 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your quick and thorough reply! I must have been pretty blind to miss that reference. Huon (talk) 22:01, 28 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

"The" Ukraine in 1944 MLA biographies edit

This is a small pet peeve of mine.|-( Please see Name of Ukraine#Syntax, _especially_ the reference notes.

Anyway, using "Ukrainian Canadian" when referring to their immigrant parent's generation is better, IMHO.:-)

Cheers – Jwkozak91 (talk) 06:30, 1 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Actually on second thought, using this -> [[Ukrainian Canadian#Settlement – First wave (1891–1914)|Ukrainian immigrants]] <- would be better. – Jwkozak91 (talk) 10:12, 1 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Isaac Campbell edit

Hello, Big iron, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Isaac Campbell, appears to be directly copied from http://www.mhs.mb.ca/docs/people/campbell_i.shtml. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Isaac Campbell if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 11:30, 19 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Tag removed - comments left on talk page for article. --Big_iron (talk) 12:21, 19 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Perez Benjamin for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Perez Benjamin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perez Benjamin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MM (Report findings) (Past espionage) 09:47, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

User withdrew nomination. --Big_iron (talk) 22:11, 4 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Page Move edit

I just moved Blackshades Remote Admin Tool to Blackshades, per WP:COMMONNAME. The qualifier is what disambiguation pages are for. If there is a need for such, please make such. I don't wish to start a move war, so if you do want to move it back, please go to the talk page and make a case, I will respond. If needed, an RfC can be started. Thank you. Tutelary (talk) 23:40, 20 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Percy Klaehn edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Percy Klaehn, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.saskatoon.ca/DEPARTMENTS/Infrastructure%20Services/Parks/Woodlawn%20Cemetery/Documents/klaehn.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:04, 20 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Did you knowDYK comment symbol edit

Russel Wilson (mayor) has been nominated for Did You Know edit

Herbert S. Sears has been nominated for Did You Know edit

Ruth Budd has been nominated for Did You Know edit

Frederick E. Harrison has been nominated for Did You Know edit

DYK for Percy Klaehn edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 27 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Frederick E. Harrison edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:05, 27 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Herbert S. Sears edit

Gatoclass (talk) 16:03, 29 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Saskatchewan edit

 

Plip!

Saskatchewan is a province, not a city. Saskatoon is a city. "City of Saskatchewan" is not real. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Missing Canadian politicians edit

Many thanks for creating the articles. I myself wanted to create these articles and nominate them for DYK. If you are able to create articles larger than 1500 characters and avoid copyvios I will nominate it for DYK provided it has some interesting fact in it. As you can see above, I have nominated several of your recent creations. The Russell Wilson article was to be featured on the Main Page today but it was pulled from the prep area because of copyvio concerns. Please avoid close paraphrasing and there won't be any problem in getting the articles to the Main Page.--Skr15081997 (talk) 14:10, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for John L. Beckwith edit

Gatoclass (talk) 02:27, 3 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for John W. Hair edit

Gatoclass (talk) 04:11, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Robert Conroy (mayor) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Conroy (mayor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Conroy (mayor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 04:32, 7 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Ruth Budd edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:08, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for William Kuinka edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:09, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Dirk Keetbaas edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:09, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ian Rusted edit

Hello Big iron,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ian Rusted for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Shiprabaxi1112 (talk) 12:49, 18 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion was speedily removed by an admin. --Big_iron (talk) 13:23, 18 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Copyright verification on IIFL Private Wealth edit

The content has no copyright infringement. India Infoline is the parent group of IIFL Private Wealth. The content provided for the article is by the group itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shiprabaxi1112 (talkcontribs) 05:00, 21 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

That is not the problem. The problem is that neither of those groups have given Wikipedia permission to use that material. --Big_iron (talk) 11:12, 21 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nathan Lloyd Smith edit

 

The article Nathan Lloyd Smith has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:SOLDIER, also WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Should be adequately covered by the article on the friendly fire incident.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 00:10, 24 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Nathan Lloyd Smith for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nathan Lloyd Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Lloyd Smith (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 01:03, 24 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Russell Wilson (politician) edit

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:27, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 12:04, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Robert Pow edit

  Hello! Your submission of Robert Pow at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Edwardx (talk) 09:51, 13 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Robert Pow edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:49, 20 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Red Maple Leaf Award edit

 
The Red Maple Leaf Award

This award is being given to you in recognition of your hard work in Canada related articles.--Skr15081997 (talk) 15:59, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Prix Victor-Rossel edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Prix Victor-Rossel, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.comoria.com/16182/Prix_Victor_Rossel.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:12, 19 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Left note on article talk page. --Big_iron (talk) 13:40, 19 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

15th General Assembly of Newfoundland edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of 15th General Assembly of Newfoundland, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: 14th General Assembly of Newfoundland. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:36, 14 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Removed tag; left note on talk page. --Big_iron (talk) 23:43, 14 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Mary Wollstonecraft Award edit

  Mary Wollstonecraft Award
The Mary Wollstonecraft Award is awarded to contributors who have helped improve the coverage of women writers and their work on Wikipedia through content contributions, outreach, community changes and related actions. In particular, thank you for your efforts with the WikiProject Women writers start-up; your ideas and contributions are much appreciated. --Rosiestep (talk) 23:30, 29 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Marsh shrew has been nominated for Did You Know edit

DYK for Marsh shrew edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:02, 30 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Deletion edit

Bess Gall (talk) 13:56, 28 January 2015 (UTC)Hello Big Iron,Reply

You have created a page here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sandrine_Bessora_Nan_Nguema&redirect=no and redirect it to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bessora&redirect=no.

The page you created has a title that is not a commonly used name in support of recognizability (WP:COMMONNAME). Among other reasons, it is also not linked with the notoriety of the subject. Could you therefore suppress this page, please

Regards

Replied on users's talk page. --Big_iron (talk) 15:35, 28 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your answer.
Still, the article may not reasonably be searched for or linked to under two or more names : the name you produce is not widely sourced.
By creating this page, you may induce creations of sources(post).
And according to Wikipedia's policies, "full names and dates of birth are included when widely published by reliable sources, or by sources linked to the subject such that it may reasonably be inferred that the subject does not object". In this case, there are no widely published sources about a full name. Furthermore, the author, that publish exclusively under pseudonym, objects to the publication of any full name : it is not of public concern, nor related to its notability.

//So please remove this page as it could be an intrusion of privacy. Regards.Bess Gall (talk) 13:50, 29 January 2015 (UTC)Reply


Hello Big Iron

These "hundreds of results" of the google search very rarely concern a writer. It is not because you find a full name that it means that it is related to the topic.

We have too little serious and reliable sources that meet our criteria on the quality of the sources, which would show that this writer legal name would be the first and last name listed as the title of the page you created and in the article itself : no legal or full name related to this writer has been widely published by reliable sources.

Moreover, this writer is also sometimes referred as “Rosie Parks” and “Sandrine Bessora”. You find this contradiction in the source you produced in the article: "In their novels “Garçon Manqué” (2000) and “53cm” 1999, Nina Bouraoui and Sandrine Bessora, respectively…".(p.99)

Furthermore, this source is not "Directly related to the topic".

Add to this that it is the only source in google books referring to Bessora as having the full name you mentioned.

This may be insufficient, regarding Wikipedia rules.

These are other reasons, added to presumption in favor of privacy, to remove the page, the redirect and the mention of this name. Regards. Dabbeydabbey (talk) 09:09, 30 January 2015 (UTC)Reply


Hello again, Big Iron.
Thank you for the message in my talk page about "one editor, one account". By the way, even if we share the same point of view, we :are two people (so two accounts).Still, if it violates the rules, I'm sorry, it wasn't the intention. Regards.Dabbeydabbey (talk) 11:47, 1 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
Replied on user's talk page. --Big_iron (talk) 21:25, 1 February 2015 (UTC)Reply


Saw your message,thanks, I'm glad we're ok then. Concerning the redirect, I will suggest a deletion on the appropriate page. This is in no way a personal attack : I have no doubt that you have created this redirect with the best intentions. But I hope you understand there are reasons behind this opposition. Regards. Dabbeydabbey (talk) 10:15, 3 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sandrine Bessora Nan Nguema listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sandrine Bessora Nan Nguema. Since you had some involvement with the Sandrine Bessora Nan Nguema redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Dabbeydabbey (talk) 10:57, 3 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Where did you find data for early Manitoba elections? edit

Hi there, I am trying to identify the source for the district level data for early Manitoba elections. The Elections Manitoba website includes PDFs of early results, but it only records the names of the winning candidates. How did you find the full set of data? If you could contact me or leave a note here, that would be great. If you can help me out, please email me at CED at ucalgary.ca. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.146.212.207 (talk) 21:04, 6 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

One source of election data is the Canadian Parliamentary Guide - a few very older versions are online foe example here but many libraries will have a set of these in paper format. If you have online access to newspaper archives for one of the Winnipeg daily newspapers, you should also be able to find election results there. --Big_iron (talk) 05:19, 7 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

Nomination of Julia Gjika for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julia Gjika is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Gjika until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 10:31, 23 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Been working on saving her for a couple of days. Think I have fleshed her out sufficiently. Could use a keep vote if you believe in the article. SusunW (talk) 06:23, 27 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Article Creation? edit

I came back from my multi-month Wikipedia break to find that someone put a huge dent in my Articles To-Create list at User:Dkriegls/Biography to-do list. I was excited to learn that someone was you! Thanks for all the hard work. I've been slowly whittling that list of female writers down over that past few years, but you did about as much work as all my other work combined (if not more). I'm curious, were you working off names from my list, or is it just a coincidence? --Dkriegls (talk to me!) 04:30, 25 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

I have been picking up names from Wikipedia:WikiProject Women writers/Missing articles which probably overlaps your list.--Big_iron (talk) 12:03, 25 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Awesome! I had posted a link to that user group last year and it looks like User:Dr. Blofeld took that list and imported it further. Interesting to track down the path projects take. --Dkriegls (talk to me!) 23:03, 25 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar for you! edit

  The Articles for Creation barnstar
For all your efforts in creating articles about notable and contemporary Women writers! Dkriegls (talk to me!)

Sugako Hashida edit

DYK nomination of Hashida Sugako edit

  Hello! Your submission of Hashida Sugako at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SusunW (talk) 00:53, 31 March 2015 (UTC) I haven't gotten a response on the page, so am tagging you here.Reply

Women's History Month 2015 edit

Hi Big iron. I would just like to say how much I have appreciated your tremendous contribution to Women's History Month with over 60 new biographies of writers from around the world, not to mention all the redirects and additions to existing articles. I've been through most of your new articles and found them all well presented and interesting to read. Maybe you'll be around next year when we'll probably be concentrating on artists.--Ipigott (talk) 10:52, 2 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Sugako Hashida edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:01, 4 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Julia Gjika edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:01, 4 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Zhao Luanluan edit

Hi Big iron, thanks for creating all those articles of women writers and poets. I've expanded one of your recent creations, Zhao Luanluan, and nominated it for DYK. See Template:Did you know nominations/Zhao Luanluan. Cheers! -Zanhe (talk) 06:44, 5 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Edward Sinnott edit

  Hello! Your submission of Edward Sinnott at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mchuedem (talk) 17:31, 8 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Chen Xuezhao edit

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Zhao Luanluan edit

Harrias talk 00:02, 11 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

Thanks for your work on the Newfoundland politicians. I started some work earlier this month and will probably get to a few more as well in the future. Connormah (talk) 04:37, 18 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Edward Sinnott edit

Materialscientist (talk) 06:51, 19 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Isaac Randell edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:46, 22 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Precious edit

blue-winged teal and women writers
Thank you, wanderer in Canada's National parks, for quality articles such as blue-winged teal, for politicians and "lighting a candle" for women writers such as Sugako Hashida, Julia Gjika, Chen Xuezhao and Zhao Luanluan, for redirects and your mantra "add source & expand", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:53, 26 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Marlène Belley edit

FYI - you have her debut work as being published in 1955, but her year of birth as 1963. I can't reach the source on Google Books to correct it, so I just wanted to let you know. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 17:57, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

It's an error in the source (I even looked at a copy of the real book) but I was asleep I guess. I will find another source for the publication date. Thanks for pointing that out. --Big_iron (talk) 20:52, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
The real publication year is 1995 which makes a lot more sense. --Big_iron (talk) 21:03, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
I had a feeling that was the case, but without anything to back me up I didn't want to change it. Happy to be of help.
Keep up the good work, and happy editing! --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:34, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Prix Émile-Nelligan edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Prix Émile-Nelligan, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.comoria.com/157744/Prix_�mile-Nelligan.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:37, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

CorenSearchBot stinks again; left message on bot and article page. --Big_iron (talk) 11:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Geneviève Billette edit

Hello Big iron,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Geneviève Billette for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. PureRED (talk) 13:07, 15 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for updating us! Your article has been restored. --PureRED (talk) 14:26, 15 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ottawa wiki-events edit

Would you be interested in helping with a Wikipedia:Meetup/ArtAndFeminism event in the Ottawa area? There is a group that is already organizing, but they have asked for assistance from some more experienced local editors.--Pharos (talk) 17:37, 22 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Great to hear you are interested for the local effort! Availability in the summer shouldn't be a problem, as they are actually planning the main Ottawa event for March 2016, with probably a smaller getting-started event in the autumn of this year. I'm actually a few hundred miles away in NYC, but if you like I can put you in touch with them on our discussion thread by email (as they don't have much previous Wikipedia experience).--Pharos (talk) 22:09, 25 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

David Murdock MacPherson entry edit

  Help with an entry
Thank you for doing the initial entry on D M MacPherson in 2007, however the spelling of his name as "McPherson" is causing difficulties. Can we induce you to make the change?

David G Anderson (user:OntarioBoy) OntarioBoy 16:13, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Newfoundland and Labrador articles edit

Thank you! You have been contributing tirelessly towards the completion of Newfoundland Labrador's general assemblies and articles on its members. You have to be commended for your excellent work on these articles. HJKeats (talk) 11:32, 31 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Leadership edit

You are invited!World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in LeadershipCome and join us remotely!
World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Leadership
Dates: 7 to 20 September 2015
 

The Virtual Edit-a-thon, hosted by Women in Red, will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in Leadership to participate. As it is a two-week event, inexperienced participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in leadership. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome. RSVP and find more details →here← --Ipigott (talk) 10:09, 30 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs edit

Thank you for your recent articles, including Julia Hartwig, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:53, 13 October 2015 (UTC)Reply